Reconstruction or replacement? A challenging question in surgical treatment of complex humeral head fractures in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of complex humeral head fractures in the elderly is challenging due to osteoporotic bone, comorbidities and reduced compliance. The treatment strategy (reconstruction versus replacement) should allow for a functional aftercare and result in a high patient satisfaction. Major complications leading to surgical revision are crucial and should be avoided. The purpose of this study was to analyse the major complication rate leading to surgical revision and the patient-based outcome in complex humeral head fractures of the elderly population treated either using locking plate fixation (LCP) or reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients older than 65 years surgically treated due to a four-part fracture of the proximal humerus between 2003 and 2015 were enrolled in our retrospective study. Major complications and revision rates were recorded and functional outcome was assessed using the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) allowing for qualitative self-assessment of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and of the Constant Score. RESULTS: A cohort of 103 patients with a mean age of 73.4 ± 6.2 years suffering from four-part fractures of the humeral head were enrolled. 63 patients were treated using the LCP fixation compared to 40 rTSAs. There were no significant differences in the patient-reported functional outcome. The revision rate was significantly higher in the LCP group (10/63; 15.9%) compared to the rTSA group (1/40; 2.5%). Reasons for revision were avascular head necrosis, cut-out of screws, secondary dislocation of the greater tuberosity and hypersensitivity to metal. CONCLUSIONS: Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty and locking plate fixation are both established surgical procedures for the management of complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly leading to similar functional results. However the revision rate in the rTSA group was significantly lower. Primary rTSA should, therefore, be favoured in multimorbid elderly patients with an increased complication risk to avoid repeated anaesthesia.

Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.

PURPOSE: Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients suffering from AO/OTA 15 2.A-C midshaft clavicle fractures were operatively treated between 2008 and 2018. 2.0- or 3.5-mm cortical screws were used to restore anatomic alignment in dislocated, wedge-shaped and fragmentary clavicle fractures. Data of radiologic outcome were collected until fracture consolidation was identified. RESULTS: 80 consecutive patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 16.3 years, who were operatively treated for dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled. 40 patients were treated using 2.0-mm and 40 patients using routine 3.5-mm cortical screws, respectively. Time to fracture consolidation was 12.8 ± 7.8 months. No mal- or non-unions occurred during routine follow-up until 18 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Restoring anatomic alignment in wedge or fragmentary clavicle fractures can ultimately be addressed using cortical screw augmentation. Both groups showed comparable results with respect to fracture reduction, fixation and stability as well as time to consolidation of the fracture, while the 2.0-mm screw diameter was associated with easier handling of small Fx fragments.

[External fixation for treatment of peripartum pubic symphysis separation : Clinical case and discussion]. / Fixateure externe zur Behandlung der intrapartalen Symphysensprengung : Fallbericht und Diskussion.

A complete peripartum pubic symphysis separation is a rare but severe complication of natural birth. Its incidence is estimated to be 0.03-3 ‰. Minor partial separations with a small width can be treated with a pelvic binder. Separations with major dehiscence should be treated by surgical reduction and fixation. This article presents the case of a 30-year-old woman who suffered a complete rupture of the pubic symphysis during the birth of her second child. Radiographic dehiscence was 39 mm. The operative treatment was carried out using a supra-acetabular external fixator for 12 weeks with a good result.

[Incorrect aftercare of a surgically treated metatarsal fracture]. / Fehlerhafte Nachbehandlung einer operativ versorgten Mittelfußfraktur.

A 60-year-old patient suffered an ankle distortion resulting in a comminuted fracture of the fifth metatarsal. On the same day the accident occurred the patient presented to an emergency department and immediate operative treatment of the fracture was performed by intramedullary Kirschner wires with closed reduction and internal fixation. The aftercare was carried out on an outpatient basis by a registered orthopedist in accordance with the surgeon's instructions. In the radiological control 14 days after surgery a dislocation of the fracture was detected and 1 week later a rectification operation was carried out in a second clinic with removal of the Kirschner wires, open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate. The patient suspected inadequate treatment by the first clinic, which in turn did not accept any inadequacies in the surgical treatment or the aftercare. In the subsequent legal dispute the appointed experts came to the conclusion that an initial good fracture position was achieved but that the aftercare treatment with a forefoot relief shoe was inadequate for the type of internal fixation chosen. The arbitration board came to the conclusion that the multifragmented fracture situation was treated by a questionably stable osteosynthesis using Kirschner wires. This should have required a very strict aftercare with partial weight bearing on crutches and immobilization in a stable orthosis or cast.

Prospective outcome analysis following tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon along with locking plate osteosynthesis for proximal humerus fractures.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal humerus are often associated with lesions of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon. This often leads to prolonged shoulder pain. Hence, many surgeons decide to perform a tenodesis of the LHB tendon simultaneous to ORIF. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcome after interlocking plate fixation and biceps tenodesis for treating proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: 56 patients (38 females, 18 male) suffering from proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery were retrospectively included. 26 of these 56 patients (19% Neer II, 38% Neer III, 43% Neer IV) were treated with simultaneous tenodesis of the LHB tendon when ORIF using interlocking plate fixation was performed. 30 patients (17% Neer II, 40% Neer III, 43% Neer IV) served as control group receiving only interlocking plate fixation. The patients were asked to complete the Munich Shoulder Questionnaire (MSQ) for evaluation of postoperative shoulder function. Results of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were calculated from the MSQ. Patients were clinically evaluated for a positive O'Brien test and Popeye sign. RESULTS: The tenodesis group demonstrated significant superior outcome regarding the MSQ (mean 90.47 points vs. 79.41 points, p = 0.006), DASH Score (mean 4.2 points vs. 16.81 points, p = 0.017) and SPADI (mean 94.59 points vs. 83.56, p = 0.045). Flexion, external rotation and the capability of throwing a soft ball were significantly improved in the tenodesis group compared to the control group. The O'Brien test as indicator for lesions of the LHB was positive in fewer patients of the tenodesis group (2/26, vs. 21/30, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference of a positive Popeye Sign. CONCLUSION: Our results show evidence of an improved shoulder function when a simultaneous tenodesis of the LHB tendon is performed during treatment of proximal humerus fractures using interlocking plate fixation.

[Osteosynthesis of distal fibular fractures with IlluminOss : Video article]. / Osteosynthese einer distalen Fibulafraktur mithilfe von IlluminOss : Videobeitrag.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was minimally invasive osteosynthesis of a distal fibular fracture under the premises of poor soft tissue conditions and existing chronic comorbidities to enable rapid recovery and to reduce soft tissue stress in order to avoid postoperative infections and achieve early weight bearing. INDICATIONS: This involved a distal fibula fracture, classified as 44 B1.1, B1.2, B1.3 according to the working group for osteosynthesis (AO) or a B fracture after Danis and Weber with indications for surgery (cortical disruption and shaft offset > 5 mm), age > 65 years, poor soft tissue conditions and a Charlson score ≥ 1. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Acute or incompletely healed infection in the implantation area, allergy to dental adhesive or implant material, open fractures, multifragmentary and severely dislocated fractures. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The surgical technique is demonstrated in detail with the help of a video of the operation and which is available online. A 1-2 cm long incision at the distal pole of the fibula, insertion of an intramedullary wire, reaming of the medullary canal and insertion of the IlluminOss balloon implant, filling the balloon with monomer and curing using visible blue light (436 nm), shortening of the implant, radiological control and wound closure. FOLLOW-UP: Postoperative cooling and elevation of the affected limb, free mobility after postoperative day 1, pain-adjusted full load bearing in VacoPed boot for 6 weeks (depending on pain and swelling). RESULTS: Study currently ongoing, no complications or revisions so far.