Developing a cascade of care for opioid use disorder among individuals in jail.

INTRODUCTION: The overdose epidemic persists as a public health crisis in the United States. Jails are a critical overdose prevention touchpoint. The risk of overdose postincarceration may be increased if an individual is released without medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment or transferred to long-term residential treatment. A growing number of studies have examined the difficulties in implementing evidence-based care for opioid use disorder (OUD) in jail settings. METHODS: We use administrative data (July 1, 2020, through September 30, 2020) from four jail facilities that implemented OUD treatment programs. These data included screening data from the Rapid Opioid Dependence Screener (RODS) (n = 2562), along with booking and medication information from jail records, which we used to develop a cascade-of-care. RESULTS: Screening rates varied dramatically by facility, with integration into the jail records management system showing the best outcomes. The prevalence of OUD identified from the RODS was 8.1% and did not vary significantly by facility. Nearly one third (31.3%) of those identified as having an OUD were dispensed medications, with two-thirds receiving methadone and the remaining third buprenorphine. The average length of stay for all screened individuals was two weeks, compared to two months for those who received an MOUD. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for OUD diagnosis is critical to reduce gaps in a cascade-of-care, and our results provide guidance on how to achieve this in jail. Failing to identify OUD and provide MOUD places an individual at an increased risk for fatal overdose. Future studies should consider examining MOUD discharge planning and factors that improve treatment retention following release from incarceration. Our study also illustrates the churn of jail populations and the need for rapid induction of treatment and overdose prevention strategies upon release.

Jail and overdose: assessing the community impact of incarceration on overdose.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Incarceration produces a specific public health threat for drug overdose, and correctional settings do not offer medication for opioid use disorder. This study examined the overall impact of jail incarceration on overdose, the specific hazard for those booked on a syringe-related charge and the proportion of all overdose decedents in the community who were in the jail prior to death. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cohort study of fatal overdose outcomes among a sample of individuals booked into and released from jail between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019. Marion County, IN, USA. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals released from one county jail between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017 and decedents who died within the county from an accidental fatal overdose between January 2017 and December 2019. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Using information on all jail booking events, including charge type, during a 5-year period (January 2015-December 2019), we looked at the hazard of accidental fatal overdose post-release, controlling for age, sex and race. Of all overdose deaths in the county, 21% (n = 237) had been in the county jail within 2 years prior to their death. Each prior booking increased the hazard of mortality by approximately 20% [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15, 1.28], while the presence of a syringe charge at most recent booking prior to release more than tripled the hazard of mortality (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 2.55, 4.93). CONCLUSIONS: In Marion County, IN, USA, there appears to be an association between increased risk of fatal drug overdose and both syringe-related arrests and repeat jail bookings.