RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Aerococcus urinae antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can be performed via broth microdilution (BMD) with Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with lysed horse blood (MHB-LHB). We sought to compare this to the commonly used gradient diffusion method. METHODS: We compared BMD with MHB-LHB to gradient diffusion via MH agar supplemented with sheep blood for 190 A. urinae isolates against sixteen antimicrobials. RESULTS: No antimicrobials demonstrated over 90% essential and categorical agreement (EA and CA) and less than 3% major and very major error rates (ME and VME). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-STX) demonstrated an 81% major error rate and ceftriaxone demonstrated a 76% very major error rate. Agar dilution (AD) with lysed horse blood was performed for TMP-STX against 94 isolates and found 100% susceptibility, consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings cannot support the routine use of gradient diffusion with MH agar supplemented with sheep blood for A. urinae in lieu of the CLSI method given its limitations in detecting resistant strains. Our results suggest A. urinae is usually susceptible to penicillin, linezolid, tetracycline, and vancomycin. Future studies should evaluate alternative testing methods for clinical microbiology laboratories.
RESUMO
Mycobacterium xenopi is a slow growing non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) isolated from water systems and has been associated with pseudo-outbreaks and pulmonary infections in humans. We observed a cluster of six respiratory cultures positive for M. xenopi within a six-month period at our institution, approximately double our normal isolation rate of this organism. Only three of the six cases met clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic criteria for NTM infection. An investigation led by our hospital's Healthcare Epidemiology and Infection Program found no epidemiologic link between the six patients. Three isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phylogenetic analysis confirmed they were non-clonal. In vitro susceptibility data found the isolates were sensitive to macrolides, moxifloxacin, and rifabutin. Our findings suggest that isolation of M. xenopi from pulmonary specimens may be increasing, further defines the genomic population structure of this potentially emerging infection, and establishes WGS as a useful tool for outbreak investigation strain typing.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spectra™ VRE agar (Remel, Lenexa, KS) is a chromogenic agar that is FDA approved for screening patients for VRE colonization. The package insert recommends confirming isolates with identification and susceptibility testing, but confirming every culture delays time to result. Given the agar's historic high specificity for E. faecium isolates, we theorized the agar could be utilized as a stand-alone screening to minimize reagents and time. AIM: Our laboratory sought to develop a workflow to optimize the use of the medium. METHODS: We plated 3,815 rectal swabs to the Spectra VRE agar and compared results to traditional identification and susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Dark blue or purple colonies on the agar demonstrated a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 85% for detection of VRE faecium, but light blue colonies were significantly less specific for E. faecalis. CONCLUSIONS: We streamlined our workflow to accept dark blue or purple colonies as VRE faecium and plan to perform additional testing only on light blue colonies. Interestingly, higher quantity of growth increased the accuracy of the agar. In the future, growth quantity may be used to further streamline the workflow once more data is obtained.
Assuntos
Enterococcus faecium , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Humanos , Enterococcus faecalis , Ágar , Vancomicina , Fluxo de Trabalho , Resistência a Vancomicina , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/farmacologiaRESUMO
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an uncommon but serious cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A lack of validated MRSA CAP risk factors can result in overuse of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. We sought to develop robust models predicting the risk of MRSA CAP using machine learning using a population-based sample of hospitalized patients with CAP admitted to either a tertiary academic center or a community teaching hospital. Data were evaluated using a machine learning approach. Cases were CAP patients with MRSA isolated from blood or respiratory cultures within 72 h of admission; controls did not have MRSA CAP. The Classification Tree Analysis algorithm was used for model development. Model predictions were evaluated in sensitivity analyses. A total of 21 of 1,823 patients (1.2%) developed MRSA within 72 h of admission. MRSA risk was higher among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the first 24 h who required mechanical ventilation than among ICU patients who did not require ventilatory support (odds ratio [OR], 8.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4 to 32). MRSA risk was lower among patients admitted to ward units than among those admitted to the ICU (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56) and lower among ICU patients without a history of antibiotic use in the last 90 days than among ICU patients with antibiotic use in the last 90 days (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.59). The final machine learning model was highly accurate (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area = 0.775) in training and jackknife validity analyses. We identified a relatively simple machine learning model that predicted MRSA risk in hospitalized patients with CAP within 72 h postadmission.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Pneumonia Estafilocócica , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Estafilocócica/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Curva ROC , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are multidrug resistant organisms that pose a significant risk in the health care setting. Standardized identification ensures prompt isolation and is imperative to maintain patient safety.
Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos , Segurança do Paciente , Humanos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Many institutions suspended surveillance and contact precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) at the outset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to a lack of resources. Once our institution reinstated surveillance in September 2020, a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) faecium outbreak was detected in the cardiothoracic transplant units, a population in which we had not previously detected outbreaks. METHODS: An outbreak investigation was conducted using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for strain typing and electronic medical record review to determine the clinical characteristics of involved patients. The infection prevention (IP) team convened a multidisciplinary process improvement team comprised of IP, cardiothoracic transplant nursing and medical leadership, environmental services, and the microbiology laboratory. RESULTS: Between December 2020 and March 2021, the outbreak involved thirteen patients in the cardiothoracic transplant units, four index cases, and nine transmissions. Of the 13, seven (54%) were on the transplant service, including heart and lung transplant recipients, patients with ventricular assist devices, and a patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation. Four of 13 (31%) developed a clinical infection. DISCUSSION: Cardiothoracic surgery/transplant patients may have a similar risk for VRE-associated morbidity as abdominal solid organ transplant and stem cell transplant patients, highlighting the need for aggressive outbreak management when VRE transmission is detected. Our experience demonstrates an unintended consequence of discontinuing MDRO surveillance in this population and highlights a need for education, monitoring, and reinforcement of foundational infection prevention measures to ensure optimal outcomes.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Enterococcus faecium , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Humanos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention (ASI) appears to be necessary to realize the full benefits of rapid diagnostic technologies in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between early ASI paired with matrix-associated laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) compared with MALDI-TOF with standard of care (SOC) reporting in patients with positive blood cultures. METHODS: Adult patients with positive blood cultures and organism speciation via MALDI-TOF admitted between February 2015 and September 2015 were randomized to ASI or SOC in a 1:1 fashion. Patients admitted for at least 48 h following positive culture were included in analyses. ASI was defined as a clinical assessment by a stewardship team member with non-binding treatment recommendations offered to the primary team. The primary outcome was time to definitive therapy. Secondary outcomes included post-culture length of stay (LOS), time to first change in antibiotics, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients were included in the analyses (76 in the ASI group and 73 in the SOC group). ASI and SOC arms did not differ according to age, sex, comorbidities or severity of illness. Gram-positive organisms were common in both SOC and ASI arms (74.0 vs. 61.8%, P=0.11). Time to definitive therapy was reduced, on average, by 30.3 h in the ASI group (71.6 vs. 41.3 h, P=0.01). Hospital LOS following the first positive blood culture was significantly shorter in the ASI group (8.7 vs. 11.2 days, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: ASI combined with MALDI-TOF reduced the time to definitive therapy and time to first change in antibiotics, and was associated with a shorter post-culture LOS.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemocultura/métodos , Humanos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a high-priority group for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and serve as sources for public information. In this analysis, we assessed vaccine intentions, factors associated with intentions, and change in uptake over time in HCWs. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of COVID-19 seroprevalence was conducted with HCWs in a large healthcare system in the Chicago area. Participants completed surveys from November 25, 2020, to January 9, 2021, and from April 24 to July 12, 2021, on COVID-19 exposures, diagnosis and symptoms, demographics, and vaccination status. RESULTS: Of 4,180 HCWs who responded to a survey, 77.1% indicated that they intended to get the vaccine. In this group, 23.2% had already received at least 1 dose of the vaccine, 17.4% were unsure, and 5.5% reported that they would not get the vaccine. Factors associated with intention or vaccination were being exposed to clinical procedures (vs no procedures: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.65) and having a negative serology test for COVID-19 (vs no test: AOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.24-1.73). Nurses (vs physicians: AOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.17-0.33), non-Hispanic Black (vs Asians: AOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.59), and women (vs men: AOR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50) had lower odds of intention to get vaccinated. By 6-months follow-up, >90% of those who had previously been unsure were vaccinated, whereas 59.7% of those who previously reported no intention of getting vaccinated, were vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination in HCWs was high, but variability in vaccination intention exists. Targeted messaging coupled with vaccine mandates can support uptake.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Teste para COVID-19 , Estudos Prospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinação , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
Background: Understanding the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination will enable accurate counseling and inform evolving vaccination strategies. Little is known about antibody response following booster vaccination in people living with HIV (PLWH). Methods: We enrolled SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated PLWH and controls without HIV in similar proportions based on age and comorbidities. Participants completed surveys on prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, and comorbidities, and provided self-collected dried blood spots (DBS). Quantitative anti-spike IgG and surrogate viral neutralization assays targeted wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron variants. We also measured quantitative anti-nucleocapsid IgG. The analysis population had received full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination plus one booster dose. Bivariate analyses for continuous outcomes utilized Wilcoxon tests and multivariate analysis used linear models. Results: The analysis population comprised 140 PLWH and 75 controls with median age 58 and 55 years, males 95% and 43%, and DBS collection on 112 and 109 days after the last booster dose, respectively. Median CD4 count among PLWH was 760 cells/mm3 and 91% had an undetectable HIV-1 viral load. Considering WT, Delta, and Omicron variants, there was no significant difference in mean quantitative anti-spike IgG between PLWH (3.3, 2.9, 1.8) and controls (3.3, 2.9, 1.8), respectively (p-values=0. 771, 0.920, 0.708). Surrogate viral neutralization responses were similar in PLWH (1.0, 0.9, and 0.4) and controls (1.0, 0.9, 0.5), respectively (p-values=0.594, 0.436, 0.706). Conclusions: PLWH whose CD4 counts are well preserved and persons without HIV have similar anti-spike IgG antibody levels and viral neutralization responses after a single SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Humanos , Masculino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Imunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes in severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic status and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in healthcare workers (HCWs) over 6-months of follow-up. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: HCWs in the Chicago area. METHODS: Cohort participants were recruited in May and June 2020 for baseline serology testing (Abbott anti-nucleocapsid IgG) and were then invited for follow-up serology testing 6 months later. Participants completed monthly online surveys that assessed demographics, medical history, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and exposures to SARS-CoV-2. The electronic medical record was used to identify SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity during follow-up. Serologic conversion and SARS-CoV-2 infection or possible reinfection rates (cases per 10,000 person days) by antibody status at baseline and follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 6,510 HCWs were followed for a total of 1,285,395 person days (median follow-up, 216 days). For participants who had baseline and follow-up serology checked, 285 (6.1%) of the 4,681 seronegative participants at baseline seroconverted to positive at follow-up; 138 (48%) of the 263 who were seropositive at baseline were seronegative at follow-up. When analyzed by baseline serostatus alone, 519 (8.4%) of 6,194 baseline seronegative participants had a positive PCR after baseline serology testing (4.25 per 10,000 person days). Of 316 participants who were seropositive at baseline, 8 (2.5%) met criteria for possible SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (ie, PCR positive >90 days after baseline serology) during follow-up, a rate of 1.27 per 10,000 days at risk. The adjusted rate ratio for possible reinfection in baseline seropositive compared to infection in baseline seronegative participants was 0.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Seropositivity in HCWs is associated with moderate protection from future SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Chicago/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Seguimentos , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Estudos Prospectivos , Reinfecção , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannnii (AB) pneumonia at our center, including the antibiotic exposure patterns of individual AB pneumonia cases and to investigate whether hospital-wide antibiotic consumption trends were associated with trends in AB pneumonia incidence. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective study with case-control and ecological components. SETTING: US private tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: All hospitalized patients with AB infection from 2008 to 2019 were identified through laboratory records; for those with AB pneumonia, medical records were queried for detailed characteristics and antibiotic exposures in the 30 days preceding pneumonia diagnosis. Hospital-wide antibiotic consumption data from 2015 through 2019 were obtained through pharmacy records. RESULTS: Incidence of both pneumonia and nonrespiratory AB infections decreased from 2008 to 2019. Among the 175 patients with AB pneumonia, the most frequent antibiotic exposure was vancomycin (101 patients). During the 2015-2019 period when hospital-wide antibiotic consumption data were available, carbapenem consumption increased, and trends negatively correlated with those of AB pneumonia (r = -0.48; P = .031) and AB infection at any site (r = -0.63; P = .003). Conversely, the decline in AB infection at any site correlated positively with concurrent declines in vancomycin (r = 0.55; P = .012) and quinolone consumption (r = 0.51; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: We observed decreasing incidence of AB infection despite concurrently increasing carbapenem consumption, possibly associated with declining vancomycin and quinolone consumption. Future research should evaluate a potential role for glycopeptide and quinolone exposure in the pathogenesis of AB infection.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Pneumonia Bacteriana , Quinolonas , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos , Humanos , Incidência , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , VancomicinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite its low sensitivity, fungal culture remains one of the key methods for diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections, as it identifies the etiology at the genus and species level and affords the opportunity for susceptibility testing. The Manual of Clinical Microbiology recommends that fungal culture screening for all pathogens should routinely be held for 4 weeks to maximize the recovery of slow-growing species. Information on the optimal fungal culture time in this era of expansion of immunocompromised populations and availability of molecular diagnostics is lacking. We reviewed our experience with fungal culture to determine the optimal culture incubation time. In addition, our experience of broad-range ITS PCR for diagnosis of culture-negative fungal infections was also reviewed. METHODS: Fungal culture and ITS PCR results from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed. RESULTS: This study included 4234 non-duplicated positive cultures. Ninety-six percent (4058) of the positive cultures were detected in the first 7 days of incubation. During the second week of incubation, 111 (2.8%) positives were detected from day 8 to day 10, and 71 (1.7%) were detected from day 11 to day 14. Only 6 (0.1%) positive cultures were detected in the third week of incubation, and no positive culture was detected in the fourth week of incubation. No clinically significant fungal isolates were recovered after 14 days. Clinically significant pathogens were detected in 16 (0.2%) culture-negative samples by ITS PCR. CONCLUSION: Extending culture incubation beyond 2 weeks did not generate clinically relevant results. When culture failed to make a laboratory diagnosis, broad-range internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rRNA gene PCR followed by sequencing produced clinically significant results.
Assuntos
Micoses , DNA Fúngico/genética , Fungos/genética , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Micoses/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Reports of false-negative quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) results from patients with high clinical suspension for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), suggested that a negative result produced by a nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAs) did not always exclude the possibility of COVID-19 infection. Repeat testing has been used by clinicians as a strategy in an to attempt to improve laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 and overcome false-negative results in particular. AIM: To investigate whether repeat testing is helpful for overcoming false-negative results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, focusing on the yield of repeat patient testing for improving SARS-CoV-2 detection by NAA. RESULTS: We found that the yield from using repeat testing to identify false-negative patients was low. When the first test produced a negative result, only 6â% of patients tested positive by the second test. The yield decreased to 1.7 and then 0â% after the third and fourth tests, respectively. When comparing the results produced by three assays, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) SARS CoV-2 RT-qPCR panel, Xpert Xpress CoV-2 and ID NOW COVID-19, the ID NOW assay was associated with the highest number of patients who tested negative initially but positive on repeat testing. The CDC SARS CoV-2 RT-qPCR panel produced the highest number of indeterminate results. Repeat testing resolved more than 90â% of indeterminate/invalid results. CONCLUSIONS: The yield from using repeat testing to identify false-negative patients was low. Repeat testing was best used for resolving indeterminate/invalid results.
RESUMO
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare personnel (HCP) have been at high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2, both from patients and co-workers. This paper summarizes occupational exposures to SARS-CoV-2 and secondary cases among HCP at a large health system. Key findings indicate that transmission of COVID-19 to HCP is low, especially with close adherence to PPE guidelines, but lapses in infection prevention practices, including dining together and omitting eye protection during patient care, especially at times when COVID-19 is circulating widely in the community increase the risk of exposure and subsequent transmission to HCP.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Exposição Ocupacional , Atenção à Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
PCR-based deep sequencing of 16S rRNA gene allows for detection of a wide array of bacterial pathogens in culture-negative specimens. Ion 16S metagenomics kit and Ion Reporter metagenomics workflow (Ion 16S mNGS) provides an end-to-end solution with integrated workflow. Ninety-eight clinical samples with the diagnosis generated with 16S rRNA gene PCR/chain termination (Sanger) sequencing (16S CS) was used to assess the performance of Ion 16S mNGS. Compared to species level detection of 16S CS, the Ion 16S mNGS had 88% sensitivity and 76% specificity. When accounting for genus level of detection, the Ion 16S mNGS had 100% sensitivity. Notably, Ion 16S mNGS generated diagnosis in 13% of 16S CS and culture-negative samples. In addition, Ion 16S mNGS had the advantage of detecting more than 1 pathogen in 16S CS positive samples. We showed that the workflow had high reproducibility.
Assuntos
Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Metagenômica/métodos , Bactérias/genética , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Fluxo de TrabalhoRESUMO
Information on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in patients with COVID-19 is limited, and clinical correlation has not been reported. This study investigated the key features of BAL fluids from COVID-19 patients and assessed their clinical significance. A total of 320 BAL samples from 83 COVID-19 patients and 70 non-COVID-19 patients (27 patients with other respiratory viral infections) were evaluated, including cell count/differential, morphology, flow cytometric immunophenotyping, and immunohistochemistry. The findings were correlated with clinical outcomes. Compared to non-COVID-19 patients, BAL from COVID-19 patients was characterized by significant lymphocytosis (p < 0.001), in contrast to peripheral blood lymphopenia commonly observed in COVID-19 patients and the presence of atypical lymphocytes with plasmacytoid/plasmablastic features (p < 0.001). Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry demonstrated that BAL lymphocytes, including plasmacytoid and plasmablastic cells, were composed predominantly of T cells with a mixture of CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Both populations had increased expression of T-cell activation markers, suggesting important roles of helper and cytotoxic T-cells in the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung. More importantly, BAL lymphocytosis was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (p < 0.05) and longer requirement for mechanical ventilation (p < 0.05), whereas the median atypical (activated) lymphocyte count was associated with shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05), shorter time on mechanical ventilation (p < 0.05) and improved survival. Our results indicate that BAL cellular analysis and morphologic findings provide additional important information for diagnostic and prognostic work-up, and potential new therapeutic strategies for patients with severe COVID-19.
Assuntos
Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Pulmão/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/citologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are at risk of developing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We developed and tested clinical decision rules for identifying CDI risk in this patient population. The study was a single-center retrospective, case-control analysis of hospitalized adult patients empirically treated for CAP between 1 January 2014 and 3 March 2018. Differences between cases (CDI diagnosed within 180 days following admission) and controls (no test result indicating CDI during the study period) with respect to prehospitalization variables were modeled to generate propensity scores. Postadmission variables were used to predict case status on each postadmission day where (i) ≥1 additional case was identified and (ii) each model stratum contained ≥15 subjects. Models were developed and tested using optimal discriminant analysis and classification tree analysis. Forty-four cases and 181 controls were included. The median time to diagnosis was 50 days postadmission. After weighting, three models were identified (20, 117, and 165 days postadmission). The day 20 model yielded the greatest (weighted [w]) accuracy (weighted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [wROC area] = 0.826) and the highest chance-corrected accuracy (weighted effect strength for sensitivity [wESS] = 65.3). Having a positive culture (odds, 1:4; P = 0.001), receipt of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for a defined infection (odds, 3:5; P = 0.006), and continuation of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics with activity against P. aeruginosa when no pathogen was identified (odds, 1:8; P = 0.013) were associated with CDI on day 20. Three models were identified that accurately predicted CDI in hospitalized patients treated for CAP. Antibiotic use increased the risk of CDI in all models, underscoring the importance of antibiotic stewardship.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium , Pneumonia , Adulto , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identifying factors associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among health care workers (HCWs) may help health systems optimize SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Northwestern HCW SARS-CoV-2 Serology Cohort Study. We used the Abbott Architect Nucleocapsid IgG assay to determine seropositivity. Logistic regression models (adjusted for demographics and self-reported community exposure to coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) were fit to quantify the associations between occupation group, health care delivery tasks, and community exposure and seropositive status. RESULTS: A total of 6510 HCWs, including 1794 nurses and 904 non-patient-facing administrators, participated. The majority were women (79.6%), 74.9% were White, 9.7% were Asian, 7.3% were Hispanic, and 3.1% were non-Hispanic Black. The crude prevalence of seropositivity was 4.8% (95% CI, 4.6%-5.2%). Seropositivity varied by race/ethnicity as well as age, ranging from 4.2% to 9.6%. Out-of-hospital exposure to COVID-19 occurred in 9.3% of HCWs, 15.0% (95% CI, 12.2%-18.1%) of whom were seropositive; those with family members diagnosed with COVID-19 had a seropositivity rate of 54% (95% CI, 44.2%-65.2%). Support service workers (10.4%; 95% CI, 4.6%-19.4%), medical assistants (10.1%; 95% CI, 5.5%-16.6%), and nurses (7.6%; 95% CI, 6.4%-9.0%) had significantly higher seropositivity rates than administrators (referent; 3.3%; 95% CI, 2.3%-4.4%). However, after adjustment, nursing was the only occupation group with a significantly higher odds (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9) of seropositivity. Exposure to patients receiving high-flow oxygen therapy and hemodialysis was significantly associated with 45% and 57% higher odds for seropositive status, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs are at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection from longer-duration exposures to people infected with SARS-CoV-2 within health care settings and their communities of residence.
RESUMO
Whole-genome sequences of Candida auris isolates from nosocomial and nonnosocomial infections were compared. The average numbers of single nucleotide variations were different between the two groups. The small amount of genetic variability between intra- or interhost isolates suggests recovery of all colonizing or infecting genomes for comparison is required for outbreaks.