The Function, Regulation, and Mechanism of Protein Turnover in Circadian Systems in Neurospora and Other Species.

Circadian clocks drive a large array of physiological and behavioral activities. At the molecular level, circadian clocks are composed of positive and negative elements that form core oscillators generating the basic circadian rhythms. Over the course of the circadian period, circadian negative proteins undergo progressive hyperphosphorylation and eventually degrade, and their stability is finely controlled by complex post-translational pathways, including protein modifications, genetic codon preference, protein-protein interactions, chaperon-dependent conformation maintenance, degradation, etc. The effects of phosphorylation on the stability of circadian clock proteins are crucial for precisely determining protein function and turnover, and it has been proposed that the phosphorylation of core circadian clock proteins is tightly correlated with the circadian period. Nonetheless, recent studies have challenged this view. In this review, we summarize the research progress regarding the function, regulation, and mechanism of protein stability in the circadian clock systems of multiple model organisms, with an emphasis on Neurospora crassa, in which circadian mechanisms have been extensively investigated. Elucidation of the highly complex and dynamic regulation of protein stability in circadian clock networks would greatly benefit the integrated understanding of the function, regulation, and mechanism of protein stability in a wide spectrum of other biological processes.

Differential regulation of phosphorylation, structure, and stability of circadian clock protein FRQ isoforms.

Neurospora crassa is an important model organism for circadian clock research. The Neurospora core circadian component FRQ protein has two isoforms, large FRQ (l-FRQ) and small FRQ (s-FRQ), of which l-FRQ bears an additional N-terminal 99-amino acid fragment. However, how the FRQ isoforms operate differentially in regulating the circadian clock remains elusive. Here, we show l-FRQ and s-FRQ play different roles in regulating the circadian negative feedback loop. Compared to s-FRQ, l-FRQ is less stable and undergoes hypophosphorylation and faster degradation. The phosphorylation of the C-terminal l-FRQ 794-aa fragment was markedly higher than that of s-FRQ, suggesting the l-FRQ N-terminal 99-aa region may regulate the phosphorylation of the entire FRQ protein. Quantitative label-free LC/MS analysis identified several peptides that were differentially phosphorylated between l-FRQ and s-FRQ, which were distributed in FRQ in an interlaced fashion. Furthermore, we identified two novel phosphorylation sites, S765 and T781; mutations S765A and T781A showed no significant effects on conidiation rhythmicity, although T781 conferred FRQ stability. These findings demonstrate that FRQ isoforms play differential roles in the circadian negative feedback loop and undergo different regulations of phosphorylation, structure, and stability. The l-FRQ N-terminal 99-aa region plays an important role in regulating the phosphorylation, stability, conformation, and function of the FRQ protein. As the FRQ circadian clock counterparts in other species also have isoforms or paralogues, these findings will also further our understanding of the underlying regulatory mechanisms of the circadian clock in other organisms based on the high conservation of circadian clocks in eukaryotes.