RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hypophosphatemia (HP) is frequent following liver resection, and thought to represent use of phosphate during liver regeneration. We sought to evaluate the association of post-hepatectomy HP with liver insufficiency and recovery. METHODS: Liver resections were retrospectively reviewed from 2009 to 2012 at a single institution. We explored the relationship between HP (defined as serum phosphate ≤0.65 mmol/L), occurrence of initial liver insufficiency (ILI) [bilirubin >50 µmol/L, international normalized ratio (INR) >1.7 within 72 hours of surgery] and in-hospital recovery of ILI. Secondary outcomes included 30-day post-operative major morbidity (Clavien grade 3 and 4 complications), mortality, and re-admission. RESULTS: Among 402 patients, 223 (55.5%) experienced HP and 64 (15.9%) met our definition of ILI, of which 53 (82.8%) recovered. Length of stay, 30-day post-operative major morbidity, mortality, and re-admission were similar between patients with and without HP. Among patients with ILI, 44 (68.8%) experienced HP. Following ILI, patients with HP recovered more often than those with NP (90.9% vs. 65.0%; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who experience post-hepatectomy ILI, HP is associated with improved recovery, potentially indicating more efficient liver regeneration. Further studies should explore the usefulness of post-hepatectomy HP as an early prognostic factor of recovery from ILI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Traditional indications do not factor molecular subtype into the decision making for post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT). We sought to determine whether constructed subtype was associated with receipt of PMRT in an academic cancer center and to assess differences in locoregional recurrence (LRR) by constructed subtype. METHODS: Patients treated with mastectomy as the primary surgical therapy were identified. Univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analyses examined the association between covariates and PMRT. Kaplan-Meier estimates for the time to either the earlier of LRR or last follow-up were obtained for each subtype, and Cox proportional hazards regression examined the effect of covariates on time to LRR in both univariate analyses and stepwise multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 884 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent a primary mastectomy between January 2002 and May 2012 were included in the study. A total of 359 patients (41.6 %) received PMRT. Compared with other subtypes, triple negative (TN; HR-/HER2-) cancers were more likely to be smaller (95 % T1/T2; p = 0.02) and have a lower nodal burden (N0 65 %; p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, age < 50 years, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), T stage, N stage, and close or positive margins remained significantly associated with PMRT, while constructed subtype was not associated with PMRT. Compared with all other subtypes, TN had the highest rate of LRR [hazard ratio (HR) 5.70; p < 0.0001]. On multivariable analysis, TN status, LVI, and not receiving chemotherapy were significantly associated with LRR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant differences in LRR by constructed subtype, receptor status does not appear to be associated with the receipt of PMRT. In our series, TN cancers had the highest risk of LRR despite their relatively smaller size and limited nodal disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Mastectomia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Ontário , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite guidelines recommending restrictive red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) strategies, perioperative transfusion practices still vary significantly. To understand the underlying mechanisms that lead to gaps in practice, we sought to assess the attitudes of surgeons regarding the perioperative management of anemia and use of RBCT in patients having gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: We conducted a self-administered Web-based survey of general surgery staff and residents, in a network of eight academic institutions at the University of Toronto. We developed a questionnaire using a systematic approach of items generation and reduction. We tested face and content validity and test-retest reliability. We administered the survey via emails, with planned reminders. RESULTS: Total response rate was 48.1 % (62/125). Half (51.0 %) of respondents stated that they were unlikely to conduct a preoperative anemia work-up. About 54.0 % reported ordering preoperative oral iron supplementation for anemia. Most respondents indicated using a 70 g/L hemoglobin trigger (92.0 %) for transfusion. Factors increasing thresholds above 70 g/L included cardiac comorbidity (58.0 %), acute cardiac disease (94.0 %), symptomatic anemia (68.0 %), and suspected bleeding (58.0 %). With those factors, the transfusion threshold often increased above 90 g/L. Respondents perceived RBCTs to increase the postoperative morbidity (62 %), but not to impact the mortality (48 %) and cancer recurrence (52 %). Institutional protocols (68.0 %), blood conservation clinics (44.0 %), and clinical practice guidelines (84.0 %) were believed to encourage restrictive use of RBCTs. CONCLUSION: Self-reported perioperative transfusion practices for GI surgery are heterogeneous. Few respondents investigated preoperative anemia. Stated use of RBCT indications varied from recommendations in published guidelines for patients with symptomatic anemia. Establishing team consensus and implementing local blood management guidelines appear necessary to improve uptake of evidence-based recommendations.
Assuntos
Anemia/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Cirurgia Geral , Padrões de Prática Médica , Anemia/sangue , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Período Perioperatório , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains a common source of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Despite numerous studies, the optimal method of pancreatic remnant reconstruction is controversial. This study examines the hypothesis that pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is associated with a lower risk for PF after PD compared with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). METHODS: Five electronic databases and the grey literature were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PJ and PG after PD. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed methodology. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PF of International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) Grade B or C. RESULTS: Four RCTs including 676 patients were included. Pancreaticogastrostomy reduced the risk for PF [relative risk (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.62] without any difference between high- and low-risk patients. Absolute risk reduction for PF was 4% (95% CI 2.4-5.6) in low-risk patients compared with 10% (95% CI 6.5-14.8) in high-risk patients undergoing PG rather than PJ. The strength of evidence for PF outcome was moderate according to the GRADE classification. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction by PG decreases the rate of PF in comparison with PJ. Surgeons should consider reconstructing the pancreatic remnant following PD with PG, particularly in patients at high risk for PF.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Gastrostomia/métodos , Fístula Pancreática/etiologia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiologia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Pancreaticojejunostomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Procedimentos de Cirurgia PlásticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is now the standard management for mucinous tumors of appendiceal origin at many centers. We examined the role of expectant observation (EO) in patients who had undergone an initial resection at the time of referral to our center and who had limited residual disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients referred to Mount Sinai/Princess Margaret Hospitals, Toronto, for consideration of surgical management of peritoneal malignancy between January 1998 and December 2009. One hundred and three patients with primary mucinous appendiceal malignancy were identified. EO, consisting of regularly scheduled imaging and clinical review, was selected for asymptomatic patients with low-grade tumor and no/limited disease on imaging. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. RESULTS: Management consisted of supportive care in 7 patients, systemic chemotherapy in 7, referral for CRS with HIPEC in 8, CRS without HIPEC at our center in 51, and EO in 30. In the CRS group, 5-year OS was 74 % and PFS was 56 %; both OS and PFS were predicted by extent of residual disease after cytoreduction (p = 0.014 and p = 0.011, respectively). In the EO group, 5-year OS and PFS were 95 and 82 %, respectively. Two patients in the EO group subsequently underwent CRS for progression on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In well-selected patients who have undergone initial resection for low-grade mucinous tumor of the appendix with limited peritoneal spread, a formal program of observation can result in excellent 5-year OS and PFS. Longer-term follow-up will help define the benefits and risks of this approach.