Comparison of Pediatric and General Orthopedic Surgeons' Approaches in Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Flexible Flatfoot: the Road to Clinical Consensus.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and flatfoot are common pediatric orthopedic disorders, being referred to and managed by both general and pediatric orthopedic surgeons, through various modalities. Our study aimed to evaluate their consensus and perspective disagreements in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of the mentioned deformities. Forty participants in two groups of general orthopedic surgeons (GOS) (n=20) and pediatric orthopedic surgeons (POS) (n=20), were asked to answer an 8-item questionnaire on DDH and flexible flatfoot. The questions were provided with two- or multiple choices and a single choice was accepted for each one. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests was performed to compare the responses. For a neonate with limited hip abduction, hip ultrasonography was the agreed-upon approach in both groups (100% POS vs 71% GOS), and for its interpretation 79% of POS relied on their own whereas 73% of GOS relied on radiologist's report (P=0.002). In failure of a 3-week application of the Pavlik harness, ending it and closed reduction (57% POS vs. 41% GOS) followed by surgery quality assessment with CT scan (64% POS vs. 47% GOS) and without the necessity for avascular necrosis evaluation (79% POS vs. 73% GOS) were the choice measures. In case of closed reduction failure, open reduction via medial approach was the favorite next step in both groups (62% POS and 80% GOS). For the patient with flexible flat foot, reassurance was the choice plan of 79% of pediatric orthopedists. Our findings demonstrated significant disagreements among the orthopedic surgeons. This proposes insufficiency of high-level evidence.

Use of the Ponseti method in the Iranian population.

BACKGROUND: The most common congenital orthopaedic condition requiring treatment is clubfoot. The Ponseti method, which has improved the recurrence rate, is at present the most attractive method of treatment in the north of America. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of this method in an Iranian population and look for characteristics that may affect the treatment process. METHODS: A total of 78 patients (129 feet) were treated by precisely adhering to the technique originally introduced by Ponseti. Relapse was defined as any return of each of 4 clubfoot components according to the Dimeglio-Bensahel system. The mean follow-up period was 24.7 months and relapse was analyzed with respect to severity of primary disorder, number of casts, compliance with postcorrection bracing and stretching exercise, and educational level of parents. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up, 24 (18.6%) clubfeet experienced relapse as defined. The mean time to relapse was 13.7 months, 30 feet had brace noncompliance, and stretching was not done for 35 feet. Significant association was detected between recurrence and severity of clubfoot, number of casts for complete correction, and bracing and stretching exercise noncompliance. CONCLUSIONS: The Ponseti method is a successful treatment protocol for idiopathic clubfoot. Its success rate will increase with use of abduction orthosis after complete correction and also by performing regular stretching exercises. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II.