Parkinson's Disease Tremor Differentially Responds to Levodopa and Subthalamic Stimulation.

Background: Tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) has an inconsistent response to levodopa and subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Objectives: To identify predictive factors of PD tremor responsiveness to levodopa and STN-DBS. Material and Methods: PD patients with upper limb tremor who underwent STN-DBS were included. The levodopa responsiveness of tremor (overall, postural, and rest sub-components), was assessed using the relevant Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III items performed during the preoperative assessment. Post-surgical outcomes were similarly assessed ON and OFF stimulation. A score for the rest/postural tremor ratio was used to determine the influence of rest and postural tremor severity on STN-DBS outcome. Factors predictive of tremor responsiveness were determined using multiple linear regression modeling. Volume of tissue activated measurement coupled to voxel-based analysis was performed to identify anatomical clusters associated with motor symptoms improvement. Results: One hundred and sixty five patients were included in this study. Male gender was negatively correlated with tremor responsiveness to levodopa, whereas the ratio of rest/postural tremor was positively correlated with both levodopa responsiveness and STN-DBS tremor outcome. Clusters corresponding to improvement of tremor were in the subthalamic nucleus, the zona incerta and the thalamus, whereas clusters corresponding to improvement for akinesia and rigidity were located within the subthalamic nucleus. Conclusion: More severe postural tremor and less severe rest tremor were associated with both poorer levodopa and STN-DBS response. The different locations of clusters associated with best correction of tremor and other parkinsonian features suggest that STN-DBS effect on PD symptoms is underpinned by the modulation of different networks.

Stimulation Sweet Spot in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation - Myth or Reality? A Critical Review of Literature.

INTRODUCTION: While deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been extensively used for more than 20 years in Parkinson's disease (PD), the optimal area of stimulation to relieve motor symptoms remains elusive. OBJECTIVE: We aimed at localizing the sweet spot within the subthalamic region by performing a systematic review of the literature. METHOD: PubMed database was searched for published studies exploring optimal stimulation location for STN DBS in PD, published between 2000 and 2019. A standardized assessment procedure based on methodological features was applied to select high-quality publications. Studies conducted more than 3 months after the DBS procedure, employing lateralized scores and/or stimulation condition, and reporting the volume of tissue activated or the position of the stimulating contact within the subthalamic region were considered in the final analysis. RESULTS: Out of 439 references, 24 were finally retained, including 21 studies based on contact location and 3 studies based on volume of tissue activated (VTA). Most studies (all VTA-based studies and 13 of the 21 contact-based studies) suggest the superior-lateral STN and the adjacent white matter as the optimal sites for stimulation. Remaining contact-based studies were either inconclusive (5/21), favoured the caudal zona incerta (1/21), or suggested a better outcome of STN stimulation than adjacent white matter stimulation (2/21). CONCLUSION: Using a standardized methodological approach, our review supports the presence of a sweet spot located within the supero-lateral STN and extending to the adjacent white matter.

A practical guide to troubleshooting pallidal deep brain stimulation issues in patients with dystonia.

High frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal portion of the globus pallidus has, in the last two decades, become a mainstream therapy for the management of medically-refractory dystonia syndromes. Such increasing uptake places an onus on movement disorder physicians to become familiar with this treatment modality, in particular optimal patient selection for the procedure and how to troubleshoot problems relating to sub-optimal efficacy and therapy-related side effects. Deep brain stimulation for dystonic conditions presents some unique challenges. For example, the frequent lack of immediate change in clinical status following stimulation alterations means that programming often relies on personal experience and local practice rather than real-time indicators of efficacy. Further, dystonia is a highly heterogeneous disorder, making the development of unifying guidelines and programming algorithms for DBS in this population difficult. Consequently, physicians may feel less confident in managing DBS for dystonia as compared to other indications e.g. Parkinson's disease. In this review, we integrate our years of personal experience of the programming of DBS systems for dystonia with a critical appraisal of the literature to produce a practical guide for troubleshooting common issues encountered in patients with dystonia treated with DBS, in the hope of improving the care for these patients.

Endurance of Short Pulse Width Thalamic Stimulation Efficacy in Intention Tremor.

The benefit of short pulse width stimulation in patients suffering from essential tremor (ET) refractory to thalamic deep brain stimulation remains controversial. Here, we add to the minimal body of evidence available by reporting the effect of this type of stimulation in 3 patients with a persistent and severe intention tremor component despite iterative DBS setting adjustments. While a reduction in pulse width to 30 µs initially showed promise in these patients by improving tremor control and mitigating cerebellar side effects arguably by widening the therapeutic window, these benefits seemed to dissipate during early follow-up. Our experience supports the need for measuring longer-term outcomes when reporting the usefulness of this mode of stimulation in ET.

Entraining Stepping Movements of Parkinson's Patients to Alternating Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation.

Patients with advanced Parkinson's can be treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN). This affords a unique opportunity to record from this nucleus and stimulate it in a controlled manner. Previous work has shown that activity in the STN is modulated in a rhythmic pattern when Parkinson's patients perform stepping movements, raising the question whether the STN is involved in the dynamic control of stepping. To answer this question, we tested whether an alternating stimulation pattern resembling the stepping-related modulation of activity in the STN could entrain patients' stepping movements as evidence of the STN's involvement in stepping control. Group analyses of 10 Parkinson's patients (one female) showed that alternating stimulation significantly entrained stepping rhythms. We found a remarkably consistent alignment between the stepping and stimulation cycle when the stimulation speed was close to the stepping speed in the five patients that demonstrated significant individual entrainment to the stimulation cycle. Our study suggests that the STN is causally involved in dynamic control of step timing and motivates further exploration of this biomimetic stimulation pattern as a potential basis for the development of DBS strategies to ameliorate gait impairments.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We tested whether the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in humans is causally involved in controlling stepping movements. To this end, we studied patients with Parkinson's disease who have undergone therapeutic deep brain stimulation (DBS), as in these individuals we can stimulate the STNs in a controlled manner. We developed an alternating pattern of stimulation that mimics the pattern of activity modulation recorded in this nucleus during stepping. The alternating DBS (altDBS) could entrain patients' stepping rhythm, suggesting a causal role of the STN in dynamic gait control. This type of stimulation may potentially form the basis for improved DBS strategies for gait.

Novel Programming Features Help Alleviate Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation-Induced Side Effects.

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a widely used treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with motor complications, but can result in adverse effects (AEs) in a significant proportion of treated patients. The use of novel programming features including short pulse width (PW) and directional steering in alleviating stimulation-induced AEs has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To determine if programming with short PW, directional steering, or the combination of these novel techniques can improve stimulation-induced dysarthria, dyskinesia, and pyramidal AEs. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive PD patients who experienced reversible AEs of STN-DBS had optimization of their settings using either short PW, directional steering, or the combination, while ensuring equivalent control of motor symptoms. Pairwise comparisons of pre- and post-optimization adverse effect ratings were made. Patients were left on the alternative setting with the greatest benefit and followed up at 6 months. Modeling of volume of tissue activated (VTA) and charge per pulse (Qp) calculations were used to explore potential underlying mechanisms of any differences found. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in stimulation-induced dysarthria, dyskinesia, and pyramidal side effects after optimization. At 6 months, mean AE ratings remained significantly improved compared to pre-optimization ratings. Different patterns of shift in VTA for each AE, and Qp could be used to explain improvements using novel techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation-induced dysarthria, dyskinesia, and pyramidal AEs induced by STN-DBS can be improved by using novel programming techniques. These represent additional tools to conventional methods that can be used to address these AEs. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in French West Indies, a real-world study in patients from African ancestry.

Affecting 2.5 million people worldwide, multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the main causes of acquired disability among young adults. In French West Indies (FWI), where MS has arisen from the end of the 80's, a low therapeutic response to interferons beta1 (IFN beta1) in patients of African descent, restrains the therapeutic options. Fingolimod is a Sphingosine-1-Phosphate receptor modulator whose efficacy in the treatment of MS has recently been shown in three phase III studies. Nevertheless, data are currently lacking concerning the use of Fingolimod among populations of African descent, particularly in a real-world setting. Efficacy and safety information collected during the first two years of follow-up have been analysed retrospectively for all patients in whom Fingolimod treatment was introduced in FWI between its marketing date and December 2015. Fifty-two consecutive patients with a relapsing remitting MS started Fingolimod therapy in the FWI, according to the European guidelines. After 24 months, 40 patients were still receiving the treatment. The average Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) dropped by 81%, and 72.5% of patients remained free from disability progression during the 24 months on Fingolimod. MS remained controlled (according NEDA 3 criteria) for 41% of patients who were still on therapy at 24 months. Nine participants presented with a moderate or major side effect. Unlike IFN beta1 therapy, Fingolimod appears to be effective in Afro-Caribbean patients in a real-world setting with a similar benefit to what has been observed in phase III studies in more selected populations.

Is carpal tunnel syndrome related to computer exposure at work? A review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis on epidemiological studies was undertaken to assess association between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and computer work. METHODS: Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Base de Donnees de Sante Publique) were searched with cross-references from published reviews. We included recent studies, original epidemiological studies for which the association was assessed with blind reviewing with control group. Relevant associations were extracted, and a metarisk was calculated using the generic variance approach (meta-odds ratio [meta-OR]). RESULTS: Six studies met the criteria for inclusion. Results are contradictory because of heterogeneous work exposure. The meta-OR for computer use was 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 3.55). The meta-OR for keyboarding was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.98) and for mouse 1.94 (95% CI, 0.90 to 4.21). CONCLUSION: It was not possible to show an association between computer use and CTS, although some particular work circumstances may be associated with CTS.