Regional European genetic ancestry predicts type I interferon level and risk of severe viral infection.

BACKGROUND: Viral infection outcomes vary widely between individuals, ranging from mild symptoms to severe organ failure and death, and it is clear that host genetic factors play a role in this variability. Type I interferon (IFN) is a critical anti-viral cytokine, and we have previously noted differences in type I IFN levels between world populations. METHODS: In this study, we investigate the interrelationship between regional European genetic ancestry, type I IFN levels and severe viral infection outcomes. RESULTS: In cohorts of European ancestry lupus patients living in Europe, we noted higher IFN in the Northwestern populations as compared to Southeastern populations. In an independent cohort of European ancestry lupus patients from the USA with varying proportional regional European genetic admixture, we observed the same Northwest vs. Southeast European ancestry IFN gradient. We developed a model to predict type I IFN level based on regional European ancestry (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.73, P = 6.1e-6). Examining large databases containing serious viral outcomes data, we found that lower predicted IFN in the corresponding European country was significantly correlated with increased viral infection fatality rate, including Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), viral hepatitis and HIV [correlation coefficients: -0.79 (P = 4e-2), -0.94 (P = 6e-3) and -0.96 (P = 8e-2), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: This association between predicted type I IFN level and viral outcome severity suggests a potential causal relationship, as greater intrinsic type I IFN is beneficial in host defense against viruses. Genetic testing could provide insight into individual and population level risk of fatality due to viruses prior to infection, across a wide range of viral pathogens.

Rituximab-mediated late-onset neutropenia in systemic lupus erythematosus - distinct roles of BAFF and APRIL.

Objective Rituximab-mediated late-onset neutropenia (LON) has been described in various diseases. We investigated its occurrence, consequences and contributing factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Rituximab-treated patients from the Karolinska University Hospital ( n = 107) were surveyed. LON was defined as an absolute neutrophil count <1500 cells/µl, occurring four weeks to two years following rituximab treatment, or later during sustained B-cell depletion. Serum levels of B-cell-related cytokines and growth factors of the myeloid lineage were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Thirty-two patients (29.9%) developed LON after a median time of 201.5 days. Thirteen patients were admitted to the hospital; 10 due to fever. Three patients developed critical conditions. BAFF levels increased from baseline (median: 0.62 ng/ml) to the post-treatment evaluation (median: 1.16 ng/ml; p < 0.001); post-treatment levels were higher in the LON group ( p = 0.021). APRIL levels were higher in the LON group both at baseline (median: 1.54 versus 1.15 ng/ml; p = 0.027) and post-treatment (median: 2.39 versus 1.11 ng/ml; p = 0.011). IL-6 and GM-CSF levels decreased in the non-LON group ( p < 0.001), but not in LON patients. High baseline disease activity predicted LON development (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.1-15.2 for SLEDAI-2K > 8). No association with neutropenia prior to rituximab treatment was documented. Conclusion Post-rituximab LON was a common complication. Although the phenomenon was predominantly self-limiting, several patients developed severe conditions. Distinct roles of BAFF and APRIL are implicated: BAFF may contribute to LON development, whereas high APRIL levels may be predictive. Rituximab-treated SLE patients should be monitored for neutrophil counts, fever and infections.

Serum soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor-2 (sTNFR2) as a biomarker of kidney tissue damage and long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the performance of soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor-2 (sTNFR2) as a biomarker of renal activity, damage, treatment response, and long-term outcome in lupus nephritis (LN). METHOD: Serum sTNFR2 levels were assessed in 64 LN patients (52 proliferative, 12 membranous) before and after induction treatment, and in 314 non-lupus controls. In LN patients, renal biopsies were performed at baseline and post-treatment. Patients with ≥ 50% reduced proteinuria, normal or improved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by ≥ 25%, and inactive urinary sediment were considered clinical responders (CRs). Patients with ≥ 50% improved renal activity index were considered histopathological responders (HRs). Long-term renal outcome was determined using the chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage after a median follow-up of 11.3 years. RESULTS: sTNFR2 levels were elevated in LN patients versus controls both at baseline (p < 0.001) and post-treatment (p < 0.001), and decreased following treatment (p < 0.001). Baseline sTNFR2 correlated with Chronicity Index scores in both baseline (r = 0.34, p = 0.006) and post-treatment (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) biopsies. In membranous LN, baseline sTNFR2 levels were higher in CRs (p = 0.048) and HRs (p = 0.03) than in non-responders, and decreased only in CRs (p = 0.03). Both baseline (p = 0.02) and post-treatment (p = 0.03) sTNFR2 levels were associated with decreasing eGFR throughout long-term follow-up, and post-treatment levels were higher in patients with long-term follow-up CKD stage ≥ 3 versus 1-2 (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest serum sTNFR2 as a marker of kidney tissue damage and a predictor of long-term prognosis in LN, and merit further evaluation of sTNFR2 as a predictor of clinical and histopathological treatment outcomes in membranous LN.

Role of early repeated renal biopsies in lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: A renal biopsy is generally recommended for diagnosis and is necessary for classification of lupus nephritis (LN), but second biopsies after immunosuppressive therapy are seldom a routine procedure. We investigated how repeat biopsies contribute to the evaluation of treatment response and long-term outcome in LN. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with active LN were included. Renal biopsies were performed at diagnosis and after standard induction immunosuppressive therapy in all patients (median 8 months), regardless of clinical outcome. Biopsies were evaluated according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification. Clinical response was defined as complete (CR), partial (PR) or non-response (NR) according to recent definitions. Histological response (HR) was defined as Class I, II or III/IV-C on repeat biopsies. Long-term renal outcome was determined in 55 patients after a median of 10 years. RESULTS: CR was demonstrated in 25%, PR in 27% and NR in 48% of patients. HR was shown in 42% and histopathological non-response (HNR) in 58% of patients. Twenty-nine per cent of CR and 61% of patients with PR had active lesions on repeat biopsies, that is, were HNR. Poor long-term renal outcome was associated with high chronicity index at repeated biopsies, but not with clinical or histological response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite apparent clinical response to immunosuppressive therapy, repeated biopsies revealed persisting active nephritis in almost half of the patients, thus providing additional information to clinical response criteria. Repeated renal biopsies may be a tool to improve the evaluation of treatment response in LN.

Addition of infliximab compared with addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (Swefot trial): 1-year results of a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: New treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis are evolving rapidly. We aimed to compare addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine) with addition of a tumour necrosis factor antagonist (infliximab) to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We undertook a randomised trial in 15 rheumatology units in Sweden. We enrolled patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (symptom duration <1 year) and administered methotrexate (up to 20 mg per week). After 3-4 months, those who had not achieved low disease activity but who could tolerate methotrexate were randomly allocated by computer addition of either sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or infliximab. Primary outcome was achievement of a good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria at 12 months. Patients were followed up to 24 months; here, we present findings at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat and we used non-responder imputation. The Swefot (Swedish Pharmacotherapy) study is registered in the WHO database at the Karolinska University Hospital, number CT20080004. FINDINGS: 487 patients were initially enrolled. Of 258 who had not achieved low disease activity with methotrexate, 130 were allocated sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine and 128 were assigned infliximab. 32 of 130 (25%) patients allocated sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine achieved the primary outcome compared with 50 of 128 (39%) assigned infliximab (risk ratio 1.59 [95% CI 1.10-2.30], p=0.0160). Adverse events were balanced fairly well between the two groups and accorded with known adverse events of the drugs used. No deaths occurred in either group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in whom methotrexate treatment failed, addition of a tumour necrosis factor antagonist to methotrexate monotherapy is clinically superior to addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. FUNDING: Swedish Rheumatism Association, Schering-Plough.

No effect of carvedilol on nitric oxide generation in phagocytes but modulation of production of superoxide ions.

Since carvedilol has been claimed to possess antioxidative effects, this drug might affect functional responses, including nitric oxide (NO) generation, of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and macrophages. When we assessed the effects of carvedilol on PMN responses in vitro, we observed that carvedilol dose dependently modulated generation of superoxide ions by NADPH oxidase when induced by the formylpeptide formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) or the phorbol ester phorbol myristate acetate. This effect was not coupled to diminished phospholipase C activity. In contrast to the effect on NADPH oxidase, neither the fMLP-elicited NO generation by PMN nor the response of the murine macrophage cell line J774 to lipopolysaccharide was affected. There was no evidence from cell-free assay systems that carvedilol is a scavenger for superoxide ions or NO. Moreover, carvedilol did not affect other reactions dependent on NO, e.g. spontaneous or fMLP-stimulated PMN migration or lipoxin A(4)-, fMLP-, or A23187-induced neutrophil cytotoxicity for human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Thus, these effects point to the possibility that carvedilol modulates the NADPH oxidase of PMN but leaves the nitric oxide synthase of phagocytes intact.