RESUMO
Objective: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for adolescent alcohol and drug (AOD) use is recommended to occur with adolescents admitted to pediatric trauma centers. Most metrics on SBIRT service delivery only reference medical record documentation. In this analysis we examined changes in adolescents' perception of SBIRT services and concordance of adolescent-report and medical record data, among a sample of adolescents admitted before and after institutional SBIRT implementation. Methods: We implemented SBIRT for adolescent AOD use using the Science to Service Laboratory implementation strategy and enrolled adolescents at 9 pediatric trauma centers. The recommended clinical workflow was for nursing to screen, social work to provide adolescents screening positive with brief intervention and referral to their PCP for continued AOD discussions with those. Adolescents screening as high-risk also referred to specialty services. Adolescents were enrolled and contacted 30 days after discharge and asked about their perception of any SBIRT services received. Data were also extracted from enrolled patient's medical record. Results: There were 430 adolescents enrolled, with 424 that were matched to their EHR data and 329 completed the 30-day survey. In this sample, EHR documented screening increased from pre-implementation to post-implementation (16.3%-65.7%) and brief interventions increased (27.1%-40.7%). Adolescents self-reported higher rates of being asked about alcohol or drug use than in EHR data both pre- and post-implementation (80.7%-81%). Both EHR data and adolescent self-reported data demonstrated low referral back to PCP for continued AOD discussions. Conclusions: Implementation of SBIRT at pediatric trauma centers was not associated with change in adolescent perceptions of SBIRT, despite improved documentation of delivery of AOD screening and interventions. Adolescents perceived being asked about AOD use more often than was documented. Referral to PCP or specialty care for continued AOD discussion remains an area of needed attention. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03297060.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma centers have had challenges meeting the American College of Surgeons criteria for screening and intervening for alcohol with adolescent trauma patients. The study objective was to conduct an implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the Science to Service Laboratory (SSL) implementation strategy in improving alcohol and other drugs (AOD) screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) delivery at pediatric trauma centers. METHODS: Using a stepped wedge cross-over cluster randomized design, 10 US pediatric trauma centers received the SSL implementation strategy to deliver SBIRT with admitted adolescent (12-17 years old) trauma patients. The strategy adapted three core SSL elements: didactic training, performance feedback, and facilitation. The main outcome measured was SBIRT reach. Data were collected from each center's electronic health record (EHR) during pre- and post-implementation wedges (2018-2022). RESULTS: EHR data from 8461 adolescent patients were extracted. Aggregated across all sites, the reach of screening with a validated AOD screening tool increased significantly from 25.2% (95% CI: 23.9, 26.5%) of adolescents during pre-implementation to 47.7% (95% CI: 46.3%, 49.2%) post-implementation. There was variability of change across centers. Brief interventions continued to be delivered at high levels to identified adolescents. Referral to primary care providers for further AOD discussion or referral to specialty service for adolescents with high risk use did not improve post-implementation and remained low. CONCLUSIONS: The SSL implementation strategy can be successfully utilized by pediatric trauma centers to improve AOD screening, but challenges exist in connecting adolescents for continuation of AOD discussions after discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Therapeutic.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Prior work has found incongruencies in injury information reported by crash and hospital records. However, no work has focused on child passengers. The objective of this study was to compare crash scene and hospital-reported injury information for crash-involved child passengers. This study also explored injury location and severity by child age and restraint type. METHODS: Utilizing linked New Jersey data from 2017 through 2019, the authors identified crash-involved child passengers <13 years old and their injuries in crash and hospital reports. Then, they characterized the congruency of injury frequency, severity, and location, as well as the frequency of injuries by child age and restraint type. Analyses were conducted from December 2023 through February 2024. RESULTS: Of 84,060 crash-involved child passengers, crash reports documented 7,858 (9%) children with at least "possible" injuries, while 2,577 (3%) had at least one injury in hospital events. Crash report and hospital data were incongruent for both body region of injury and injury severity. The proportion of children injured increased as children's ages increased and as restraint type progressed. CONCLUSIONS: Crash reports overestimated the number of injured child passengers and misrepresented injury severity and locations. Child restraint systems mitigated a child's injury risk. Importantly, injury information documented on crash reports currently informs the allocation of traffic safety resources. These results highlight the importance of improving these reports' accuracy and underscore calls to link administrative datasets for public health efforts.
RESUMO
In 2019, a child's death in Korea led to legislation that imposed stricter penalties for school zone traffic violations. We assessed the impact of that legislation using 2017-2022 Traffic Accident Analysis System data. Adjusted analyses revealed a significant decline in severe injuries in school zones, decreasing from 11 cases to 8 cases per month (p=0.017). The legislation correlated with a reduced risk of all child traffic injuries (risk ratio, 0.987; 95% confidence interval, 0.977 to 0.997; p=0.002), indicating its efficacy in curbing accidents.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Instituições Acadêmicas , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Criança , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Punição , Crime/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Feminino , AdolescenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) visits nationally decreased while the proportion of injury-related PED visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the trends in Rhode Island (RI). METHODS: This is a planned sub-analysis of RI data from a retrospective study of pediatric injury-related visits to 40 PEDs for children <18 years old from January 2019-December 2020. We calculated frequencies and compared patient demographics, injury types, severity, and mechanisms for 3/17/2019-12/31/2019 (pre-COVID-19) versus 3/15/2020-12/31/2020 (study period). RESULTS: Despite a 31.4% decrease in total injury-related PED visits from 2019 to 2020, the proportion of injury-related PED visits increased by 8.1% (p<0.001) in 2020. The mean age of patients decreased from 8.3 (SD 5.4) to 7.7 (SD 5.4) years old (p<0.0001), with a higher proportion of female (p=0.0018), privately insured (p=0.0274), and non-Hispanic White children (p<0.001) in 2020. There was a higher proportion of trauma activations, admissions, and injuries caused by intentional self-harm (all p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In RI, the total number of injury-related PED visits decreased while the proportion of injury-related PED visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, similar to national trends. There were significant demographic, mechanism, and intent shifts among injured patients, highlighting epidemiologic changes during the pandemic and identifying high-risk groups that would benefit from targeted education and interventions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rhode Island , EscolaridadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Injuries, the leading cause of death in children 1-17 years old, are often preventable. Injury patterns are impacted by changes in the child's environment, shifts in supervision, and caregiver stressors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and proportion of injuries, mechanisms, and severity seen in Pediatric Emergency Departments (PEDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study from January 2019 through December 2020 examined visits to 40 PEDs for children < 18 years old. Injury was defined by at least one International Classification of Disease-10th revision (ICD-10) code for bodily injury (S00-T78). The main study outcomes were total and proportion of PED injury-related visits compared to all visits in March through December 2020 and to the same months in 2019. Weekly injury visits as a percentage of total PED visits were calculated for all weeks between January 2019 and December 2020. RESULTS: The study included 741,418 PED visits for injuries pre-COVID-19 pandemic (2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020). Overall PED visits from all causes decreased 27.4% in March to December 2020 compared to the same time frame in 2019; however, the proportion of injury-related PED visits in 2020 increased by 37.7%. In 2020, injured children were younger (median age 6.31 years vs 7.31 in 2019), more commonly White (54% vs 50%, p < 0.001), non-Hispanic (72% vs 69%, p < 0.001) and had private insurance (35% vs 32%, p < 0.001). Injury hospitalizations increased 2.2% (p < 0.001) and deaths increased 0.03% (p < 0.001) in 2020 compared to 2019. Mean injury severity score increased (2.2 to 2.4, p < 0.001) between 2019 and 2020. Injuries declined for struck by/against (- 4.9%) and overexertion (- 1.2%) mechanisms. Injuries proportionally increased for pedal cycles (2.8%), cut/pierce (1.5%), motor vehicle occupant (0.9%), other transportation (0.6%), fire/burn (0.5%) and firearms (0.3%) compared to all injuries in 2020 versus 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of PED injury-related visits in March through December 2020 increased compared to the same months in 2019. Racial and payor differences were noted. Mechanisms of injury seen in the PED during 2020 changed compared to 2019, and this can inform injury prevention initiatives.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Expert consensus recommends prescription opioid safety counseling be provided when prescribing an opioid. This may be especially important for youth with preexistent alcohol and other drug (AOD) use who are at higher risk of developing opioid use disorder. This study examined the frequency that adolescent trauma patients prescribed opioids at hospital discharge received counseling and if this differed by adolescents' AOD use. METHOD: This study was embedded within a larger prospective stepped-wedge type III hybrid implementation study of AOD screening across a national cohort of pediatric trauma centers. Data were collected during 2018-2021 from admitted adolescent trauma patients (12-17 yo) at seven centers. Patient data were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) on any prescribed discharged opioids, documentation of counseling delivered on prescribed opioid, who delivered counseling, and patients' AOD screening results. Additionally, adolescents received an online survey within 30 days of hospital discharge that included asking about hospital discussions on safe use of prescription pain medication. RESULTS: Of the 247 adolescent trauma patients enrolled, 158 completed the 30-day survey. AOD screening results were documented in the EHR for 139 patients (88%), with 69 (44.1%) screening AOD-positive. Opioids at discharge were prescribed to 86 (54.4%) adolescent patients, with no significant difference between those screened AOD-positive and AOD-negative (42.4% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.89). Counseling was documented in the EHR for 30 (34.9%) of those prescribed an opioid and was not significantly different by sex, age, race, ethnicity or between adolescent patients with documentation of AOD use (29.3%) versus those who did not (33.3%, p = 0.71). According to the adolescent survey, among those prescribed an opioid, 61.2% reported someone had talked with them about safe use of newly prescribed pain medications with again no difference between AOD-positive and AOD-negative screening results (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Although adolescent trauma patients recalled discussions on safe use of prescribed pain medication more often than was documented in the EHR, these discussions were not universal and did not differ if adolescents had screened positive or negative for AOD use as documented in the EHR. TRIAL REGISTRY: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03297060.
RESUMO
Importance: Presentation to emergency departments (EDs) with high levels of pediatric readiness is associated with improved pediatric survival. However, it is unclear whether children of all races and ethnicities benefit equitably from increased levels of such readiness. Objective: To evaluate the association of ED pediatric readiness with in-hospital mortality among children of different races and ethnicities with traumatic injuries or acute medical emergencies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of children requiring emergency care in 586 EDs across 11 states was conducted from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017. Eligible participants included children younger than 18 years who were hospitalized for an acute medical emergency or traumatic injury. Data analysis was conducted between November 2022 and April 2023. Exposure: Hospitalization for acute medical emergency or traumatic injury. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. ED pediatric readiness was measured through the weighted Pediatric Readiness Score (wPRS) from the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment and categorized by quartile. Multivariable, hierarchical, mixed-effects logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race and ethnicity with in-hospital mortality. Results: The cohort included 633â¯536 children (median [IQR] age 4 [0-12] years]). There were 557â¯537 children (98â¯504 Black [17.7%], 167â¯838 Hispanic [30.1%], 311â¯157 White [55.8%], and 147â¯876 children of other races or ethnicities [26.5%]) who were hospitalized for acute medical emergencies, of whom 5158 (0.9%) died; 75â¯999 children (12â¯727 Black [16.7%], 21â¯604 Hispanic [28.4%], 44â¯203 White [58.2%]; and 21â¯609 of other races and ethnicities [27.7%]) were hospitalized for traumatic injuries, of whom 1339 (1.8%) died. Adjusted mortality of Black children with acute medical emergencies was significantly greater than that of Hispanic children, White children, and of children of other races and ethnicities (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% CI, 1.59-1.79) across all quartile levels of ED pediatric readiness; but there were no racial or ethnic disparities in mortality when comparing Black children with traumatic injuries with Hispanic children, White children, and children of other races and ethnicities with traumatic injuries (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89-1.15). When compared with hospitals in the lowest quartile of ED pediatric readiness, children who were treated at hospitals in the highest quartile had significantly lower mortality in both the acute medical emergency cohort (OR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16-0.36) and traumatic injury cohort (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.61). The greatest survival advantage associated with high pediatric readiness was experienced for Black children in the acute medical emergency cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, racial and ethnic disparities in mortality existed among children treated for acute medical emergencies but not traumatic injuries. Increased ED pediatric readiness was associated with reduced disparities; it was estimated that increasing the ED pediatric readiness levels of hospitals in the 3 lowest quartiles would result in an estimated 3-fold reduction in disparity for pediatric mortality. However, increased pediatric readiness did not eliminate disparities, indicating that organizations and initiatives dedicated to increasing ED pediatric readiness should consider formal integration of health equity into efforts to improve pediatric emergency care.
Assuntos
Mortalidade da Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Etnicidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos de Coortes , Emergências , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Grupos RaciaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Child restraint systems (CRSs) significantly reduce risk of crash-related injury, however installation and use errors undermine their benefits. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) created the Ease of Use (EOU) rating system to help guide consumers and incentivize manufacturers to improve their products. The EOU rating system assigns one to five stars to four CRS features and overall. Our study assessed the relationship between EOU ratings and CRS installation and use errors documented in seat checks conducted by child passenger safety technicians (CPSTs). METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from Safe Kids Illinois seat check records from 2015 through 2019 and EOU ratings from 2008 to 2020. Five types of errors were documented by CPSTs. Study authors (JYL and MLM) used a tiered system to match seat check model numbers to EOU ratings. We calculated chi-square statistics and performed logistic regression analyses to assess for EOU as a predictor of relevant CRS errors (e.g., tether errors for forward-facing CRSs). RESULTS: Our analyses included 2132 seat check observations, of which 217 (10.2%) were exact, 244 (10.5%) were probable, and 1671 (78.4%) were near matches via sorting and web search. Errors were most common for seat belts (70.7%) and least common for recline angle (36.9%). Star ratings for instructions, vehicle installation, and labels were associated with recline angle and seat belt errors. Star ratings for instructions, labels, and securing child were associated with harness errors. CRSs with 4-star and 5-star ratings had lower odds of errors for recline angle (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.62; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.43, 0.89 and OR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.56) lower anchors (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.40, 0.89 and OR 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.68), and harness (OR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.76 and OR 0.19; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.35) when compared with 1 and 2-star CRSs. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence in support of NHTSA's EOU ratings as predictors of some CRS installation and use errors among caregivers who obtain seat checks. A higher star rating may be helpful for caregivers when choosing a CRS that will yield lower installation errors.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Proteção para Crianças , Criança , Humanos , Acidentes de Trânsito , Cintos de Segurança , Illinois , ProbabilidadeRESUMO
This study aimed to examine the key factors associated with parents' and caregivers' illegal engagement with their smartphones while driving with their children aged 10 years and younger. Five hundred and ten participants completed an online survey (M = 40.4 years, SD = 6.9, Range = 20.0-69.0 years; Female: 79.2%). Most participants reported that they 'never' accessed social media, talked or composed a text on their smartphone (while handheld) while driving with their children (88.0%, 85.3%, and 80.0%, respectively). However, it was interesting to note that more than one-quarter of the sample reported that they had read a text message or used an app on their handheld smartphone while driving their children (36.3%, and 28.6%, respectively). The results of a logistic regression model showed that participants': age, severity of nomophobia (the fear of being without a mobile phone), and self-reported engagement in other risky driving behaviours (i.e., errors, violations) were significantly associated with illegal engagement with their smartphone while driving their child aged 10 years and younger. With the growing prevalence of mobile phone use and the impact of distraction due to child occupants, it is important to consider the compounded effect of these factors on driver performance, as well as the influence of driver risk-taking behaviour while engaging with smartphones and the consequences of this on children who observe this behaviour.
Assuntos
Condução de Veículo , Telefone Celular , Direção Distraída , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Smartphone , Acidentes de Trânsito , Autorrelato , PaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Unintentional injuries remain a leading cause of death for children and adolescents older than 1 year. Injury prevention has long been a cornerstone of anticipatory guidance. Previous studies have established the sustained efficacy of injury prevention anticipatory guidance in pediatric primary care. This study examines the topical emphasis of injury prevention anticipatory guidance by patient age, with special attention given to the rate of water safety anticipatory guidance across 4 patient age groups. METHODS: A nationwide, random sample of AAP member pediatricians was surveyed on their experiences, attitudes, and practices related to injury prevention anticipatory guidance, including barriers to delivering anticipatory guidance. RESULTS: Of the respondents who reported providing direct patient care, 92% considered injury prevention anticipatory guidance a priority issue. The content of that injury prevention guidance varied considerably by patient age. Roughly half (53%) reported counseling families with adolescents on water safety/drowning prevention, which represents a statistically significant decrease relative to other patient age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reported injury prevention anticipatory guidance is high across different mechanisms of injury. However, fewer pediatricians deliver drowning prevention anticipatory guidance to adolescents than to younger patients. Targeted outreach and education to increase injury prevention anticipatory guidance, especially for adolescent patients, should be part of a multipronged approach to decrease drowning and other injury deaths.
Assuntos
Afogamento , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Afogamento/prevenção & controle , Aconselhamento , Inquéritos e Questionários , Atitude , ÁguaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric concussion patients are frequently managed in the primary care or acute care settings. Optimal care includes vision and vestibular assessments, as well as targeted anticipatory guidance for return to school and activity. We aimed to examine clinical practices related to the evaluation and management of concussion patients at children's hospital-based emergency department (ED) and primary care/urgent care settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of children aged 5 to 18 years who presented to either the ED or the primary and urgent care settings during a 2-year period. We evaluated 2 concussion management practices: (1) completion of the visio-vestibular examination and (2) provision of anticipatory guidance and follow-up. RESULTS: Among patients seen in the ED (n = 500), only 12.4% had at least 1 component of the visio-vestibular examination performed compared with 51.3% of patients (n = 78) in the primary and urgent care settings ( P < 0.05). Regarding anticipatory guidance, 86.2% of ED patients were advised to engage in cognitive rest, and 94.2% were told to physically rest compared with 67.9% and 72.8% in the primary and urgent care settings ( P < 0.05), respectively. Follow-up recommendations were provided similarly for both settings (92.0% in the ED and 85.9% in the primary/urgent care, P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Although most pediatric concussion patients receive instructions acutely about cognitive and physical rest, there is opportunity to increase the frequency of visio-vestibular testing in both the ED and the primary care settings. Future efforts should focus on strategies to consistently optimize visio-vestibular assessment given its value in concussion diagnosis.
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Exame Físico , DescansoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Decompressive craniectomy is recommended to reduce mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Disparities exist in TBI treatment outcomes; however, data on disparities pertaining to decompressive craniectomy utilization is lacking. We investigated these disparities, focusing on race, insurance, sex, and age. METHODS: Hospitalizations (2004-2014) were retrospectively extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The criteria included are as follows: age ≥18 years and indicators of severe TBI diagnosis. Poor outcomes were defined as discharge to institutional care and death. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of race, insurance, age, and sex, on craniectomy utilization and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 349,164 hospitalized patients, 6.8% (n = 23,743) underwent craniectomy. White (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.57; P < 0.001) and Black (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.32-0.64; P = 0.003) Medicare beneficiaries were less likely to undergo craniectomy. Medicare (P < 0.0001) and Medicaid beneficiaries (P < 0.0001) of all race categories had poorer outcomes than privately insured White patients. Black (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.08-2.34; P = 0.001) patients with private insurance and Black (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.22-1.58; P < 0.0001) Medicaid beneficiaries had poorer outcomes than privately insured White patients (P < 0.0001). Older patients (OR = 0.74, 95%, CI = 0.71-0.76; P < 0.001) were less likely to undergo craniectomy and were more likely to have poorer outcomes. Females (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76-0.88; P < 0.001) were less likely to undergo craniectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There are disparities in race, insurance status, sex, and age in craniectomy utilization and outcome. This data highlights the necessity to appropriately address these disparities, especially race and sex, and actively incorporate these factors in clinical trial design and enrollment.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Craniectomia Descompressiva , Adolescente , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/cirurgia , Hematoma/cirurgia , Medicaid , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , AdultoRESUMO
Booster seats reduce injury in motor vehicle crashes, yet they are used less frequently than car seats and seat belts. Primary care providers are well positioned to educate and encourage families to use booster seats. We aimed to assess how a booster seat distribution program affected the documentation of restraint usage and anticipatory guidance at well-child visits at a pediatric primary care practice. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged 4 to 12 years from June to December in 2019 and 2020, representing before and after a booster seat program. The most frequently documented restraints in 2019 and 2020 were seat belts (51% vs 30%), booster seats (25% vs 27%), and not documented/unclear (17% vs 25%) (P < .001). The program significantly increased referrals for booster seats (P < .001). Despite significant differences in the proportion of children in each restraint category, overall booster seat use was similar between years.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Proteção para Crianças , Equipamentos para Lactente , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cintos de Segurança , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , AconselhamentoRESUMO
Objective: To identify admission characteristics that predict a successful community discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) among older adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: In a retrospective cohort study, we leveraged probabilistically linked Medicare Administrative, IRF-Patient Assessment Instrument, and National Trauma Data Bank data to build a parsimonious logistic model to identify characteristics associated with successful discharge. Multiple imputation methods were used to estimate effects across linked datasets to account for potential data linkage errors. Setting: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities in the U.S. Participants: The sample included a mean of 1060 community-dwelling adults aged 66 years and older across 30 linked datasets (N=1060). All were hospitalized after TBI between 2011 and 2015 and then admitted to an IRF. The mean age of the sample was 79.7 years, and 44.3% of the sample was women. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Successful discharge home. Results: Overall, 64.6% of the sample was successfully discharged home. A logistic model including 4 predictor variables: Functional Independence Measure motor (FIM-M) and cognitive (FIM-C) scores, pre-injury chronic conditions, and pre-injury living arrangement, that were significantly associated with successful discharge, resulted in acceptable discrimination (area under the curve: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.81). Higher scores on the FIM-M (odds ratio [OR]:1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.09) and FIM-C (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08) were associated with greater odds of successful discharge, whereas living alone vs with others (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.71) and a greater number of chronic conditions (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.99) were associated with lower odds of successful discharge. Conclusions: The results provide a parsimonious model for predicting successful discharge among older adults admitted to an IRF after a TBI-related hospitalization and provide clinically useful information to inform discharge planning.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: There are limited data on how often providers collect and document adequate restraint information in children seen in the emergency department (ED) after motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). The objectives of this study are to determine (1) how often adequate child restraint information to determine age-appropriate use is documented after MVC; (2) the frequency of incorrect use of the child restraint when adequate details are documented; and (3) for those discharged from the ED with identified incorrect use, the frequency of provision of information on child passenger safety (CPS). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of visits of children younger than 13 years with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code for MVC to an urban, academic, level 1 pediatric trauma center, from October 2015 to September 2018. Adequate documentation of child restraint use was defined as identification of location of the child in the car (front vs rear row), type of restraint used, and forward or rear facing for children 24 months or younger. RESULTS: A total of 165 visits qualified for inclusion. There was adequate documentation in 46% of visits. Of those, incorrect child restraint use was identified in 49%. Of discharged patients with incorrect use, 10% had documentation of provision of CPS information. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate details to determine proper age-appropriate restraint use are documented in only half of ED visits for MVC. Very few are given CPS instructions on discharge, even when incorrect use has been identified. Identification of incorrect restraint use in the ED is an opportunity for a teachable moment that is being underused.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Documentação , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Veículos AutomotoresRESUMO
Since all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) were introduced in the mid-1970s, regulatory agencies, injury prevention researchers, and pediatricians have documented their dangers to youth. Major risk factors, crash mechanisms, and injury patterns for children and adolescents have been well characterized. Despite this knowledge, preventing pediatric ATV-related deaths and injuries has proven difficult and has had limited success. This policy statement broadly summarizes key background information and provides detailed recommendations based on best practices. These recommendations are designed to provide all stakeholders with strategies that can be used to reduce the number of pediatric deaths and injuries resulting from youth riding on ATVs.
Assuntos
Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Veículos Off-Road , Pediatria , Morte Perinatal , Ferimentos e Lesões , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/prevenção & controleRESUMO
This prospective multicenter study evaluated differences in concussion severity and functional outcome using glial and neuronal biomarkers glial Fibrillary Acidic (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase (UCH-L1) in children and youth involved in non-sport related trauma, organized sports, and recreational activities. Children and youth presenting to three Level 1 trauma centersfollowing blunt head trauma with a GCS 15 with a verified diagnosis of a concussion were enrolled within 6 hours of injury. Traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan and functional outcome within 3 months of injury were evaluated. 131 children and youth with concussion were enrolled, 81 in the no sports group, 22 in the organized sports group and 28 in the recreational activities group. Median GFAP levels were 0.18, 0.07, and 0.39 ng/mL in the respective groups (p = 0.014). Median UCH-L1 levels were 0.18, 0.27, and 0.32 ng/mL respectively (p = 0.025). A CT scan of the head was performed in 110 (84%) patients. CT was positive in 5 (7%), 4 (27%), and 5 (20%) patients, respectively. The AUC for GFAP for detecting +CT was 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.93) and for UCH-L1 was 0.82 (95%CI 0.71-0.94). In those without CT lesions, elevations in UCH-L1 were significantly associated with unfavorable 3-month outcome. Concussions in the 3 groups were of similar severity and functional outcome. GFAP and UCH-L1 were both associated with severity of concussion and intracranial lesions, with the most elevated concentrations in recreational activities .
Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Traumatismos Cranianos Fechados , Adolescente , Biomarcadores , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida , Humanos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine child deaths in motor vehicle crashes by rurality, restraint use, and state child passenger restraint laws. STUDY DESIGN: 2015-2019 Fatality Analysis Reporting System data were analyzed to determine deaths and rates by passenger and crash characteristics. Optimal restraint use was defined using age and the type of the restraint according to child passenger safety recommendations. RESULTS: Death rates per 100â000 population were highest for non-Hispanic Black (1.96; [1.84, 2.07]) and American Indian or Alaska Native children (2.67; [2.14, 3.20]) and lowest for Asian or Pacific Islander children (0.57; [0.47, 0.67]). Death rates increased with rurality with the lowest rate (0.88; [0.84, 0.92]) in the most urban counties and the highest rate (4.47; [3.88, 5.06]) in the most rural counties. Children who were not optimally restrained had higher deaths rates than optimally restrained children (0.84; [0.81, 0.87] vs 0.44; [0.42, 0.46], respectively). The death rate was higher in counties where states only required child passenger restraint use for passengers aged ≤6 years (1.64; [1.50, 1.78]) than that in those requiring child passenger restraint use for passengers aged ≤7 or ≤8 years (1.06; [1.01, 1.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Proper restraint use and extending the ages covered by child passenger restraint laws reduce the risk for child crash deaths. Additionally, racial and geographic disparities in crash deaths were identified, especially among Black and Hispanic children in rural areas. Decision makers can consider extending the ages covered by child passenger restraint laws until at least age 9 to increase proper child restraint use and reduce crash injuries and deaths.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , População Rural , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Lactente , Grupos Raciais , Família , Veículos AutomotoresRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a disability-based metric for quantifying disability rates as a result of motor vehicle crash (MVC) spine injuries and compare functional outcomes between pediatric and adult subgroups. METHODS: Disability rate was quantified using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores within the National Trauma Data Bank-Research Data System for the top 95% most frequent Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 3 spine injuries (14 unique injuries). Pediatric (7-18 years), young adult (19-45 years), middle-aged adult (46-65 years), and older adult (66+ years) MVC occupants with FIM scores available and at least one of the 14 spine injuries were included. FIM scores of 1 or 2 at time of discharge were used to define disability and correspond to full functional or modified dependence in self-feeding, locomotion, and/or verbal expression. Disability rate was evaluated on a per injury basis for each AIS 3 spine injury and calculated as the proportion of cases associated with disability (i.e. FIM of 1 or 2) out of the total cases of that particular injury. Disability rates were calculated with and without the exclusion of cases with severe co-injuries (AIS 4+) to minimize bias from additional non-spinal injuries that could have contributed to disability. Associations between adjusted disability rates and existing mortality rates were investigated. RESULTS: Locomotion impairment alone was the most frequent disability type for the top 14 AIS 3 spine injuries (7 cervical, 4 thoracic, and 3 lumbar) across all age groups and spine regions. Adjusted and unadjusted disability rates ranged from 0-69%. Adjusted disability rates increased with age: 14.8 ± 10% (mean ± SD) in pediatrics to 16.2 ± 6.6% (young adults), 29.2 ± 10.9% (middle-aged adults), and 45.0 ± 12.2% (older adults). Among all adult populations, adjusted mortality and disability rates were positively correlated (R2>0.24), with disability rates consistently greater than corresponding mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults had significantly greater disability rates associated with MVC spine injuries across all spinal regions. MVC disability rates for pediatrics were considerably lower. Overall, rates of mortality were significantly lower than rates of disability. The adjusted disability rates developed can supplement existing injury metrics by accounting for age- and location-specific functional implications of MVC spine injuries.