Preserving fairness and diagnostic accuracy in private large-scale AI models for medical imaging.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly used in the medical domain. However, as medical data is highly sensitive, special precautions to ensure its protection are required. The gold standard for privacy preservation is the introduction of differential privacy (DP) to model training. Prior work indicates that DP has negative implications on model accuracy and fairness, which are unacceptable in medicine and represent a main barrier to the widespread use of privacy-preserving techniques. In this work, we evaluated the effect of privacy-preserving training of AI models regarding accuracy and fairness compared to non-private training. METHODS: We used two datasets: (1) A large dataset (N = 193,311) of high quality clinical chest radiographs, and (2) a dataset (N = 1625) of 3D abdominal computed tomography (CT) images, with the task of classifying the presence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Both were retrospectively collected and manually labeled by experienced radiologists. We then compared non-private deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and privacy-preserving (DP) models with respect to privacy-utility trade-offs measured as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and privacy-fairness trade-offs, measured as Pearson's r or Statistical Parity Difference. RESULTS: We find that, while the privacy-preserving training yields lower accuracy, it largely does not amplify discrimination against age, sex or co-morbidity. However, we find an indication that difficult diagnoses and subgroups suffer stronger performance hits in private training. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that - under the challenging realistic circumstances of a real-life clinical dataset - the privacy-preserving training of diagnostic deep learning models is possible with excellent diagnostic accuracy and fairness.

Artificial intelligence (AI), in which computers can learn to do tasks that normally require human intelligence, is particularly useful in medical imaging. However, AI should be used in a way that preserves patient privacy. We explored the balance between maintaining patient data privacy and AI performance in medical imaging. We use an approach called differential privacy to protect the privacy of patients' images. We show that, although training AI with differential privacy leads to a slight decrease in accuracy, it does not substantially increase bias against different age groups, genders, or patients with multiple health conditions. However, we notice that AI faces more challenges in accurately diagnosing complex cases and specific subgroups when trained under these privacy constraints. These findings highlight the importance of designing AI systems that are both privacy-conscious and capable of reliable diagnoses across patient groups.

Privacy: An Axiomatic Approach.

The increasing prevalence of large-scale data collection in modern society represents a potential threat to individual privacy. Addressing this threat, for example through privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs), requires a rigorous definition of what exactly is being protected, that is, of privacy itself. In this work, we formulate an axiomatic definition of privacy based on quantifiable and irreducible information flows. Our definition synthesizes prior work from the domain of social science with a contemporary understanding of PETs such as differential privacy (DP). Our work highlights the fact that the inevitable difficulties of protecting privacy in practice are fundamentally information-theoretic. Moreover, it enables quantitative reasoning about PETs based on what they are protecting, thus fostering objective policy discourse about their societal implementation.

Medical imaging deep learning with differential privacy.

The successful training of deep learning models for diagnostic deployment in medical imaging applications requires large volumes of data. Such data cannot be procured without consideration for patient privacy, mandated both by legal regulations and ethical requirements of the medical profession. Differential privacy (DP) enables the provision of information-theoretic privacy guarantees to patients and can be implemented in the setting of deep neural network training through the differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) algorithm. We here present deepee, a free-and-open-source framework for differentially private deep learning for use with the PyTorch deep learning framework. Our framework is based on parallelised execution of neural network operations to obtain and modify the per-sample gradients. The process is efficiently abstracted via a data structure maintaining shared memory references to neural network weights to maintain memory efficiency. We furthermore offer specialised data loading procedures and privacy budget accounting based on the Gaussian Differential Privacy framework, as well as automated modification of the user-supplied neural network architectures to ensure DP-conformity of its layers. We benchmark our framework's computational performance against other open-source DP frameworks and evaluate its application on the paediatric pneumonia dataset, an image classification task and on the Medical Segmentation Decathlon Liver dataset in the task of medical image segmentation. We find that neural network training with rigorous privacy guarantees is possible while maintaining acceptable classification performance and excellent segmentation performance. Our framework compares favourably to related work with respect to memory consumption and computational performance. Our work presents an open-source software framework for differentially private deep learning, which we demonstrate in medical imaging analysis tasks. It serves to further the utilisation of privacy-enhancing techniques in medicine and beyond in order to assist researchers and practitioners in addressing the numerous outstanding challenges towards their widespread implementation.