Safety and Efficacy of Treatment of Hepatitis C in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Directly Acting Antiviral Agents.

BACKGROUND: With the development of all oral, interferon-free directly acting antiviral (DAA) medications, treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients is possible, but limited data exists on its safety and efficacy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients transplanted at our center with HCV who have been started on DAAs. Primary endpoints included sustained virologic response as defined as negative viral load at 12 weeks postcompletion of therapy and allograft function. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used regimen was sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (n = 21). Of the treated patients, 100% had undetectable viral load at the completion of therapy. Of the 31 patients treated, 30 (97%) achieved sustained virologic response. Both graft and patient survivals at most recent follow-up was 100%. There was no significant change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) before or after therapy (64.2 ± 16.5 mL/min per body surface area before vs. 58.9 ± 17.5 mL/min per body surface area after therapy; P = 0.22); however, 3 patients now have GFR less than 20. A total of 6 (19.3%) of 31 patients had worsening proteinuria during or shortly after therapy. Patients with more than 500 mg/g of proteinuria at the start of treatment were significantly more likely to develop worsening proteinuria than those with less than 500 mg/g of proteinuria at the start of therapy (P < 0.001). Retrospective review of 20 untreated HCV patients did not demonstrate worsening allograft function and proteinuria during a median follow-up time of 1386 days (range, 332-6254). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data demonstrate that DAAs can be used safely and effectively in patients after kidney transplantation. Patients with proteinuria or lower GFR should be monitored more closely.

Routine use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in potential living kidney donors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most transplant centers exclude prospective living kidney donors with hypertension from donation. Centers routinely identify hypertension using BP measured in the clinic, but it is not clear that clinic BP accurately detects the presence or absence of hypertension in potential donors. We therefore conducted a prospective study to determine the impact of routine ambulatory BP monitoring on diagnosis of hypertension in potential donors and the value of other baseline characteristics in predicting ambulatory BP results. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We compared classification of hypertension status by clinic BP and by ambulatory BP monitoring in 178 potential living kidney donors. RESULTS: Of 63 individuals with hypertension by clinic BP, 62% had white-coat hypertension by ambulatory BP and were therefore eligible to donate. Of 115 individuals who were normotensive by clinic BP, 17% had masked hypertension by ambulatory BP and were excluded from donation. Individuals with masked hypertension were older, were more likely to be male, and had a somewhat higher clinic BP than individuals with sustained normotension. Individuals with white-coat hypertension had a somewhat lower clinic diastolic BP than individuals with sustained hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Routine ambulatory BP monitoring may identify a large number of individuals with white-coat hypertension and a smaller but significant number of individuals with masked hypertension, ensuring adequate protection of potential donors and accurate assessment of donor risk. Differences in baseline characteristics are small and are not clinically useful in distinguishing individuals with masked hypertension from individuals with sustained normotension or individuals with white-coat hypertension from individuals with sustained hypertension, demonstrating the importance of ambulatory BP monitoring in this population.