Favorable longterm outcomes of liver transplant recipients treated de novo with once-daily tacrolimus: Results of a single-center cohort.

The once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus has been recently related with significant graft and patient mid-term survival advantages; however, practical information on the de novo administration after liver transplantation and longterm outcomes is currently lacking. This study is a 5-year retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort of liver transplant recipients treated de novo with once-daily tacrolimus (April 2008/August 2011). The study cohort consisted of 160 patients, including 23 with pretransplant renal dysfunction, with a median follow-up of 57.6 months (interquartile range, 46.6-69.0). Tacrolimus target trough levels were 5-10 ng/mL during the first 3 months after transplant, reducing progressively to <7 ng/mL after the first posttransplant year. Once-daily tacrolimus was withdrawn in 35 (21.8%) patients during follow-up, mostly due to renal dysfunction and/or metabolic syndrome. The biopsy-proven acute rejection rate was 12.5% with no cases of steroid-resistant rejection. The cumulative incidence of de novo diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were 16.9%, 31.2%, and 6.5%, respectively. Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was 2.8%. Renal function remained stable after the sixth month after transplant with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 77.7 ± 19.6 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) at 5 years. None of our patients developed chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5. Patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 96.3%, 91.9%, and 88.3%, respectively. Overall survival of patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score > 25 points was not significantly different. In conclusion, our study suggests that immunosuppression based on de novo once-daily tacrolimus is feasible in routine clinical practice, showing favorable outcomes and outstanding longterm survival even in patients with high MELD scores. Liver Transplantation 22 1391-1400 2016 AASLD.

Tacrolimus dose individualization in "de novo" patients after 10 years of experience in liver transplantation: pharmacokinetic considerations and patient pathophysiology.

AIM: To determine how changes in tacrolimus (TAC) immunosuppression clinical practice, in the first 15 days post liver transplantation (LT) and across a decade, impact a clinical covariate - pharmacokinetic (PK) model, developed in data from 1998, thus testing its utility in dose individualization across time. Patient cohorts from 1998 (Reference: R-1998) and 2007 (EVALUATION: E-2007) were compared. METHODS: Analysis of monitoring observations (Cmin and Cmin/dose) and the biochemical variables aspartate aminotransferase (AST), hematocrit (HCT), albumin (ALB) and serum creatinine (SCr) was done for 0 - 3 and 4 - 15 days post transplantation (PT). The population PK model developed for R-1998 [1] was re-evaluated for the two cohorts. RESULTS: Significant differences in R-1998 vs. E-2007 existed in Cmin and Cmin/dose and in covariates AST (as hepatic function marker) and SCr (as toxicity marker). E-2007 had lower levels of Cmin and Cmin/dose (1/CL), lower AST with faster recovery and lower variability in Cmin/dose for similar dose. AST was a covariate on CL/F in the 0 - 3 day PT period. In 4 - 15 days PT for E-2007, low levels of HCT and ALB as CL/F predictors confirmed a subgroup with higher CL/F (23.8 l/h vs. 19.3 l/h). The R-1998 model's original structure was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Ten years of use of TAC shows gain in therapeutic targeting efficiency, due to improvement in LT methods, knowledge of the drug and consideration of PK steady state. The remaining uncertainty with TAC monitoring in LT can be resolved with application of PK principles combined with patients' diosyncrasies in the model developed for TAC dose individualization in R-1998. The applicability of the model as nucleus in Bayes individualization remains intact across a decade.

Liver transplantation for neuroendocrine tumors in Europe-results and trends in patient selection: a 213-case European liver transplant registry study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes and indications in a large cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for liver metastases (LM) from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) over a 27-year period. BACKGROUND: LT for NET remains controversial due to the absence of clear selection criteria and the scarcity and heterogeneity of reported cases. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study included 213 patients who underwent LT for NET performed in 35 centers in 11 European countries between 1982 and 2009. One hundred seven patients underwent transplantation before 2000 and 106 after 2000. Mean age at the time of LT was 46 years. Half of the patients presented hormone secretion and 55% had hepatomegaly. Before LT, 83% of patients had undergone surgical treatment of the primary tumor and/or LM and 76% had received chemotherapy. The median interval between diagnosis of LM and LT was 25 months (range, 1-149 months). In addition to LT, 24 patients underwent major resection procedures and 30 patients underwent minor resection procedures. RESULTS: Three-month postoperative mortality was 10%. At 5 years after LT, overall survival (OS) was 52% and disease-free survival was 30%. At 5 years from diagnosis of LM, OS was 73%. Multivariate analysis identified 3 predictors of poor outcome, that is, major resection in addition to LT, poor tumor differentiation, and hepatomegaly. Since 2000, 5-year OS has increased to 59% in relation with fewer patients presenting poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis of the 106 cases treated since 2000 identified the following predictors of poor outcome: hepatomegaly, age more than 45 years, and any amount of resection concurrent with LT. CONCLUSIONS: LT is an effective treatment of unresectable LM from NET. Patient selection based on the aforementioned predictors can achieve a 5-year OS between 60% and 80%. However, use of overly restrictive criteria may deny LT to some patients who could benefit. Optimal timing for LT in patients with stable versus progressive disease remains unclear.

Venous outflow obstruction after orthotopic liver transplantation: use of a breast implant to maintain graft position.

Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a rare complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) usually related to technical issues or to malposition or kinking of the hepatic graft. When HVOO is diagnosed during the early post-transplant period, surgical options are technically very demanding and outcomes discouraging. Therefore, angioplasty and stent placement have been indicated to avoid a chronic lesion of the graft. Three cases of HVOO after OLT are reported. HVOO was diagnosed during the early post-transplant period and was due to graft malposition in two patients and kinking of the vena cava anastomosis in one. All patients were successfully treated with a 300-cc gel-filled breast implant surgically placed in the right hepatic fossa with the liver graft resting on it. Massive ascites in all three patients disappeared and renal impairment resolved within two wk post-implant placement. No prosthesis-related complications have been observed after a follow-up ranging from 30 to 58 months. We describe a simple and effective method of maintaining the liver graft in an adequate position to achieve prolonged relief of the outflow obstruction for the whole graft and discuss the advantages of a breast implant over stent placement or the use of different balloon catheters.

Pathophysiological idiosyncrasies and pharmacokinetic realities may interfere with tacrolimus dose titration in liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: To explore the main factors that make it difficult to empirically monitor tacrolimus (TAC) in the early period post-liver transplantation (LTx), with a specific focus on those aspects related to patient idiosyncrasy and clinical status as well as to the pharmacokinetic (PK) assumptions on which drug individualization in clinical practice is based. METHODS: Retrospective monitoring data from 75 de novo liver transplant patients treated with twice daily with TAC and followed for up to 15 days were analyzed. An extensive battery of laboratory measurements were available. Dose adjustment was performed empirically using trough levels (C(min)). The population was separated into two major background groups according to low or high values of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (Group 1 and 2, respectively) based on AST measurements made during the first 4 days post-LTx. Each of these two major groups was then further subdivided into two subgroups based on elevated (Groups 1A, 2A) or reduced (Groups 1B, 2B) combined albumin (cut-off 2.5 g/dl) and hematocrit (cut-off 28%). RESULTS: The C(min)/Dose ratio [inversely proportional to systemic clearance (CL)] had a variability [coefficient of variation (CV) >80%) that was incongruently higher for the ratio than for C(min) and Dose separately. This was attributed to most patients not being at steady state or physiologically stable in the early post-LTx period. Group 1 patients were more predictable than Group 2 patients, who were responsible for the variability in the ratio. C(min) was lower in the reduced ALB and HCT patient groups when AST conditions were similar (1A vs. 1B and 2A vs. 2B), likely due to increased TAC metabolic clearance (reduced C(min)/Dose). This situation existed for two periods: 0-15 days post-LTx and 4-15 days post-LTx observations. Group 2A patients were the main source of the paradoxical variability in C(min)/Dose (higher ratio of 2.7; CV = 100%), suggesting a lower clearance and difficulty in the recovery of stability. In contrast, Group 2B patients had the lower ratio (1.4; 47%) but required the highest number of dose adjustments as the variability was hard to identify clinically. Group 1A patients were the most predictable empirically. When observations from 15 new patients who entered the clinic in 2007 and 2008 were used for the analysis, the same sub-groups existed in the same proportions in both years. CONCLUSION: The difficulty in empirical dose adjustment of TAC is associated to the inevitable non-fulfillment of PK assumptions early post-LTx and also to the inherent complexity of the clinical condition, leading to increased uncertainty for the clinician regarding dose selection. Identifying these sub-categories provides a rational means of classifying patients akin to a phenotype. The complexity of the kinetics in LTx and TAC treatment does not invalidate C(min) as a biomarker, but a Bayes algorithm including a full PK structure and these covariates would be optimal.

A prospective randomized open study in liver transplant recipients: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus versus tacrolimus and steroids.

This open-label, randomized study compared the efficacy of a regimen of corticosteroids and tacrolimus (standard therapy group, n = 79) with a regimen of daclizumab induction therapy in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus (modified therapy group, n = 78) in primary liver transplant recipients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included time to rejection and patient and graft survival. The incidence of BPAR was significantly reduced in the modified therapy group compared to the standard therapy group (11.5% versus 26.6%, respectively, P = 0.017). The time to rejection was significantly shorter in the standard therapy group compared with the modified therapy group (P = 0.044). There was no significant difference between groups in patient or graft survival. Hepatitis C virus-positive patients exhibited no differences from hepatitis C virus-negative patients with respect to the incidence of BPAR. A steroid-sparing regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus was effective and well tolerated in the prevention of BPAR in adult liver transplant recipients in comparison with a standard regimen of tacrolimus and steroids.

Factors influencing change in health-related quality of life after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients following liver transplantation and the factors associated with HRQoL variation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected for 60 consecutive patients activated for liver transplantation in a single hospital. Patients were classified according to the severity of the cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class) and disease etiology (alcoholic cirrhosis, viral cirrhosis, cholestatic diseases, and hepatocarcinoma). HRQoL was assessed by three different questionnaires: the Health Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), and a specific-symptom questionnaire. Questionnaires were completed during the pre-operative period and six months after transplantation. RESULTS: In the pre-operative period, patients with Child A had higher mean levels of HRQoL than did those in other groups. At six months following transplantation, there were no significant differences among the groups, largely because gains obtained by patients with Child B and C were much greater than those attained by patients with Child A. Across the four etiological groups, there were significant differences in all domains of the three questionnaires, except SF-36-bodily pain and HAD-anxiety, prior to transplantation, because patients with hepatocarcinoma had much better HRQoL. After transplantation, there were no differences because patients with viral and alcohol-induced cirrhosis achieved greater gains with respect to the neoplastic group. During the pre-operative period, the scores for all areas of the SF-36 and for all groups were below the general population normalized score of 50 (except for patients with Child class A and those affected with hepatocarcinoma). Six-months post-transplantation, the scores on most of the domains remained below 50, except for certain mental areas in which higher scores were attained. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related quality of life is influenced by the severity and etiology of cirrhosis-patients with Child class C and those with alcoholic or viral cirrhosis have the poorest quality of life. There were no differences observed among the groups after the transplantation, as the patients with the lowest HRQoLs prior to surgery demonstrated greater gains in HRQoL associated with liver transplantation.

Daclizumab induction and maintenance steroid-free immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus to prevent acute rejection of hepatic allografts.

Steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens reduce corticosteroid-related side effects in liver transplant recipients although their efficacy is very variable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steroid-free regimen in a 6-month, open-label, multicenter, pilot study, which involved 102 liver transplant patients treated with daclizumab (2 mg/kg within 6 h following transplant and 1 mg/kg on day 7), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g b.i.d) and tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml in the first month and 5-10 ng/ml thereafter). One intra-operative dose of methylprednisolone was administered. At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 9.8%, and patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 95%, respectively. Acute rejection rates were similar for hepatitis C-positive patients (8.6%) and hepatitis C-negative patients (10.4%). Infections occurred in 22% of patients; most cases were considered mild or moderate. Post-transplantation hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed in 37% and 14% of patients, respectively, during the study period, but were markedly less frequent (8% and 6%, respectively) at 6 months. Hypercholesterolemia was observed in only 2% of patients. In conclusion, the steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of daclizumab, MMF, and tacrolimus effectively prevents acute rejection after liver transplantation without decreasing safety.