[Borderline personality disorder: state of knowledge and attitudes among french-speaking mental health professionnals]. / Trouble de la personnalité borderline: état des connaissances et des représentations auprès de praticiens francophones en santé mentale.

OBJECTIVES: Patients suffering from borderline personality disorder are very prevalent in various settings (emergency rooms, psychiatric and general hospitals, ambulatory consultations). However, it remains one of the most stigmatized and neglected mental health conditions, albeit being an area that is responsible for very interesting advances in psychotherapy. Today, the prognosis of patients with borderline personality disorder is rather favorable, provided that they follow a dedicated psychotherapy. Conceptions about this condition therefore deserve to be updated as it is sufficiently described in the literature that negative attitudes towards these patients diminish the quality of care they receive as well as their prognosis, and that these attitudes change with training. We decided to study the state of knowledge and attitudes towards borderline personality disorder in a group of French-speaking caregivers interested in these patients. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2020, at the start of training sessions in psychotherapeutic approaches to borderline personality disorder, we provided two questionnaires to 126 caregivers from various professional backgrounds (psychiatrists or child psychiatrists, psychologists, mental health nurses, social workers). The first consisted of 13 questions with 3 choice answers aimed at testing knowledge about borderline personality disorder and the second of 11 questions in the form of a Likert scale aimed at evaluating attitudes towards these patients (e.g. degree of comfort, involvement, hope, avoidance with these patients) adapted frome a questionnaire of Blake and colleagues. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 126 caregivers (69 psychiatrists/pedopsychiatrists; 19 mental health nurses; 23 psychologists; 14 social workers). Fifty three of them (42.06 %) worked in an outpatient setting (either in a state facility or in private practice), 50 (39.68 %) worked in an inpatient psychiatric unit, 13 (10.32%) in both care systems, and 10 (7.94 %) worked in other facilities such as sheltered homes or workshops for persons with psychiatric disabilities. The average number of years in postgraduate training was 7.73 (SD=5.67; rank=0 to 31), and 35 (27.78%) had received at least one training course on borderline disorder in the past. The mean age of the sample was 37.89 (SD=10.08; rank=20 to 64) and there were 76 women (60.32%) and 50 men (39.68%). Concerning the first questionnaire (knowledge), the rate of correct responses among caregivers was relatively low (54%) considering that the vast majority of those assessed were caregivers already trained in mental health who were working with patients suffering from borderline personality disorder. The results showed a significant knowledge gap among professionals, in particular in the nursing profession, illustrating an ever more flagrant shortfall in formations in this sub-population. Concerning the second questionnaire (attitudes), the answers showed that attitudes of caregivers towards patients with borderline personality disorder were still tinged with fear and lack of confidence in taking charge of them. Thus, one participant out of five would have liked to avoid these patients, more than 12% of caregivers did not appreciate them, and 23% thought that they were manipulative. In addition, nearly half of the caregivers surveyed had low confidence in their ability to make a positive difference in the lives of borderline patients. However, there was a recognition of their distress as well as a demand for dedicated training. CONCLUSIONS: Stigmas and ignorance persist around patients with borderline personality disorder. Current training courses do not allow caregivers who are on the front lines (in particular nurses) and who wish to be trained to acquire sufficient knowledge and tools necessary for the care of patients suffering from this disorder. This calls for an improvement in training as well as a reflection on the most appropriate approaches possible to the various target audiences.

Emergency psychiatric management of borderline personality disorder: Towards an articulation of modalities for personalised integrative care.

Building on existing literature, the authors draw the landscape of psychiatric emergencies, and focus on borderline personality disorder, frequently encountered, and strongly linked to death by suicide. A review of knowledge in terms of diagnosis, prognosis, etiology, and treatment, as well as their own experiences, lead them to propose areas of progress that would secure the patient's care pathway. The evolution of society has led psychiatric emergency departments to play the role of a safety net and an entry point to the mental health system. Borderline personality disorder is one of the most common pathologies encountered in psychiatric emergencies. It represents a major concern, long characterized by an often dramatic evolution, and by the human and economic stress it generates. However, since the 1990s, knowledge of this disorder has been refined, and today there are various means of evaluation, good clinical practices and psychotherapeutic treatments, thanks to which significant and lasting improvement is possible. Recent studies highlight the crucial role of hospital caregivers, and the benefit of consolidating their skills by providing them with the knowledge and tools specific to this disorder. They also converge on the interest of setting up specific emergency treatment modalities, particularly highly structured, safe and empowering for the patient, in order to improve their effectiveness. The authors suggest that a case formulation model for persons with borderline personality disorder in emergency would make it possible to activate these two levers of progress, while improving collaboration between hospital and outpatient care. This would also address their main concern of optimizing the patient's therapeutic pathway and reinforcing adherence to treatment that could bring remission, and should be supported by data from empirical research.