RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are few interventional studies using CMV cell-mediated immunity (CMI) to guide antiviral prophylaxis. We assessed the Quantiferon-CMV (QTF-CMV) assay to guide CMV prophylaxis duration in high-risk organ transplant recipients. METHODS: A single-arm, multicenter, prospective interventional study including high-risk kidney, pancreas, liver, and heart transplant recipients who were either donor CMV-seropositive, recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) or recipient-seropositive with antithymocyte globulin (R+/ATG) induction. CMI testing was performed using the QTF-CMV assay at months 3, 4, 5, and 6 posttransplant. Prophylaxis was discontinued for a positive CMI but continued for a negative result up to a maximum of 6 mo. The primary endpoint was CMV viremia ≥1000 IU/mL up to 1 y posttransplant. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were included, comprising kidney (nâ =â 89), kidney-pancreas (nâ =â 7), liver (nâ =â 10), and heart (nâ =â 2) transplants. Eighty-nine patients (82.4%) completed the study protocol (nâ =â 39 D+/R- and nâ =â 50 R+/ATG). In the D+/R- group, only 1 of 39 patients (2.6%) had a positive QTF-CMV result. In the R+/ATG group, 33 of 50 patients (66%) had a positive QTF-CMV result before 6 mo, allowing for early discontinuation of prophylaxis (28 at month 3, 4 at month 4, and 1 at month 5). During the follow-up, CMV viremia ≥1000 IU/mL occurred in only 4 of 33 patients (12.1%) who discontinued prophylaxis early compared with 6 of 17 patients (35.3%) with negative QTF-CMV results and continued prophylaxis (hazard ratio 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.09; Pâ =â 0.07). No R+ patient developed CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: QTF-CMV-guided prophylaxis appears useful in R+ patients who may benefit from a tailored duration of prophylaxis. This strategy does not appear to be useful in D+/R- patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence of herpes zoster is up to 9 times higher in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients than in the general population. We investigated the immunogenicity and safety of an adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in renal transplant (RT) recipients ≥18 years of age receiving daily immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized (1:1), observer-blind, multicenter trial, RT recipients were enrolled and received 2 doses of RZV or placebo 1-2 months (M) apart 4-18M posttransplant. Anti-glycoprotein E (gE) antibody concentrations, gE-specific CD4 T-cell frequencies, and vaccine response rates were assessed at 1M post-dose 1, and 1M and 12M post-dose 2. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days after each dose, respectively. Solicited general symptoms and unsolicited AEs were also collected 7 days before first vaccination. Serious AEs (including biopsy-proven allograft rejections) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were recorded up to 12M post-dose 2. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four participants (RZV: 132; placebo: 132) were enrolled between March 2014 and April 2017. gE-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were higher in RZV than placebo recipients across postvaccination time points and persisted above prevaccination baseline 12M post-dose 2. Local AEs were reported more frequently by RZV than placebo recipients. Overall occurrences of renal function changes, rejections, unsolicited AEs, serious AEs, and pIMDs were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RZV was immunogenic in chronically immunosuppressed RT recipients. Immunogenicity persisted through 12M postvaccination. No safety concerns arose. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02058589.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Herpes Zoster , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
RATIONALE: Consensus guidelines on the management of methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity using glucarpidase (Voraxaze) may be relatively unfamiliar to the nephrology community. PRESENTING CONCERNS OF THE PATIENT: A 61-year-old man with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma was admitted for cycle #1 of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) following 2 cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy. On admission, he was clinically euvolemic and had a creatinine clearance of 98 mL/min. He received standard HDMTX toxicity prophylaxis with volume expansion, urinary alkalinization, and leucovorin rescue. DIAGNOSES: Despite prophylactic efforts, he developed a severe acute kidney injury, creatinine 63 to 226 µmol/L (2.56 mg/dL), following HDMTX, impaired methotrexate clearance, and neurotoxicity manifested by status epilepticus. INTERVENTIONS: He was given glucarpidase to convert extracellular methotrexate into its inactive metabolites, glutamate and DAMPA (4-deoxy-4-amino-N 10-methylpteroic acid) at 52 hours post-HDMTX. Cross-reactivity between commercial methotrexate immunoassays with DAMPA led to falsely elevated methotrexate concentrations for much longer than expected based on the current guideline (5 days instead of <48 hours). This required ongoing monitoring of methotrexate concentration by mass spectrometry. OUTCOMES: The patient remained nonoliguric and did not develop acute indications for dialysis. Serum creatinine peaked at 608 µmol/L (6.88 mg/dL) 6 days after HDMTX. He ultimately had a full renal and neurologic recovery. LESSONS LEARNED: Glucarpidase is an effective option for nonrenal elimination of methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity. Timing of methotrexate concentration monitoring to assess for toxicity, how to access the drug, and the need for ongoing monitoring by mass spectrometry beyond the guideline recommendation are highlighted for centers where HDMTX therapy may be used.
JUSTIFICATION: Les lignes directrices consensuelles sur la prise en charge de la néphrotoxicité induite par le méthotrexate par l'administration de glucarpidase (VoraxazeMD) sont possiblement mal connues en néphrologie. PRÉSENTATION DU CAS: Nous présentons le cas d'un patient de 61 ans atteint d'un lymphome intravasculaire à grandes cellules B qui avait été admis pour un cycle de traitement à dose élevée de méthotrexate (HDMTX) après deux cycles de chimiothérapie par R-CHOP. À l'admission, le patient était cliniquement euvolémique et présentait une clairance de la créatinine à 98 mL/min. Le patient a reçu la prophylaxie standard pour une toxicité à HDMTX avec expansion volumique, alcalinisation urinaire et sauvetage par leucovorine. DIAGNOSTIC: Malgré les mesures prophylactiques, l'état du patient a évolué vers une grave insuffisance rénale aigüe (créatinine initiale de 63 à 226 µmol/L [2,56 mg/dL]) après le traitement au HDMTX, de même qu'une altération de la clairance du méthotrexate et une neurotoxicité manifestée par un status epilepticus. INTERVENTIONS: Le patient a reçu du glucarpidase pour convertir le méthotrexate extracellulaire en ses métabolites inactifs, le glutamate et le DAMPA (acide 4-déoxy-4-amino-N 10-méthylptéroïque) 52 heures après le traitement au HDMTX. La réactivité croisée entre les immunoessais commerciaux au méthotrexate et le DAMPA a entraîné des concentrations faussement élevées de méthotrexate pour beaucoup plus longtemps que prévu selon la recommandation actuelle (5 jours plutôt que < 48 heures). Cette situation a nécessité une surveillance continue de la concentration du méthotrexate par spectrométrie de masse. RÉSULTATS: Le patient est demeuré non oligurique et n'a pas nécessité de dialyse. Le taux de créatinine sérique a culminé à 608 µmol/L (6,88 mg/dL) six jours après l'administration de HDMTX. Les fonctions rénale et neurologique du patient se sont finalement rétablies complètement. LEÇONS TIRÉES: La glucarpidase est une option efficace pour éliminer de façon non rénale la néphrotoxicité induite par le méthotrexate. Le moment de mesurer la concentration de méthotrexate pour évaluer la toxicité, la façon d'accéder au médicament et la nécessité d'une surveillance continue par spectrométrie de masse au-delà de la recommandation actuelle sont clarifiés pour les centres où un traitement par HDMTX pourrait être administré.
RESUMO
IMPORTANCE: BK virus infection is a significant complication of modern immunosuppression used in kidney transplantation. Viral reactivation occurs first in the urine (BK viruria) and is associated with a high risk of transplant failure. There are currently no therapies to prevent or treat BK virus infection. Quinolone antibiotics have antiviral properties against BK virus but efficacy at preventing this infection has not been shown in prospective controlled studies. OBJECTIVE: To determine if levofloxacin can prevent BK viruria in kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial involving 154 patients who received a living or deceased donor kidney-only transplant in 7 Canadian transplant centers between December 2011 and June 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 3-month course of levofloxacin (500 mg/d; n = 76) or placebo (n = 78) starting within 5 days after transplantation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was time to occurrence of BK viruria (detected using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) within the first year after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included BK viremia, peak viral load, rejection, and patient and allograft survival. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 46.5 weeks in the levofloxacin group and 46.3 weeks in the placebo group (27 patients had follow-up terminated before the end of the planned follow-up period or development of viruria because the trial was stopped early owing to lack of funding). BK viruria occurred in 22 patients (29%) in the levofloxacin group and in 26 patients (33.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.51-1.63; P = .58). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regard to any of the secondary end points. There was an increased risk of resistant infection among isolates usually sensitive to quinolones in the levofloxacin group vs placebo (14/24 [58.3%] vs 15/45 [33.3%], respectively; risk ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.01-2.98) as well as a nonsignificant increased risk of suspected tendinitis (6/76 [7.9%] vs 1/78 [1.3%]; risk ratio, 6.16; 95% CI, 0.76-49.95). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among kidney transplant recipients, a 3-month course of levofloxacin initiated early following transplantation did not prevent BK viruria. Levofloxacin was associated with an increased risk of adverse events such as bacterial resistance. These findings do not support the use of levofloxacin to prevent posttransplant BK virus infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01353339.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Vírus BK/isolamento & purificação , Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Polyomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Vírus BK/genética , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Urina/virologia , Carga Viral , ViremiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: BK virus infection has emerged as a major complication in kidney transplantation leading to a significant reduction in graft survival. There are currently no proven strategies to prevent or treat BK virus infection. Quinolone antibiotics, such as levofloxacin, have demonstrated activity against BK virus. We hypothesize that administration of a quinolone antibiotic, when given early post-transplantation, will prevent the establishment of BK viral replication in the urine and thus prevent systemic BK virus infection. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of this pilot trial is to assess the efficacy, safety and feasibility of a 3-month course of levofloxacin in the kidney transplant population. This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with two parallel arms conducted in 11 Canadian kidney transplant centers. A total of 154 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing kidney transplantation will be randomized to receive a 3-month course of levofloxacin or placebo starting in the early post-transplant period. Levofloxacin will be administered at 500 mg po daily with dose adjustments based on kidney function. The primary outcome will be the time to occurrence of BK viruria within the first year post-transplantation. Secondary outcomes include BK viremia, measures of safety (adverse events, resistant infections,Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea), measures of feasibility (proportion of transplanted patients recruited into the trial), proportion of patients adherent to the protocol, patient drop-out and loss to follow-up,and use of quinolone antibiotics outside of the trial protocol. DISCUSSION: Results from this pilot study will provide vital information to design and conduct a large, multicenter trial to determine if quinolone therapy decreases clinically meaningful outcomes in kidney transplantation. If levofloxacin significantly reduces BK viruria and urine viral loads in kidney transplantation, it will provide important justification to progress to the larger trial. If the full trial shows that levofloxacin significantly reduces BK infection and improves outcomes, its use in kidney transplantation will be strongly endorsed given the lack of proven therapies for this condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number:222493) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01353339).
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Vírus BK/patogenicidade , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Polyomavirus/prevenção & controle , Projetos de Pesquisa , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Canadá , Protocolos Clínicos , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Ofloxacino/efeitos adversos , Projetos Piloto , Infecções por Polyomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Polyomavirus/virologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/diagnóstico , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/virologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore donor and recipient outcomes from organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) in Ontario and to examine the impact of DCD on deceased donation rates in Ontario since its implementation. METHODS: Donor data were obtained from the Trillium Gift of Life Network (TGLN) TOTAL database from June 1, 2006 until May 31, 2009. All DCDs were tracked, including unsuccessful DCD attempts during that time. For the first 36 months after DCD implementation, all Ontario solid organ transplant programs that utilized organs from DCD provided clinical outcome data at one year. Total DCD activity until December 1, 2010 was also tracked. In addition, we compared organ donation and DCD rates across all Canadian jurisdictions and the USA. RESULTS: For the first 36 months of DCD activity in Ontario, June 1, 2006 to May 31, 2009, there were 67 successful DCDs out of 87 attempted DCDs in 18 Ontario hospitals, resulting in 128 kidney, 41 liver, and 21 lung transplants. The one-year kidney patient and death-censored allograft survivals were 96 and 97%, respectively. Mean (SD) creatinine at 12 months was 150 (108) µmol·L(-1). In 26 (20%) extended criteria donors (ECD-DCD), the one-year creatinine was 206 (158) µmol·L(-1) vs 137 (80) µmol·L(-1) in 102 standard criteria donors (SCD-DCD) (P = 0.002). The one-year liver and lung allograft survivals were 78% and 70%, respectively. Since its implementation four and a half years ago, DCD has accounted for 10.9% of deceased donor activity in Ontario. In 2009, Ontario had a record number of organ donors. Of the 221 deceased donors, 37 (17%) donors were DCD. By December 1, 2010 there were 121 DCD Ontario donors resulting in > 300 solid organ transplants and accounting for 90% of all DCD activity in the country. CONCLUSION: The rapid update of DCD in Ontario can be attributed to strong proponents in the critical care and transplantation communities with continued support from Trillium Gift of Life Network (TGLN). Ontario is the only province to demonstrate growth in deceased donor rates over the last decade (25% over the last four years), which can be attributed primarily to the success of its DCD activity.
Assuntos
Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Pulmão/estatística & dados numéricos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Morte , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Doadores de Tecidos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) is rapidly spreading through North America. In the general population, the majority of WNV infections are asymptomatic. During 2002, an outbreak of WNV occurred in Toronto, Canada. We observed four cases of severe symptomatic community-acquired WNV infection in our organ-transplant population. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from chart review. WNV was diagnosed by acute and convalescent serology. Incidence was compared with data obtained from a population-based surveillance program. RESULTS: Four transplant patients had WNV encephalitis (n=3) or meningitis (n=1). Mean age was 44.5 (range 26-58) years and transplant type included kidney (n=2), liver (n=1), and heart (n=1). The mean time posttransplant was 3.8 years (range 2 months-8 years). The presenting symptoms were fever (4/4), confusion (3/4), headache (4/4), and weakness (2/4). Cerebrospinal fluid showed a pleocytosis in all patients and elevated protein in three of four. All patients had identifiable occupational or recreational risk factors. There was no evidence that the infection was acquired by transfusion or the transplanted organ. Outcomes were full recovery (2/4), lower limb paralysis (1/4), and death (1/4). On the basis of active population surveillance data, the rate of WNV meningoencephalitis in the general population in the Toronto area was approximately 5 per 100,000. This compares to four cases in a transplant population of 2,000 patients (rate 200 per 100,000) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients are likely at greater risk of severe neurologic disease caused by community-acquired WNV compared with the general population. Prevention of transmission and patient education may be more important in this population.