A comparison of the Thunderbeat and standard electrocautery devices in head and neck surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: New energy-based sutureless vessel ligation devices, such as the Thunderbeat (Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan), could reduce operative time and limit blood loss in head and neck surgery; however, efficacy and safety in major head and neck surgery have not been investigated in a prospective, randomized study. METHODS: This prospective, double-arm, randomized controlled trial consisted of two parts: total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND). Thirty patients planned for TL were randomized in two groups. For the ND part, forty-two operative sides were likewise randomized. In both parts, Thunderbeat was used in addition to the standard instrumentation in the intervention groups, while only standard instrumentation was used in the control groups. Primary outcome values were blood loss, operative time and complication rate. RESULTS: For the TL part there was no difference in mean blood loss (p = 0.062), operative time (p = 0.512) and complications (p = 0.662) between both hemostatic techniques. For the neck dissection part, there was a reduction in blood loss (mean 210 mL versus 431 mL, p = 0.046) and in operative time (median 101 (IQR 85-130) minutes versus 150 (IQR 130-199) minutes, p = 0.014) when Thunderbeat was used. There was no difference in complication rate between both hemostatic systems (p = 0.261). CONCLUSION: The Thunderbeat hemostatic device significantly reduces operative blood loss and operative time for neck dissections, without increase in complications. In TL, blood loss using Thunderbeat was comparable with the standard technique, but the operative time tended to be shorter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMCG Research Register, Reg. no. 201700041, date of registration: 18/1/2017.

Short- and long-term complications of surgical and percutaneous dilatation tracheotomies: a large single-centre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine and compare the incidence of long- and short-term complications of percutaneous dilatation tracheotomies (PDT) and surgical tracheotomies (ST). DESIGN: A single-centre retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: 305 patients undergoing a tracheotomy (PDT or ST) in the University Medical Center Groningen from 2003 to 2013 were included. Data were gathered from patient files. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term and long-term complications including tracheal stenosis. RESULTS: The incidence of short- and long-term complications, including tracheal stenosis, was similar in both groups. Analysis of a small high-risk subgroup showed no difference in long-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of short- and long-term complications, including tracheal stenosis, is equal in PDT and ST. PDT is a safe alternative for ST in selected patients.

A prospective multicenter clinical feasibility study of a new automatic speaking valve for postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation.

Evaluation of short- and long-term clinical feasibility and exploration of limitations and advantages of a new automatic speaking valve (ASV) for laryngectomized patients with integrated HME, the Provox FreeHands FlexiVoice (FlexiVoice). This ASV not only enables automatic, but also manual closure of the valve. A multicenter, prospective clinical study in 40 laryngectomized patients was conducted. Participants were asked to use the FlexiVoice for 26 weeks. The primary outcome measure was long-term compliance. Secondary outcome measures were: patient preference, hours of FlexiVoice use, device life of adhesive, voice and speech quality, and quality of life. After 26 weeks, 15 patients (37.5 %) were using the FlexiVoice on a daily basis, for a mean of 12.64 h/day (SD ± 5.03). Ten patients (25 %) were using the device on a non-daily basis, for a mean of 3.76 h/day (SD ± 2.07). The remaining 15 patients (37.5 %) discontinued using the FlexiVoice. Sixty percent of the 25 long-term users applied both automatic and manual closure of the valve. Unpredictable fixation of the adhesive was the main reason for discontinuing or not using the FlexiVoice on a daily basis. Overall, 18 patients (45 %) preferred the FlexiVoice, 16 patients (40 %) their usual HME, 3 patients (7.5 %) their usual ASV, 1 patient (2.5 %) preferred no device at all, and in 2 patients preference was not recorded. The minor technical issues identified could be corrected. The Provox FreeHands FlexiVoice appears to be a useful ASV, which allows for hands-free speech in a larger proportion of laryngectomized patients in the present cohort. The additional manual closure option of the device is beneficial for maintaining the adhesive seal longer.

Clinical feasibility study of protrach dualcare a new speaking valve with heat and moisture exchanger for tracheotomized patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the ProTrach DualCare (Atos Medical, Hörby, Sweden), a device combining a hands-free speaking valve and a Heat and Moisture Exchanger (HME) for tracheotomized patients. Study Design: A non-randomized, prospective single center feasibility study. Methods: Sixteen adult tracheotomized patients were included. Participants were asked to test the DualCare for two weeks while continuing their normal activities. After these two weeks, participants could choose whether or not to take part in the long-term evaluation. The EuroQOL-5D, Borg scale and questionnaires on speaking, pulmonary function and patient preference were used. During the long-term evaluation, a minor redesign was implemented and all participants were asked to test the new device again for one week, with a potential long-term evaluation. Eleven decided to participate. Results: The device was well-tolerated. Speaking noise was reduced (p = 0.020) and speech was considered to sound more natural compared to previously used devices according to the users (p = 0.020). Overall 11 participants preferred the DualCare to their standard device. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Overall, 11 of 16 participants preferred the DualCare to their standard speaking valve or HME. Users of the DualCare were able to use hands free speech with the benefits of an HME and the device was considered clinically feasible and has the potential to improve quality of life of tracheotomized patients. Level of Evidence: 2b.