Comparison of Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ and manual density separation for optimum depletion of red blood cells and preservation of CD34+ cells in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow grafts.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The current approach for preventing hemolysis of red blood cells (RBCs) in major ABO-incompatible bone marrow (BM) grafts after infusion is to deplete RBCs from BM products before transplantation. Traditionally, manual density separation (MDS) using Ficoll-Hypaque (Cytiva Sweden AB, Uppsala, Sweden has been used to accomplish RBC depletion. This process yields good CD34+ cell recovery, but it requires open manipulation and is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We hypothesized that an alternative automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ (Haemonetics Corporation, Boston, MA, USA) would offer equivalent RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery. Small marrow volumes from pediatric donors can be processed using Cell Saver (CS) without adding the third-party RBCs necessary for other automated methods. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised data from 58 allogeneic BM grafts. RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery from BM using MDS (35 grafts) were compared with CS (14 grafts). Nine products underwent RBC depletion using CS with Ficoll (CS-F) when RBC volume was less than 125 mL. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis of log transformation of CD34+ cell recovery adjusted for log transformation of both baseline CD34+ cell content and baseline total volume showed no significant difference between MDS and CS (estimated coefficient, -0.121, P = 0.096). All products contained an RBC volume of less than 0.25 mL/kg post-processing. CD34+ cell recovery with CS-F was comparable to MDS and CS and suitable for pediatric recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that an automated method using Haemonetics Cell Saver 5+ achieves RBC depletion and CD34+ cell recovery comparable to MDS when adjusting for baseline factors.

Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma Treated With Interval Compression.

BACKGROUND: Interval compression (IC), a regimen of alternating vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide/etoposide every 2 weeks, improves survival for localized Ewing sarcoma (ES), with uncertain effect on metastatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of pediatric patients with metastatic ES treated with IC at our center between January 2013 and March 2020. We calculated event-free survival and overall survival (OS) and used log-rank tests for univariate comparisons. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients 2.7 to 17.1 years of age (median: 11.6 y). Twenty-six patients (76%) had pulmonary metastases, and 14 (41%) had extrapulmonary metastases. All patients received local control therapy: surgery only (n=7, 21%), radiotherapy only (n=18, 53%), or both (n=9, 26%). The estimated 3-year OS and event-free survival were 62%±9% and 39%±9%, respectively. Patients with pulmonary-only and extrapulmonary metastasis had a 3-year OS of 88%±8% and 27%±13%, respectively ( P =0.0074). Age group (above vs. below 12 y), or primary tumor site did not affect survival, but local control therapy did (surgery only, 83%±15%; combined surgery and radiation, 30%±18%; radiation only, 15%±10%; P =0.048). CONCLUSION: IC yielded similar outcomes for patients with metastatic ES to other reported regimens. We suggest including this approach to other blocks of therapy.