Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 46(5): 689-698, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31358392

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Thermal radiofrequency (TRF) of the saphenous nerve (a sensory nerve) combined with pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the sciatic nerve (a sensory and motor nerve) might relieve intractable stifle osteoarthritis (OA) pain in dogs. The objective was to determine if saphenous nerve TRF induces Wallerian degeneration and if sciatic nerve PRF induces degeneration or dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded, controlled, randomized, preclinical study. ANIMALS: A group of six intact, female Beagle dogs aged 14-16 months. METHODS: In each dog, one pelvic limb was assigned randomly to the control group and the other to the treatment group. Dogs were anesthetized and, using ultrasonography, radiofrequency electrodes were positioned adjacent to saphenous and sciatic nerves bilaterally; TRF and PRF were performed only in the treatment limb. Motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) was measured in both sciatic nerves 2 weeks later, and the dogs were euthanized. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of saphenous and sciatic nerves were examined using light microscopy. Degeneration and inflammation were scored 0 (none) to 3 (severe). A one-tailed, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for differences in scores and MNCV between control and treatment nerves. RESULTS: Degeneration and inflammation scores were higher in treatment saphenous nerves in 5/6 dogs [83%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 36%, 99%]; however, after Bonferroni correction only degeneration score was higher (p = 0.0313). Degeneration, inflammation or decreased MNCV were not observed in sciatic nerves (each outcome: 0/6 nerves, 0%; 95% CI, 0%, 48%). No dogs experienced postprocedural pain or neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The degeneration in TRF-treated saphenous nerves appears sufficient to impair transmission. Sciatic nerve PRF did not cause degeneration with attendant motor deficits, consistent with a proposed neuromodulatory mechanism. A clinical trial is needed to confirm the combined techniques produce analgesia without motor deficits in dogs with stifle OA.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/veterinária , Doenças do Cão/terapia , Osteoartrite/veterinária , Terapia por Radiofrequência/veterinária , Joelho de Quadrúpedes/inervação , Animais , Dor Crônica/terapia , Cães , Feminino , Osteoartrite/terapia , Medição da Dor/veterinária , Nervo Isquiático/anatomia & histologia , Nervo Isquiático/fisiologia , Método Simples-Cego , Nervos Espinhais/anatomia & histologia , Nervos Espinhais/fisiologia
2.
Am J Vet Res ; 80(5): 455-460, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31034277

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cardiovascular effects of atipamezole administered at half the volume or the same volume as dexmedetomidine to isoflurane-anesthetized cats. ANIMALS: 6 adult (1 to 2 years old) domestic shorthair cats (body weight, 3 to 6 kg). PROCEDURES: Each cat was anesthetized with isoflurane and rocuronium 3 times; there was a 1-week washout period between successive anesthetic procedures. For each anesthetic procedure, dexmedetomidine (5 µg/kg) was administered IV. Five minutes after dexmedetomidine was administered, atipamezole (25 or 50 µg/kg) or saline (0.9% NaCl) solution was administered IM. Pulse rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured during anesthesia before dexmedetomidine administration (baseline), after dexmedetomidine administration, and 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after administration of atipamezole or saline solution. Pulse rate and MAP were also recorded when MAP was at its lowest value. Hemodynamic variables were compared among treatments at baseline, after dexmedetomidine administration, and after administration of atipamezole or saline solution. Effects of treatment and time on all variables were assessed with mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Both doses of atipamezole resulted in a significantly lower MAP than did saline solution. Pulse rate, CO, and SVR were not significantly different among treatments after atipamezole or saline solution were administered. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Atipamezole administered IM at half the volume or the same volume as dexmedetomidine was ineffective at increasing pulse rate or CO in anesthetized cats that received dexmedetomidine. However, atipamezole caused short-lasting but severe arterial hypotension.


Assuntos
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 2/uso terapêutico , Anestesia/veterinária , Gatos , Dexmedetomidina/antagonistas & inibidores , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Animais , Débito Cardíaco/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Cross-Over , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Isoflurano/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Distribuição Aleatória , Resistência Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA