Impact of the implementation of electronic health records on the quality of discharge summaries and on the coding of hospitalization episodes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the implementation and use of the electronic health records (EHR) modifies the quality, readability and/or the length of the discharge summaries (DS) and the average number of coded diagnosis and procedures per hospitalization episode. DESIGN: A pre-post-intervention descriptive study conducted between 2010 and 2014. SETTING: The 'Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre' (H12O) of Madrid (Spain). A tertiary University Hospital of up to 1200 beds. INTERVENTION: Implementation and systematic use of the EHR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The quality, length and readability of the DS and the number of diagnosis and procedures codes by raw and risk-adjusted data. RESULTS: A total of 200 DS were included in the present work. After the implementation of the EHR the DS had better quality per formal requirements, although were longer and harder to read (P < 0.001). The average number of coded diagnoses and procedures was increased, 9.48 in the PRE-INT and 10.77 in the POST-INT, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001) in both raw and risk-adjusted data. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of EHR improves the formal quality of DS, although poor use of EHR functionalities might reduce its understandability. Having more clinical information immediately available due to EHR increases the number of diagnosis and procedure codes enhancing their utility for secondary uses.

[Aggressions towards Primary Health Care Workers in Madrid, Spain, 2011-2012]. / Agresiones sufridas por las personas que trabajan en atención primaria de la Comunidad de Madrid, 2011-2012.

OBJECTIVE: The number of aggressions towards health care professionals has risen over the past few years. There are no previous studies in primary care covering an entire region and to all professional categories. The aim of this study was to characterize aggressions in Primary Care in the Community of Madrid. METHODS: Multicenter cross-sectional study. Analysis of a Registration System that reports any type of aggression suffered by Primary Care workers, in the Community of Madrid. The study variables included sociodemographic characteristics of the aggressor and the victim, the type of aggression (verbal or physical abuse), its causes and consequences. We described median, intercuartilic range and frequencies. Logistic regression was performed calculating odds ratio and their 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: 1,157 assaults were reported, 53.07% suffered by doctors. Physical assault occurred in 4.7% of the cases. The main reason was dissatisfaction with the care (36.1%). The non-medical staff showed less risk of being physically assaulted (OR: 0.38; CI95%: 0.17-0.86). The perpetrator profile was male (56.8%), aged between 31-40 (26.8%) years. Health care victim profile was female (84%), aged between 45-60 years. 10% of professionals reported some form of aggression, 5,9% of aggression were submitted to court. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of assault is higher in health personnel, particularly physicians. There were significant differences by gender and age, both in the profile of the aggressor and the victim.