Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 114: 17-24, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37276741

RESUMO

Patients with Parkinson's Disease presented gait impairment. Applying additional weights to enhancing sensory input may improve gait impairment. We assumed that gait impairment could be improved when patients walked with additional forearm weights, and the gait improvement was associated with clinical characteristic of Parkinson's Disease. Thirty patients with Parkinson's Disease and 30 age-sex matched controls were recruited. Spatiotemporal and joint kinematics parameters were evaluated by a three-dimensional motion capture system in normal walking and walking with sandbags, respectively. The comparisons of spatiotemporal parameters were analyzed using t-test or nonparametric tests. The comparison of joint kinematic data was analyzed using statistical parametric mapping. The correlation between motor symptom and gait parameters changes was analyzed using Pearson's correlation analysis. During normal walking, patients showed deteriorated gait compared with controls. After applying weights to forearms patients increased cadence (p = 0.004), speed (p < 0.001) and step length (p = 0.048), and decreased stride time (p = 0.003). The hip angles significantly increased during 5%-23% and 87%-100% of gait cycle, while knee angles during 9%-25% and 88%-98% of the gait cycle, and ankle angles in 92%-100% of gait cycle. The gait parameters of patients with forearm-loading showed no significant difference compared with healthy subjects walking normally. The change of gait parameters correlated positively with the axial and tremor severity while correlated negatively with the rigidity sub-score. Patients with tremor dominant subtype also showed greater improvement of speed and step time compared with patients with postural instability/gait difficulty subtype. Applying added weights bilaterally to the forearms of patients can normalize gait patterns. Notably, patients with higher scores on axial and tremor and lower rigidity scores gained more benefits.


Assuntos
Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Antebraço , Tremor/complicações , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/complicações , Marcha , Caminhada , Fenômenos Biomecânicos
2.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 15: 621977, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33828470

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Efficient methods for assessing walking adaptability in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) are urgently needed. Therefore, this study aimed to assess C-Gait for detecting freezing of gait (FOG) in patients with early- to middle-stage PD. METHOD: People with PD (PWP) diagnosis (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3) were recruited from April 2019 to November 2019 in Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital. The participants performed six items of walking adaptability on an instrumented treadmill augmented with visual targets and obstacles (C-Mill). The patient's walking adaptability was evaluated by C-Gait assessment and traditional walking tests, and FOG-related indexes were collected as outcome measures. Two discriminant models were established by stepwise discriminant analysis; area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to validate the models. RESULT: In total, 53 patients were included in this study. Most C-Gait assessment items had no or low correlations with traditional walking tests. The obstacle avoidance (r = -0.639, P = 0.003) and speed of adaptation (r = -0.486, P = 0.035) items could lead to FOG with high sensitivity. In addition, the C-Gait assessment model (AUC = 0.755) had slightly better discrimination of freezers from non-freezers compared with traditional walking test models (AUC = 0.672); specifically, obstacle avoidance and speed of adaptation have uniquely discriminant potential. CONCLUSION: C-gait assessment could provide additional value to the traditional walking tests for PD. Gait adaptability assessment, as measured by C-Gait, may be able to help identify freezers in a PD population.

3.
Neural Regen Res ; 16(7): 1336-1343, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33318414

RESUMO

Parkinson's disease (PD) can be classified into three motor-based subtypes: postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD), tremor dominant (TD), and indeterminate. The neuropathophysiological mechanisms of the three motor subtypes are different, which may lead to different responses to therapy. Sixty-nine patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≤ 3) were screened from 436 patients with Parkinsonism recruited through outpatient services and the internet. According to the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) TD/PIGD ratio, the patients were divided into PIGD (TD/PIGD ≤ 0.09; n = 36), TD (TD/PIGD ≥1.15; n = 19), and indeterminate (TD/PIGD = 0.90-1.15; n = 14) groups. All patients received 2 weeks of multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment (MIRT) during hospitalization, as well as a remote home rehabilitation health education class. Compared with the scores at admission, all patients showed significant improvements in their MDS-UPDRS III score, walking ability, balance, and posture control at discharge. Moreover, the MDS-UPDRS III score improvement was greater in the PIGD group than in the TD group. The follow-up data, collected for 3 months after discharge, showed that overall symptom improvement in each group was maintained for 1-3 months. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the duration or grade effects of symptom improvement among the three groups. These findings suggest that 2 weeks of MIRT is effective for improving motor performance in all three motor subtypes. Patients in the PIGD group had a better response after hospitalization than those in the TD group. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital of Capital Medical University of China (approval No. 2018bkky022) on May 7, 2018 and registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR1900020771) on January 19, 2019.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA