A multicenter, retrospective study of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension transitioned from parenteral prostacyclin therapy to inhaled iloprost.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by progressive increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, leading to right heart failure and death. Guidelines recommend customization of treatment, necessitating the development of effective strategies for transitioning patients among treatments. In this study, we characterized our experience with patient transitions from parenteral prostacyclin to inhaled iloprost. We retrospectively assessed records from 11 centers of 37 consecutive patients with PAH aged ≥ 18 years who were treated with intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) prostacyclin analogues and transitioned to inhaled iloprost. The transition period began on the first day of inhaled iloprost with the intent of discontinuing parenteral prostacyclin and ended on the first day on inhaled iloprost free of parenteral prostacyclin. Persistence was defined as the absence of (1) parenteral prostacyclin while remaining on inhaled iloprost during post-transition Days 1-90 and (2) no reinitiation of parenteral prostacyclin during post-transition Days 90-365. All patients were clinically stable before transitioning to inhaled iloprost. The mean age was 46.5 years, 70.3% were female, 51.4% had idiopathic PAH, and 43.0% were in New York Heart Association Functional Class III. Among patients with an overlapping transition, the mean transition period was 10.5 days. A transition dosing algorithm was used in 10 patients (27.0%). At one year, 78.4% of the patients remained persistent on inhaled iloprost and 81.1% were free of clinical worsening. In selected patients on background oral PAH therapy, transitioning from parenteral prostacyclin to inhaled iloprost appears safe and feasible and is associated with long-term success. Further study is needed to define the optimal patient selection criteria and transition algorithm.

Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes in primary pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between echocardiographic findings and clinical outcomes in patients with severe primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). BACKGROUND: Primary pulmonary hypertension is associated with abnormalities of right heart structure and function that contribute to the poor prognosis of the disease. Echocardiographic abnormalities associated with PPH have been described, but the prognostic significance of these findings remains poorly characterized. METHODS: Echocardiographic studies, invasive hemodynamic measurements and 6-min walk tests were performed and outcomes prospectively followed in 81 patients with severe PPH. Subjects were participants in a 12-week randomized trial examining the effects of prostacyclin plus conventional therapy compared with conventional therapy alone. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 36.9 +/- 15.4 months, 20 patients died and 21 patients underwent transplantation. Pericardial effusion (p = 0.003) and indexed right atrial area (p = 0.005) were predictors of mortality. Pericardial effusion (p = 0.017), indexed right atrial area (p = 0.012) and the degree of septal shift in diastole (p = 0.004) were predictors of a composite end point of death or transplantation. In multivariable analyses incorporating clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables, pericardial effusion and an enlarged right atrium remained predictors of adverse outcomes. Six-minute walk results, mixed venous oxygen saturation and initial treatment randomization were also independently associated with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pericardial effusion, right atrial enlargement and septal displacement are echocardiographic abnormalities that reflect the severity of right heart failure and predict adverse outcomes in patients with severe PPH. These characteristics may help identify patients appropriate for more intensive medical therapy or earlier transplantation.

Fluticasone Propionate Reduces Oral Prednisone Use While it Improves Asthma Control.

This study examined the effect of fluticasone propionate aerosol on oral prednisone requirements in patients with severe asthma. Ninety-six patients dependent on oral prednisone were treated with placebo or fluticasone propionate aerosol (750 or 1000 &mgr;g twice daily) for 16 weeks. The dosage of oral prednisone was adjusted weekly according to predetermined criteria. Fluticasone propionate 750 and 1000 &mgr;g twice daily resulted in 69% and 88% of patients (low and high doses, respectively) not using any prednisone compared to 3% of placebo-treated patients by the end of the study. In the fluticasone propionate groups, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and peak expiratory flow rates and the number of nighttime awakenings improved at the last evaluable visit. In addition, the number of nighttime awakenings and symptomatic albuterol use declined relative to placebo values (p < 0.05). Fluticasone propionate aerosol was well tolerated. Fluticasone propionate aerosol (750 or 1000 &mgr;g twice daily) effectively and safely allowed most asthmatics who were dependent on oral corticosteriods to reduce or eliminate oral prednisone use while improving pulmonary function.