A Comparison of Quality of Life, Cosmesis and Cost-Utility of Open Surgery, Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy and High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Breast Fibroadenoma.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of life (QOL), cosmesis and cost-utility of open surgery (OS), vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for fibroadenoma (FA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 162 patients with 267 FAs were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and treatment information were recorded. Patients were followed up at 3-, 6- and 12-month post-treatment. QOL was evaluated by health survey. Breast cosmesis was evaluated by self-rating survey and Harvard Scale. A decision-analytic model was established and incremental cost was calculated for cost-utility analysis. RESULTS: For QOL evaluation, there was no difference of physical component summary (PCS) score in three groups (P > 0.05), while the mental component summary (MCS) score was significantly higher in HIFU group than the other two groups at 3- and 6-month post-treatment (P < 0.05). The proportion of patients satisfied with breast cosmesis was significantly higher in HIFU group (96.49%) than in VABB group (54.90%) and OS group (49.99%) (P < 0.05). By Harvard Scale, 27.78%, 78.42% and 100.00% of patients were rated as excellent and good in OS group, VABB group and HIFU group, respectively (P < 0.05). To acquire a quality-adjusted life year (QALY), cost of OS, VABB and HIFU was 1034.31 USD, 1776.96 USD and 1277.67 USD, respectively. When compared to OS, incremental cost analysis showed HIFU was cost-effective, while VABB was not. CONCLUSION: OS, VABB and HIFU were all effective and safe for FA, but among these three treatments, HIFU had the best QOL improvement, breast cosmesis and cost-effectiveness.

Focused ultrasound ablation surgery for multiple breast fibroadenomas: pathological and follow-up results.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the histopathological findings and follow-up outcome of focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) treatment of multiple fibroadenomas (FA). METHODS: A total of 20 patients with 101 multiple FAs were enrolled. After one session FUAS ablation, 21 lesions (≥15.0 mm) were surgically removed within one week for histopathological analysis, including 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining, H&E staining, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) -flavretin enzyme staining, Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The remaining 80 lesions were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: All ablation procedures were performed successfully. Pathologic findings showed that irreversible damage of FA was confirmed. TTC, H&E and NADH staining and TEM/SEM demonstrated tumor cell death and tumor structural destruction at the gross, cellular, and subcellular levels, respectively. The median shrinkage rate at 12 months post-FUAS was 66.4 (43.6, 89.5) %. CONCLUSION: Histopathological analysis for FAs after FUAS treatment proved that FUAS could effectively induce irreversible coagulative necrosis of FA, and the tumor volume would gradually shrink in follow-up. FUAS was safe and effective to treat multiple FAs with good cosmesis.Key pointsThis study was the first study of detailed histopathological analysis for FAs after FUAS treatment.FUAS can effectively induce irreversible coagulative necrosis of fibroadenoma cells.FUAS ablation of multiple fibroadenomas is safe and effective.

Evaluating the learning curve of high intensity focus ultrasound for breast fibroadenoma by CUSUM analysis: a multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the learning curve of high intensity focus ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for breast fibroadenoma. METHODS: A database of 110 patients with 255 breast fibroadenomas who underwent HIFU treatment at two different clinical centers (Center 1 and 2) were retrospectively analyzed. The learning curves of HIFU treatment for breast fibroadenoma were drawn by CUSUM analysis in two centers, respectively. According to the inflection point of the learning curves, the treatment was divided into two groups: initial phase and consolidation phase. HIFU treatment parameters were compared between two groups. The effectiveness and safety results were also evaluated. RESULTS: The inflection points of the learning curves were the 60th treatment in Center 1 and the 65th treatment in Center 2. The screening time, treatment time, sonication time and hyperechoic scale change time were significantly shorter in consolidation phase than those in initial phase of the two centers (p < 0.05). There were no differences in non-perfused volume (NPV) ratio and energy effect factor (EEF) between the two groups in Center 1, while in Center 2, these above-mentioned results in consolidation phase led to a greater improvement than those in initial phase. There was no difference of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and no adverse event observed in both centers. CONCLUSION: HIFU treatment for breast fibroadenoma was effective and safe. The learning curve of HIFU treatment for breast fibroadenoma can be completed after treating 60-65 tumors without increasing the safety risk.