The effect of paracorporeal pulsatile biventricular assist devices on allosensitization in adults: A comparison with left ventricular assist devices.

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been associated with the development of anti-HLA antibodies ('allosensitization'), but data on devices providing biventricular support in adults are limited. We sought to characterize differences in anti-HLA antibody formation in adult patients receiving left- (LVAD) versus biventricular- (BiVAD) assist devices as bridge to transplantation (BTT) by retrospectively reviewing the records of adult patients who have undergone VAD implantation at our institution. We assessed 82 patients supported with a pulsatile-flow paracorporeal BiVAD and compared them with 40 patients receiving LVAD till 2018. Forty-eight (58.5%) of the BiVAD and 23 (57.5%) of the LVAD patients were eventually transplanted (p = 0.91) with an average time to transplantation 559 and 598 days, respectively (p = 0.73). Evidence of sensitization pre-VAD was found in 11.0% of the BiVAD patients and 15.0% of the LVAD ones (p = 0.53); these percentages rose to 43.9% (p < 0.001) and 40.0% (p = 0.01), respectively. The post-VAD sensitization status was not significantly different between the BiVAD and the LVAD group (p = 0.68). De novo sensitization was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.55). Post-transplantation outcomes regarding rejections and cardiac allograft vasculopathy were also similar. Conclusively, BiVAD- and LVAD- induced allosensitization do not appear to differ significantly.

Outcomes and quality of life after aortic valve surgery in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of catheter-based techniques questioned existing treatment strategies for patients with aortic stenosis. The increasing effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation therapies justifies a renewed evaluation of the results in terms of survival rate as well as the quality of life (QoL) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in the elderly. The aim of this study is the assessment of QoL in octogenarians undergoing isolated SAVR. METHODS: A retrospective observational and descriptive study between January 2015 and January 2018, was conducted. Eighty-four Caucasians patients over 80 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement in a single unit were, finally, followed-up. The patients' medical records were reviewed and QoL after a median 22-month follow-up time was evaluated by administering the EQ-5D questionnaire on the telephone. RESULTS: Mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II was 2.1%. The 30-day mortality was 0% and the 1-year mortality was 3.6%. On the assessment of QoL within mean follow-up time of 22 months, performed in 81 patients (survivors), a remarkable improvement was recorded in 76.5% of patients (62 patients), while 12.3% (10 patients) reported aggravation of their health status and 11.1% (9 patients) had no change. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates after SAVR can be kept at very low levels, especially in experienced high-volume centers, even in the elderly. Furthermore, it must be pointed out that the majority of these patients achieve a good functional status and a satisfactory QoL after the operation. Therefore, SAVR should not be withheld on the grounds of age alone.

A retrospective comparison of inhaled milrinone and iloprost in post-bypass pulmonary hypertension.

During cardiac operations, weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may prove challenging as a result of superimposed acute right ventricular dysfunction in the setting of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effect of inhaled milrinone versus inhaled iloprost in patients with persistent pulmonary hypertension following discontinuation of CPB. Eighteen patients with elevated PVR post-bypass were administered inhaled milrinone at a cumulative dose of 50 µg kg-1. These patients were retrospectively matched with 18 patients who were administered 20 µg of inhaled iloprost. Both drugs were administered through a disposable aerosol-generating jet nebulizer device and inhaled for a 15-min period. Hemodynamic measurements were performed before and after cessation of the inhalation period. Both inhaled milrinone and inhaled iloprost induced significant reductions in mean pulmonary artery pressure and PVR and significant increases in cardiac index in patients with post-CPB pulmonary hypertension. The favorable effect of both agents on the pulmonary vasculature was confirmed by echocardiographic measurements. Both agents were devoid of systemic side effects, since mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance were not affected. A decrease in intrapulmonary shunt by inhalation of both agents was also demonstrated. Pulmonary vasodilatation attributed to iloprost seems to be of greater magnitude and of longer duration as compared to that of inhaled milrinone. Both substances proved to be selective pulmonary vasodilators. The greater magnitude and of longer duration vasodilatation attributed to iloprost may be due to its longer duration of action.

Hemodynamic effects of combination therapy with inhaled nitric oxide and iloprost in patients with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction after high-risk cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) plus aerosolized iloprost in patients with pulmonary hypertension/right ventricular dysfunction after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A single center. PARTICIPANTS: Eight consecutive patients with valve disease and postextracorporeal circulation (ECC) pulmonary hypertension/right ventricular dysfunction. INTERVENTION: The continuous inhalation of nitric oxide (10 ppm) and iloprost, 10 µg, in repeated doses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The hemodynamic profile was obtained before inhalation, during the administration of inhaled NO alone (prior and after iloprost), and after the first 2 doses of iloprost. Tricuspid annular velocity and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion were estimated at baseline and before and after adding iloprost. At the end of the protocol, there were significant decreases in pulmonary vascular resistance (p < 0.001), the mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p < 0.001), and the mean pulmonary artery pressure/mean arterial pressure ratio (p = 0.006). Both tricuspid annular velocity (p < 0.001) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (p < 0.001) increased. The cardiac index (p < 0.001) and venous blood oxygen saturation (p = 0.001) increased throughout the evaluation period. Each iloprost dose was associated with further decreases in pulmonary vascular resistances/pressure. By comparing data at the beginning of inhaled NO with those after the second dose of iloprost, the authors noticed decreases in pulmonary vascular resistances (p = 0.004) and the mean pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.017) and rises in tricuspid annular velocity (p < 0.001) and tricuspid annular systolic plane systolic excursion (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled NO and iloprost significantly reduced pulmonary hypertension and contributed to the improvement in right ventricular function. Inhaled NO and iloprost have additive effects on pulmonary vasculature.

Inhaled nitric oxide plus iloprost in the setting of post-left assist device right heart dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction may complicate the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We examined whether inhaled vasodilators can sufficiently reduce RV afterload, avoiding the need for temporary RV mechanical support. METHODS: The study includes 7 patients with RV dysfunction after LVAD insertion. Treatment consisted of inotropes, inhaled nitric oxide (10 ppm), and iloprost (10 µg) in repeated doses. Full hemodynamic profile was obtained before inhalation, during administration of inhaled NO alone (before and after iloprost), as well as after the first two doses of inhaled iloprost. Tricuspid annular velocity was estimated at baseline and before and after adding iloprost. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), RV systolic pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and a considerable increase in LVAD flow, LV flow rate index, and tricuspid annular velocity at all points of evaluation versus baseline. By the end of the protocol, MPAP/mean systemic arterial pressure, and PVR/systemic vascular resistance ratios were reduced by 0.17±0.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.25, p=0.001) and 0.12±0.025 (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.18; p=0.003), respectively. The tricuspid annular velocity increased by 2.3±0.18 cm/s (95% confidence interval, 1.83 to 2.73 cm/s; p<0.001). Pairwise comparisons before and after iloprost showed an important decrease in PVR (p=0.022), MPAP (p=0.001), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p=0.002), and RV systolic pressure (p<0.001), and a rise in tricuspid annular velocity (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled vasodilators mainly affected the pulmonary vasculature. Combination treatment with inhaled NO and iloprost sufficiently decreased PVR and MPAP on the basis of an additive effect, improved RV function, and avoided the need for RV assist device.

Orthotopic heart transplantation: ten years' clinical experience.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplantation is the "gold standard" in the treatment of patients with end-stage heart failure who satisfy strict selection criteria. METHODS: We reviewed ten years' clinical experience (1996-2006) from 53 orthotopic transplants in our centre. RESULTS: Low perioperative (3.7%) and long-term (7.5%) mortality rates yielded a 95% survival rate in the first year, 92% at five years, and 70% at ten years--significantly better than the corresponding rates worldwide. In addition, excellent functional recovery was achieved in all transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: The strict application of international criteria in the selection of both candidates and donors, together with uninterrupted, multidisciplinary follow up, have made it feasible to perform heart transplantation with excellent results, despite the curiously low number of potential recipients and the shortage of acceptable donor hearts.

Effect of long-term calcitonin administration on steroid-induced osteoporosis after cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Early, rapid bone loss and fractures after cardiac transplantation are well-documented complications of steroid administration; therefore, we undertook this study on the effects of long-term calcitonin on steroid-induced osteoporosis. METHODS: Twenty-three heart transplant recipients on maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone were retrospectively studied. All patients received long-term prophylactic treatment with elemental calcium and vitamin D. Twelve (52.2%) patients also received long-term intranasal salmon calcitonin, whereas 11 (47.8%) received none. Bone mineral density and vertebral fractures were assessed at yearly intervals. Statistical comparisons between each group's bone loss during the first year and in the early (1 to 3 years), intermediate (4 to 6 years) and late (7+ years) post-transplantation periods were done. RESULTS: Lumbar spine bone loss was significant during the early follow-up period in the group not receiving calcitonin (0.744 +/- 0.114 g/cm(2) vs 0.978 +/- 0.094 g/cm(2) [p = 0.002]). The calcitonin group showed bone mineral density (BMD) levels within normal average values throughout the study period. BMD increased in the no-calcitonin group during the intermediate (4 to 6 years) and late (7+ years) follow-up periods, with values approaching normal average and no significant difference between the 2 groups (0.988 +/- 0.184 g/cm(2) vs 0.982 +/- 0.088 g/cm(2) [p = 0.944] and 0.89 +/- 0.09 g/cm(2) vs 1.048 +/- 0.239 g/cm(2) [p = 0.474], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with intranasal salmon calcitonin prevents rapid bone loss associated with high-dose steroids early after cardiac transplantation. Long-term administration does not seem warranted in re-establishing BMD.

Inhaled iloprost controls pulmonary hypertension after cardiopulmonary bypass.

PURPOSE: Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a major cause of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Various iv vasodilator modalities have been used with limited results because of lack of pulmonary selectivity. The aim of the present controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled iloprost, a synthetic prostacyclin analogue, in patients with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) immediately after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Twelve patients with persistent PH after discontinuation of CPB were included in the study. In all patients standard hemodynamic monitoring was used. Inhaled iloprost was administered via nebulized aerosol at a cumulative dose of 0.2 micro g*kg(-1) for a total duration of 20 min. Complete sets of hemodynamic measurements were performed before inhalation (baseline), during and after cessation of the inhalation period. Echocardiographic monitoring of RV function was also used. RESULTS: Inhaled iloprost induced a reduction in the transpulmonary gradient at the end of the inhalation period in comparison to baseline (9.33 +/- 3.83 mmHg vs 17.09 +/- 6.41 mmHg, P < 0.05). The mean pulmonary artery pressure to systemic artery pressure ratio decreased over this period (0.28 +/- 0.08 vs 0.45 +/- 0.17, P < 0.05). A statistically significant decrease of the PVR to systemic vascular resistance ratio was also observed (0.15 +/- 0.05 vs 0.21 +/- 0.05, P < 0.05). Improved indices of RV function were observed in echocardiographic monitoring. CONCLUSION: Inhaled iloprost appears to be a selective pulmonary vasodilator and may be effective in the initial treatment of PH and the improvement of RV performance in the perioperative setting.

Cardiac surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using preoperatively determined dosages of iloprost.

BACKGROUND: Patients with preoperatively diagnosed type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) scheduled for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) present a challenge in their intraoperative anticoagulation management because re-exposure to heparin may result in profound thrombocytopenia, intravascular thromboses, bleeding, and even death. Iloprost, a prostacyclin analogue that reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation, has been suggested as a management approach in such cases. The purpose of this study was to assess and confirm the efficacy of a perioperative intravenous iloprost infusion in preventing thromboembolic complications in patients with type II HIT undergoing cardiac surgery and requiring the use of heparin and CPB. METHODS: During a one-and-a-half-year period, 22 patients with type II HIT presented at the Cardiac Surgery Service of the Onassis Cardiac Center in Athens. In these patients, platelet aggregation test results were found strongly positive at heparin serum concentrations corresponding to those achieved during CPB. Iloprost was used in a preoperatively, in vitro-determined, patient-specific concentration that was assessed and modified perioperatively depending on its in vivo effect on platelet aggregation as opposed to the conventional constant rate. RESULTS: In the 22 patients, the preoperatively determined concentration of iloprost seemed to correlate well with the in vivo interruption of platelet aggregation, as tested by a perioperative heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) assay, and in only 3 cases (14%) was the rate of iloprost infusion increased. The patients' platelet counts, which were evaluated peri- and postoperatively, were preserved with no statistically significant fluctuations. Postoperative bleeding was within normal limits and no thrombotic episodes or other complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Although a number of alternative anticoagulation methods, such as the use of another anticoagulant (danaparoid sodium and recombinant hirudin) or the preoperative use of a defibrinogenating agent (ancorod), have been suggested for patients with type II HIT requiring anticoagulation during CPB, the use of heparin associated with a potent platelet inhibitor such as the prostacyclin analog iloprost is, as this study confirmed, the only to-date safe and effective choice.