RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a marker of immune-nutrition balance, has predictive value for the survival and prognosis of patients with various cancers. AIM: To explore the clinical significance of the preoperative PNI on the prognosis of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: The data concerning 233 patients diagnosed with ACs were extracted and analyzed at our institution from January 1998 to December 2020. All patients were categorized into low and high PNI groups based on the cutoff value determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between these groups and assessed prognostic factors through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value for the PNI was established at 45.3. Patients with a PNI ≥ 45.3 were categorized into the PNI-high group, while those with a PNI < 45.3 were assigned to the PNI-low group. Patients within the PNI-low group tended to be of advanced age and exhibited higher levels of aspartate transaminase and total bilirubin and a lower creatinine level than were those in the PNI-high group. The 5-year OS rates for patients with a PNI ≥ 45.3 and a PNI < 45.3 were 61.8% and 43.4%, respectively, while the 5-year DFS rates were 53.5% and 38.3%, respectively. Patients in the PNI- low group had shorter OS (P = 0.006) and DFS (P = 0.012). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that the PNI, pathological T stage and pathological N stage were found to be independent prognostic factors for both OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: The PNI is a straightforward and valuable marker for predicting long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. The PNI should be incorporated into the standard assessment of patients with AC.
RESUMO
To investigate the safety and efficacy of the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by neoadjuvant consolidation chemotherapy (NCCT) and surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Patients diagnosed as locally advanced GC or Siewert II/III GEJ adenocarcinoma with clinical stage T3-4 and/or N positive were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent NCRT (45 Gy/25 fractions) with concurrent S-1, followed by NCCT (4 to 6 cycles of the SOX regimen) 2 to 4 weeks after NCRT. Gastric cancer radical resection with D2 lymph node dissection was performed 4 to 6 weeks after the total neoadjuvant therapy. The study was conducted from November 2019 to January 2023, enrolling a total of 46 patients. During the NCRT, all patients completed the treatment without dose reduction or delay. During the NCCT, 32 patients (69.6%) completed at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3 or higher adverse events in NCRT (5 cases) were non-hematological. During the course of NCCT, a notable occurrence of hematological toxicities was observed, with grade 3 or higher leukopenia (9.7%) and thrombocytopenia (12.2%) being experienced. A total of 28 patients (60.9%) underwent surgery, achieving R0 resection in all cases. A significant proportion of cases (71.4%) exhibited pathological downstaging to ypT0-2, while 10 patients (35.7%) demonstrated a pathologic complete response (pCR). The total neoadjuvant therapy comprising NCRT followed by NCCT and surgery demonstrates a low severe adverse reactions and promising efficacy, which could be considered as a viable treatment for locally advanced GC or GEJ adenocarcinoma.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT04062058); the full date of first trial registration was 20/08/2019.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Textbook outcomes (TOs) have been used to assess the quality of surgical treatment for many digestive tumours but not ampullary carcinoma (AC). AIM: To discuss the factors associated with achieving a TO and further explore the prognostic value of a TO for AC patients undergoing curative pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Patients who underwent PD at the China National Cancer Center between 1998 and 2020 were identified. A TO was defined by R0 resection, examination of ≥ 12 Lymph nodes, no prolonged hospitalization, no intensive care unit treatment, no postoperative complications, and no 30-day readmission or mortality. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the prognostic value of a TO for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of a TO. The rate of a TO and of each indicator were compared in patients who underwent surgery before and after 2010. RESULTS: Ultimately, only 24.3% of 272 AC patients achieved a TO. A TO was independently associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.443, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.276-0.711, P = 0.001] and RFS (HR: 0.379, 95%CI: 0.228-0.629, P < 0.001) in the Cox regression analysis. Factors independently associated with a TO included a year of surgery between 2010 and 2020 (OR: 4.549, 95%CI: 2.064-10.028, P < 0.001) and N1 stage disease (OR: 2.251, 95%CI: 1.023-4.954, P = 0.044). In addition, the TO rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent surgery after 2010 (P < 0.001) than in those who underwent surgery before 2010. CONCLUSION: Only approximately a quarter (24.3%) of AC patients achieved a TO following PD. A TO was independently related to favourable oncological outcomes in AC and should be considered as an outcome measure for the quality of surgery. Further multicentre research is warranted to better elucidate its impact.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The preoperative total bilirubin-albumin ratio (TBAR) and fibrinogen-albumin ratio (FAR) have been proven to be valuable prognostic factors in various cancers. AIM: To detect the prognostic value of TBAR and FAR in ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: AC patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy in the National Cancer Center of China between 1998 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The prognostic cutoff values of TBAR and FAR were determined through the best survival separation model. Then, a novel prognostic score combining TBAR and FAR was calculated and validated through the logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 188 AC patients were enrolled in the current study. The best cutoff values of TBAR and FAR for predicting overall survival were 1.7943 and 0.1329, respectively. AC patients were divided into a TBAR-low group (score = 0) vs a TBAR-high group (score = 1) and a FAR-low group (score = 0) vs a FAR-high group (score = 1). The total score was calculated as a novel prognostic factor. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a high score was an independent protective factor for recurrence [score = 1 vs score = 0: Odds ratio (OR) = 0.517, P = 0.046; score = 2 vs score = 0 OR = 0.236, P = 0.038]. In addition, multivariable survival analysis also demonstrated that a high score was an independent protective factor in AC patients (score = 2 vs score = 0: Hazard ratio = 0.230, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: A novel prognostic score based on preoperative TBAR and FAR has been demonstrated to have good predictive power in AC patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, more studies with larger samples are needed to validate this conclusion.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effect of perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) on the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma (AC) is still debated. AIM: To explore the impact of PBT on short-term safety and long-term survival in AC patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: A total of 257 patients with AC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1998 and 2020 in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, were retrospectively analyzed. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze survival information. RESULTS: A total of 144 (56%) of 257 patients received PBT. The PBT group and nonperioperative blood transfusion group showed no significant differences in demographics. Patients who received transfusion had a comparable incidence of postoperative complications with patients who did not. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses indicated that transfusion was not an independent predictor of OS or RFS. We performed Kaplan-Meier analysis according to subgroups of T stage, and subgroup analysis indicated that PBT might be associated with worse OS (P < 0.05) but not RFS in AC of stage T1. CONCLUSION: We found that PBT might be associated with decreased OS in early AC, but more validation is needed. The reasonable use of transfusion might be helpful to improve OS.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Both hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) and neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) are rare histological subtypes of gastric cancer with unique clinicopathological features and unfavorable outcomes. HAS with NED is even rarer. CASE SUMMARY: Here, we report a 61-year-old man with HAS with NED, as detected by gastric wall thickening by positron emission tomography/computed tomography for a pulmonary nodule. Distal gastrectomy was performed, and pathological examination led to the diagnosis of HAS with NED. However, liver metastases occurred 6 mo later despite adjuvant chemotherapy, and the patient died 27 mo postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We treated a patient with HAS with NED who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery and still developed liver metastases. We first report the detailed processes of the treatment and development of HAS with NED, providing an important reference for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of this condition.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence shows that pancreatic tumors in different anatomical locations have different characteristics, which have a significant impact on prognosis. However, no study has reported the differences between pancreatic mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMAC) in the head vs the body/tail of the pancreas. AIM: To investigate the differences in survival and clinicopathological characteristics between PMAC in the head and body/tail of pancreas. METHODS: A total of 2058 PMAC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database diagnosed between 1992 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. We divided the patients who met the inclusion criteria into pancreatic head group (PHG) and pancreatic body/tail group (PBTG). The relationship between two groups and risk of invasive factors was identified using logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were conducted to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of two patient groups. RESULTS: In total, 271 PMAC patients were included in the study. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates of these patients were 51.6%, 23.5%, and 13.6%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year CSS rates were 53.2%, 26.2%, and 17.4%, respectively. The median OS of PHG patients was longer than that of PBTG patients (18 vs 7.5 mo, P < 0.001). Compared to PHG patients, PBTG patients had a greater risk of metastases [odds ratio (OR) = 2.747, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.628-4.636, P < 0.001] and higher staging (OR = 3.204, 95% CI: 1.895-5.415, P < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed that age < 65 years, male sex, low grade (G1-G2), low stage, systemic therapy, and PMAC located at the pancreatic head led to longer OS and CSS (all P < 0.05). The location of PMAC was an independent prognostic factor for CSS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.52-0.94, P = 0.017]. Further analysis demonstrated that OS and CSS of PHG were significantly better than PBTG in advanced stage (stage III-IV). CONCLUSION: Compared to the pancreatic body/tail, PMAC located in the pancreatic head has better survival and favorable clinicopathological characteristics.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (D-NETs) are uncommon. The surgical treatment for D-NETs was in debate. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a promising approach for treating gastrointestinal tumors. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LECS for D-NETs. Meanwhile, the authors described the details of the LECS technique. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with D-NETs underwent LECS between September 2018 and April 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The endoscopic procedures were performed with endoscopic full-thickness resection. The defect was manually closed under the surveillance of the laparoscopy. RESULTS: A total of seven patients were enrolled, including three men and four women. The median age was 58 years (ranging from 39-65). Four tumors were located in the bulb and three in the second portion. All cases were diagnosed as NET with grade G1. The tumor depth was pT1 in two cases and pT2 in five cases. The median specimen size and the tumor size were 22 mm (ranging from 10-30) and 8.0 mm (ranging from 2.3-13.0), respectively. En-bloc resection and curative resection rates are 100 and 85.7%, respectively. There were no severe complications. Until 1 June 2022, there was no recurrence. The median follow-up was 9.5 months (range, 1.4-45.1). CONCLUSIONS: LECS with endoscopic full-thickness resection is a reliable surgical procedure. The minimally invasive advantages of LECS enable more individualized treatment options for a specific group. Limited by the length of observation, the long-term performance of LECS for D-NETs requires additional investigation.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Duodenais , Laparoscopia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Duodenais/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in the growth and expansion of gastric cancer (GC). Studies have identified that CD93 is involved in abnormal tumor angiogenesis, which may be related to the regulation of the TME. AIM: To determine the role of CD93 in GC. METHODS: Transcriptomic data of GC was investigated in a cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Additionally, RNA-seq data sets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE118916, GSE52138, GSE79973, GSE19826, and GSE84433) were applied to validate the results. We performed the immune infiltration analyses using ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and ssGSEA. Furthermore, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted to identify the immune-related genes. RESULTS: Compared to normal tissues, CD93 significantly enriched in tumor tissues (t = 4.669, 95%CI: 0.342-0.863, P < 0.001). Higher expression of CD93 was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.62, 95%CI: 1.09-2.4, P = 0.017), less proportion of CD8 T and activated natural killer cells in the TME (P < 0.05), and lower tumor mutation burden (t = 4.131, 95%CI: 0.721-0.256, P < 0.001). Genes co-expressed with CD93 were mainly enriched in angiogenesis. Moreover, 11 genes were identified with a strong relationship between CD93 and the immune microenvironment using WGCNA. CONCLUSION: CD93 is a novel prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for GC, that is closely related to the immune infiltration in the TME. Although this retrospective study was a comprehensive analysis, the prospective cohort studies are preferred to further confirm these conclusions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) is a rare histological subtype of gastric cancer, which is categorized into small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. It is characterized by strong invasiveness and poor prognosis. Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (L/SCNEC) is an extremely rare pathological type of gastric cancer, and there have been no reports on this situation until now. CASE SUMMARY: Herein, we first present a 57-year-old patient diagnosed with L/SCNEC of the stomach. A 57-year-old Chinese male presented with epigastric discomfort. Outpatient gastroscopic biopsy was performed, and pathological examination revealed that the cardia was invaded by adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical proximal subtotal gastrectomy and was diagnosed with L/SCNEC. He refused adjuvant treatment and was followed up every 3 mo. Eight months after the operation, the patient showed no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: We advocate conducting further genomic studies to explore the origin of gastric large cell and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and using different chemotherapy schemes according to large or small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach for clinical research to clarify the heterogeneity of GNEC and improve the prognosis of patients with GNEC.
RESUMO
Objective: We evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) in a single-center randomized phase II trial. Methods: Patients with LAGC were enrolled and received either NACT or NACRT, followed by gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was an R0 resection rate. Results: We enrolled 75 patients: 75.7% (NACT, 28/37 patients) and 76.3% (NACRT, 29/38 patients) underwent surgery; R0 resection rates were 73.0% (27/37) and 73.7% (28/38), respectively. The NACRT group had significantly better major pathological response than the NACT group (37.9% vs 17.9%, p = 0.019). Between-group postoperative complications were not significantly different. The median follow-up was 59.6 months; 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 50.1% (NACT) and 61.9% (NACRT); neither group reached the median OS; median progression-free survival was 37.3 and 63.4 months, respectively. Conclusions: S-1-based NACRT did not improve the R0 resection rate, although it presented better tumor regression with similar safety to NACT. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02301481.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) with oral capecitabine and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were well tolerated in a phase I study in patients who had undergone partial or total gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). This phase II study aimed to further determine the efficacy and toxicity of this combination after radical resection and D1/D2 lymph node dissection (LND) for patients with locally advanced GC. AIM: To further determine the efficacy and toxicity of this combination after radical resection and D1/D2 LND for patients with locally advanced GC. METHODS: Forty patients (median age, 53 years; range, 24-71 years) with pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who underwent D1/D2 LND were included in this study. The patients received ACRT comprising IMRT (total irradiation dose: 45 Gy delivered in daily 1.8-Gy fractions on 5 d a week over 5 wk) and capecitabine chemotherapy (dose: 800 mg/m² twice daily throughout the duration of radiotherapy). The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxic effects, and treatment compliance. RESULTS: The 3-year DFS and OS were 66.2% and 75%, respectively. The median time to recurrence was 19.5 mo (range, 6.1-68 mo). Peritoneal implantation (n = 10) was the most common recurrence pattern, and the lung was the most common site of extra-abdominal metastases (n = 5). Nine patients developed grade 3 or 4 toxicities during ACRT. Two patients discontinued ACRT, while eleven underwent ACRT without receiving the entire course of capecitabine. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The ACRT protocol described herein showed acceptable safety and efficacy for patients with locally advanced GC who received radical gastrectomy and D1/2 LND.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the related factors of pathological complete response(pCR)of patients with gastric cancer treated by neoadjuvant therapy and resection,and to analyze the risk factors of prognosis. Methods The clinical and pathological data of 490 patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical gastrectomy from January to December in 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors affecting pCR and prognosis. Results Among the 490 patients,41 achieved pCR,and the overall pCR rate was 8.3%(41/490).The pCR rate was 16.0% in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group and 6.4% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group.The results of multivariate analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemoradiation(OR=4.401,95% CI=2.023-9.574,P<0.001)and preoperative therapeutic response as partial response(OR=40.492,95% CI=5.366-305.572,P<0.001)were independent predictors of pCR after neoadjuvant therapy.Multivariate analysis of prognosis showed that poorly differentiated tumor(HR=1.809,95% CI=1.104-2.964,P=0.019),gastric cardia-fundus-body tumor(HR=2.025,95% CI=1.497-2.739,P<0.001),≤15 intraoperative dissected lymph nodes(HR=1.482,95% CI=1.059-2.073,P=0.022),and postoperative complications(HR=1.625,95% CI=1.156-2.285,P=0.005)were independent risk factors for prognosis,while pCR(HR=0.153,95% CI=0.048-0.484,P=0.001)and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy(HR=0.589,95% CI=0.421-0.823,P<0.001)were independent protective factors of prognosis. Conclusions Patients who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer might have promising long-term survival,and pCR is an independent predictor for overall survival.Compared with chemotherapy alone,preoperative chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve the pCR rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality across the globe, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 40%. In recent years, several applications of artificial intelligence (AI) have emerged in the gastric cancer field based on its efficient computational power and learning capacities, such as image-based diagnosis and prognosis prediction. AI-assisted diagnosis includes pathology, endoscopy, and computerized tomography, while researchers in the prognosis circle focus on recurrence, metastasis, and survival prediction. In this review, a comprehensive literature search was performed on articles published up to April 2020 from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Thereby the current status of AI-applications was systematically summarized in gastric cancer. Moreover, future directions that target this field were also analyzed to overcome the risk of overfitting AI models and enhance their accuracy as well as the applicability in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Neoplasias Gástricas , Previsões , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle factors such as body mass index (BMI), alcohol drinking, and cigarette smoking, are likely to impact the prognosis of gastric cancer, but the evidence has been inconsistent. AIM: To investigate the association of lifestyle factors and long-term prognosis of gastric cancer patients in the China National Cancer Center. METHODS: Patients with gastric cancer were identified from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer Database 1998-2018. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: In this study, we reviewed 18441 cases of gastric cancer. Individuals who were overweight or obese were associated with a positive smoking and drinking history (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Current smokers were more likely to be current alcohol drinkers (61.3% vs 10.1% vs 43.2% for current, never, and former smokers, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariable results indicated that BMI at diagnosis had no significant effect on prognosis. In gastrectomy patients, factors independently associated with poor survival included older age (HR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.05-1.38, P = 0.001), any weight loss (P < 0.001), smoking history of more than 30 years (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.04-1.24, P = 0.004), and increasing pTNM stage (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results contribute to a better understanding of lifestyle factors on the overall burden of gastric cancer and long-term prognosis. In these patients, weight loss (both in the 0 to 10% and > 10% groups) but not BMI at diagnosis was related to survival outcomes. With regard to other factors, smoking history of more than 30 years conferred a worse prognosis only in patients who underwent gastrectomy. Extensive efforts are needed to elucidate mechanisms targeting the complex effects of lifestyle factors.
Assuntos
Estilo de Vida , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Redução de PesoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The necessity of additional gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC) patients who do not meet curative criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is controversial. AIM: To examine the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients who underwent additional laparoscopic gastrectomy after ESD and to determine the appropriate strategy for treating those after noncurative ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 45 patients with EGC who underwent additional laparoscopic gastrectomy after noncurative ESD from January 2013 to January 2019 at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We analyzed the patients' clinicopathological data and identified the predictors of residual cancer (RC) and lymph node metastasis (LNM). RESULTS: Surgical specimens showed RC in ten (22.2%) patients and LNM in five (11.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive horizontal margin [odds ratio (OR) = 13.393, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.435-125, P = 0.023] and neural invasion (OR = 14.714, 95%CI: 1.087-199, P = 0.043) were independent risk factors for RC. Undifferentiated type was an independent risk factor for LNM (OR = 12.000, 95%CI: 1.197-120, P = 0.035). Tumors in all patients with LNM showed submucosal invasion more than 500 µm. Postoperative complications after additional laparoscopic gastrectomy occurred in five (11.1%) patients, and no deaths occurred among patients with complications. CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy is necessary not only for patients who have a positive margin after ESD, but also for cases with neural invasion, undifferentiated type, and submucosal invasion more than 500 µm. Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a safe, minimally invasive, and feasible procedure for additional surgery after noncurative ESD. However, further studies are needed to apply these results to clinical practice.
Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Idoso , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/estatística & dados numéricos , Endossonografia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Metástase Linfática/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Neoplasia Residual , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients with a neuroendocrine (NE) component are frequently observed in routine practice. Several previous studies have investigated the influence of a NE component on the survival of these patients; however, the results were inconsistent. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated a consecutive series of 95 gastric adenocarcinoma patients with a NE component and 190 gastric adenocarcinoma patients without a NE component. We adopted 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% as the cut-off proportions of the NE component, respectively, and analyzed the patients' overall survival according to the proportion of the NE component. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actual survival rates of the patients with a NE component were 90.1%, 72.3%, and 67.2%, respectively, and for those without a NE component 94.2%, 79.3%, and 75.7%, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the patients with NE components >70% (HR: 2.156; 95% CI: 1.011, 4.597; p=0.047) and >90% (HR: 2.476; 95% CI: 1.088, 5.634; p=0.031) had significantly worse survival than those without a NE component. Only the diameter of tumors (>4.64 cm) (HR: 2.585; 95% CI: 1.112, 6.006; p=0.027) and pN3 (HR: 2.953; 95% CI: 1.051, 8.293; p=0.040) were independently associated with worse overall survival for gastric adenocarcinoma patients with a NE component (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients with a NE component >70% and >90% have significantly worse survival than those without a NE component. Only the diameter of tumors and the number of metastatic lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors for gastric adenocarcinoma patients with a NE component.
RESUMO
AIM: To examine the impact of aging on the short-term outcomes following pancreatic resection (PR) in elderly patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data was conducted at the China National Cancer Center. Consecutive patients who underwent PR from January 2004 to December 2015 were identified and included. 'Elderly patient' was defined as ones age 65 and above. Comorbidities, clinicopathology, perioperative variables, and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between the elderly and young patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model for severe postoperative complications (grades IIIb-V). RESULTS: A total of 454 (63.4%) patients were < 65-years-old and 273 (36.6%) patients were ≥ 65-years-old, respectively. Compared to patients < 65-years-old, elderly patients had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (P = 0.007) and more comorbidities (62.6% vs 32.4%, P < 0.001). Elderly patients had more severe postoperative complications (16.8% vs 9.0%, P = 0.002) and higher postoperative mortality rates (5.5% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model for severe postoperative complications, age ≥ 65 years [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-6.30], body mass index ≥ 24 kg/m2 (HR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.07-5.89), pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR = 4.86, 95%CI: 1.20-8.31) and length of operation ≥ 241 min (HR = 2.97; 95%CI: 1.04-6.14) were significant (P = 0.010, P = 0.041, P = 0.017 and P = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION: We found that aging is an independent risk factor for severe postoperative complications after PR. Our results might contribute to more informed decision-making for elderly patients.
Assuntos
Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , China/epidemiologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the association of body mass index (BMI) with the overall survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PDAC patients diagnosed in the National Cancer Center of China between January 1999 and December 2014 was performed. These patients were categorized into four BMI groups (< 18.5, 18.5-22.9, 23-27.4 and ≥ 27.5 kg/m2). χ2 tests for comparison of the proportions of categorical variables, and Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables were employed. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meyer method. Their HRs of mortality and 95%CIs were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: With a median age of 59.6 years (range: 22.5-84.6 years), in total 1783 PDAC patients were enrolled in this study. Their mean usual BMI was 24.19 ± 3.53 for the whole cohort. More than half of the patients (59.3%) experienced weight loss during the disease onset and progression. Compared with healthy-weight individuals, newly diagnosed patients who were overweight or obese had more severe weight loss during their disease onset and progression (P < 0.001). Individuals who were overweight or obese were associated with positive smoking history (P < 0.001). A significant difference in comorbidity of diabetes (P = 0.044) and coronary artery disease (P < 0.001) was identified between high BMI and normal-weight patients. After a median follow-up of 8 mo, the survival analysis showed no association between BMI and the overall survival (P = 0.90, n = 1783). When we stratified the whole cohort by pancreatic cancer stage, no statistically significant association between BMI and overall survival was found for resectable (P = 0.99, n = 217), unresectable locally advanced (P = 0.90, n = 316) and metastatic patients (P = 0.88, n = 1250), respectively. The results did not change when we used the BMI at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significance of BMI for the overall survival of PDAC patients.
Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , China/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Magreza/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lymph node status is crucial to determining treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). We aim to establish a nomogram to predict the possibility of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC patients. METHODS: Medical records of 952 EGC patients with curative resection, from 2002 to 2014, were retrospectively retrieved. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to examine risk factors associated with LNM. A nomogram for predicting LNM was established and internally validated. RESULTS: Five variables significantly associated with LNM were included in our model, these are sex (Odd ratio [OR] = 1.961, 95% confidence index [CI], 1.334 to 2.883; P = 0.001), depth of tumor (OR = 2.875, 95% CI, 1.872 to 4.414; P = 0.000), tumor size (OR = 1.986, 95% CI, 1.265 to 3.118; P = 0.003), histology type (OR = 2.926, 95% CI, 1.854 to 4.617; P = 0.000) and lymphovascular invasion (OR = 4.967, 95% CI, 2.996 to 8.235; P = 0.000). The discrimination of the prediction model was 0.786. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer was successfully established, which was superior to the absolute endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) indication in terms of the clinical performance.