Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early assisted discharge for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: the design of a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are the main cause for hospitalisation. These hospitalisations result in a high pressure on hospital beds and high health care costs. Because of the increasing prevalence of COPD this will only become worse. Hospital at home is one of the alternatives that has been proved to be a safe alternative for hospitalisation in COPD. Most schemes are early assisted discharge schemes with specialised respiratory nurses providing care at home. Whether this type of service is cost-effective depends on the setting in which it is delivered and the way in which it is organised. METHODS/DESIGN: GO AHEAD (Assessment Of Going Home under Early Assisted Discharge) is a 3-months, randomised controlled, multi-centre clinical trial. Patients admitted to hospital for a COPD exacerbation are either discharged on the fourth day of admission and further treated at home, or receive usual inpatient hospital care. Home treatment is supervised by general nurses. Primary outcome is the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an early assisted discharge intervention in comparison with usual inpatient hospital care for patients hospitalised with a COPD exacerbation. Secondary outcomes include effects on quality of life, primary informal caregiver burden and patient and primary caregiver satisfaction. Additionally, a discrete choice experiment is performed to provide insight in patient and informal caregiver preferences for different treatment characteristics. Measurements are performed on the first day of admission and 3 days, 7 days, 1 month and 3 months thereafter. Ethical approval has been obtained and the study has been registered. DISCUSSION: This article describes the study protocol of the GO AHEAD study. Early assisted discharge could be an effective and cost-effective method to reduce length of hospital stay in the Netherlands which is beneficial for patients and society. If effectiveness and cost-effectiveness can be proven, implementation in the Dutch health care system should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR1129.

Temazepam 10mg does not affect breathing and gas exchange in patients with severe normocapnic COPD.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines can improve sleep quality, but are also thought to cause respiratory depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aims of this study were to assess the effects of temazepam on indices of circadian respiratory function, dyspnea, sleep quality, and sleepiness in patients with severe COPD and insomnia. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in 14 stable patients with COPD (mean FEV(1) 0.99+/-0.3L) with insomnia, polysomnography with continuous transcutaneous capnography and oximetry, arterial gas sampling, hypercapnic ventilatory response, multiple sleep latency test, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, dyspnea and sleep visual analogue scales (VAS) were performed at baseline, after one week of temazepam 10mg at bedtime and after one week of placebo. RESULTS: Temazepam did not cause statistically significant changes in mean transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension during sleep compared to placebo (5.9+/-1.0 kPa vs. 6.3+/-1.4 kPa, p-value 0.27), nor in mean oxygen saturation (92+/-3% vs. 92+/-2%, p-value 0.31), nor in any of the other investigated variables, except for the total sleep time and sleep latency VAS, which improved with temazepam. CONCLUSIONS: One week usage of temazepam 10mg does not influence circadian respiratory function, dyspnea, and sleepiness in patients with stable, severe, normocapnic COPD and insomnia and it improves total sleep time and subjective sleep latency. However, this is a preliminary explorative study for assessing the feasibility to perform a larger study on this topic. The clinical implications of this study are very limited.