Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Open Vet J ; 14(5): 1098-1102, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938427

RESUMO

Background: Young farm animals are susceptible to opportunistic infections which may cause economic losses due to mortality and poor weight gain. The development of antimicrobial resistance and the desire to improve therapy efficacy and safety are the reasons to seek for new antibacterial drugs ensuring rapid recovery with minimum adverse events. Aim: To estimate the efficacy of DOKSI AVZ 500 in respiratory pathologies in young pigs. Methods: The study was conducted in 65-70-day-old Yorkshire piglets with signs of bacterial respiratory pathologies. The animals were treated with the test drug for 3 or 5 days. The reference group received TETRAMAX 500 which is similar to the test drug in terms of chemical structure, mechanism of action, and activity spectrum. The animal's status was assessed using clinical examination, clinical blood count, and bacteriological tests. Results: Both test and reference drugs were well tolerated and ensured the animal recovery within about 4 days. The recovery was accompanied by normalization of hematological parameters and flora composition. The bacterium associated with the disease development, Streptococcus suis, was virtually completely eliminated in all groups. No adverse events were noted. After the treatment, all the animals readily gained weight and live market quality. Conclusion: DOKSI AVZ 500 was a highly efficient therapy for respiratory pathologies caused by the resident opportunistic flora in piglets. It has also shown noninferiority vs. TETRAMAX 500 in terms of all the health-related parameters and thus can be recommended for introduction in veterinary practice in pig farms.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Doenças dos Suínos , Animais , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças dos Suínos/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Respiratórias/veterinária , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Tilosina/análogos & derivados
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(1): 1959148, 2022 01 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34435933

RESUMO

In Russia, a universal varicella vaccination (UVV) program has not been implemented, and varicella vaccination coverage is low. We assessed the efficacy, antibody persistence, and safety of one- and two-dose varicella vaccination schedules in Russian children with a ten-year follow-up period, as part of an international phase IIIB, observer-blind, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00226499). Children aged 12-22 months were randomized (3:3:1) to receive two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (V2 group), one dose trivalent measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and one dose of varicella vaccine (V1 group), or two doses of MMR vaccine (V0 [control] group), 42 days apart. Main study outcomes were: vaccine efficacy (VE) against confirmed varicella cases, anti-varicella zoster virus (VZV) seropositivity rates and geometric mean concentrations, and reporting of (serious) adverse events ([S]AEs). The total vaccinated cohort in Russia comprised 1000 children; 900 were followed up until study end (year [Y] 10). VE estimates against confirmed varicella (Y10) were 92.4% in the V2 group and 74.7% in the V1 group. Anti-VZV seropositivity rates remained ≥99.4% in the V2 group and ≥89.7% in the V1 group from day 42 post-vaccination 2 until Y10. Occurrence of (un)solicited AEs and SAEs was similar across groups and confirmed the safety profile of the vaccines. No vaccination-related SAEs or deaths were reported. These results are consistent with the global trial results, i.e., the highest VE estimates observed following the two-dose schedule compared to the one-dose schedule. These data may inform decision-making related to potential implementation of a UVV program.


What is the context?Varicella is a common childhood disease caused by the highly contagious varicella zoster virus.Varicella vaccines have been used for more than three decades.A large clinical trial conducted in ten countries assessed the efficacy and safety of one dose of monovalent varicella vaccine or two doses of combined varicella vaccine (MMRV). The enrolled children were also followed up for a ten-year period to evaluate the persistence of the immune response and the long-term efficacy of the vaccine.What is new?Here, we present the long-term efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety results in the cohort of children enrolled in Russia, as part of the global ten-year follow-up study. We found that:The monovalent and combined vaccines reduced the number of varicella cases.The MMRV two-dose regimen displayed higher efficacy in preventing varicella of all severities compared to the one-dose regimen.The immune response conferred by the vaccine persisted up to ten years post-vaccination.No vaccination-related deaths occurred, and no safety concerns were raised.What is the impact?Vaccination against varicella resulted in long-term protective efficacy and antibody persistence over ten years post-vaccination in Russian children.Although one-dose varicella vaccination was effective at protecting against varicella, a two-dose schedule provided a more complete protection. This could inform health policy decisions regarding the implementation of varicella vaccination in routine immunization program in Russia.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster , Vacinação , Criança , Seguimentos , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA