Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(11)2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413084

RESUMO

The Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) is a collection of coagulase-positive staphylococci consisting of four distinct species, namely, Staphylococcus cornubiensis, Staphylococcus delphini, Staphylococcus intermedius, and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius SIG members are animal pathogens and rare causes of human infection. Accurate identification of S. pseudintermedius has important implications for interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing data and may be important for other members of the group. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the performance of five commercially available identification platforms with 21 S. delphini isolates obtained from a variety of animal and geographic sources. Here, we show that automated biochemical platforms were unable to identify S. delphini to the species level, a function of its omission from their databases, but could identify isolates to the SIG level with various degrees of success. However, all automated systems misidentified at least one isolate as Staphylococcus aureus One matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system was able to identify S. delphini to the species level, suggesting that MALDI-TOF MS is the best option for distinguishing members of the SIG. With the exception of S. pseudintermedius, it is unclear if other SIG members should be routinely identified to the species level; however, as our understanding of their role in animal and human diseases increases, it may be necessary and important to do so.


Assuntos
Automação Laboratorial/instrumentação , Automação Laboratorial/normas , Infecções Estafilocócicas/veterinária , Staphylococcus/química , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Automação Laboratorial/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus hyicus/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus intermedius/isolamento & purificação
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 56(3)2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305540

RESUMO

The performance of a disk diffusion test using broth from positive blood cultures as inoculum (direct disk diffusion [dDD]) was evaluated for a collection of 20 challenge isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates seeded into human blood were inoculated into Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, VersaTREK Redox 1, and BacT/Alert FA Plus bottles and incubated in the respective automated blood culture systems. Disk diffusion results were compared to reference disk diffusion results. Categorical agreement (CA) values for dDD, after removal of random errors due to natural MIC variation, were 87.8%, 88.4%, and 92.2% for the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. No very major errors (VME) were observed, and major error (ME) rates were 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. Incubation of the dDD test samples for 6 h compared to incubation for 16 to 18 h resulted in 19.9% of tests having too light of growth to allow reading of zones of inhibition. Among the evaluable dDD tests, CA values were 58.9%, 76.6%, and 73.2% for the isolates seeded into the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. VME rates for isolates seeded into these systems were 2.2%, 1.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, and ME rates were 25.4%, 6.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, at the 6-h reading. The best performance of dDD was found for blood cultures with bacterial concentrations in the range of 7.6 × 107 to 5.0 × 108 CFU/ml; CA values ranged from 94.7 to 96.2% for these concentrations after 18 h of incubation and from 76.9 to 84.1% after 6 h of incubation. These preliminary data demonstrate the potential accuracy of dDD testing by the clinical laboratory.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Sangue/microbiologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão/normas , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Meios de Cultura , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo
6.
J Mol Diagn ; 13(6): 583-604, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21871973

RESUMO

The superior sensitivity and specificity associated with the use of molecular assays has greatly improved the field of infectious disease diagnostics by providing clinicians with results that are both accurate and rapidly obtained. Herein, we review molecularly based infectious disease diagnostic tests that are Food and Drug Administration approved or cleared and commercially available in the United States as of December 31, 2010. We describe specific assays and their performance, as stated in the Food and Drug Administration's Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data or the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety's decision summaries, product inserts, or peer-reviewed literature. We summarize indications for testing, limitations, and challenges related to implementation in a clinical laboratory setting for a wide variety of common pathogens. The information presented in this review will be particularly useful for laboratories that plan to implement or expand their molecular offerings in the near term.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Doenças Transmissíveis/genética , Aprovação de Teste para Diagnóstico , Humanos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
7.
Drug Resist Updat ; 14(2): 95-106, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21398170

RESUMO

Antibacterial drugs are overused and often inappropriately selected. This exacerbates drug resistance and exacts a high burden from acute respiratory tract, bloodstream, sexually-transmitted, diarrheal and other infections. Appropriate use of existing diagnostic tests, and developing better ones, could avert these costs and would avoid selective pressure from unnecessary antibacterial use. Product profiles of resistance-averting tests would specify WHO 'ASSURED' (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment-free and Deliverable) criteria and request susceptibility as well as etiological information. Advances in genomics, nanoscience, microfluidics and bioengineering, as well as innovative funding paradigms can help to overcome research and development barriers for such diagnostics if they are deliberately and forcefully applied. Rapid uptake of new tests requires timely translation of research on cost-benefit analyses into policy, value-based subsidies and reimbursements, as well as behavioral change of health care providers and users.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Antibacterianos/síntese química , Bactérias/patogenicidade , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Bioensaio , Análise Custo-Benefício , Países em Desenvolvimento , Descoberta de Drogas , Genômica/métodos , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/psicologia , Microfluídica/métodos
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 47(6): 1902-5, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19357210

RESUMO

This report describes the results of an 11-laboratory study to determine if a cefoxitin broth microdilution MIC test could predict the presence of mecA in staphylococci. Using breakpoints of < or = 4 microg/ml for mecA-negative and > or = 6 or 8 microg/ml for mecA-positive isolates, sensitivity and specificity based on mecA or presumed mecA for Staphylococcus aureus at 18 h of incubation were 99.7 to 100% in three cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broths tested. For coagulase-negative strains at 24 h of incubation, breakpoints of < or = 2 microg/ml for mecA-negative and > or = 4 microg/ml for mecA-positive isolates gave sensitivity and specificity of 94 to 99% and 69 to 80%, respectively.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Cefoxitina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Staphylococcus/genética
9.
J Clin Microbiol ; 45(12): 3954-7, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17942655

RESUMO

A study conducted by 11 laboratories investigated the ability of four combinations of erythromycin (ERY) and clindamycin (CC) (ERY and CC at 4 and 0.5, 6 and 1, 8 and 1.5, and 0.5 and 2 microg/ml) in a single well of a broth microdilution panel to predict the presence of inducible CC resistance. Each laboratory tested approximately 30 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 20 coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) isolates in a panel using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth from three different manufacturers. Only the strains resistant to ERY and those susceptible or intermediate to CC were included in the analysis (S. aureus, n = 333; CoNS, n = 97). Results of the D-zone test were used as the gold standard. After an 18-h incubation, the combination of 4 microg/ml ERY and 0.5 microg/ml CC performed the best, with 98 to 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for both organism groups. After a 24-h incubation, the ERY-CC combinations of 4 and 0.5, 6 and 1, and 8 and 1.5 microg/ml correlated well with the D-zone test.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Clindamicina/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Eritromicina/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Meios de Cultura/química , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(10): 4852-4, 2003 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14532241

RESUMO

Five strains of a newly described Escherichia species, Escherichia albertii, were extensively characterized by conventional biochemical methods and by commercial identification panels. E. albertii is an indole-negative species that ferments D-mannitol but not D-xylose. Because these strains are not included in the databases of commercial systems at present, they were most often identified as Hafnia, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, or, on one system (MicroScan dried overnight panels), Yersinia ruckeri.


Assuntos
Escherichia/classificação , Escherichia/metabolismo , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Humanos , Manitol/metabolismo , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA