RESUMO
The effect of hydration in modulating metabolic disease risk is a comparatively recent concept. Diabetic patients are at increased risk of dehydration due to osmotic diuresis. Undiagnosed or undertreated hyperglycemia may lead to electrolyte imbalance and elevated renal burden of glucose excretion, which may alter fluid reabsorption in the kidney. Also, the presence of one or more contributory factors, such as inadequate fluid intake, strenuous exercise, high temperatures, alcohol consumption, diarrhea, acute illnesses, fever, nausea, and vomiting, may put diabetic patients at increased risk of dehydration and electrolyte imbalance. Certain antidiabetic agents used by diabetic patients may cause fluid retention/deficits and/or electrolyte abnormalities in a few patients. Thus, drinking ample amounts of water and fluids with appropriate electrolyte composition is important to prevent dehydration. Successful management of dehydration in patients with diabetes is an unmet need and can best be accomplished by maintaining adequate hydration status.
Assuntos
Desidratação , Hidratação , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico , Humanos , Hidratação/métodos , Desidratação/etiologia , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/etiologia , Desequilíbrio Hidroeletrolítico/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Complicações do DiabetesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In 2016, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) developed a cardiovascular risk assessment algorithm and defined low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in Indians. The recent refinements in the role of various risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis in prediction of ASCVD risk necessitated updating the risk algorithm and treatment goals. METHODS: The LAI core committee held twenty-one meetings and webinars from June 2022 to July 2023 with experts across India and critically reviewed the latest evidence regarding the strategies for ASCVD risk prediction and the benefits and modalities for intensive lipid lowering. Based on the expert consensus and extensive review of published data, consensus statement IV was commissioned. RESULTS: The young age of onset and a more aggressive nature of ASCVD in Indians necessitates emphasis on lifetime ASCVD risk instead of the conventional 10-year risk. It also demands early institution of aggressive preventive measures to protect the young population prior to development of ASCVD events. Wide availability and low cost of statins in India enable implementation of effective LDL-C-lowering therapy in individuals at high risk of ASCVD. Subjects with any evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis are likely to benefit the most from early aggressive interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This document presents the updated risk stratification and treatment algorithm and describes the rationale for each modification. The intent of these updated recommendations is to modernize management of dyslipidemia in Indian patients with the goal of reducing the epidemic of ASCVD among Indians in Asia and worldwide.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Consenso , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Lipídeos/sangue , Aterosclerose/prevenção & controle , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Fatores de Risco de Doenças CardíacasRESUMO
Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is effective in reducing HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) when administered as monotherapy, dual or triple combination therapy. In India, Vildagliptin is commonly prescribed in T2DM patients because it reduces mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), has lower risk of hypoglycemia and is weight neutral. Early combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin is effective and well-tolerated in patients with T2DM, regardless of age or ethnicity. In view of already existing data on vildagliptin and the latest emerging clinical evidence, a group of endocrinologists, diabetologists and cardiologists convened for an expert group meeting to discuss the role and various combinations of vildagliptin in T2DM management. This practical document aims to guide Physicians and Specialists regarding the different available strengths and formulations of vildagliptin for the initiation and intensification of T2DM therapy.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on the real-world management of diabetes in the Indian population. In this 2-year analysis of the LANDMARC study, the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and related complications were assessed. METHOD: This multicenter, observational, prospective study included adults aged ≥25 to ≤60 years diagnosed with T2DM (duration ≥2 years at enrollment) and controlled/uncontrolled on ≥2 anti-diabetic agents. This interim analysis at 2 years reports the status of glycaemic control, diabetic complications, cardiovascular (CV) risks and therapy, pan-India including metropolitan and non-metropolitan cities. RESULTS: Of the 6234 evaluable patients, 5318 patients completed 2 years in the study. Microvascular complications were observed in 17.6% of patients (1096/6234); macrovascular complications were observed in 3.1% of patients (195/6234). Higher number of microvascular complications were noted in patients from non-metropolitan than in metropolitan cities (p < .0001). In 2 years, an improvement of 0.6% from baseline (8.1%) in mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was noted; 20.8% of patients met optimum glycaemic control (HbA1c < 7%). Hypertension (2679/3438, 77.9%) and dyslipidaemia (1776/3438, 51.7%) were the predominant CV risk factors in 2 years. The number of patients taking oral anti-diabetic drugs in combination with insulin increased in 2 years (baseline: 1498/6234 [24.0%] vs. 2 years: 1917/5763 [33.3%]). While biguanides and sulfonylureas were the most commonly prescribed, there was an evident increase in the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (baseline: 3049/6234, 48.9% vs. 2 years: 3526/5763, 61.2%). CONCLUSION: This longitudinal study represents the control of T2DM, its management and development of complications in Indian population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2017/05/008452.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Estudos Longitudinais , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
In 2021 an estimated 74 million individuals had diabetes in India, almost all type 2 diabetes. More than half of patients with diabetes are estimated to be undiagnosed and more 90% have dyslipidemia that is associated with accelerated development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Patients of Indian descent with diabetes have multiple features that distinguish them from patients with diabetes in Western populations. These include characteristics such as earlier age of onset, higher frequency of features of the metabolic syndrome, more prevalent risk factors for ASCVD, and more aggressive course of ASCVD complications. In light of the unique features of diabetes and diabetic dyslipidemia in individuals of Indian descent, the Lipid Association of India developed this expert consensus statement to provide guidance for management of diabetic dyslipidemia in this very high risk population. The recommendations contained herein are the outgrowth of a series of 165 webinars conducted by the Lipid Association of India across the country from May 2020 to July 2021, involving 155 experts in endocrinology and cardiology and an additional 2880 physicians.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Cardiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dislipidemias , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Dislipidemias/complicações , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Dislipidemias/terapia , Aterosclerose/complicações , Aterosclerose/terapia , Lipídeos , Índia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The interplay between cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) is well established. We aim at providing an evidence-based expert opinion regarding the prevention and treatment of both heart failure (HF) and renal complications in people with T2D. METHOD: ology: The consensus recommendations were developed by subject experts in endocrinology, cardiology, and nephrology. The criteria for consensus were set to statements with ≥80% of agreement among clinicians specialized in endocrinology, cardiology, and nephrology. Key expert opinions were formulated based on scientific evidence and clinical judgment. RESULTS: Assessing the risk factors of CVD or CKD in people with diabetes and taking measures to prevent HF or kidney disease are essential. Known CVD or CKD among people with diabetes confers a very high risk for recurrent CVD. Metformin plus lifestyle modification should be the first-line therapy (unless contraindicated) for the management of T2D. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists can be preferred in people with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or with high-risk indicators, along with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), whereas SGLT2i are the first choice in HF and CKD. The GLP-1 agonists can be used in people with CKD if SGLT2i are not tolerated. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests SGLT2i as preferred agents among people with T2D and HF, and for those with T2D and ASCVD. SGLT2i and GLP-1RA also lower CV outcomes in those with diabetes and ASCVD, and the treatment choice should depend on the patient profile.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Hipertensão Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/farmacologia , Consenso , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Renal/induzido quimicamente , Hipertensão Renal/complicações , Hipertensão Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1RESUMO
Background: Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) constitute one-sixth of affected adults globally. Here, we evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) with body fat percentage (BF%) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels among patients with T2D in India. Method: This was a cross-sectional Indian registry study across 845 geographically diverse zones between December 2017 and August 2019. Results: Of 37,927 patients, 55.6% were men, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 54.2 ± 11.5 years and HbA1c of 8.3 ± 1.71%. Mean ± standard deviation BMI and BF% were 27.0 ± 4.6 kg/m2 and 32.0 ± 8.0%, respectively. Overall, 15.4% of patients were overweight, and 25.0% were obese. Despite fewer males (20.7%) having BMI-based obesity than females (31.2%), around three-quarters of both sexes had BF%-defined obesity (males 77.2%; females 71.2%). One-third of males (34.6%) and 41.9% of females had BF%-defined obesity despite normal BMI. The association was substantiated by a moderately significant correlation (r=0.51) between BMI and BF% in the overall population (p<0.0001). Conclusion: This pan-India registry presents a real-world reflection of the Asian Indian phenotype: high BF% despite lower BMI in people with T2D. This highlights the importance of primordial and primary prevention, and may guide decisions on the choice of agents for glycaemic control, with a preference for drugs that promote weight loss or are weight neutral.
RESUMO
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have gained an important place in the management of diabetes management because of their exceptional glucose-lowering, weight lowering and cardiovascular (CV) benefits. Despite recommendations by various clinical practice guidelines and benefits, their usage in clinical practice was limited because of being injectable in nature. Oral semaglutide is a novel GLP-1RA with 94% homology to human GLP-1 which is co-formulated with absorption enhancer sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl] amino) caprylate (SNAC), that overcomes the challenges of peptide absorption in the acidic conditions of the stomach. Oral semaglutide has been evaluated in an extensive phase 3 clinical trial programme named Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) which demonstrated its robust glucose and weight lowering effects against other comparators. The evolution of the GLP-1RA class to include an oral pill will facilitate the use of this class of agents much earlier in the diabetes treatment cascade owing to wider acceptance from patients and clinicians alike. The current review discusses the various aspects of oral semaglutide and its place in clinical practice.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The rapid increase in burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), poses a huge medico-economic challenge, especially when the cost of care is funded by out-of-pocket expenses. The aim of this review is to highlight various issues associated with rising cost of insulin, prevalence of cost-related insulin underuse, insulin related cost-saving behaviors, and viable solutions for the benefit of patients with T2DM receiving insulin. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) from 2000 to 2020 were searched using the key terms uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, insulin therapy, glycemic control, direct cost, indirect cost, out-of-pocket expenses, cost-related insulin underuse, cost-saving behaviors, and biosimilar insulin in developed countries and India. RESULTS: In majority of the patients with T2DM on monotherapy, addition of another oral antidiabetic agent is required. Despite these measures, the target glycemic goals are not achieved in majority of the patients resulting in various complications. These complications can be prevented and target glycemic goals can be achieved with early initiation of insulin therapy. However, rising cost is a major deterrent to the lifelong use of insulin. This results in non-compliance and further deterioration of glycemic control. Recently, biosimilar insulins have revolutionized the management of T2DM and look promising from the economic point of view. CONCLUSIONS: Biosimilar insulins are likely to further enhance the compliance of patients and should be used whenever feasible in patients with DM. However, the patient, along with prescriber should be allowed to make shared, informed decisions regarding the insulin they wish to use.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insulinas , Glicemia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes , InsulinaRESUMO
India shoulders a heavy burden of diabetes mellitus (DM), the management of which is suboptimal globally.& Objectives: Insulin Management: Practical Aspects in Choice of Therapy (IMPACT) survey was designed to gain insight into the ground (in-clinic) reality of DM management by physicians in India. METHODS: A survey consisting of 12 multiple-choice questions was conducted by SurveyMonkey® , focusing on practice profile, patient profile, and other aspects of DM management. RESULTS: The survey included 2424 physicians. Majority of them were general physicians (58.5%) followed by diabetologists (31.1%). Most (49.2%) of the respondents specified that the ideal time for a DM consultation is 15 min. However, 73.4% of them provided consultation of <10& min because of heavy patient load. Nearly half of the respondents reported that their patients consumed a diet with carbohydrate content of 60% to 80%, and 79.4% of them admitted that <50% of their patients adhered to dietary advice. About 73.5% of the respondents believed controlling fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level alone would not adequately control postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) level, and 93.0% of them preferred an insulin therapy at the initiation that controls both FPG and PPG levels. CONCLUSION: Limited consultation time, high-carbohydrate diet, and a need for choosing insulin regimens that provide control for both PPG and FPG levels are some ground realities of DM management in India. These realities need to be factored in while choosing treatment options to achieve the desired glycemic control and improve the status of diabetes care.
Assuntos
Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Período Pós-Prandial , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal data on management and progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India are scarce. LANDMARC (CTRI/2017/05/008452), first-of-its-kind, pan-India, prospective, observational study aimed to evaluate real-world patterns and management of T2DM over 3 years. METHODS: Adults (≥25 to ≤60 years old at T2DM diagnosis; diabetes duration ≥2 years at enrolment; controlled/uncontrolled on ≥2 anti-diabetic agents) were enrolled. The first-year trends for glycaemic control, therapy and diabetic complications, including those from metropolitan and non-metropolitan cities are reported here. RESULTS: Of 6236 enrolled participants, 5654 completed 1 year in the study. Although the overall mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) improved by 0.5% (baseline: 8.1%) at 1 year, only 20% of the participants achieved HbA1c <7%. Participants from metropolitan and non- metropolitan cities showed similar decrease in glycaemic levels (mean change in HbA1c: -0.5% vs. -0.5%; p = .8613). Among diabetic complications, neuropathy was the predominant complication (815/6236, 13.1% participants). Microvascular complications (neuropathy, nephropathy and retinopathy) were significantly (p < .0001) higher in non-metropolitan than metropolitan cities. Hypertension (2623/6236, 78.2%) and dyslipidaemia (1696/6236, 50.6%) continued to be the most commonly reported cardiovascular risks at 1 year. After 1 year, majority of the participants were taking only oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) (baseline: 4642/6236 [74.4%]; 1 year: 4045/6013 [67.3%]), while the proportion of those taking insulin along with OADs increased (baseline: 1498/6236 [24.0%] vs. 1 year: 1844/6013 [30.7%]). Biguanides and sulfonylureas were the most used OADs. The highest increase in use was seen for dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (baseline: 3047/6236 [48.9%]; 1 year: 3529/6013 [58.7%]). Improvement in all glycaemic parameters was significantly (p < .0001) higher in the insulin vs. the insulin-naïve subgroups; in the insulin-naïve subgroup, no statistical difference was noted in those who received >3 vs. ≤3 OADs. CONCLUSIONS: First-year trends of the LANDMARC study offer insights into real-world disease progression, suggesting the need for controlling risk factors and timely treatment intensification in people with T2DM.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Sheehan's Syndrome (SS) is one of the most important causes of hypopituitarism in developing countries with patients having varying degrees and severity of anterior pituitary hormone deficiency including growth hormone deficiency (GHD). SS is characterized by increased clustering of metabolic and proinflammatory risk factors predisposing them to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Coronary calcium deposits (CCD), a marker for significant coronary atherosclerosis, is used for evaluation in asymptomatic individuals of global cardiac risk to develop events related to coronary heart disease (CHD). This study therefore aimed to evaluate the prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with SS appropriately replaced for pituitary hormone deficiencies but untreated for GHD. METHODS: Thirty patients previously diagnosed with SS and stable on a conventional replacement treatment for at least 6 months before the study and thirty age and Body Mass Index (BMI) matched controls were enrolled in this observational study. The subjects underwent detailed clinical, biochemical, and hormone analysis. Coronary multidetector computed tomography was performed in 19 SS patients and 19 healthy participants by a 16-row multislice scanner. Non contrast acquisitions were performed to detect coronary calcifications. Calcium was quantified by the Agatston score (AS) in all subjects. AS > 10 indicates increased CHD risk. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) age was 38.30 ± 10.73 years and the diagnostic delay was 11.35 ± 4.74 years. Patients with SS had significantly higher mean triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lower HDL cholesterol concentrations on conventional replacement therapy. The prevalence of CCD was significantly higher in patients of SS compared to controls (42.1% vs. 5.3%; P = 0.023). The presence of CCD and AS > 10 were detected in 42.1% and 31.6% of patients respectively. The presence of significant calcification (Agatston score > 10) was documented in 75% of patients (6/8) of the SS patients with CCD compared to none in the control group (P = 0.019). (Left anteriordescending, 1; left circumflex, 2; right coronary artery, 2 and posterior descending, 1) CONCLUSION: Since coronary artery calcium is an independent predictor of CHD events, the presence of significant prevalence of CCD in patients with SS compared to healthy matched controls, undermines the importance of early risk stratification of SS individuals with plethora of conventional cardiovascular risk factors that are at relatively high risk to avoid the adverse vascular consequences.
Assuntos
Hormônio do Crescimento Humano , Hipopituitarismo , Adulto , Cálcio , Diagnóstico Tardio , Humanos , Hipopituitarismo/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Dapagliflozin is the first in a novel class of glucose-lowering agents known as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors which was approved by USFDA in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults initially, followed by to reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in adults with T2DM and established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Most recently, it is approved to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and in adults with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (NYHA class II-IV). Dapagliflozin has been studied in a wide range of patients with diabetes and plethora of evidence has confirmed its efficacy as a monotherapy as well as an add-on to the oral therapies and insulin, when compared to placebo. Additional advantages include weight reduction which has been consistently demonstrated in Phase III studies and good tolerability. Also there is a demonstrable reduction in systolic blood pressure in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors. DECLARE TIMI 58 study clearly demonstrated that Dapagliflozin was non inferior in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with T2DM and high CV risk compared with placebo. 27% risk reduction in heart failure hospitalisation was noted along without increased risk of amputation. DAPA HF evaluated the efficacy and safety of the dapagliflozin in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction, irrespective of the presence or absence of diabetes. Patients with symptomatic HF due to reduced ejection fraction treated with dapagliflozin had positive outcomes with reduction in cardiovascular deaths and HF events. The DAPA-CKD trial which was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), with or without type 2 diabetes found that it significantly lowered the risk of a sustained decline in the estimated GFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes in patients with CKD, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes. Ongoing trials like DELIVER, DAPA ACT HF-TIMI 68, DICTATE-AHF, HF readmission study, DAPA MI Study, Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Weight Loss, will throw more light on the precise effects of dapagliflozin in several clinical scenarios. To conclude - Dapagliflozin was well studied not only in T2DM but also in HF and CKD patients with positive results and good safety profile.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Glucosídeos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Early use of combination therapy in diabetes patients may lead to sustained glycemic control and thereby reduce the progression of diabetic complications. Given the limitation of the traditional stepwise intensification strategy, early combination therapy can be an effective approach. Therefore, this study aims to assess the real-world efficacy of a combination of metformin and vildagliptin in comparison to metformin alone in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in India. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, non-interventional study based on electronic medical records (EMRs) of 2740 T2DM patients, retrieved from 2010 onwards from 22 diabetes centres across India. Adult drug naïve patients with a 5-year history of T2DM treated with either metformin or a combination of metformin and vildagliptin for at least 3 months were considered for this study. Efficacy assessment was done to evaluate the post-treatment HbA1c levels and patients requiring additional oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) at the time of follow-up visit. Patients were also analyzed for the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: Out of the total, 2452 patients were in metformin only arm, and 288 patients were in metformin plus vildagliptin treatment arm. A more significant reduction in HbA1c level was observed in metformin plus vildagliptin arm than metformin only arm (median: -0.5% vs 0%, respectively; p<0.001). Patients requiring additional OAD at follow-up were significantly lesser in the metformin plus vildagliptin arm than the metformin only arm (15.6% vs 35.2%, respectively; p<0.001). The adverse events were comparable across the two arms, and commonly reported adverse events were giddiness, fatigue and gastric discomfort. CONCLUSION: The findings of this EMR-based real-world study emphasizes the need for early initiation of combination therapy (metformin plus vildagliptin) over metformin monotherapy for achieving better glycemic control.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal data on progression, complications, and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) across India are scarce. LANDMARC (CTRI/2017/05/008452), the first pan-India, longitudinal, prospective, observational study, aims to understand the management and real-world outcomes of T2DM over 3 years. METHODS: Adults (≥25 to ≤60 years old at T2DM diagnosis; diabetes duration ≥2 years at enrollment; controlled/uncontrolled on ≥2 anti-diabetic agents) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 6279 recruited participants, 6236 were eligible for baseline assessment (56.6% [n/N = 3528/6236] men; mean ± SD age: 52.1 ± 9.2 years, diabetes duration: 8.6 ± 5.6 years). mean ± SD HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial glucose values were 64 ± 17 mmol/mol (8.1 ± 1.6%), 142.8 ± 50.4 mg/dl, and 205.7 ± 72.3 mg/dl, respectively. Only 25.1% (n/N = 1122/6236) participants had controlled glycemia (HbA1c < 53 mmol/mol, <7%). Macrovascular and microvascular complications were prevalent in 2.3% (n/N = 145/6236) and 14.5% (n/N = 902/6236) participants, respectively. Among those with complications, non-fatal myocardial infarction (n/N = 74/145, 51.0%) and neuropathy (n/N = 737/902, 81.7%) were the most reported macrovascular and microvascular complication, respectively. Hypertension (n/N = 2566/3281, 78.2%) and dyslipidemia (n/N = 1635/3281, 49.8%) were the most reported cardiovascular risks. Majority (74.5%; n/N = 4643/6236) were taking oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) only, while 24.4% (n/N = 1522/6236) participants were taking OADs+insulin. Biguanides (n/N = 5796/6236, 92.9%) and sulfonylureas (n/N = 4757/6236, 76.3%) were the most reported OADs. Basal (n/N = 837/6236, 13.4%) and premix (n/N = 684/6236, 11.0%) insulins were the most reported insulins. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline data from LANDMARC help understand the clinical/medical profile of study participants and underscore the extent of suboptimal glycemic control and prevalence of associated complications in a vast majority of Indians with T2DM.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
The expanding burden of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in today's world, with respect to incidence, prevalence, and cost incurred, is an existential risk to society. Various guidelines recommend individualization of treatment. This expert opinion aims to review the recent evidences and reach a consensus on the preferable combination therapy for use in newly diagnosed Indian T2DM patients with HbA1C >7.5%. The core committee included seventeen diabetes specialists. Three statements were developed, discussed, and rated by specialists and recommendations were noted. Specialists were requested to rate the statements using a 9-point Likert's scale with score of 1 being "Strongly Disagree" and 9 being "Strongly Agree". Statement-specific scores of all the specialists were added and mean score of ≥7.00 was considered to have achieved a consensus. Statements used to meet the consensus were: Statement 1. Majority of newly-diagnosed Indian diabetics have HbA1C >7.5%; Statement 2. Patients with HbA1C >7.5% may be initiated with dual therapy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4Is) + Metformin; and Statement 3. In Indian patients with HbA1C >7.5% at diagnosis, DPP4Is + Metformin may be considered as a first-line therapy. Literature review revealed that HbA1C level at the time of diagnosis in majority of Indian T2DM patients is >7.5%. Consensus was reached that dual anti-diabetic therapy should be initiated in patients with HbA1C >7.5%. DPP4Is + Metformin is the preferred cost-effective option and may be considered as a first-line therapy in Indian T2DM patients with HbA1C >7.5% at diagnosis.