Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Mater Sci Mater Med ; 27(12): 180, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27770393

RESUMO

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease that impairs proper bone remodeling. Guided bone regeneration is a surgical technique that improves bone defect in a particular region through new bone formation, using barrier materials (e.g. membranes) to protect the space adjacent to the bone defect. The polytetrafluorethylene membrane is widely used in guided bone regeneration, however, new membranes are being investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of P(VDFTrFE)/BT [poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/barium titanate] membrane on in vivo bone formation. Twenty-three Wistar rats were submitted to bilateral ovariectomy. Five animals were subjected to sham surgery. After 150 days, bone defects were created and filled with P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane or PTFE membrane (except for the sham and OVX groups). After 4 weeks, the animals were euthanized and calvaria samples were subjected to histomorphometric and computed microtomography analysis (microCT), besides real time polymerase chain reaction (real time PCR) to evaluate gene expression. The histomorphometric analysis showed that the animals that received the P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane presented morphometric parameters similar or even better compared to the animals that received the PTFE membrane. The comparison between groups showed that gene expression of RUNX2, BSP, OPN, OSX and RANKL were lower on P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane; the gene expression of ALP, OC, RANK and CTSK were similar and the gene expression of OPG, CALCR and MMP9 were higher when compared to PTFE. The results showed that the P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane favors bone formation, and therefore, may be considered a promising biomaterial to support bone repair in a situation of osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Compostos de Bário/química , Hidrocarbonetos Fluorados/química , Osteogênese , Osteoporose/cirurgia , Titânio/química , Compostos de Vinila/química , Animais , Materiais Biocompatíveis/química , Regeneração Óssea , Transplante Ósseo , Osso e Ossos/metabolismo , Catepsina K/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Metaloproteinase 9 da Matriz/metabolismo , Membranas Artificiais , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteoporose/metabolismo , Ligante RANK/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Receptor Ativador de Fator Nuclear kappa-B/metabolismo , Receptores da Calcitonina/metabolismo , Microtomografia por Raio-X
2.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 17(4): 742-57, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24283497

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The coating of implant surfaces with components of the extracellular matrix offers an approach to influence peri-implant bone healing. In this study, bone healing around coated implants is analyzed in a peri-implant defect model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight months after extraction of the premolar teeth, six dogs received 48 implants (eight per animal) in the mandible. Implant surfaces were sandblasted and acid-etched, and some were additionally coated with collagen type II and chondroitin sulfate (collagen/CS). On each side of the mandible, implants either had no peri-implant defect (control side) or a vertical defect of 5 mm in depth and 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mm in width. Implants healed submerged for 8 weeks. Fluorochrome staining, histology, and histomorphometry were used to analyze implant osseointegration. RESULTS: Fluorochrome labels showed an increased mineralization around collagen/CS-coated surfaces at 4 weeks (p = .031). Histomorphometry generally showed lower vertical and horizontal bone apposition with increasing gap size for both surface types. In gapless sites and 0.5-mm gaps, collagen/CS coated implants showed increased bone volume in areas directly adjacent to the implant, in comparison with uncoated implants (p < .05). CONCLUSION: The width of the peri-implant gap influences peri-implant bone formation. Complete filling of all gaps by newly formed bone could not be observed around either surface. In proximity to the surface, implant surface coating by collagen/CS positively influenced bone formation.


Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária/métodos , Matriz Extracelular/química , Animais , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Cães , Humanos , Microscopia de Fluorescência , Osseointegração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA