Improving Emergency Preparedness in Pediatric Primary Care Offices: A Simulation-Based Interventional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric emergencies pose a challenge to primary care practices due to irregular frequency and complexity. Simulation-based assessment can improve skills and comfort in emergencies. Our aim was improving pediatric office emergency preparedness, as measured by adherence to the existing American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement, and quality of emergency care in a simulated setting, as measured by performance checklists. METHODS: This was a single center study nested in a multicenter, prospective study measuring emergency preparedness and quality of care in 16 pediatric primary care practices and consisted of 3 phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. Baseline emergency preparedness was measured by checklist based on AAP guidelines, and quality of care was assessed using in-situ simulation. A report-out was provided along with resources addressing potential areas for improvement after baseline assessment. A repeat preparedness and simulation assessment was performed after a 6 to 10 month intervention period to measure improvement from baseline. RESULTS: Sixteen offices were recruited with 13 completing baseline and follow-up preparedness assessment. Eight of these sites also completed baseline and follow-up simulation assessment. Median baseline preparedness score was 70% and follow-up was 75.9%. Median baseline simulation performance scores were 37.4% and 35.5% for respiratory distress and seizure scenarios, respectively. Follow-up simulation assessment scores were 73% and 76.9% respectively (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our collaborative was able to successfully improve the quality of care in a simulated setting in a group of pediatric primary care offices over 6 to 10 months. Future work will focus on expansion and improving emergency preparedness.

Preparedness for Pediatric Office Emergencies: A Multicenter, Simulation-Based Study.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric emergencies can occur in pediatric primary care offices. However, few studies have measured emergency preparedness, or the processes of emergency care, provided in the pediatric office setting. In this study, we aimed to measure emergency preparedness and care in a national cohort of pediatric offices. METHODS: This was a multicenter study conducted over 15 months. Emergency preparedness scores were calculated as a percentage adherence to 2 checklists on the basis of the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines (essential equipment and supplies and policies and protocols checklists). To measure the quality of emergency care, we recruited office teams for simulation sessions consisting of 2 patients: a child with respiratory distress and a child with a seizure. An unweighted percentage of adherence to checklists for each case was calculated. RESULTS: Forty-eight teams from 42 offices across 9 states participated. The mean emergency preparedness score was 74.7% (SD: 12.9). The mean essential equipment and supplies subscore was 82.2% (SD: 15.1), and the mean policies and protocols subscore was 57.1% (SD: 25.6). Multivariable analyses revealed that independent practices and smaller total staff size were associated with lower preparedness. The median asthma case performance score was 63.6% (interquartile range: 43.2-81.2), whereas the median seizure case score was 69.2% (interquartile range: 46.2-80.8). Offices that had a standardized process of contacting emergency medical services (EMS) had a higher rate of activating EMS during the simulations. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric office preparedness remains suboptimal in a multicenter cohort, especially in smaller, independent practices. Academic and community partnerships using simulation can help address gaps and implement important processes like contacting EMS.

Frequency of Pediatric Emergencies in Ambulatory Practices.

: media-1vid110.1542/5789654354001PEDS-VA_2017-3082Video Abstract BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric emergencies is challenging for ambulatory providers because these rare events require preparation and planning tailored to the expected emergencies. The current recommendations for pediatric emergencies in ambulatory settings are based on 20-year-old survey data. We aimed to objectively identify the frequency and etiology of pediatric emergencies in ambulatory practices. METHODS: We examined pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) runs originating from ambulatory practices in the greater Indianapolis metropolitan area between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014. Probabilistic matching of pickup location addresses and practice location data from the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency were used to identify EMS runs from ambulatory settings. A manual review of EMS records was conducted to validate the matching, categorize illnesses types, and categorize interventions performed by EMS. Demographic data related to both patients who required treatment and practices where these events occurred were also described. RESULTS: Of the 38 841 pediatric EMS transports that occurred during the 3-year period, 332 (0.85%) originated from ambulatory practices at a rate of 42 per 100 000 children per year. The most common illness types were respiratory distress, psychiatric and/or behavioral emergencies, and seizures. Supplemental oxygen and albuterol were the most common intervention, with few critical care level interventions. Community measures of low socioeconomic status were associated with increased number of pediatric emergencies in ambulatory settings. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric emergencies in ambulatory settings are most likely due to respiratory distress, psychiatric and/or behavioral emergencies, or seizures. They usually require only basic interventions. EMS data are a valuable tool for identifying emergencies in ambulatory settings when validated with external data.