HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: New and Upcoming Drugs to Address the HIV Epidemic.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provides a critical intervention toward ending the HIV epidemic and protecting people with reasons to utilize PrEP. PrEP options continue to expand as new administration modalities offer the potential to tailor PrEP use for individual success. We have provided the evidence for new and emerging antiretroviral agents for PrEP (cabotegravir, lenacapavir, dapivirine, and broadly neutralizing antibodies), divided into pharmacology, animal model, and human data, accompanied by a summary and suggested place in therapy. Cabotegravir is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved intramuscular injection given every 2 months with a strong body of evidence demonstrating efficacy for HIV PrEP, lenacapavir administered subcutaneously every 6 months is currently under investigation for HIV PrEP, dapivirine vaginal ring is an available PrEP option for women in certain areas of Africa, and broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies have been challenged in demonstrating efficacy in phase 1-2 study for HIV PrEP to date. Clinical literature for individual agents is discussed with data from major studies summarized in tables. This review provides a detailed overview of recently available and premier candidate PrEP drugs.

Long-term evaluation of clinical success and safety of omadacycline in nontuberculous mycobacteria infections: a retrospective, multicenter cohort of real-world health outcomes.

Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) continue to increase in prevalence, leading to problematic clinical outcomes. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with FDA orphan drug and fast-track designations for pulmonary NTM infections, including Mycobacteroides abscessus (MAB). This multicenter retrospective study across 16 U.S. medical institutions from January 2020 to March 2023 examined the long-term clinical success, safety, and tolerability of OMC for NTM infections. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 yr, who were clinically evaluable, and` had been treated with OMC for ≥3 mo without a previous diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The primary outcome was 3 mo clinical success, with secondary outcomes including clinical improvement and mortality at 6- and 12 mo, persistence or reemergence of infection, adverse effects, and reasons for OMC utilization. Seventy-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (48/75, 64.0%) or Caucasian (58/75, 77.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 59 yr (49-67). Most had NTM pulmonary disease (33/75, 44.0%), skin and soft tissue disease (19/75, 25.3%), or osteomyelitis (10/75, 13.3%), and Mycobacterium abscessus (60/75, 80%) was the most commonly isolated NTM pathogen. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 6 mo (4 - 14), and the most commonly co-administered antibiotic was azithromycin (33/70, 47.1%). Three-month clinical success was observed in 80.0% (60/75) of patients, and AEs attributable to OMC occurred in 32.0% (24/75) of patients, leading to drug discontinuation in 9.3% (7/75).

Pharmacogenomic panel testing provides insight and enhances medication management in people with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to assess the impact of pharmacogenomic panel testing in people with HIV (PWH). DESIGN: Prospective, observational intervention assessment. METHODS: One hundred PWH were provided a comprehensive pharmacogenomic panel during routine care visits within the HIV specialty clinic of a large academic medical center. The panel determined the presence of specific genetic variants that could predict response or toxicity to commonly prescribed antiretroviral therapy (ART) and non-ART medications. An HIV specialty pharmacist reviewed the results with participants and the care team. The pharmacist (1) recommended clinically actionable interventions based on the participants' current drug therapy, (2) assessed for genetic explanations for prior medication failures, adverse effects, or intolerances, and (3) advised on potential future clinically actionable care interventions based on individual genetic phenotypes. RESULTS: Ninety-six participants (median age 53 years, 74% white, 84% men, 89% viral load <50 copies/ml) completed panel testing, yielding 682 clinically relevant pharmacogenomic results (133 major, 549 mild-moderate). Ninety participants (89 on ART) completed follow-up visits with 65 (72%) receiving clinical recommendations based on current medication profiles. Of the 105 clinical recommendations, 70% advised additional monitoring for efficacy or toxicity, and 10% advised alteration of drug therapy. Panel results offered explanation for prior ART inefficacy in one participant and ART intolerance in 29%. Genetic explanation for non-ART toxicity was seen in 21% of participants, with genetic contributors to inefficacy of non-ART therapy identified in 39% of participants. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data in a small cohort of PWH demonstrates benefit of routine pharmacogenomic panel testing.

Cabotegravir: a novel HIV integrase inhibitor combined with rilpivirine as the first long-acting injectable program for the treatment of HIV infection.

Cabotegravir, a novel HIV integrase inhibitor, shares structural similarity with dolutegravir and bictegravir. Its oral half-life is 32 hours, but cabotegravir nanosuspension for intramuscular injection yields half-lives ranging from 25 to 54 days, enabling extended interval dosing. Drug interactions are minimal, although oral doses require spacing from polyvalent cations, and potent uridine glucuronosyltransferase induction (e.g., rifampin, carbamazepine) requires avoidance due to anticipated subtherapeutic cabotegravir exposure through extended intervals. Randomized clinical trials combined cabotegravir treatment with rilpivirine to demonstrate treatment efficacy in patients living with HIV who had attained virologic suppression, lacked known/suspected mutations to either component, and had not experienced prior HIV treatment failure. Together, oral cabotegravir and rilpivirine maintained viral suppression in the LATTE study while the combination, given intramuscularly, performed comparably to conventional oral therapy in LATTE-2. FLAIR and ATLAS, respectively, demonstrated HIV suppression maintenance for monthly injections in treatment-naive participants and treatment-experienced patients, with ATLAS-2M supporting the efficacy of injections given every 2 months. Investigations to date show an excellent safety profile. Injectable cabotegravir causes short-lived, mild injection site reactions (primarily administration site pain/soreness) that decrease in frequency over time, produce attributable discontinuation rates of at least 2%, and generate satisfaction scores that favor injectable therapy over oral therapy. Virologic failure with resistance development is rare, primarily occurs in the first year of therapy, and is associated with baseline proviral DNA mutations to coadministered rilpivirine. A key component of the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved injectable maintenance treatment program for HIV, injectable cabotegravir heralds a new era in HIV treatment innovation. Here we provide a detailed review of the clinical pharmacology, administration and available formulations of the novel HIV integrase inhibitor cabotegravir with in-depth analysis of the clinical trial data, safety, satisfaction and viral resistance development when combined with rilpivirine as the first long-acting injectable program for the treatment of HIV infection.

Hepatotoxicity of contemporary antiretroviral drugs.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To date, more than 30 antiretroviral drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of HIV infection. As new drugs with better efficacy and safety profile become available for clinical practice, older drugs are either withdrawn from the market or become no longer actively prescribed. We review hepatotoxicity associated with contemporary antiretroviral drugs, with emphasis on data from the past 3 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Although less robust data exists for side effects of contemporary antiretroviral medications recently approved for the management of HIV (i.e., doravirine, ibalizumab, fostemsavir, cabotegravir), the risks of substantial hepatotoxicity appears to be minimal with these agents. SUMMARY: Although newer antiretroviral drugs are better tolerated than their earlier counterparts, they are not completely devoid of adverse drug reactions, including hepatotoxicity. Monitoring patients on antiretroviral therapy for treatment-emergent liver injury should continue to be part of routine clinical care.

Hepatotoxicity of Contemporary Antiretroviral Drugs: A Review and Evaluation of Published Clinical Data.

Contemporary antiretroviral agents afford enhanced potency and safety for patients living with HIV. Newer antiretroviral drugs are often better tolerated than those initially approved in the early stages of the HIV epidemic. While the safety profile has improved, adverse drug reactions still occur. We have segregated the antiretroviral agents used in contemporary practice into class groupings based on their mechanism of antiviral activity (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, integrase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and entry inhibitors) while providing a review and discussion of the hepatoxicity seen in the most relevant clinical literature published to date. Clinical literature for individual agents is discussed and agent comparisons afforded within each group in tabular format. Our review will provide a summative overview of the incidence and medications associated with hepatic adverse reactions linked to the use of contemporary antiretroviral drugs.

Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease.

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is a collective name given to a group of more than 190 species of Mycobacterium. The clinical presentation for most NTM infections is non-specific, often resulting in delayed diagnosis. Further complicating matters is that NTM organisms can be difficult to isolate. Medications used to treat NTM infection can be difficult for patients to tolerate, and prolonged courses of anti-mycobacterial therapy are often required for adequate suppression or eradication. Herein, we review different NTM syndromes, appropriate diagnostic tests, and treatment regimens.

Unexpected Vancomycin Pharmacokinetic Profile Secondary to Macromolecular Complexing: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing and monitoring of vancomycin has been largely debated for decades, with key guideline changes for recommended monitoring in 2009 and 2020. Current and past practices for pharmacokinetic dose optimization use serum drug assays to guide dose adjustment to effectively balance efficacy and the risks of toxicity. These assays detect both bound and unbound serum concentrations. Vancomycin is believed to be 50%-55% protein bound in most cases; however, some variability in this parameter has been previously published. The authors report 2 cases of abnormal vancomycin pharmacokinetics discovered based on unexpected serum levels during routine clinical care. METHODS: Unexpected vancomycin levels, observed during clinical care for 2 separate patients, were further evaluated to determine the source of the abnormal pharmacokinetics. In case 1, serial dilution was performed to assure that assay interference was not associated with the significant elevation (>100 mg/L). In both cases, samples were filtered using a Millipore Centrifree 30 KDa centrifugal filter to separate bound vancomycin, with a Protein G spin kit used to bind IgG and remove IgG complexes from the patient sample. In case 2, a polyethylene glycol precipitation was also performed to precipitate large-molecular-weight complexes. RESULTS: In both cases, laboratory analysis revealed abnormal vancomycin protein-binding profiles with macromolecular complex formation. Immunoglobulin G played a role in the macrocomplex in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of unusual or unexpected vancomycin pharmacokinetics in the absence of renal dysfunction, an abnormal protein-binding profile should be considered. Bound vancomycin may yield elevated serum levels, leading to poorly informed dose adjustments and risk for treatment failure. Given implications for therapeutic drug monitoring and unknown impacts on efficacy and toxicity, further investigations into population incidence and risk factors for abnormal protein binding of vancomycin are warranted.

Implementation of a pharmacogenomics education program for pharmacists.

PURPOSE: The development, implementation, and evaluation of a pharmacogenomics education program for pharmacists in a large, integrated multicampus health system are described. SUMMARY: Pharmacogenomics has been described as tailoring medications to each patient's unique genetic sequence with the goals of minimizing harmful effects and optimizing therapeutic effects. Pharmacists are uniquely trained to lead the implementation of pharmacogenomics in clinical care. After assessment of pharmacists' comfort with pharmacogenomics, different approaches were explored to develop, pilot test, and disseminate pharmacogenomics education across a multicampus academic medical center. Limited success with large-audience, single-lecture didactic education led to development and delivery of targeted, competency-based online modules using the institution's academic virtual learning environment and course management system. Implementation steps included (1) collaboration with the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine to create an interprofessional development team and project charter, (2) galvanizing pharmacy leadership support across multiple campuses, (3) development of competency-based interactive modules, and (4) assessment of the quality of and learner satisfaction with the modules. Significant improvements in competency scores were observed with each module and across the multiple campuses. Satisfaction with the education program was assessed at the end of a 4-module series. CONCLUSION: A pharmacogenomics educational program targeting pharmacists was developed through interprofessional collaboration and provided a novel opportunity to construct an educational infrastructure to support enterprise health-system campuses with limited educational resources.

Management of HIV/AIDS in older patients-drug/drug interactions and adherence to antiretroviral therapy.

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are living longer with their disease, as HIV has become a chronic illness managed with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). This has led to an increasing number of patients greater than 50 years old living successfully with HIV. As the number of older adults with HIV has increased, there are special considerations for the management of HIV. Older adults with HIV must be monitored for drug side effects and toxicities. Their other non-HIV comorbidities should also be considered when choosing a cART regimen. Older adults with HIV have unique issues related to medication compliance. They are more likely than the younger HIV patients to have vision loss, cognitive impairment, and polypharmacy. They may have lower expectations of their overall health status. Depression and financial concerns, especially if they are on a fixed income, may also contribute to noncompliance in the aging HIV population.

Effect of combined fluoroquinolone and azole use on QT prolongation in hematology patients.

QTc prolongation is a risk factor for development of torsades de pointes (TdP). Combination therapy with fluoroquinolones and azoles is used in patients with hematologic malignancies for prophylaxis and treatment of infection. Both drug classes are implicated as risk factors for QTc prolongation. The cumulative effect on and incidence of QTc prolongation for this combination have not been previously described. A retrospective chart review was performed with hospitalized inpatients from 1 September 2008 to 31 January 2010 comparing QTc interval data from electrocardiogram (ECG) assessment at baseline and after the initiation of combination therapy. Ninety-four patients were eligible for inclusion. The majority, 88 patients (93.6%), received quinolone therapy with levofloxacin. Fifty-three patients (56.4%) received voriconazole; 40 (42.6%) received fluconazole. The overall mean QTc change from baseline was 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 11.9) ms. Twenty-one (22.3%) of the studied patients had clinically significant changes in the QTc while receiving combination fluoroquinolone-azole therapy. Statistically significant risk factors for clinically significant changes in QTc were hypokalemia (P = 0.03) and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of <55% (P = 0.02). Low magnesium (P = 0.11), exposure to 2 or more drugs with the potential to prolong the QTc interval (P = 0.17), and female sex (P = 0.21) trended toward significance. Combination therapy with fluoroquinolone and azole antifungals is associated with increased QTc from baseline in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies. One in five patients had a clinically significant change in the QTc, warranting close monitoring and risk factor modification to prevent the possibility of further QTc prolongation and risk of TdP.