Biopsychosocial factors associated with the state of disability after hemiparesis in the chronic phase of stroke: exploratory analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the main biopsychosocial factors associated with disability level after stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with chronic stroke survivors. Disability was assessed using the World Health Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. The independent variables were: Body functions: emotional functioning and whether the dominant upper limb was affected. For the Activities & Participation component, satisfaction regarding the execution of activities and participation were assessed using the SATIS-Stroke, as well as the locomotion ability for adults (ABILOCO), manual ability (ABILHAND) and the return to work. For environmental factors, income and facilitators and obstacles were assessed using the Measure of the Quality of the Environment (MQE). Personal factors: age and sex. Multiple Linear Regression was employed. RESULTS: Limited locomotor ability (ß = -0.281; t = -3.231 p = 0.002), dissatisfaction regarding activities and participation (ß = -0.273; t = -3.070 p = 0.003), and the non-return to work (ß = 0.162; t = 2.085 p = 0.04) were associated with disability. CONCLUSION: The reduction in locomotor ability, dissatisfaction regarding activities and participation and the non-return to work were associated with disability in the chronic phase following a stroke.

The reduction in locomotion ability, dissatisfaction regarding activities and participation, and the non-return to work were associated with disability in the chronic phase following a stroke.Clinicians will be able to develop rehabilitation strategies focused on diminishing locomotor limitations, increasing satisfaction with activities and participation, and improving vocational planning for the return to work after a strokeThese findings underscore the importance of assessments and intervention strategies based on the individual rather than the disease as well as focusing on social and personal issues to guide clinical decision making.

Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke.

PURPOSE: To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. METHODS: Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (≤39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.Implications for rehabilitationWHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity.The WHODAS 2.0 cut-off point of >39.62 allows stratification of post-stroke disability into two different levels (no/mild disability versus moderate/severe disability).These results facilitate clinical decision-making by rehabilitation professionals.