Association of Emergency Department Evaluation With Public Insurance Use and Treatment Delays for ACL Injury.

Background: Utilization of an emergency department (ED) visit for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is associated with high cost and diagnostic unreliability. Hypothesis: Patients initially evaluated at an ED for an ACL injury would be more likely to be from a lower income quartile, use public insurance, and experience a delay in treatment. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients in the Rhode Island All Payers Claims Database who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) between 2012 and 2021 were identified using the Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) code 29888. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts based on CPT codes for ED or in-office services within 1 year of ACLR. A chi-square analysis was used to test for differences between cohorts in patient and surgical characteristics. Multivariable linear and logistic regression were used to determine how ED evaluation affected timing and outcome variables. Results: While adjusting for patient and operative characteristics, patients in the ED cohort were more likely to have Medicaid (29% vs 12.5%; P < .001) and be in the lowest income quartile (44.6% vs 32.1%; P < .001). ED visit and Medicaid status were associated with increased time to (1) diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging, adding 7.97 days on average (95% CI, 4.14-11.79 days; P < .001) and 8.40 days (95% CI, 3.44-13.37 days; P = .001), respectively; and (2) surgery, adding 20.30 days (95% CI, 14.10-26.49 days; P < .001) and 12.88 days (95% CI, 5.15-20.60 days; P = .001), respectively. Patients >40 years who were evaluated in the ED were 2.5 times more likely to require subsequent ACLR (odds ratio, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.01-6.21]; P = .049). Conclusion: In this study, patients who visited the ED within 1 year before ACLR were more likely to have a lower income, public insurance, increased time to diagnostic imaging, and increased time to surgery, as well as decreased postoperative physical therapy use and increased subsequent ACLR rates in the 40-49 years age-group.

Predictors of Citations for Original Research in Ophthalmology.

There is a dearth of literature on factors associated with citation of publications in ophthalmology. We investigated predictors of citations for original ophthalmologic research articles based on author, study, and journal characteristics. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA), we extracted articles that studied the leading cause of vision impairment in the United States (cataract, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and glaucoma) and were published in the top fifteen ophthalmology journals with the highest impact factors that accepted original research. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests, and negative binomial regression were used to compare citation counts based on author, study, and journal characteristics. In this study, author research productivity, journal impact factor, study funding, and location in high-income countries were predictors of increased citation in ophthalmology.