Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta­analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Few studies have thoroughly assessed the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate this association. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases were searched until April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of VDZ in the treatment of IBD were included. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for each outcome using a random effects model. A total of 12 RCTs, including 4,865 patients, met the inclusion criteria. In the induction phase, VDZ was more effective than placebo for patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD) in clinical remission (RR=2.09; 95% CI=1.66-2.62) and clinical response (RR=1.54; 95% CI=1.34-1.78). In the maintenance therapy group, VDZ reached higher clinical remission (RR=1.98; 95% CI=1.58-2.49) and clinical response (RR=1.78; 95% CI=1.40-2.26) rates compared with the placebo group. VDZ particularly improved clinical remission (RR=2.07; 95% CI=1.48-2.89) and clinical response (RR=1.84; 95% CI=1.54-2.21) in patients with TNF antagonist failure. In terms of corticosteroid-free remission, VDZ was also more effective than placebo in patients with IBD (RR=1.98; 95% CI=1.51-2.59). In Crohn's patients, VDZ was more effective than placebo in terms of mucosal healing (RR=1.78; 95% CI=1.27-2.51). With respect to adverse events, VDZ significantly reduced the risk of IBD exacerbation compared with the placebo (RR=0.60; 95% CI=0.39-0.93; P=0.023). However, when compared with the placebo, VDZ increased the risk of nasopharyngitis in patients with CD (RR=1.77; 95% CI=1.01-3.10; P=0.045). No significant differences in other adverse events were observed. Although there might be underlying risk, such as selection bias, in the present study it can be safely concluded that VDZ is a safe and effective biological agent for IBD, particularly for patients with TNF antagonist failure.

Vitamin D intake as well as circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and risk for the incidence and recurrence of colorectal cancer precursors: A meta-analysis.

Objective: Vitamin D consumption and circulating 25(OH)D level are associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal adenoma (CRA), but few studies have assessed their relationship with the incidence and recurrence of CRC precursors. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to further evaluate the association. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase databases in English until August 2021. Studies evaluating the association of vitamin D intake and circulating 25(OH)D level with risk of CRC precursors were included. A random-effects model was used to pool the risk estimates. Results: A total of 48 studies were selected for inclusion. The CRC precursors incidence was negatively correlated with total vitamin D intake (RR = 0.84 95%CI: 0.80-0.88) and circulating 25(OH)D level (RR = 0.79 95%CI: 0.67-0.92). However, vitamin D intake and circulating 25(OH)D level did not show significant effects on the risk of CRC precursors recurrence. For dose-response analysis, evidence of a linear association was found between CRC precursors incidence and circulating 25(OH)D level, and the risk decreased by 14% per 10 ng/ml increment of circulating 25(OH)D level (RR = 0.86 95% CI: 0.75-0.99). Conclusion: Vitamin D intake and circulating 25(OH)D level can play an effective role in reducing the risk of incidence of CRC precursors. However, they have not prevented the recurrence of CRC precursors.