Changes in weight and lean body mass during highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have prospectively evaluated the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on body weight and lean body mass (LBM) or explored the impact of baseline immunologic or virological changes on these parameters. METHODS: Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) protocol 892 was a prospective, 48-week, multisite observational study of body composition conducted during 1997-2000 among 224 antiretroviral-naive and antiretroviral-experienced subjects coenrolled into various adult ACTG antiretroviral studies. Assessments included human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA load (by polymerase chain reaction); T lymphocyte subset analysis; Karnofsky score; height (baseline only); weight, LBM, and fat (by bioelectrical impedance analysis); and functional performance (by questionnaire). RESULTS: Overall, only modest median increases in body weight (1.9 kg) and LBM (0.6 kg) occurred after 16 weeks of therapy. Significantly greater median increases in body weight (2.1 vs. 0.5 kg; P=.045) occurred in subjects who achieved virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA load, <500 copies/mL) at week 16 than in subjects who did not. Subjects who were antiretroviral naive at baseline gained more weight (median increase in body weight, 2.6 vs. 0.0 kg; P<.001) and LBM (1.0 vs. 0.1 kg; P=.002) after 16 weeks of treatment than did subjects who were antiretroviral experienced. Subjects with lower baseline CD4 cell counts (<200 cells/mm3) and subjects with higher baseline HIV-1 RNA loads (> or =100,000 copies/mL) were more likely to show increases in LBM of >1.5 kg (P=.013 and P=.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: HAART had modestly favorable effects on body composition, particularly in patients with greater pretreatment immunocompromise and virological compromise. The difference between antiretroviral-naive and antiretroviral-experienced subjects with regard to the ability to achieve increased body weight and LBM requires more study.

Development and validation of a self-completed HIV symptom index.

Traditional, open-ended provider questions regarding patient symptoms are insensitive. Better methods are needed to measure symptoms for clinical management, patient-oriented research, and adverse drug-event reporting. Our objective was to develop and initially validate a brief, self-reported HIV symptom index tailored to patients exposed to multidrug antiretroviral therapies and protease inhibitors, and to compare the new index to existing symptom measures. The research design was a multistage design including quantitative review of existing literature, qualitative and quantitative analyses of pilot data, and quantitative analyses of a prospective sample. Statistical analyses include frequencies, chi-square tests for significance, linear and logistic regression. The subjects were from a multisite convenience sample (n = 73) within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group and a prospective sample from the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center (n = 115). Measures were patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life, physician-assessed disease severity, CD4 cell count, and HIV-1 RNA viral quantification. A 20-item, self-completed HIV symptom index was developed based upon prior reports of symptom frequency and bother and expert opinion. When compared with prior measures the index included more frequent and bothersome symptoms, yet was easier to use (self-report rather than provider interview). The index required less than 5 minutes to complete, achieved excellent completion rates, and was thought comprehensive and comprehensible in a convenience sample. It was further tested in a prospective sample of patients and demonstrated strong associations with physical and mental health summary scores and with disease severity. These associations were independent of CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA viral quantification. This 20-item HIV symptom index has demonstrated construct validity, and offers a simple and rational approach to measuring HIV symptoms for clinical management, patient-oriented research, and adverse drug reporting.

Clinical importance of provider-reported HIV symptoms compared with patient-report.

BACKGROUND: Although the patient experiences the symptoms, only symptoms that providers recognize and report "count" in most clinical and research settings. Reliance upon provider-report has been justified by the claim that providers report only "clinically important" symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether provider-reported symptoms constitute a more "clinically important" subset of patient-reported symptoms in HIV infection. DESIGN: Secondary analyses of AIDS Clinical Trials 175 (ACTG 175), a randomized controlled trial of combination antiviral therapy among patients with moderate HIV disease. SETTING: Large, multicenter study. PATIENTS: 1,262 patients who participated in the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) sub-study and for whom providers completed symptom forms. MEASUREMENTS: Patient- and provider-reported symptoms, HRQOL, risk of recent hospitalization, survival, CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. RESULTS: On average, providers reported 3-fold fewer symptoms than patients did, but the degree of under report varied by symptom. When patient-reports were used as a gold standard, provider-reports demonstrated poor sensitivity (mean 0.25) and good specificity (mean 0.96). Agreement beyond chance was fair (mean kappa 0.35) and did not improve when weighted by symptom severity. Site specific variation was greater for provider than for patient-reported symptoms (R2: 0.15 and 0.05 respectively). Patient-reported symptoms were substantially more strongly associated with the physical health scale and all HRQOL subscales than provider-reported symptoms (P <0.0001). Patient-reported symptoms were equally strongly associated with survival (P >0.50) and recent hospitalization as provider-reported symptoms (P >0.48). Of note, patient-reported symptoms were independently associated with survival and recent hospitalization after adjustment for CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Provider-reported symptoms are not a more clinically important subset of patient-reported symptoms. Patient-reported symptom checklists are likely to be more complete and more strongly associated with HRQOL. Further, patient-reported symptoms are as related to recent hospitalization and survival as provider-reported symptoms. An HIV specific, patient-completed symptom checklist might substantially improve symptom reporting for adverse drug event monitoring, clinical management and medical research.

Preliminary guidelines for the evaluation and management of dyslipidemia in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus and receiving antiretroviral therapy: Recommendations of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group Cardiovascular Disease Focus Group.

Dyslipidemia is a prevalent condition that affects patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who are receiving antiretroviral therapy. These preliminary recommendations summarize the current understanding in this area and propose guidelines for management. Existing guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia in the general population formed the general basis for our recommendations. Data on the prevalence and treatment of dyslipidemia of HIV-infected patients, implications of treatment-related dyslipidemia in other chronically ill populations, and pharmacokinetic profiles for the available hypolipidemic agents in non-HIV populations were considered. Although the implications of dyslipidemia in this population are not fully known, the frequency, type, and magnitude of lipid alterations in HIV-infected people are expected to result in increased cardiovascular morbidity. We propose that these patients undergo evaluation and treatment on the basis of existing guidelines for dyslipidemia, with the caveat that avoidance of interactions with antiretroviral agents is paramount.

Amphotericin B oral suspension for fluconazole-refractory oral candidiasis in persons with HIV infection. Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study Team 295.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B oral suspension (ABOS) for the treatment of fluconazole refractory oral candidiasis in persons with HIV infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, multicenter, open label trial at 25 study centers within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individuals with diffuse oral candidiasis after 14 days of treatment with 200 mg of fluconazole daily (more than five plaques or a single plaque > 3 cm largest length) were treated with ABOS, 100 mg/ml, 5 ml swish and swallow, four times daily for 14 days. Thereafter incomplete or non-responders received an additional 14 days of therapy and responders received maintenance ABOS twice daily for up to 6 months. Relapses during maintenance ABOS were treated by increasing the dose to four times daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To demonstrate an ABOS clinical response rate > 33% and a treatment-limiting toxicity rate < 50%. Clinical response was defined as the absence of mouth pain and the presence of less than five oral plaques, the largest being < 3 cm largest dimension. RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects with a median age of 39 years and a median CD4 count of 10 x 10(6) cells/l were enrolled. Four subjects were excluded from the analysis because of inadequate follow-up after randomization (n = 3) or the presence of active esophageal disease (n = 1). Of the remaining 54 subjects, 23 (42.6%; 95% lower confidence interval, 31.1%) were classified as responders after 28 days. Five subjects (9%) stopped treatment due to toxicity. Relapse occurred in 16 responders (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Amphotericin B oral suspension is well tolerated but has limited efficacy for the treatment of fluconazole refractory oral candidiasis.

Rifabutin but not clarithromycin prevents cryptosporidiosis in persons with advanced HIV infection.

BACKGROUND: Macrolides have been reported to be effective for the prevention of cryptosporidiosis in persons with HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin and rifabutin for the prevention of cryptosporidiosis in persons with advanced HIV infection. DESIGN: Cross-protocol analysis involving 2288 individuals with a history of a CD4 cell counts of < or = 100 x 10(6) cell/l who were enrolled in two prospective clinical trials to prevent Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) end-organ disease. INTERVENTIONS: Clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, rifabutin 300-450 mg daily, the combination of the two or no MAC prophylaxis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Laboratory-confirmed cryptosporidiosis. Subjects were analyzed in an intent-to-treat and as-treated manner using time-to-event analyses (Cox proportional hazards models). RESULTS: The median length of follow up was 463 days. The median CD4 count at entry was 29 x 10(6) cell/l (range 0-182). There were 60 cases of cryptosporidiosis during the prospective observational period, with an event rate of 2.2 per 100 person-years. In the intent-to-treat [relative risk (RR) 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.96; P = 0.041 and as-treated (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20-0.91; P = 0.03) analyses, rifabutin alone was significantly associated with a lower rate of cryptosporidiosis. Clarithromycin alone was not protective in similar analyses (P = 0.98 and 0.90, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In doses used to prevent MAC infection, rifabutin but not clarithromycin decreases the risk of developing cryptosporidiosis in persons with advanced HIV infection who are not receiving potent combination antiretroviral therapy.

Predictive markers of HIV-related weight loss and determination of differences between populations with weight loss stratified by opportunistic processes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors predictive of >10% weight loss among enrolled participants in clinical trials of the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of data from selected ACTG antiretroviral clinical trials completed prior to 1996 (ACTG 116, 117, 155, 175, and 241), which did not include protease inhibitors. METHODS: Data were analyzed in Cox proportional hazards models to determine significant predictors for >10% weight loss while on study. Weight loss occurring within 30 days before or after an opportunistic infection (OI) was defined as "OI-associated." Both univariate and multivariate models were considered; gender-specific models were also analyzed to provide insight into potential gender differences in predictors of weight loss. RESULTS: We found that substantial weight loss is a frequent occurrence among those enrolled in clinical trials of antiretroviral agents; approximately 15% of subjects in the studies considered experienced >10% weight loss. CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA at week 8, Karnofsky score, and injection drug use status were significant multivariate predictive markers for weight loss associated with an OI; baseline weight, hemoglobin, triglycerides, and gender were additional predictors for weight loss not associated with an OI. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize the association between baseline viral load and future weight loss. Baseline and week 8 immunologic parameters as well as measures of baseline symptomatology were significant predictors of weight loss associated and not associated with an OI.

Perspective: human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA end points in HIV clinical trials: issues in interim monitoring and early stopping.

Due to the desire to both shorten the length and reduce the size of clinical trials in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, the use of surrogate end points such as HIV-1 RNA is becoming increasingly standard. While these end points may be reasonable surrogates for the clinical effectiveness of drugs, a key point in their use as trial end points is the definition of a relevant duration of antiviral response. This definition is often complicated by the desire to perform interim reviews of ongoing laboratory end point trials. Unlike clinical end point trials, in which early clinical response is generally indicative of longer-term follow-up, it is yet to be determined whether short-term viral response adequately predicts the long-term durability of that response.

Analysis of repeated virological measurements based on cell dilution assays.

Virological measurement has become increasingly popular as an endpoint in the evaluation of new drugs to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diseases. A commonly used quantity to measure the viral load is the proportion of infected cells in a patient's blood. Although the literature suggests various patient-specific estimation procedures for such proportions based on a series of cell dilutions, the resulting estimates are highly unstable. Moreover, it seems inappropriate to use those estimates as raw data points to make inferences about the group differences in comparative studies. In this article, under a two-arm clinical trial setting, we propose semi-parametric methods to estimate the treatment difference with this particular quantity evaluated repeatedly over time. Our proposals are conceptually simple and implemented easily in practice. We also propose model checking techniques to examine the adequacy of the fitted model. Data from a recent trial conducted by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group to evaluate the relative merit of zidovudine (ZDV) and dideoxyinosine (ddI) illustrate the methods. Our analysis indicates that patients treated with high dose ddI tended to have significantly lower viral load than those treated with a low dose combination of ZDV and ddI.

Lack of effect of cimetidine on lymphocyte subsets in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Cimetidine, widely used for peptic ulcer disease, blocks type 2 histamine receptors present on immune cells, including T cells, B cells, and monocytes. As an earlier published study showed evidence of increases in CD4 cell counts due to this drug, we conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial of oral cimetidine (400 mg p.o. t.i.d.) in a study involving 182 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Overall, cimetidine-treated patients had a decline in CD4+ cell counts that was no different from the decline for placebo-treated persons, neither during the first 8 weeks of the trial (mean drop, 7.1% [standard error, 12.1-1.8] vs. 6.7% [standard error, 11.6-1.5]) nor during the subsequent 8 weeks of open-label administration of cimetidine. No differences were evident between the treatment groups in terms of the percentage reactive to p24 antigen at baseline, and p24 antigen concentrations did not change from baseline to the end of week 8. In summary, cimetidine is well tolerated by HIV-infected individuals but alters neither CD4+ cell counts nor at least one quantitative measure of viral load, HIV p24 antigen levels.

Response to treatment with the leukocyte-derived immunomodulator IMREG-1 in immunocompromised patients with AIDS-related complex. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a 6-month course of therapy with IMREG-1, a leukocyte-derived immunomodulator, slows disease progression in patients with AIDS-related complex. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Five academic- and three community-based clinics. PATIENTS: Immunocompromised patients (143) with HIV. INTERVENTIONS: IMREG-1 or placebo every 2 weeks (13 doses). MAIN RESULTS: Twelve of forty-eight patients on placebo and 5 of 95 patients on IMREG-1 experienced adverse events (AIDS-defining opportunistic infection or neoplasm, wasting syndrome, HIV-associated encephalopathy, or peripheral sensory neuropathy). Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, Kaplan-Meier event probabilities were 26% for the placebo group and 6% for the IMREG-1 group (P less than 0.001); based on the Cox proportional hazards model, the relative risk for patients on placebo compared with patients on IMREG-1 was 5.1 (95% CI, 1.8 to 14.8). The frequency of symptoms significantly increased from baseline in patients receiving placebo. The mean decrease in CD4+ cells from baseline was 80 x 10(6) cells/L in the placebo group and 29 x 10(6) cells/L in patients on IMREG-1, with 20% (8) and 38% (32) of patients, respectively, showing a trend toward an increase (P = 0.04). In patients receiving IMREG-1, the size and rate of delayed hypersensitivity responses were larger than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AIDS-related complex experienced fewer adverse events and constitutional symptoms after IMREG-1 treatment. The slower loss of CD4+ cells and increased size and rate of delayed hypersensitivity responses most likely reflect the effect of IMREG-1 on the immune system. No toxicity related to IMREG-1 administration was observed.