Innovation in oncology clinical trial design.

Progress in and better understanding of cancer biology causes a shift in cancer drug development: away from the evaluation of drugs in large tumour histology defined patient populations towards targeted agents in increasingly heterogeneous molecularly defined subpopulations. This requires novel approaches in clinical trial design by academia and industry, and development of new assessment tools by regulatory authorities. Pharmaceutical industry is developing new targeted agents generating many clinical studies, including target combinations. This requires improved operational efficiency by development of innovative trial designs, strategies for early-stage decision making and early selection of candidate drugs with a high likelihood of success. In addition, patient awareness and ethical considerations necessitate that agents will be rapidly available to patients. Regulatory Authorities such as the European Medicine Agency and national agencies recognise that these changes require a different attitude towards benefit-risk analysis for drug approval. The gold standard of randomised confirmatory Phase III trials is not always ethical or feasible when developing drugs for treatment of small cancer populations. Alternative strategies comprise accelerated approval via conditional marketing approval, which can be granted in the EU based on small non-randomised Phase II trials. The paper describes innovative trial designs with their pros and cons and efforts of pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities to deal with the paradigm shift. Furthermore, all stakeholders should continue to share their experiences and discuss problems in order to understand the position and concerns of the other stakeholders to learn from each other and to progress the field of novel oncology clinical trial design.

Present and future breast cancer management--bench to bedside and back: a positioning paper of academia, regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical industry.

Insights into tumour biology of breast cancer have led the path towards the introduction of targeted treatment approaches; still, breast cancer-related mortality remains relatively high. Efforts in the field of basic research revealed new druggable targets which now await validation within the context of clinical trials. Therefore, questions concerning the optimal design of future studies are becoming even more pertinent. Aspects such as the ideal end point, availability of predictive markers to identify the optimal cohort for drug testing, or potential mechanisms of resistance need to be resolved. An expert panel representing the academic community, the pharmaceutical industry, as well as European Regulatory Authorities met in Vienna, Austria, in November 2012, in order to discuss breast cancer biology, identification of novel biological targets and optimal drug development with the aim of treatment individualization. This article summarizes statements and perspectives provided by the meeting participants.

Serum CD44 levels predict survival in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders that are preferentially diagnosed in the elderly. Aberrant expression of the adhesion receptor CD44 correlates with poor prognosis in various neoplasms. To evaluate the prognostic impact of CD44 in MDS serum levels of soluble CD44 standard (solCD44s) were measured in 130 MDS patients (median age 68 years) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). solCD44s levels were significantly elevated in MDS patients as compared to those of healthy donors (p<0.001) and were found to correlate with distinct FAB and WHO subtypes. The highest levels of solCD44s were found in patients with CMML, in RAEB and in patients with MDS transformed into secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In univariate analysis elevated levels of solCD44s (cut-off level>688.5ng/ml) correlated significantly with shorter overall survival in MDS patients (12 versus 39 months; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis solCD44s displayed prognostic significance independent of the International Prognosis Scoring System (IPSS). To test for refined prognostication, IPSS risk groups were split into two separate categories based on the solCD44s levels. Using this approach, MDS patients with a shorter survival were identified both in the IPSS low-risk (p=0.037) and in the IPSS intermediate-1-risk group (p=0.015). The CD44s-adjusted IPSS defines a cohort of MDS patients with unfavorable prognosis, which might be helpful in risk stratification and in therapeutic algorithms.

Investigator-initiated trials of targeted oncology agents: why independent research is at risk?

BACKGROUND: Drug development traditionally has relied upon the complementary contributions of clinicians and scientists at academic institutions and at pharmaceutical companies. Greater regulatory burdens, increased bureaucratic requirements, restricted reimbursement, and spiralling research and development costs are exerting pressure on the drug development pipeline. The result is a de-emphasis of exploratory research, particularly independent academic research, despite its proven value in identifying new drug targets and developing innovative cancer therapies. DESIGN: An expert panel assembled by the Biotherapy Development Association-a nonprofit international forum for academic and industry researchers, patients, and government regulatory and postregulatory agencies-examined the growing schism between academia and industry and identified several causes of declining academic research. RESULTS: The authors propose solutions to sustain investigator-initiated research and provide a new model whereby expert organisations provide a forum for academia and industry to plan studies within a regulatory framework to support licensure/authorisation and reimbursement for new molecularly targeted agents and biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Investigator-initiated trials have led to the discovery and development of innovative, safe, and effective cancer treatments. To ensure that such research continues, action will be required on the parts of legislative and regulatory bodies, industry, universities, patient advocacy organisations, and preclinical and clinical academic scientists.

Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) include a rapidly expanding repertoire of medical, surgical and supportive care measures. DESIGN: To provide timely and evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with MBC, an international expert panel reviewed and discussed the evidence available from clinical trials regarding diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive measures with emphasis on their impact on the quality of life and overall survival of patients with MBC. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, use of targeted therapies and bisphosphonates, surgical treatment and supportive care measures in the management of patients with MBC were formulated. CONCLUSIONS: The present consensus manuscript updates evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of MBC depending on disease-associated and biological variables.

Improving the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

A series of cancer vaccines have been evaluated in clinical trials with encouraging results, but the demonstration of clinical benefit in confirmatory studies has so far proven to be difficult. The development of cancer vaccines is hampered by a range of issues particular to this field of research. On 12th March 2008, the Biotherapy Development Association convened a workshop to discuss issues faced by scientists and clinicians involved in the development of cancer vaccines. This paper is a review of the field, based on discussions held at the BDA workshop, and describes biological barriers encountered in generating effective immune responses to tumours, methodological obstacles encountered in the improvement of immunological monitoring which aims to improve inter-laboratory and inter-trial comparisons, challenges in clinical trial design and problems posed by the lack of specific regulation for cancer vaccines and the impact on their development. Ultimately, a number of general solutions are posed: (1) better patient selection, (2) use of multi-modal treatments that affect several aspects of the immune system at once, (3) a requirement for the development of good biomarkers to stratify patients for selection prior to trial and as surrogates for clinical response and (4) harmonisation of SOPs for immunological monitoring of clinical trials.

Market and patient access to new oncology products in Europe: a current, multidisciplinary perspective.

To air challenging issues related to patient and market access to new anticancer agents, the Biotherapy Development Association--an international group focused on developing targeted cancer therapies using biological agents--convened a meeting on 29 November 2007 in Brussels, Belgium. The meeting provided a forum for representatives of pharmaceutical companies and academia to interact with European regulatory and postregulatory agencies. The goal was to increase all parties' understanding of their counterparts' roles in the development, licensure, and appraisal of new agents for cancer treatment, events guided by an understanding that cancer patients should have rapid and equitable access to life-prolonging treatments. Among the outcomes of the meeting were a greater understanding of the barriers facing drug developers in an evolving postregulatory world, clarity about what regulatory and postregulatory bodies expect to see in dossiers of new anticancer agents as they contemplate licensure and reimbursement, and several sets of recommendations to optimize patients' access to innovative, safe, effective, and fairly priced cancer treatments.

Second consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

The present consensus manuscript defines evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of metastatic breast cancer depending on disease-associated and biologic variables.

Low-dose cytosine arabinoside (LD-AraC) vs LD-AraC plus granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor vs LD-AraC plus Interleukin-3 for myelodysplastic syndrome patients with a high risk of developing acute leukemia: final results of a randomized phase III study (06903) of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group.

In this randomized phase III study of the EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group, patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with 10-30% bone marrow blasts and hematopoietic failure were treated with low-dose cytosine arabinoside (LD-AraC) (2 x 10 mg/m2/day subcutaneously (s.c.) days 1-14) either alone or in combination with rhGM-CSF or interleukin-3 (IL-3) both given s.c. at a dose of 150 microg/day from day 8 to 21. A total of 180 evaluable patients with a median age of 65 years and refractory anemia with an excess of blasts (RAEB, n = 107) or RAEB in transformation (RAEBt, n = 73) were randomized. There were no differences among the three treatment regimens with respect to numbers of courses applied or treatment delays. Hemorrhage occurred in approximately 40% in all arms, whereas infection rates were higher in the granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)- or IL3-containing arm. The overall response rate was 38.6% with no statistically significant difference among the three arms. In summary, a substantial proportion of patients had achieved relatively durable responses in all the three arms. No influence of either growth factor was detected on the grade of cytopenia. Thus, the combination of LD-AraC with GM-CSF or IL-3 cannot be recommended for routine use in a high-risk MDS population.

Irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor CI-1033 induces caspase-independent apoptosis in colorectal cancer DiFi cell line.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in the majority of colorectal carcinomas and represents a target for therapeutic interventions with signal transduction inhibitors. We investigated the ability of CI-1033 to induce apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation in the colorectal cancer cell lines DiFi and Caco-2, which both express high levels of EGFR. While in Caco-2 cells CI-1033 treatment at a concentration 0.1 microM for 72 hours demonstrated only antiproliferative (53.7 +/- 4.3%) but no pro-apoptotic effects, treatment of DiFi cells resulted in a reduced proliferation rate (31.4 +/- 3.1%) and in apoptosis (44.2 +/- 8.9%). In order to define proteins involved in the regulation of apoptosis, we aimed to determine differences in the proteome profile of both cell lines before and after treatment with CI-1033. Cellular proteins were analyzed by 2-D gel electrophoresis followed by computational image analysis and mass spectrometry. Our data show that DiFi cells differ from Caco-2 cells in nine significantly upregulated proteins, and their potential role in apoptosis is described. We demonstrate that induction of apoptosis was triggered via caspase-independent pathways. Overexpression of leukocyte elastase inhibitor (LEI) and translocation of cathepsin D to the cytosol accompanied by upregulation of other defined proteins resulted in Bax-independent AIF translocation from mitochondria into the nucleus and apoptosis. Definition of these proteins can pave the way for functional studies and contribute to a better understanding of the effects of CI-1033 and the pathways of caspase-independent cell death.

Phase I trial of intravenous aviscumine (rViscumin) in patients with solid tumors: a study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer New Drug Development Group.

BACKGROUND: Aviscumine is an Escherichia coli-derived recombinant type II ribosome-inactivating protein with potent antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. It is the recombinant counterpart of natural mistletoe lectin-I. The current study was performed to determine the safety profile, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the intravenous (i.v.) administration of aviscumine in cancer patients. Translational research included the evaluation of pharmacokinetics and monitoring of plasma cytokine and anti-aviscumine antibody induction after administration of the drug. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Aviscumine was given twice weekly as a 1 h central i.v. infusion in patients with advanced, refractory progressive, solid malignant tumors who had not been previously exposed to natural mistletoe preparations. They had histologically or cytologically verified disease, were > or =18 years old, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or =2 and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. DLT was defined as any non-hematological grade 3-4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0), neutrophil count <500/microl for > or =7 days, febrile neutropenia or thrombocytopenia grade 4. The MTD was defined as the dose at which >20% of patients experienced DLT during the first treatment cycle. The Continual Reassessment Method was used to determine the number of patients required per dose level. RESULTS: Forty-one fully eligible patients (19 male, 22 female) with a median age of 56 years (range 37-74) were enrolled. Colorectal, ovarian, renal cell and breast cancer were the most common tumor types. Dose levels of aviscumine ranged from 10 to 6400 ng/kg. The median number of cycles was two (range one to eight). Common clinical toxicities in cycle 1 were fatigue, fever, nausea, vomiting and allergic reactions. Fatigue grade 3 was dose limiting in one of six patients at 4000 ng/kg and reversible grade 3 liver toxicity (elevation in alkaline phosphatase, transaminases and/or gamma-glutamyltransferase) occurred in one of 10 patients at 4800 ng/kg and in two of five patients at 6400 ng/kg. The best response (RECIST criteria) was stable disease in 11 patients, lasting for two to eight cycles. The pharmacokinetic evaluation revealed a short alpha half-life of 13 min and linear kinetics on dose levels > or =1600 ng/kg. Aviscumine stimulated the immune system with a release of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6 and interferon-gamma, and induced immunoglobulin (Ig) G- and/or IgM-anti-aviscumine antibodies of uncertain clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for further clinical trials is 5600 ng/kg twice weekly. Based on the short half-life of the recombinant protein observed in this trial, the exploration of prolonged infusion schedules of aviscumine is warranted.

The EORTC and drug development. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Early drug development at EORTC has always been subject to structural changes to adapt to the rapid changes that occur in oncological drug development. The expertise of early drug developers has always been cross-fertilised with disease-/tumour-oriented groups and also backwards to the laboratory research groups. This results in the establishment of a solid and dedicated network of medical oncologists with focused expertise in cancer drug development. The EORTC Data Center is fully equipped with all expertise to support clinical research activities and includes regulatory, safety, and quality assurance desks. The EORTC New Drug development Programme (NDDP) provides methodological expertise to early clinical trials and coordinates phase I and phase II studies addressing various approaches. Through NDDP, the early clinical groups and the disease-/tumour-oriented groups have created specific networks to address early drug development in specific tumour types. This results in very efficient networks which have the resources and the patients to address and conduct challenging clinical trials in a standardised fashion ensuring the highest standards in cancer treatment.

Blood levels of angiogenin and vascular endothelial growth factor are elevated in myelodysplastic syndromes and in acute myeloid leukemia.

Angiogenesis is of prognostic importance not only in solid tumors but also in malignant blood diseases. We measured levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin (ANG), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in peripheral blood samples from 65 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), from 25 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and from 50 healthy donors. In matched samples, VEGF levels in serum were substantially higher than VEGF levels in plasma (380.7 +/- 56 pg/ml vs. 45.3 +/- 4.5 pg/ml, mean +/- SEM, p < 0.001), whereas serum and plasma levels of ANG were comparable and significantly correlated (r = 0.8; p < 0.01). Compared to normal controls (1.3 +/- 0.09 pg), serum levels of VEGF corrected for the peripheral blood platelet count (VEGF/10(6) platelets, VEGF(PLT)) were elevated in patients with refractory anemia (RA; 3.1 +/- 0.8 pg, p < 0.01), and reached maximal values in patients with advanced stage MDS (RAEB, RAEB-t) (3.5 +/- 0.6 pg, p < 0.001), de novo AML (3.6 +/- 1.1 pg, p < 0.05), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML; 3.7 +/- 0.9 pg; p < 0.001). Levels of soluble ANG were elevated in RA (351 +/- 25.7 ng/ml, p < 0.001), in RAEB/RAEB-t (402 +/- 17.9 ng/ml; p < 0.001), in CMML (413.8 +/- 29.5 ng/ml; p < 0.001), and in patients with AML (305.1 +/- 17.1 ng/ml; p < 0.01, controls 255.4 +/- 8.1 ng/ml). Serum bFGF was neither elevated in MDS nor in AML patients. These results suggest that VEGF(PLT) is a marker of disease progression in MDS. Moreover, we show for the first time that elevated blood levels of ANG can be found in patients with myeloid malignancies, suggesting a role of ANG in the pathogenesis of these diseases.

Intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia following MDS.

This study investigated the feasibility of allogeneic (alloSCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as postconsolidation therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) or acute myeloid leukemia after MDS. Patients with a histocompatible sibling were candidates for alloSCT and the remaining patients for ASCT. Remission-induction therapy consisted of 1 or 2 courses with idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide, followed by one intensive consolidation course with cytarabine and mitoxantrone. Initially, bone marrow cells were used for ASCT. Subsequently, mobilized blood stem cells were used in an attempt to shorten posttransplantation hypoplasia. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years the 184 evaluable patients showed a 4-year survival rate of 26% and a median survival of 13 months. The remission-induction chemotherapy induced complete remission (CR) in 100 patients (54%). The 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 29% and the median DFS was 12 months. Twenty-eight of 39 patients (72%) with a donor were allografted in CR-1, including 2 patients who underwent transplantation in CR-1 without a consolidation course. Thirty-six of 59 patients (61%) without a donor received ASCT in CR-1. The 4-year DFS rates in the group of patients with or without a donor were 31% and 27%, respectively. The 4-year survival rates from CR were 36% and 33%, respectively. This large prospective study shows the feasibility of both alloSCT and ASCT. This treatment approach leads to a relatively high remission rate, and the majority of patients in remission received the SCT in CR-1. The ongoing study investigates whether this approach is better than treatment with chemotherapy only.

LST1: a gene with extensive alternative splicing and immunomodulatory function.

The gene of the leukocyte-specific transcript (LST1) is encoded within the TNF region of the human MHC. The LST1 gene is constitutively expressed in leukocytes and dendritic cells, and it is characterized by extensive alternative splicing. We identified 7 different LST1 splice variants in PBMC; thus, 14 LST1 splice variants (LST1/A-LST1/N) have been detected in various cell types. These isoforms code for transmembrane as well as soluble LST1 proteins characterized by two alternative open reading frames at their 3' end. We demonstrate the presence of the transmembrane variant LST1/C on the cell surface of the monocytic cell lines U937 and THP1. Recombinant expression of LST1/C permitted its profound inhibitory effect on lymphocyte proliferation to be observed. In contrast, the alternative transmembrane variant LST1/A, the extracellular domain of which shows no amino acid sequence homology to LST1/C exerted a weaker but similar inhibitory effect on PBMC. These data demonstrate the protein expression of LST1 on the cell surface of mononuclear cells, and they show an inhibitory effect on lymphocyte proliferation of two LST1 proteins although they have only a very short amino acid homology.