Evaluation of Busulfan as a Third-Party Immunoassay on a Clinical Chemistry Analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens to prepare patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical due to large inter- and intra-individual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics, and the risk of adverse consequences of toxicity including hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Busulfan is most commonly measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which is not as widely available in clinical laboratories as automated routine clinical chemistry analyzers. The objective was to perform analytical verification of a busulfan immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. METHODS: The MyCare Oncology busulfan immunoassay was configured as a third-party reagent on the Abbott Alinity c. Imprecision, linearity, sample carryover, and onboard stability of reagent studies were evaluated. The performance of the busulfan immunoassay using the Abbott Alinity c was compared to the Beckman Coulter AU480 using sodium heparinized plasma, as well as to LC-MS/MS using lithium heparinized plasma. RESULTS: The imprecision goal of 8% was met, and linearity within the analytical measurement range of 240 to 1700 ng/mL was verified. Sample carryover was negligible, and the reagents were stable onboard for at least 84 days. The busulfan immunoassay correlated well with LC-MS/MS (slope = 0.949, y-intercept = -7.8 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9935) and the Beckman Coulter AU480 (slope = 1.090, y-intercept = -34.5 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9988). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated successful analytical verification of a busulfan third-party immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. The ability to perform TDM of busulfan on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer will positively impact turnaround times to improve patient outcomes.

The Alberta Newborn Screening Approach for Sickle Cell Disease: The Advantages of Molecular Testing.

Sickle cell disease (SCD), a group of inherited red blood cell (RBC) disorders caused by pathogenic variants in the beta-globin gene (HBB), can cause lifelong disabilities and/or early mortality. If diagnosed early, preventative measures significantly reduce adverse outcomes related to SCD. In Alberta, Canada, SCD was added to the newborn screening (NBS) panel in April 2019. The primary conditions screened for are sickle cell anemia (HbS/S), HbS/C disease, and HbS/ß thalassemia. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the first 19 months of SCD screening performance, as well as described our approach for screening of infants that have received a red blood cell transfusion prior to collection of NBS specimen. Hemoglobins eluted from dried blood spots were analyzed using the Bio-Rad™ VARIANT nbs analyzer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Targeted sequencing of HBB was performed concurrently in samples from all transfused infants. During the period of this study, 43 of 80,314 screened infants received a positive NBS result for SCD, and of these, 34 were confirmed by diagnostic testing, suggesting a local SCD incidence of 1:2400 births. There were 608 infants with sickle cell trait, resulting in a carrier frequency of 1:130. Over 98% of non-transfused infants received their NBS results within 10 days of age. Most of the 188 transfused infants and 2 infants who received intrauterine transfusions received their final SCD screen results within 21 ± 10 d of birth. Our SCD screening algorithm enables detection of affected newborns on the initial NBS specimen, independent of the reported blood transfusion status.

Biliary excretion of arsenic by human HepaRG cells is stimulated by selenide and mediated by the multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2).

Millions of people worldwide are exposed to unacceptable levels of arsenic, a proven human carcinogen, in drinking water. In animal models, arsenic and selenium are mutually protective through formation and biliary excretion of seleno-bis (S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion [(GS)2AsSe]-. Selenium-deficient humans living in arsenic-endemic regions are at increased risk of arsenic-induced diseases, and may benefit from selenium supplementation. The influence of selenium on human arsenic hepatobiliary transport has not been studied using optimal human models. HepaRG cells, a surrogate for primary human hepatocytes, were used to investigate selenium (selenite, selenide, selenomethionine, and methylselenocysteine) effects on arsenic hepatobiliary transport. Arsenite + selenite and arsenite + selenide at different molar ratios revealed mutual toxicity antagonism, with the latter being higher. Significant levels of arsenic biliary excretion were detected with a biliary excretion index (BEI) of 14 ± 8%, which was stimulated to 32 ± 7% by selenide. Consistent with the formation and biliary efflux of [(GS)2AsSe]-, arsenite increased the BEI of selenide from 0% to 24 ± 5%. Arsenic biliary excretion was lost in the presence of selenite, selenomethionine, and methylselenocysteine. Sinusoidal export of arsenic was stimulated ∼1.6-fold by methylselenocysteine, but unchanged by other selenium forms. Arsenic canalicular and sinusoidal transport (±selenide) was temperature- and GSH-dependent and inhibited by MK571. Knockdown experiments revealed that multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) accounted for all detectable biliary efflux of arsenic (±selenide). Overall, the chemical form of selenium and human MRP2 strongly influenced arsenic hepatobiliary transport, information critical for human selenium supplementation in arsenic-endemic regions.

Human red blood cell uptake and sequestration of arsenite and selenite: Evidence of seleno-bis(S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion formation in human cells.

Over 200 million people worldwide are exposed to the human carcinogen, arsenic, in contaminated drinking water. In laboratory animals, arsenic and the essential trace element, selenium, can undergo mutual detoxification through the formation of the seleno-bis(S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion [(GS)2AsSe]-, which undergoes biliary and fecal elimination. [(GS)2AsSe]-, formed in animal red blood cells (RBCs), sequesters arsenic and selenium, and slows the distribution of both compounds to peripheral tissues susceptible to toxic effects. In human RBCs, the influence of arsenic on selenium accumulation, and vice versa, is largely unknown. The study aims were to characterize arsenite (AsIII) and selenite (SeIV) uptake by human RBCs, to determine if SeIV and AsIII increase the respective accumulation of the other in human RBCs, and ultimately to determine if this occurs through the formation and sequestration of [(GS)2AsSe]-. 75SeIV accumulation was temperature and Cl--dependent, inhibited by 4,4'-diisothiocyanatodihydrostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (H2DIDS) (IC50 1 ± 0.2 µM), and approached saturation at 30 µM, suggesting uptake is mediated by the erythrocyte anion-exchanger 1 (AE1 or Band 3, gene SLC4A1). HEK293 cells overexpressing AE1 showed concentration-dependent 75SeIV uptake. 73AsIII uptake by human RBCs was temperature-dependent, partly reduced by aquaglyceroporin 3 inhibitors, and not saturated. AsIII increased 75SeIV accumulation (in the presence of albumin) and SeIV increased 73AsIII accumulation in human RBCs. Near-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy revealed the formation of [(GS)2AsSe]- in human RBCs exposed to both AsIII and SeIV. The sequestration of [(GS)2AsSe]- in human RBCs potentially slows arsenic distribution to susceptible tissues and could reduce arsenic-induced disease.

Studies of selenium and arsenic mutual protection in human HepG2 cells.

Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are exposed to unacceptable levels of carcinogenic inorganic arsenic. Animal models have shown that selenium and arsenic are mutually protective through the formation and elimination of the seleno-bis(S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion [(GS)2AsSe]-. Consistent with this, human selenium deficiency in arsenic-endemic regions is associated with arsenic-induced disease, leading to the initiation of human selenium supplementation trials. In contrast to the protective effect observed in vivo, in vitro studies have suggested that selenite increases arsenite cellular retention and toxicity. This difference might be explained by the rapid conversion of selenite to selenide in vivo. In the current study, selenite did not protect the human hepatoma (HepG2) cell line against the toxicity of arsenite at equimolar concentrations, however selenide increased the IC50 by 2.3-fold. Cytotoxicity assays of arsenite + selenite and arsenite + selenide at different molar ratios revealed higher overall mutual antagonism of arsenite + selenide toxicity than arsenite + selenite. Despite this protective effect, in comparison to 75Se-selenite, HepG2 cells in suspension were at least 3-fold more efficient at accumulating selenium from reduced 75Se-selenide, and its accumulation was further increased by arsenite. X-ray fluorescence imaging of HepG2 cells also showed that arsenic accumulation, in the presence of selenide, was higher than in the presence of selenite. These results are consistent with a greater intracellular availability of selenide relative to selenite for protection against arsenite, and the formation and retention of a less toxic product, possibly [(GS)2AsSe]-.