Use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in France: Analysis of French nationwide health insurance database.

AIM: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have been commercialized in France for type 2 diabetes since April 2020 and later for heart and renal diseases. Given the recent developments in treating diabetes and the widening of SGLT-2i indications, we aimed to study changes in the use of glucose-lowering drugs in France and to characterize SGLT-2i new users. METHODS: We performed a nationwide utilization study using the French health insurance database. Trends in incidence and prevalence of glucose-lowering drug use were assessed by a repeated cross-sectional study in 2019 and 2021. A cohort study of incident SGLT-2i users was then conducted to describe patient characteristics and the strategy for treating diabetes. RESULTS: The prevalence of SGLT-2i use gradually reached 0.1% in the third quarter of 2021 and increased more significantly to 0.2% thereafter. SGLT-2i became the second most prescribed glucose-lowering drug class after metformin at the end of 2021 (0.1%). Among the cohort of 125 387 SGLT-2i new users (mean age 65.0 years; 60.1% of men), 87.6% presented a diabetic comorbidity. The patient profile changed over the study period with an increasing proportion of patients with cardiovascular (28.7% in 2020 vs. 40.2% in 2021) or renal (7.7% in 2020 vs. 11.8% in 2021) comorbidities at initiation. The main combinations used at SGLT-2i initiation were metformin (12.5%) and metformin plus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (8.1%). One-year probability of SGLT-2i persistence was estimated to be 55%. CONCLUSION: The expansion of indications for SGLT-2i and the broadening of the target population make it essential to assess the reasons for discontinuation and review their safety profile.

Impact of Covid-19 Vaccination on Spontaneous Pharmacovigilance Reporting in France.

INTRODUCTION: In 2021, the massive Covid-19 vaccination campaign in France was accompanied by an intensified pharmacovigilance monitoring of their potential adverse drug reactions. The importance of this reporting might have led to an important selective reporting and overloading of Pharmacovigilance Centres, delaying the recording of some reports in the national pharmacovigilance database. In this context, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign in France and related reports on spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions that were not related to the Covid-19 vaccine. METHODS: We performed time-series analyses considering the monthly number of adverse drug reactions reported between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2022 using the French Pharmacovigilance database. The impact of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign on the monthly reporting not Covid-19 vaccine related was estimated using interrupted time-series. January 2021, marking the start of the campaign, was the intervention date in the models. Analyses were run globally first considering all adverse drug reaction reports, and second according to notifier type and to case seriousness. RESULTS: We included 170,294 reports registered in the French Pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2022 that were not Covid-19 vaccine-related. Among these, 77,067 (45.3%) were serious and 146,683 (86.1%) had been reported by health care professionals. The campaign start was associated with a nearly 35.0% decrease in average monthly reporting that was not Covid-19 vaccine-related, with a significant level decrease in the monthly number of reports of -658.0 (p < 10-3) immediately after the vaccination campaign start and a subsequent slope decrease of -50.0 (p < 10-3). This decrease was mainly due to a significant level and slope decrease (level: -739.2 p < 10-3; slope: -39 [p < 10-2]) for health care professional reports. A similar level decrease was found for the monthly number of both serious and non-serious reports (-402.3, p < 10-3; and -311.9, p = 10-2, respectively). According to the ATC 1 level, the decrease in the monthly number of reports showed similar patterns for all drugs. However, a potential increase in the number of serious reports suspecting antineoplastic and immunomodulating drugs (ATC L) or drugs targeting blood was observed (ATC B). CONCLUSION: Our study showed a significant impact of the Covid-19 campaign vaccination in the reporting of adverse drug reactions that were not Covid-19 vaccine-related, of roughly 35%. This leads to a loss of information regarding the monitoring of drug safety that could have impacted the system capacity to detect safety signals for drugs other than Covid-19 vaccines.

[Performing pharmacoepidemiological studies using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS): How to translate guidelines into practice]. / Réalisation d'études pharmacoépidémiologiques à partir du système national des données de santé (SNDS) : application des recommandations dans la pratique.

The French health insurance data warehouse named SNDS is one of the largest medico-administrative in the world allowing for powerful pharmacoepidemiological studies, based on real-life data collected prospectively. In addition to the absolute necessity of a strong pharmacological rationale, recommendations have been thought to improve the quality of pharmacoepidemiological studies. These guidelines emphasize the importance of an accurate definition of the study population, outcome and exposure, especially for studies performed on medico-administrative databases. Compliance with certain guidelines, particularly those concerning the identification of a specific population or an outcome and the definition of risk periods or exposure periods, may be difficult when performing studies on the SNDS because of its structure and the nature of the data recorded. The objective of this article is to provide advice for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies according to the recommendationswhen using the SNDS, given its specificities. The performing of reliable studies from this rich but complex data warehouse requires the expertise of researchers with deep knowledge both in the SNDS and in pharmacological reasoning.

Performing pharmacoepidemiological studies using the French health insurance data warehouse (SNDS): How to translate guidelines into practice.

The French health insurance data warehouse named SNDS is one of the largest medico-administrative in the world allowing for powerful pharmacoepidemiological studies, based on real-life data collected prospectively. In addition to the absolute necessity of a strong pharmacological rationale, recommendations have been thought to improve the quality of pharmacoepidemiological studies. These guidelines emphasize the importance of an accurate definition of the study population, outcome and exposure, especially for studies performed on medico-administrative databases. Compliance with certain guidelines, particularly those concerning the identification of a specific population or an outcome and the definition of risk periods or exposure periods, may be difficult when performing studies on the SNDS because of its structure and the nature of the data recorded. The objective of this article is to provide advice for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiological studies according to the recommendations when using the SNDS, given its specificities. The performing of reliable studies from this rich but complex data warehouse requires the expertise of researchers with deep knowledge both in the SNDS and in pharmacological reasoning.

Pharmacoepidemiology for oncology clinical practice: Foundations, state of the art and perspectives.

Since the early 2000s, the arrival of the so-called targeted therapies and immunotherapies have prolonged survival rates in many cancers. In parallel, post-marketing surveillance of anticancer drugs through pharmacoepidemiology has gradually developed. This paper provides (i) a detailed argumentation of the foundations for pharmacoepidemiology of anticancer drugs, (ii) an overview of pharmacoepidemiological studies currently available in this field, and (iii) some perspectives to improve pharmacoepidemiology for oncology practice. First of all, according to the existing literature, the development of pharmacoepidemiological studies for the clinical evaluation of anticancer drugs appears particularly justified based on common limitations of clinical trials in oncology regarding essential methodological principles such as adequate control groups, randomisation or double blinding. Many descriptive field cohort studies have investigated together treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety to compare results from clinical trials with those of everyday practice. The utilisation of anticancer drugs has also been extensively described through cross-sectional or cohort studies by often using medico-administrative or medical databases. Such studies are useful to quantify and characterise use over time in the population, including clinically unvalidated use, and to evaluate adherence and persistence to increasingly available oral anticancer drugs. Despite their importance to increase knowledge, comparative effectiveness or safety studies remain uncommon. In a context of rapidly emerging therapies and personalised treatments, this may be due to methodological challenges especially related to the choice of a comparator or the consideration of confounding by indication. In the future, efforts must be pursued to provide real-time access to high-quality, large-scale clinical, biological and treatment data, and to improve record-linkage between hospital and outpatient databases. More research is also needed to better evaluate all medications, not only anticancer, as part of an overall cancer care pathway and to bring the evaluation of anticancer drugs closer to patients and society (social pharmacology).

[Atropinic burden and anticholinergic drugs: Interest and application in clinical practice in the elderly]. / Poids atropinique et médicaments anticholinergiques : intérêt et application en pratique clinique chez la personne âgée.

Anticholinergic drugs (also called antimuscarinics or atropinics) increase the risk of falls, cognitive impairment and/or mortality in older patients. These drugs belong to the lists of potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly. The aim of this review was to present and discuss the different tools available to measure the atropinic risk in drug exposure of older patients. Several scales, developed from biological and/or clinical criteria, allow to classify anticholinergic drugs according to their atropinic potency and to assign to them an atropinic burden. Total atropinic burden of patient drug exposure can be calculated as the sum of atropinic score of each drug. Other tools include drug daily doses to better estimate the atropinic risk. These different methods are a precious help to decrease atropinic exposure in the elderly. Nevertheless, they have to be considered as upgradable and it is necessary to adapt them regularly according to the introduction of new drugs in clinical practice.

ß-Adrenoceptor Drugs and Parkinson's Disease: A Nationwide Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Potential relationships between ß-adrenergic drugs and α-synuclein synthesis in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been recently suggested. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the putative association between ß-adrenoceptor drug exposure and PD occurrence. METHODS: A nested case-control study was performed in the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB) (a 1/97th random sample of affiliates to the French Insurance System). Incident PD patients diagnosed between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/2017 (index date) were matched 1:1 to controls by gender, birth year, and insurance scheme. Exposure to any ß-agonist and to any ß-antagonist was compared between cases and controls within 1-2 years before the index date, and exposure to salbutamol and to propranolol was individualized. The association between PD and ß-adrenoceptor drugs was investigated through conditional logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors. Because of a statistical interaction between ß-agonists and diabetes, results were stratified according to the presence of diabetes. RESULTS: Among the 2225 incident PD patients identified in the EGB (mean age 75.6 ± 10.2 years, sex ratio 1.04), no significant association was found between PD and ß-antagonists (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05 [95% confidence interval 0.91-1.20]), except for propranolol (aOR 2.11 [1.38-3.23]). For ß-agonists, a protective association in non-diabetic patients (aOR 0.75 [0.60-0.93]) and an opposite and significant association in diabetic patients (aOR 1.61 [1.02-2.55]) were observed. Similar results were found with salbutamol. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify an increased risk of PD occurrence after ß-antagonist exposure, except for propranolol (potential protopathic bias). The discordant results observed with ß-agonists in patients with or without diabetes deserve further exploration of the influence of diabetic comorbidity on PD occurrence and evolution.

Abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis and the risk of cancer: a world observational post-marketing study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether abatacept used in patients for RA was associated with an increased risk of reporting overall cancer and specific cancers, including breast, lung, lymphoma, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer when compared with other biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). METHODS: We performed an observational study within VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global database of individual case safety reports, from 2007 to 2017 to compare the cases of cancer reported in RA patients exposed to abatacept with those reported in RA patients exposed to other bDMARDs. We conducted disproportionality analyses allowing the estimation of reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% CIs of the exposure odds among spontaneous reporting of cancers to the exposure odds among other reported adverse effects. RESULTS: We identified 15 846 adverse effects reported in RA patients who received abatacept and 290 568 adverse effects reported in RA patients treated with other bDMARDs. Compared with other bDMARDs, the use of abatacept was not associated with an increased risk of reporting cancer overall [ROR 0.98 (95% CI 0.91, 1.05)]. Analyses by specific cancer sites showed a significantly increased ROR for melanoma [1.58 (95% CI 1.17, 2.08)], but not for other specific cancer sites. CONCLUSION: Compared with other bDMARDs, exposure to abatacept in RA patients was only significantly associated with an increased risk of reporting melanoma. This increased risk is consistent with the properties of abatacept (CTLA-4 agonist) since it has an opposite action than ipilimumab, an antibody that blocks CTLA-4 and is approved for the treatment of malignant melanoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT03980639.

Drug-induced parkinsonism: Revisiting the epidemiology using the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-Induced Parkinsonism (DIP) is the second most common cause of parkinsonism after idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Little is known about DIP epidemiology. Using VigiBase®, the objective of this study was to assess the main characteristics of DIP reporting around the world. METHODS: We described reports recorded in the WHO pharmacovigilance database, Vigibase® and classified as "Parkinsonism" between 2000 and 2017. Differences of reporting between geographical locations and characteristics of reports were investigated using disproportionality analysis with calculation of Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Among the 9,009,107 reports recorded in VigiBase®, 4565 (0.05%) were DIP. Co reported terms were mainly "tremor" (n = 408, 8.9%), "gait disturbance" (n = 209, 4.6%) and "extrapyramidal disorders" (n = 180, 3.9%). DIP reports were significantly more frequent in men (ROR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.3-1.5) and in patients aged 75 and over (ROR = 2.12; 95% CI 1.98-2.26). Compared to all other continents, risk of reporting drug-induced parkinsonism was higher in Europe (ROR = 2.89; 95% CI 2.73-3.07), Africa (ROR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.46-2.25) and Oceania (ROR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.27-1.77). The risk was lower in Asia (ROR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.51-0.59) and America (ROR = 0.55 95% CI 0.51-0.59). The highest risk of DIP reporting was found with sulpiride and haloperidol followed by risperidone, aripiprazole, paliperidone, metoclopramide, olanzapine, quetiapine and clozapine. CONCLUSION: Risk of DIP reports was higher in men, in people aged 75 and over and in Europe. Main drugs involved are antipsychotics not only drugs from the first generation but also those from the second one.

Trends of atropinic (anticholinergic) exposure in the elderly: a 10-year analysis in the French EGB database.

Atropinic drugs are known to potentially induce physical and/or mental impairments in the elderly. The aim of this study was to investigate trends of atropinic exposure in patients ≥65 years in France between 2006 and 2015. A repeated cross-sectional study was performed quarterly from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015, in the 'Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB)', a representative sample of the French population. Exposed patients were identified using the Anticholinergic Durán's list. Outcomes were rate of patients exposed to at least one atropinic drug (atropinic prevalence rate) and atropinic burden per patient (sum of atropinic burden scores). Interrupted time series were used to analyze the impact of market withdrawal of some drugs with atropinic properties during the period of the study. The number of patients ≥65 years registered in the EGB ranged from 75 611 in 2006 to 95 389 in 2015. Atropinic prevalence rate decreased significantly from 45.6% in 2006 to 33.2% in 2015 (-12.4%, slope significance P < 0.05). Subjects aged ≥85 years were the most exposed. Total atropinic burden decreased significantly between 2006 and 2015 (2.2 ± 1.7 in 2006; 2.0 ± 1.5 in 2015; slope significance P < 0.05), especially in patients ≥85 years. Market withdrawals for safety reasons of some atropinic drugs were significantly associated with a decrease in the atropinic prevalence rate (P < 0.05) and atropinic burden per patient (P < 0.05). In conclusion, atropinic drug exposure in the elderly significantly decreased in France between 2006 and 2015. This decrease can be partly explained by regulatory measures against some atropinic drugs.

Tamoxifen and the risk of Parkinsonism: a case/non-case study.

BACKGROUND: Three studies have suggested a potential positive association between the use of tamoxifen in breast cancer and Parkinsonism, mainly after long-term exposure. OBJECTIVES: To explore this potential signal, we performed a case/non-case study using the World Health Organization Global Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) database, VigiBase® between 1979 and 2018. METHODS: Among women ≥ 55 years, we measured the risk of reporting "Parkinsonism" compared with all other adverse drug reactions [as a reporting odds ratio (ROR 95% CI)] for tamoxifen compared to all other drugs or aromatase inhibitors. RESULTS: During the study period, 356 ICSRs of Parkinsonism reported with tamoxifen were identified. We failed to find a positive association between tamoxifen exposure and Parkinsonism in comparison with exposure to other drugs (ROR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.71-0.88) or aromatase inhibitors (ROR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.33-0.46). CONCLUSION: This study did not find evidence for Parkinsonism associated with tamoxifen.

Atropinic (Anticholinergic) Burden in Parkinson's Disease.

Use of atropinic drugs remains controversial in Parkinson's disease (PD) because there is insufficient evidence about their efficacy and they can induce serious adverse drug reactions. Atropinic risk scales were developed to help to identify atropinic drugs in prescription forms and to evaluate their burden in clinical practice. In the present review, we discuss the few studies investigating atropinic burden in PD and present the results of our study indicating that atropinic drugs are still widely prescribed in PD (almost 3 of 5 prescriptions) with a clinically significant atropinic burden in around 1 of 6 PD patients. Drugs mainly responsible for high values of atropinic burden were those used for nonmotor symptoms. Clinically significant atropinic burdens were mainly induced by associations of several "low-risk" drugs. Physicians must be aware that in addition to classical atropinic antiparkinsonian drugs, many others (psychotropics) can contribute to increased atropinic burden in PD patients. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.