In vitro and clinical investigations to determine the drug-drug interaction potential of entrectinib, a small molecule inhibitor of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK).

Background Entrectinib is a CNS-active, potent inhibitor of tyrosine receptor kinases A/B/C, ROS1 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase approved for use in patients with solid tumors. We describe the in vitro and clinical studies investigating potential entrectinib drug-drug interactions. Methods In vitro studies with human biomaterials assessed the enzymes involved in entrectinib metabolism, and whether entrectinib modulates the activity of the major cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes or drug transporter P-glycoprotein. Clinical studies investigated the effect of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (rifampin) on single-dose entrectinib pharmacokinetics. The effect of entrectinib on sensitive probe substrates for CYP3A4 (midazolam) and P-glycoprotein (digoxin) were also investigated. Results Entrectinib is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4. In vitro, entrectinib is a CYP3A4/5 inhibitor (IC50 2 µM) and a weak CYP3A4 inducer. Entrectinib inhibited P-glycoprotein (IC50 1.33 µM) but is a poor substrate. In healthy subjects, itraconazole increased entrectinib Cmax and AUC by 73% and 504%, respectively, and rifampin decreased entrectinib Cmax and AUC by 56% and 77%, respectively. Single dose entrectinib did not affect midazolam AUC, although Cmax decreased by 34%. Multiple dose entrectinib increased midazolam AUC by 50% and decreased Cmax by 21%. Single dose entrectinib increased digoxin AUC and Cmax by 18% and 28%, respectively, but did not affect digoxin renal clearance. Conclusions Entrectinib is a CYP3A4 substrate and is sensitive to the effects of coadministered moderate/strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and strong inducers, and requires dose adjustment. Entrectinib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein and no dose adjustments are required with CYP3A4/P- glycoprotein substrates.Registration Number (Study 2) NCT03330990 (first posted online November 6, 2017) As studies 1 and 3 are phase 1 trials in healthy subjects, they are not required to be registered.

Dosing regimen optimisation for oseltamivir in immunocompromised paediatric patients with influenza: Extrapolation of efficacy.

AIMS: To optimise the dosing regimen of oseltamivir for immunocompromised (IC) paediatric patients (<18 years) with influenza, we used an extrapolation approach alongside clinical data. METHODS: Efficacy was extrapolated from adult IC patients to paediatric IC patients by leveraging existing efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD), and disease-progression models of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate (OC). Data of IC paediatric patients from two studies (NV25719 and NV20234) were included in the population PK (n = 30), PK/PD analysis (n = 22) and disease modelling approach (n = 36). Simulations were performed to identify the optimal dosing regimen. RESULTS: Clearance of oseltamivir (CL) and OC (CLM ) were similar in IC and otherwise-healthy (OwH) patients <10 years, but decreased by 44.4% (95% CI: 26.8-62.0) and 49.1% (95% CI: 34.5-63.8), respectively, in IC patients aged 10-17 years versus OwH patients. There were no notable exposure-response relationships for any of the virologic PD analyses. Thus, no additional benefit was seen with oseltamivir carboxylate exposures higher than achieved with the conventional dose (75 mg twice daily, age- and weight-adjusted for children <13 years). The disease model illustrated that doses above the conventional oseltamivir dose had limited impact on viral kinetics in IC paediatric patients and a prolonged treatment duration of 10 days was favoured to limit potential viral rebound. CONCLUSION: An oseltamivir dosage recommendation (conventional dose, twice daily for 10 days) was established in IC paediatric patients with influenza, based on extrapolation of efficacy from IC adults, leveraging population PK, PK/PD, and disease modelling, whilst taking resistance and safety data into account.

Pharmacologic effects of oseltamivir in immunocompromised adult patients as assessed by population PK/PD analysis and drug-disease modelling for dosing regimen optimization.

AIM: Pharmacologic effects were analysed to determine a dose recommendation for oseltamivir in immunocompromised (IC) adults with influenza. METHODS: Quantitative clinical pharmacology methods were applied to data from 160 adult IC patients (aged 18-78 years) from two studies (NV20234, 150 patients; NV25118, 10 patients) who received oseltamivir 75-200 mg twice daily for up to 10 days. An established population-pharmacokinetic (PK) model with additional effects on oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) clearance described the PK characteristics of oseltamivir in IC patients versus otherwise healthy (OwH) patients from previous clinical trials. Estimated PK parameters were used to evaluate exposure-response relationships for virologic endpoints (time to cessation of viral shedding, viral load measures and treatment-emergent resistance). A drug-disease model characterized the viral kinetics of influenza accounting for the effect of OC on viral production. RESULTS: Oseltamivir clearance was 32.5% lower (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.1-38.8) and OC clearance was 33.7% lower (95% CI, 23.2-44.1) in IC versus OwH patients. No notable exposure-response relationships were identified for exposures higher than those achieved after conventional dose oseltamivir 75 mg, which appeared to be close to the maximum effect of oseltamivir. Simulations of the drug-disease model predicted that initiating treatment within 48 hours of symptom onset had maximum impact, and a treatment duration of 10 days was favourable over 3-5 days to limit viral rebound. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of conventional-dose oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily for 10 days in the treatment of IC adult patients with influenza.

Baloxavir treatment of ferrets infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus reduces onward transmission.

Influenza viruses cause seasonal outbreaks and pose a continuous pandemic threat. Although vaccines are available for influenza control, their efficacy varies each season and a vaccine for a novel pandemic virus manufactured using current technology will not be available fast enough to mitigate the effect of the first pandemic wave. Antivirals can be effective against many different influenza viruses but have not thus far been used extensively for outbreak control. Baloxavir, a recently licensed antiviral drug that targets the influenza virus endonuclease, has been shown to reduce virus shedding more effectively than oseltamivir, a widely used neuraminidase inhibitor drug. Thus it is possible that treatment with baloxavir might also interrupt onward virus transmission. To test this, we utilized the ferret model, which is the most commonly used animal model to study influenza virus transmission. We established a subcutaneous baloxavir administration method in ferrets which achieved similar pharmacokinetics to the approved human oral dose. Transmission studies were then conducted in two different locations with different experimental setups to compare the onward transmission of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus from infected ferrets treated with baloxavir, oseltamivir or placebo to naïve sentinel ferrets exposed either indirectly in adjacent cages or directly by co-housing. We found that baloxavir treatment reduced infectious viral shedding in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets compared to placebo, and reduced the frequency of transmission amongst sentinels in both experimental setups, even when treatment was delayed until 2 days post-infection. In contrast, oseltamivir treatment did not substantially affect viral shedding or transmission compared to placebo. We did not detect the emergence of baloxavir-resistant variants in treated animals or in untreated sentinels. Our results support the concept that antivirals which decrease viral shedding could also reduce influenza transmission in the community.

Safety and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Nacubactam, a Novel ß-Lactamase Inhibitor, Alone and in Combination with Meropenem, in Healthy Volunteers.

Nacubactam is a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor with dual mechanisms of action as an inhibitor of serine ß-lactamases (classes A and C and some class D) and an inhibitor of penicillin binding protein 2 in Enterobacteriaceae The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous nacubactam were evaluated in single- and multiple-ascending-dose, placebo-controlled studies. Healthy participants received single ascending doses of nacubactam of 50 to 8,000 mg, multiple ascending doses of nacubactam of 1,000 to 4,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) for up to 7 days, or nacubactam of 2,000 mg plus meropenem of 2,000 mg q8h for 6 days after a 3-day lead-in period. Nacubactam was generally well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) being mild to moderate complications associated with intravenous access and headache. There was no apparent relationship between drug dose and the pattern, incidence, or severity of AEs. No clinically relevant dose-related trends were observed in laboratory safety test results. No serious AEs, dose-limiting AEs, or deaths were reported. After single or multiple doses, nacubactam pharmacokinetics appeared linear, and exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner across the dose range investigated. Nacubactam was excreted largely unchanged into urine. Coadministration of nacubactam with meropenem did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of either drug. These findings support the continued clinical development of nacubactam and demonstrate the suitability of meropenem as a potential ß-lactam partner for nacubactam. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT02134834 [single ascending dose study] and NCT02972255 [multiple ascending dose study].).

Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Oseltamivir and Oseltamivir Carboxylate Accounting for Physiological Changes to Predict Exposures in Neonates and Infants.

A mechanistic population-pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict oseltamivir exposures in neonates and infants accounting for physiological changes during the first 2 years of life. The model included data from 13 studies, comprising 436 subjects with normal renal function (317 pediatric subjects (≥ 38 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), ≥ 13 days old) and 119 adult subjects < 40 years). Concentration-time profiles of oseltamivir and its active metabolite, oseltamivir carboxylate (OC), were characterized by a four-compartment model, with absorption described by three additional compartments. Renal maturational changes were implemented by description of OC clearance with allometric function of weight and Hill function of PMA. Clearance of OC increased with weight up to 43 kg (allometric coefficient 0.75). Half the adult OC clearance was reached at a PMA of 45.6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 41.6-49.6) with a Hill coefficient of 2.35 (95% CI 1.67-3.04). The model supports the European Union/United States-approved 3 mg/kg twice-daily oseltamivir dose for infants < 1 year (PMA ≥ 38 weeks) and allows prediction of exposures in preterm neonates.

Inconsistent internal standard response in LC-MS/MS bioanalysis: an evaluation of case studies.

Aim: Monitoring the internal standard (IS) response is common practice in bioanalysis by LC-MS/MS. IS response variation may raise questions on assay quality and should trigger investigations into the root cause. Results: In two case studies with IS variability, re-analysis of diluted samples and spiking predose study samples revealed no effect of IS variability on results. The D17-labeled IS in a third case proved not to be suitable during method development and was replaced by a differently labeled IS. Conclusion: Determining the exact root cause for varying IS response is not always feasible; however, assay accuracy and reliability of results should be demonstrated. In some cases, assay re-development is needed to solve the problem.

Stabilization of clinical samples collected for quantitative bioanalysis--a reflection from the European Bioanalysis Forum.

In bioanalysis of small molecules, the analyte concentration in the measured samples should reflect the concentration during sample collection. Precautions may be needed to prevent over- or under-estimation of the obtained result. This might require the addition of stabilizers to prevent degradation or nonspecific binding. For unstable drugs, it is essential to know how analytes can be stabilized before the start of the clinical study. Although the stabilization methods are well documented, the impact of the stabilization on the clinical workflow is not properly addressed. Already during method development, the clinical implications in terms of personnel safety, ease of use, training possibilities and staff capacity should be taken into account, and validation of the bioanalytical method should reflect collection procedures.

Determination of dalcetrapib by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

The cholesteryl ester transfer protein modulator dalcetrapib is currently under development for the prevention of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. Dalcetrapib, a thioester, is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to the corresponding thiophenol which in turn is further oxidized to the dimer and mixed disulfides (where the thiophenol binds to peptides, proteins and other endogenous thiols). These forms co-exist in an oxidation-reduction equilibrium via the thiol and cannot be stabilized without influencing the equilibrium, hence specific determination of individual components, i.e., in order to distinguish between the free thiol, the disulfide dimer and mixed disulfide adducts, was not pursued for routine analysis. The individual forms were quantified collectively as dalcetrapib-thiol (dal-thiol) after reduction under basic conditions with dithiothreitol to break disulfide bonds and derivatization with N-ethylmaleimide to stabilize the free thiol. The S-methyl and S-glucuronide metabolites were determined simultaneously with dal-thiol with no effect from the derivatization procedure. Column-switching liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry provided a simple, fast and robust method for analysis of human and animal plasma and human urine samples. Addition of the surfactant Tween 80 to urine prevented adsorptive compound loss. The lower limits of quantitation (LLOQ) were 5 ng/mL for dal-thiol, and 5 ng/mL for the S-methyl and 50 ng/mL for the S-glucuronide metabolites. Using stable isotope-labeled internal standards, inter- and intra-assay precisions were each <15% (<20% at LLOQ) and accuracy was between 85 and 115%. Recovery was close to 100%, and no significant matrix effect was observed.

Pharmacokinetic interaction study of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir in combination with rifabutin in healthy subjects.

The effect of multiple doses of rifabutin (150 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-ritonavir (1,000 mg of saquinavir and 100 mg of ritonavir [1,000/100 mg]) twice daily (BID) was assessed in 25 healthy subjects. Rifabutin reduced the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h postdose (AUC(0-12)), maximum observed concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and minimum observed concentration of drug in plasma at the end of the dosing interval (C(min)) for saquinavir by 13%, 15%, and 9%, respectively, for subjects receiving rifabutin (150 mg) every 3 days with saquinavir-ritonavir BID. No effects of rifabutin on ritonavir AUC(0-12), C(max), and C(min) were observed. No adjustment of the saquinavir-ritonavir dose (1,000/100 mg) BID is required when the drugs are administered in combination with rifabutin. The effect of multiple doses of saquinavir-ritonavir on rifabutin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in two groups of healthy subjects. In group 1 (n = 14), rifabutin (150 mg) was coadministered every 3 days with saquinavir-ritonavir BID. The AUC(0-72) and C(max) of the active moiety (rifabutin plus 25-O-desacetyl-rifabutin) increased by 134% and 130%, respectively, compared with administration of rifabutin (150 mg) once daily alone. Rifabutin exposure increased by 53% for AUC(0-72) and by 86% for C(max). In group 3 (n = 13), rifabutin was coadministered every 4 days with saquinavir-ritonavir BID. The AUC(0-96) and C(max) of the active moiety increased by 60% and 111%, respectively, compared to administration of 150 mg of rifabutin once daily alone. The AUC(0-96) of rifabutin was not affected, and C(max) increased by 68%. Monitoring of neutropenia and liver enzyme levels is recommended for patients receiving rifabutin with saquinavir-ritonavir BID.

Effect of saquinavir-ritonavir on cytochrome P450 3A4 activity in healthy volunteers using midazolam as a probe.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inhibitory potential of multiple doses of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir on the pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 model substrate. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, one-sequence, two-period crossover study. SETTING: Clinical pharmacology unit in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen healthy adult male and female volunteers (median age 37.5 yrs). Intervention. A single oral dose of midazolam 7.5 mg was administered on day 1. A second dose was administered on day 16, after 14 days of oral saquinavir 1000 mg-ritonavir 100 mg twice/day. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma concentrations of midazolam and its metabolite, 1'-hydroxymidazolam. Pharmacokinetic parameters of midazolam and 1'-hydroxymidazolam were determined when midazolam was given alone (day 1) and after coadministration with saquinavir-ritonavir for 14 days (day 16). Two weeks of treatment with saquinavir-ritonavir resulted in a 4.3-fold increase in maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and a 12.4-fold increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) for midazolam. Midazolam's half-life increased from 4.7 to 14.9 hours. Concomitant reductions for 1'-hydroxymidazolam were approximately 7-fold for C(max) and 2-fold for AUC(0-infinity). The 1'-hydroxymidazolam AUC(0-infinity):midazolam AUC(0-infinity) ratio was only 1% during coadministration of midazolam with saquinavir-ritonavir compared with 33% for midazolam alone. Adverse-event reports indicated that the combination of saquinavir, ritonavir, and midazolam was well tolerated but resulted in prolonged sedation. CONCLUSION: Administration of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir markedly increased the exposure of midazolam by inhibiting its metabolism, confirming that the combination of saquinavir and ritonavir at steady state strongly inhibits CYP3A4 activity.

Drug-drug interaction study of ketoconazole and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir.

Saquinavir, a potent human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor, is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Saquinavir is coadministered with ritonavir, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, to boost its exposure. Ketoconazole is a potent CYP3A inhibitor. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir/ritonavir and vice versa using the approved dosage regimens of saquinavir/ritonavir at 1,000/100 mg twice daily and ketoconazole at 200 mg once daily. This was an open-label, randomized two-arm, one-sequence, two-period crossover study in healthy subjects. In study arm 1, 20 subjects received saquinavir/ritonavir treatment alone for 14 days, followed in combination with ketoconazole treatment for 14 days. In arm 2, 12 subjects received ketoconazole treatment for 6 days, followed in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir treatment for 14 days. The pharmacokinetics were assessed on the last day of each treatment (days 14 and 28 in arm 1 and days 6 and 20 in arm 2). The exposures C(max) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) of saquinavir and ritonavir with or without ketoconazole were not substantially altered after 2 weeks of concomitant dosing with ketoconazole. The C(max) and AUC(0-12) of ketoconazole, dosed at 200 mg once daily, were increased by 45% (90% confidence interval = 32 to 59%) and 168% (90% confidence interval = 146 to 193%), respectively, after 2 weeks of concomitant dosing with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (1,000 mg of saquinavir/100 mg of ritonavir given twice daily). The greater exposure to ketoconazole when given in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir was not associated with unacceptable safety or tolerability. No dose adjustment for saquinavir/ritonavir (1,000/100 mg twice daily) is required when coadministered with 200 mg of ketoconazole once daily, and high doses of ketoconazole (>200 mg/day) are not recommended.