DOSAGE study: protocol for a phase III non-inferiority randomised trial investigating dose-reduced chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer in older patients.

INTRODUCTION: Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, given their under-representation in clinical trials and the lack of robust treatment guidelines for this population. Moreover, older patients, especially those with frailty, have an increased risk of developing chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in a decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospitalisations and high healthcare costs. Phase II trials have suggested that upfront dose reduction of chemotherapy can reduce toxicity rates while maintaining efficacy, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations and an improved QoL. The DOSAGE aims to show that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), with adaption of the treatment plan (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) based on expected risk of treatment toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DOSAGE study is an investigator-initiated phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged≥70 years with metastatic colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. Based on toxicity risk, assessed using the Geriatric 8 (G8) tool, patients will be stratified to either doublet chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin) or fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Patients classified as low risk will be randomised between a fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomised between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction. In the dose-reduced arm, dose escalation after two cycles is allowed. The primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, overall survival, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Considering a median PFS of 8 months and non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, we shall include 587 patients. The study will be enrolled in 36 Dutch Hospitals, with enrolment scheduled to start in July 2024. This study will provide new evidence regarding the effect of dose-reduced chemotherapy on survival and treatment outcomes, as well as the use of the G8 to choose between doublet chemotherapy or monotherapy. Results will contribute to a more individualised approach in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, potentially leading to improved QoL while maintaining survival benefits. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has received ethical approval by the ethical committee Leiden Den Haag Delft (P24.018) and will be approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the participating institutions. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06275958.

The performance of metabolomics-based prediction scores for mortality in older patients with solid tumors.

Prognostic information is needed to balance benefits and risks of cancer treatment in older patients. Metabolomics-based scores were previously developed to predict 5- and 10-year mortality (MetaboHealth) and biological age (MetaboAge). This study aims to investigate the association of MetaboHealth and MetaboAge with 1-year mortality in older patients with solid tumors, and to study their predictive value for mortality in addition to established clinical predictors. This prospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 70 years with a solid malignant tumor, who underwent blood sampling and a geriatric assessment before treatment initiation. The outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. Of the 192 patients, the median age was 77 years. With each SD increase of MetaboHealth, patients had a 2.32 times increased risk of mortality (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.59-3.39). With each year increase in MetaboAge, there was a 4% increased risk of mortality (HR 1.04, 1.01-1.07). MetaboHealth and MetaboAge showed an AUC of 0.66 (0.56-0.75) and 0.60 (0.51-0.68) for mortality prediction accuracy, respectively. The AUC of a predictive model containing age, primary tumor site, distant metastasis, comorbidity, and malnutrition was 0.76 (0.68-0.83). Addition of MetaboHealth increased AUC to 0.80 (0.74-0.87) (p = 0.09) and AUC did not change with MetaboAge (0.76 (0.69-0.83) (p = 0.89)). Higher MetaboHealth and MetaboAge scores were associated with 1-year mortality. The addition of MetaboHealth to established clinical predictors only marginally improved mortality prediction in this cohort with various types of tumors. MetaboHealth may potentially improve identification of older patients vulnerable for adverse events, but numbers were too small for definitive conclusions. The TENT study is retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107. Date of registration: 22-10-2019.

Toxicity in Older Patients with Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibition has emerged as an effective treatment strategy for a variety of cancers, including in older adults. However, older patients with cancer represent a heterogenous group as they can vary widely in frailty, cognition, and physical status. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the association between clinical frailty and immune-related treatment toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity in older patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and older treated with checkpoint inhibitors were selected from the TENT study, IMAGINE study, and "Tolerability and safety of immunotherapy study". Clinical frailty was assessed by the Geriatric-8 test score and World Health Organization (WHO) status. Outcomes were grades 3-5 toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity during treatment. RESULTS: Of 99 patients included, 22% had comorbidities. While 33% of the patients were considered frail based on an abnormal Geriatric-8 test score of < 15, physical impairments were considered absent in 51% (WHO score of 0) and mild in 40% (WHO score of 1). Despite the limited sample size of the cohort, consistent trends were observed with patients with an abnormal Geriatric-8 test score of < 15 or a higher WHO score of 1 for having higher odds of toxicity [odds ratio (OR) 2.32 (95% CI 0.41-13.02); OR 1.33 (95% CI 0.45-4.17)], treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity [OR 2.25 (95% CI 0.61-8.31); OR 2.18 (95% CI 0.7-6.73)], and hospitalization due to immune-related treatment toxicity [OR 3.72 (95% CI 0.39-35.4); OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.35-4.9)]. Moreover, in a sub-analysis, we observed that the treatment discontinuation due to immune-related treatment toxicity occurred often in patients with grade 1-2 toxicity as well. CONCLUSIONS: Although not statistically significant, in older patients treated with immunotherapy in a real-life population with cancer, we observed consistent trends towards increased toxicity, hospitalization, and treatment discontinuation with increasing frailty. Larger studies are needed to confirm these exploratory results. Moreover, older patients with a lower toxicity grade 1-2 experienced early treatment discontinuation frequently, suggesting a lower tolerance of toxicity.

Outcomes in studies regarding older patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients are often deemed ineligible for clinical research, and many frequently-used endpoints and outcome measures are not as relevant for older patients for younger ones. This systematic review aimed to present an overview of outcomes used in clinical research regarding patients over the age of 65 years with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched to identify studies on prostate cancer (treatment) in patients aged ≥65 between 2016 and 2023. Data on title, study design, number of participants and age, stage of disease, treatment, and investigated outcomes were synthesized and descriptively analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies were included. Of these most included patients over 65 years, while others used a higher age. Overall, 39 articles (57.3%) reported on survival-related outcomes, 22 (32.4%) reported on progression of disease and 38 (55.9%) used toxicity or adverse events as an outcome measure. Health-related quality of life and functional outcomes were investigated in 29.4%, and cognition in two studies. The most frequently investigated survival-related outcomes were overall and cancer-specific survival (51.3%); however, 38.5% only studied overall survival. DISCUSSION: The main focus of studies included in this review remains survival and disease progression. There is limited attention for health-related quality of life and functional status, although older patients often prioritize the latter. Future research should incorporate outcome measures tailored to the aged population to improve care for older patients with prostate cancer.

Tolerability and effectiveness of palbociclib in older women with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Palbociclib has become the standard of care for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, but real-world evidence in older women remains scarce. Therefore, we investigated tolerability of palbociclib in older women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Consecutive women aged ≥ 70 with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, treated with palbociclib in any treatment line in six hospitals, were included. Primary endpoint was grade ≥ 3 palbociclib-related toxicity. Predictors of toxicity were identified using logistic regression models. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan Meier. RESULTS: We included 144 women with a median age of 74 years. Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 54% of patients, of which neutropenia (37%) was most common. No neutropenic fever or grade 5 toxicity occurred. Dose reduction during treatment occurred in 50% of patients, 8% discontinued treatment due to toxicity and 3% were hospitalized due to toxicity. Polypharmacy (odds ratio (OR) 2.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-5.58) and pretreatment low leukocytes (OR 4.81; 95% CI 1.27-18.21) were associated with grade 3-4 toxicity, while comorbidities were not. In first-line systemic therapy, median PFS was 12 months and median OS 32 months. In second-line, median PFS was 12 months and median OS 31 months. CONCLUSION: Although grade 3-4 toxicity and dose reductions occurred frequently, most were expected and managed by dose reductions, showing that palbociclib is generally well tolerated and thus represents a valuable treatment option in the older population.

Older patients' experiences with and attitudes towards an oncogeriatric pathway: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: To tailor treatment for older patients with cancer, an oncogeriatric care pathway has been developed in the Leiden University Medical Center. In this care pathway a geriatric assessment is performed and preferences concerning cancer treatment options are discussed. This study aimed to explore patient experiences with and attitudes towards this pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study was performed using an exploratory descriptive approach. Individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with older patients (≥70 years) who had followed the oncogeriatric care pathway in the six months prior to the interview. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: After interviews with 14 patients with a median age of 80 years, three main themes were identified. (1) Patients' positive experiences with the oncogeriatric pathway: Patients appreciated the attitudes of the healthcare professionals and felt heard and understood. (2) Unmet information needs about the oncogeriatric care pathway: Patients experienced a lack of information about the aim and process. (3) Incomplete information for decision-making: Most patients were satisfied with decision-making process. However, treatment decisions had often been made before oncogeriatric consultation. No explicit naming and explaining of different available treatment options had been provided, nor had risk of physical or cognitive decline during and after treatment been addressed. DISCUSSION: Older patients had predominately positive attitudes towards the oncogeriatric care pathway. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment decision. Providing information on the aim and process of the care pathway, available treatment options, and treatment-related risks of cognitive and physical decline may further improve the oncogeriatric care pathway and the decision-making process.

Geriatric predictors of response and adverse events in older patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has improved cancer treatment in recent years. Older and frail patients are frequently treated with ICIs, but since they have been underrepresented in previous clinical trials, the real impact of ICI in this patient group is not well defined. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for associations between geriatric impairments and treatment outcomes in older patients with advanced and metastatic cancer treated with ICIs. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles published before June 2022. Studies investigating the association between impairments in at least two geriatric domains and treatment outcome were considered eligible. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the QUIPS tool was performed independently by two investigators. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included. Median sample size of the studies was 92 patients (interquartile range (IQR) 47-113), with a median of 26 frail patients (IQR 21-35). Five studies investigated disease-related and survival outcomes, and two of them found a statistically significant association between geriatric impairments and either survival or disease progression. Eight studies investigated toxicity outcomes, and two of them showed a statistically significant association between geriatric impairments and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Few studies suggested a relation between geriatric impairments and worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Only a few studies have investigated the association between geriatric impairments and treatment outcomes and these studies were small. Older patients with geriatric impairments seem to be more likely to experience irAEs, but larger studies that include frail patients and use geriatric screening tools are required to confirm this association. These studies will be essential to improve the development of specific strategies to deal with frail patients.