Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the tunnel subepithelial connective tissue graft: a clinical report.

This article describes a surgical periodontal plastic procedure for the coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. This surgical technique is based on the construction of a tunnel under the gingival tissue by means of a sulcular incision beyond the mucogingival line without raising the papillae. A large connective tissue graft obtained from the palatal mucosa is introduced through this tunnel, covering the adjacent gingival recessions. A suturing technique to allow this graft to slip through the tunnel under the gingival tissues and to secure and stabilize the graft covering the recessions is described. Twelve-month postoperative results are presented from 21 teeth that were treated with this technique: 100% root coverage was achieved in 66.7% of the recessions treated, with a mean root surface coverage of 91.6%. This study suggests that the use of this surgical procedure allows the treatment of multiple adjacent recessions in a single procedure with adequate early healing and highly predictable root coverage results.

Generalizability of the added benefits of guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. Evaluation in a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that GTR therapy of intrabony defects results in significantly better outcomes than access flap alone. Most of the available data, however, have been produced in highly controlled research environments by a small group of investigators. Generalizability of results to different clinicians and different subject populations has not been evaluated so far. METHODS: This parallel group study involved 143 patients recruited in a practice-based research network of 11 offices in 7 countries. It was designed to evaluate: 1) the applicability of the documented added benefits of GTR in the treatment of intrabony defects to different populations, and 2) the generalizability of the expected results to different clinicians. GTR was compared to access flap alone. Defects, one in each patient, were accessed with a previously described papilla preservation flap in both the test and control group. In addition, GTR sites received application of a bioabsorbable poly-D,L-lactide-co-glycolide membrane. A stringent plaque control regimen was enforced in all patients during the 1-year observation period. Outcomes included gains in clinical attachment (CAL) and reductions in probing depth. RESULTS: Observed gains in CAL were 2.18 +/- 1.46 mm for access flap and 3.04 +/- 1.64 mm for the GTR-treated group. The treatment-associated difference was statistically significant (P = 0.03) after correcting for both center effect and defect anatomy. Among the various centers, a 1.73 mm difference in CAL gain was observed. This is a clinically relevant amount, which underlines the significance of center variability in the outcome of periodontal surgical procedures. A frequency distribution analysis of the obtained CAL gains indicated that GTR treatment of deep intrabony defects decreased, with respect to the access flap control, the probability of obtaining only a modest attachment gain at 1 year. Conversely, CAL gains of 4 mm or more were observed in more than 40% of GTR-treated defects and in less than 20% of the controls (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that GTR therapy of deep intrabony defects performed by different clinicians on various patient populations resulted in both greater amounts and improved predictability of CAL gains than access flap alone.

Profile surgical template: a systematic approach to precise implant placement. A technical note.

The precise placement of dental implants is essential to designing a prosthesis that fulfills the esthetic and functional requirements of the patient, and simultaneously allows clear phonetics and facilitates oral hygiene. To achieve this, an effective surgical template is essential: it must provide good orientation, be comfortable, have adequate intraoral fixation, allow freedom of choice to the surgeon, and be capable of use during image-diagnostic procedures. In accordance with this criteria, the profile surgical template, based on utilization of the buccal contour of missing teeth, has been designed.

Guided tissue regeneration in human Class II furcations and interproximal infrabony defects after using a bioabsorbable membrane barrier.

This study clinically evaluated a bioabsorbable barrier membrane designed for periodontal regeneration. Ten Class II furcations and 12 interproximal infrabony defects were treated by flap debridement and placement of a bioabsorbable barrier membrane using the principles of guided tissue regeneration. Treatment was evaluated in terms of changes in vertical probing depth, horizontal attachment level, clinical attachment level, and recession. Baseline data were collected on the day of surgery, and outcome measurements were performed at the 1-year appointment. The mean initial probing depth for Class II furcations was 6.5 mm. At 1 year, the mean probing depth was reduced to 2.9 mm, a 3.6 mm change. These differences were clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was a mean gain of 2.4 mm in clinical attachment level (P < 0.01) and a mean 3.4-mm change in horizontal attachment level (P < 0.01). Recession increased 1.2 mm. For interproximal infrabony defects, there was a mean probing depth reduction of 5.0 mm (P < 0.01), a mean gain of clinical attachment level of 3.8 mm (P < 0.02), and a mean increase of 1.2 mm in recession (P < 0.04). The results indicate that significant improvements occurred after treatment of Class II furcations and interproximal infrabony defects with the use of a bioabsorbable barrier membrane and guided tissue regeneration.

[Suggestions to improve dentist-endodontist collaboration]. / Sugerencias para la óptima colaboración odontólogo-endodoncista.

Referrals from the general dentist to the endodontist are in some occasions complicated with lack of proper communication among dentist-patient-specialist, resulting in the loss of confidence or even the patient. Suggestions to improve this communication are discussed, which will provide the patient a higher confidence in the indicated endodontic treatment and a better dental service. It will also enhance the prestige of the general dentists' and specialists' practice.

[Desmoplastic fibroma. Differential diagnosis of a periapical lesion from endodontic failure]. / Fibroma desmoplástico. Diagnóstico diferencial con lesión periapical por fracaso de una endodoncia.

Treatment of endodontically involved teeth requires accurate diagnosis of the clinical pulpal condition to determine the primary cause of pathosis. The case presented shows the differential diagnosis between a desmoplastic fibroma and a failure of a misdiagnosed endodontic treatment. The initial direction of treatment should had never been the endodontic therapy but local surgical curettage of the lesion.