Sex differences in food choices, adherence to dietary recommendations and plasma lipid profile in type 2 diabetes - The TOSCA.IT study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetic women have a more adverse plasma lipid profile than men. Sex differences in dietary habits may play a role, but are little investigated. The study evaluates the quality of diet, adherence to the nutritional recommendations of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group and their relation with plasma lipid in men and women with diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2573 people, aged 50-75, enrolled in the TOSCA.IT study (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00700856). Plasma lipids were measured centrally. Diet was assessed with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Women had a more adverse plasma lipid profile than men. Women consumed significantly more legumes, vegetables, fruits, eggs, milk, vegetable oils, and added sugar, whereas men consumed more starchy foods, soft drinks and alcoholic beverages. This stands for a higher proportion (%) of energy intake from saturated fat and added sugar (12.0 ± 2.4 vs 11.5 ± 2.5 and 3.4 ± 3.2 vs 2.3 ± 3.2, P < 0.04), and a higher intake of fiber (11.2 ± 2.8 vs 10.4 ± 2.6 g/1000 Kcal/day) in women. Adherence to the recommendations for saturated fat and fiber consumption was associated with significantly lower LDL-cholesterol regardless of sex. Adherence to the recommendations for added sugars was associated with significantly lower triglycerides and higher HDL-cholesterol in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with diabetes show significant differences in adherence to nutritional recommendations, but sex differences in plasma lipid profile are unlikely to be explained by nutritional factors. Adherence to the nutritional recommendations is associated with a better plasma lipid profile regardless of sex, thus reinforcing the importance of substituting saturated for unsaturated fat sources, increasing fiber and reducing added sugar intake.

Hyponatremia and pituitary adenoma: think twice about the etiopathogenesis.

Pituitary adenomas may be the cause of the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), although few cases have so far been reported. We described a case of hypotonic hyponatremia in a 76-yr-old man with a pituitary macroadenoma. He had a recent history of two syncopal attacks which had occurred in the last two months. Baseline assessment demonstrated a sodium serum level of 114 mEq/l. Clinically, the patient appeared euvolemic. Thyroid and adrenal function testing did not show any abnormality. Plasma and urinary osmolality (238 and 186 mOsm/kg, respectively) were in agreement with the diagnosis of SIADH. Accordingly, 3% hypertonic saline solution was started, followed by water intake restriction when natremia reached 126 mEq/l. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed the presence of a 2-cm lesion in the azygos-esophageal recess. Because the nature of the lesion appeared uncertain, antibiotic therapy was initiated. After one month, a new CT scan did not show any evidence of the mediastinic mass. Sodium serum level was within the normal range (141 mEq/l) and remained stable thereafter, without fluid restriction. This case very well demonstrates that, in the presence of hyponatremia due to SIADH, more frequently associated co-morbidities (ie mediastinic diseases) have to be searched, even in the presence of a possible, yet rare, cause of this syndrome (ie pituitary adenoma).