Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Humanos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for unbound ceftriaxone in a critically ill population and determine an optimal dosing regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, observational study of critically ill patients treated with ceftriaxone. Unbound serum ceftriaxone concentrations were measured using validated ultrafiltration and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK analysis and dosing simulations were performed using an iterative 2-stage Bayesian fitting procedure and Monte Carlo simulations. The PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) target was attained when unbound serum ceftriaxone concentrations exceeded 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ≥ 60% of the dosing interval (ƒT>4xMIC ≥ 60%). RESULTS: 91 patients were enrolled, and 173 unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were acquired. The population PK parameter estimates were hepatic clearance 5.2 ± 0.9 L/h/1.85m2, the unbound renal clearance of ceftriaxone divided by the creatinine clearance 0.61 ± 0.24, lean body mass corrected volume of distribution of the central compartment 0.82 ± 0.21 L/kg, and intercompartmental distribution rate constant from central to peripheral compartment 0.18 ± 0.08 h-1. Dosing simulations predicted ƒT>4 mg/L of 88% (95% CI: 69 - 100%) for 2,000 mg ceftriaxone once daily and ƒT>4 mg/L of 100% (95% CI: 100 - 100%) both for 1,000 mg twice daily and continuous infusion of 2,000 mg daily. CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable population PK model for unbound ceftriaxone in a critically ill population. Dosing simulations revealed ƒT>4 mg/L ≥ 60% for 1,000 mg twice daily and 2,000 mg once daily or by continuous infusion.
Assuntos
Ceftriaxona , Estado Terminal , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Teorema de Bayes , Creatinina , Estado Terminal/terapia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Método de Monte Carlo , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In- and exclusion criteria of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) aim to include a homogeneous study-population. This study compared characteristics of lung cancer patients from phase III RCTs evaluating tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with characteristics of lung cancer patients in a real world setting in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD. Patients (N = 9239) with a first ever lung cancer registration between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Eligibility for inclusion was assessed for twelve RCTs (evaluating TKIs or ICIs). Reasons for potential exclusion and the number of unmet criteria were assessed for each RCT independently. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: The proportion of potentially eligible patients was 74.3% and 51.9% for TKI and ICI RCTs, respectively. History of another malignancy, renal insufficiency or concomitant drug-use were main reasons for exclusion. OS was considerably longer for potentially eligible patients. Hazards ratios varied from 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.24) to 1.35 (1.20-1.42) across the RCTs. CONCLUSION: This study showed that a considerable proportion of lung cancer patients in a real-world setting would have been ineligible for participation in phase III RCTs and that potentially ineligible patients experienced a shorter OS.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Oral glucocorticoids may increase major osteoporotic fracture risk (MOF) in myasthenia gravis patients. To assess this risk, we performed a case-control study including all Danish patients with a MOF between 1995 and 2011. We also pooled our data with data from another study. We found no increased risk. Osteoporosis prevention remains advisable. PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: The prolonged use of high doses of oral glucocorticoids (GCs), a common treatment in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), may increase major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk. Previous epidemiological studies did not exclusively focus on patients with MG or had relatively few GC-exposed MG patients. Aims were to evaluate the risk of MOF in MG patients using oral GCs in a large study population and to perform a pooled analysis with data from previous work. METHODS: A population-based case-control study (1995-2011) was conducted using the Danish National Health Service. Cases had sustained a MOF, and controls had not. All were aged ≥ 18 years. Multivariate conditional logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) among MG patients using oral GCs versus non-users. Adjustments were made for comorbidities and comedications. In the pooled analysis, results were pooled by the use of generic inverse variance methods, assuming a random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 376,858 cases and 376,858 controls. MOF risk was not elevated in MG patients currently using oral GCs compared to MG patients not on oral GCs (ORadj.: 1.26 (95% CI 0.68-2.33)). The use of the highest cumulative dose of oral GCs (≥ 7 g) did not show an increased risk of MOF among MG patients (ORadj.: 2.00 (95% CI 0.90-4.44)). Our pooled analysis also showed no association between oral GC use and MOF risk. CONCLUSION: This study showed that oral GC use in patients with MG was not associated with increased risk of MOF in our case-control study and pooled analysis. Osteoporosis prevention in MG patients based on clinical guidelines remains advisable.
Assuntos
Miastenia Gravis , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Miastenia Gravis/induzido quimicamente , Miastenia Gravis/complicações , Miastenia Gravis/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Medicina EstatalRESUMO
AIMS: A diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a severe condition associated with morbidity and mortality. Population-based studies are rare and limited by access to reliable data. Without this data, efforts in primary prevention cannot be evaluated. Therefore, we examined the incidence and changes over time for the first DFU in people with diabetes. We also examined hospitalization and all-cause mortality and their changes over time. METHODS: From the UK primary care CPRD GOLD database (2007-2017), we identified 129,624 people with diabetes by a prescription for insulin or a non-insulin anti-diabetic drug. DFUs were identified using Read codes and expressed as incidence rates (IRs). Changes over time were described using Poisson and logistic regression and expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and odds ratios (ORs) respectively. RESULTS: The mean IR of first registered DFUs was 2.5 [95% CI: 2.1-2.9] per 1000 person-years for people with type 2 diabetes and 1.6 [1.3-1.9] per 1000 person-years for people with type 1. The IRs declined for people with type 2 diabetes (IRR per year: 0.97 [0.96-0.99]), while no changes were observed for people with type 1 diabetes (IRR per year: 0.96 [0.89-1.04]). Average hospitalization and 1-year mortality risk for people with type 2 diabetes were 8.2% [SD: 4.7] and 11.7% [SD: 2.2] respectively. Both declined over time (OR: 0.89 [0.84, 0.94] and 0.94 [0.89, 0.99]). CONCLUSION: The decline in all IRs, hospitalizations and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes suggests that prevention and care of the first DFU has improved for this group in primary care in the UK.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Pé Diabético , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Pé Diabético/complicações , Pé Diabético/epidemiologia , Pé Diabético/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials have shown that low-dose glucocorticoid therapy in patients with RA reduces bone loss in hands or hip, but the effect on osteoporotic fractures is not yet clear. Therefore, we investigated the use of low-dose oral glucocorticoids and risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with RA. METHODS: This was a cohort study including patients with RA aged 50+ years from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1997 and 2017. Exposure to oral glucocorticoids was stratified by the most recent prescription in current (<6 months), recent (7-12 months) and past (>1 year) use, and average daily and cumulative doses. Risk of incident osteoporotic fractures (including hip, vertebrae, humerus, forearm, pelvis and ribs) was estimated by time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards models, adjusted for lifestyle parameters, comorbidities and comedications. Secondary analyses assessed osteoporotic fracture risk with a combination of average daily and cumulative doses of oral glucocorticoids. RESULTS: Among 15 123 patients with RA (mean age 68.8 years, 68% females), 1640 osteoporotic fractures occurred. Current low-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy (≤7.5 mg prednisolone equivalent dose/day) in patients with RA was not associated with overall risk of osteoporotic fractures (adjusted hazard ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.98, 1.33) compared with past glucocorticoid use, but was associated with an increased risk of clinical vertebral fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.11, 2.29). Results remained unchanged regardless of a short-term or a long-term use of oral glucocorticoids. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware that even in RA patients who receive low daily glucocorticoid doses, the risk of clinical vertebral fracture is increased.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/induzido quimicamente , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Risperidone and aripiprazole, commonly used antipsychotics in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), have previously been associated with elevated fracture risk in other populations. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of fracture among children with ASD using risperidone or aripiprazole. This was a retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study, set between January 2013 and December 2018. We used the MarketScan Medicaid insurance data, which covers multiple states of the United States. We included ASD children aged 2-18 years, who were new users of aripiprazole or risperidone and with no prior history of antipsychotic use or fractures. The main exposure was the continued use of aripiprazole or risperidone. The incidence rates of any fracture during follow-up were evaluated, and the risk between aripiprazole and risperidone was compared via Cox-proportional hazard models. Results were stratified by age, sex, duration of exposure and fracture site. In total, 3312 patients (78% male; mean [SD] age 11.0 [3.7] years) were identified for each cohort. Over the full duration of follow-up, fracture incidence rates per 1000 patient-years were 23.2 for risperidone and 38.4 for aripiprazole (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.60 [0.44-0.83]). Risks were similar between cohorts throughout the first 180 days on treatment, but significantly higher in the aripiprazole group thereafter. Extremity fractures drove most of the increased risk, with the biggest differences in lower leg and ankle fractures. Differences widened for children aged 10 years or younger (HR [95% CI]: 0.47 [0.30-0.74]). In conclusion, compared to aripiprazole, risperidone was associated with 40% lower risk of fracture. Further analysis on the mechanism and long-term bone health of antipsychotic-treated children with ASD is warranted. LAY SUMMARY: We compared the risk of bone fractures among 6624 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), half of whom used risperidone and half of whom used aripiprazole. Taking other factors into account, risks were similar between the two groups throughout the first 180 days on treatment, but significantly higher in the aripiprazole group thereafter. The biggest differences were in lower leg and ankle fractures. Overall, compared with aripiprazole, risperidone was associated with 40% lower risk of fracture.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Transtorno do Espectro Autista , Fraturas Ósseas , Adolescente , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Aripiprazol/efeitos adversos , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/complicações , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/epidemiologia , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risperidona/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are potential pharmacological treatment options for patients at risk of NAFLD. Therefore, we examined the association between the risk of NAFLD and the use of TZDs and GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with the use of sulfonylureas (SUs) and insulins. Additionally, we calculated the incidence of HCC in users of TZDs and GLP-1 receptor agonists. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (2007-2018). All patients aged ≥18 with a prescription of an oral glucose-lowering agent or GLP-1 receptor agonist were included. The first prescription defined the start of follow-up. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of NAFLD. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs of the primary outcome. Incidence rates of HCC were determined per 1,000 person-years for all exposures. The study identified 207,367 adults with a prescription for a glucose-lowering agent. The risk of NAFLD was lower in patients prescribed a TZD than in those prescribed an SU (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.51). No difference in risk of NAFLD was observed comparing GLP-1 receptor agonist use with insulin use (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.91-1.63). CONCLUSIONS: Results of our study endorse the use of TZDs for selected patients at risk of NAFLD but do not support previous findings regarding the beneficial effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists. The low number of events in several subgroups may affect the generalizability of the current findings.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/epidemiologia , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Incidência , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIMS: To identify patient-specific factors associated with early metformin treatment modification among type 2 diabetes patients before and after implementation of the updated 2015 NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guideline. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (2009-2016). Patients ≥ 18 years, newly treated with metformin only, during the period of valid data collection were included. The first prescription defined start of follow-up. Determinants of treatment modification in two cohorts (before and after implementation of the updated guideline) were studied by time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: After implementation of the updated guideline, patients were less likely to receive sulphonylureas (62.3% vs 41.3%) or thiazolidediones (4.7% vs 2.2%) and more likely to receive dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (15.8% vs 27.1%) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (0.8% vs 9.9%). Some determinants influenced general practitioners' prescribing differently after implementation of the updated guideline compared to before, including a high body mass index and heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a first step towards tailored prescribing has been made. However, not all determinants that are important to consider when prescribing second-line glucose-lowering agents were of influence on general practitioners' prescribing.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipoglicemiantes , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Substituição de Medicamentos/normas , Substituição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Endocrinologia/história , Endocrinologia/métodos , Endocrinologia/normas , Feminino , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/classificação , Hipoglicemiantes/normas , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Ciência da Implementação , Masculino , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the increased use of acid suppressants, significant potential complications such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are becoming more apparent. Paradoxically, in spite of an increased focus on potential complications, there is an increased use of acid suppressants in children and a lack of data specifically targeting the association between acid suppressants and CAP. Our main objective was to evaluate the risk of CAP in children using acid suppressants (proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and/or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs)). METHODS: We performed a cohort study using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. All patients aged 1â month to 18â years with a prescription of acid suppressants were included and matched to up to four unexposed children. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of CAP. The cohort consisted of 84â868 exposed and 325â329 unexposed children. RESULTS: Current use of PPIs and H2RAs was associated with an increased risk of CAP (adjusted hazard ratio 2.05 (95% CI 1.90-2.22) and 1.80 (95% CI 1.67-1.94), respectively). The risk was even greater in patients with respiratory disease. Long-term use (≥211â days) of PPIs and H2RAs led to a significantly greater risk of CAP compared with short-term use (<31â days). After cessation of therapy, the risk remained increased for the following 7â months. CONCLUSION: The use of acid suppressants in children was associated with a doubled risk of CAP. This risk increased with chronic use and respiratory disease, and remained increased after discontinuation of therapy.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/induzido quimicamente , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Ácido Gástrico , Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pneumonia/induzido quimicamente , Pneumonia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are used in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Bleeding is the primary major complication of LMWH therapy, which is associated with dose. The administration of appropriate dosages of LMWHs depends on the patient's risk of VTE, risk of bleeding, bodyweight, and renal function. Therefore, LMWH prescribing is prone to errors. However, no earlier study has explored the frequency of prescribing errors with LMWH. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the frequency and determinants of in-hospital LMWH-prescribing errors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the frequency and determinants of LMWH prescribing errors between April and August 2014. We randomly selected 500 patients 18 years and older with at least one LMWH prescription during inpatient hospitalization. A prescribing error was a deviation from the internal hospital guidelines. Logistic regression estimated determinants of prescribing error. RESULTS: A prescribing error was present with 34% of all LMWH users. The most frequently recorded error was a dose that was not adjusted to body weight and/or renal function (85%). Prophylactic LMWH prescribing in medical wards was associated with a higher risk of prescribing error as compared with surgical wards. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of prescribing errors was 34% in a tertiary care hospital. Being a patient with prophylactic LMWH use on a medical ward is a determinant for LMWH prescribing error. Interventions that will lead to better electronic recording of body weight and more awareness among medical doctors may reduce the total number of prescribing errors.
Assuntos
Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular , Tromboembolia Venosa , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We wanted to estimate the magnitude of the risk from all-cause, cause-specific and sex-specific mortality in patients with SLE and relative risks compared with matched controls and to evaluate the influence of exposure to medication on risk of mortality in SLE. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Hospital Episode Statistics and national death certificates (from 1987 to 2012). Each SLE patient (n = 4343) was matched with up to six controls (n = 21 780) by age and sex. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate overall and cause-specific mortality rate ratios. RESULTS: Patients with SLE had a 1.8-fold increased mortality rate for all-cause mortality compared with age- and sex-matched subjects [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.57, 2.08]. The HR was highest in patients aged 18-39 years (adjusted HR = 4.87, 95% CI: 1.93, 12.3). Mortality rates were not significantly different between male and female patients. Cumulative glucocorticoid use raised the mortality rate, whereas the HR was reduced by 45% with cumulative low-dose HCQ use. Patients with SLE had increased cause-specific mortality rates for cardiovascular disease, infections, non-infectious respiratory disease and for death attributable to accidents or suicide, whereas the mortality rate for cancer was reduced in comparison to controls. CONCLUSION: British patients with SLE had a 1.8-fold increased mortality rate compared with the general population. Glucocorticoid use and being diagnosed at a younger age were associated with an increased risk of mortality. HCQ use significantly reduced the mortality rate, but this association was found only in the lowest cumulative dosage exposure group.
Assuntos
Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Causas de Morte , Intervalos de Confiança , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Fatores Sexuais , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2-inhibitors (SGLT2-Is), such as canagliflozin, has been associated with an increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLAs) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, conflicting results have been reported for different SGLT2-Is and the underlying mechanism is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of LLA and diabetic foot ulcer with SGLT2-I use compared to other anti-diabetic drugs and to explore hypovolemia as a potential underlying mechanism. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD (2013-2019). The study population (N=51,847) consisted of T2DM patients over 18 years of age with at least one prescription of a non-insulin anti-diabetic drug. Concomitant diuretic use and the presence of signs of hypovolemia were determined to assess the potential underlying mechanism. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for LLA in current SGLT2-I use versus current sulphonylurea (SU) use. Analyses were adjusted for lifestyle variables, comorbidities, and concomitant drug use. RESULTS: Current SGLT2-I use was not associated with an increased risk of LLA compared to current SU use (fully adjusted HR 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.29). Concomitant use of diuretics and the presence of signs of hypovolemia were not associated with an increased risk of LLA. CONCLUSION: Use of SGLT2-Is, with or without signs of hypovolemia, was not associated with an increased risk of LLA or DFU versus current SU use. Future studies powered to detect potential differences between individual SGLT2-Is are required to rule out a canagliflozin-specific effect.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Adolescente , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Glucose , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Sódio , Transportador 2 de Glucose-Sódio , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: People with diabetes could have an increased risk of falls as they show more complications, morbidity and use of medication compared to the general population. This study aimed to estimate the risk of falls and to identify risk factors associated with falls in people with diabetes. The second aim was to estimate fall-related injuries, such as lesions and fractures, including their anatomic localization in people with diabetes compared with the general population. METHODS: From the Danish National Patient Register, we identified people with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) (n=12,975) Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) (n=407,009). The cohort was divided into two groups, with respective control groups matched on age and sex (1:1). All episodes of people hospitalized with a first fall from 1996 to 2017 were analyzed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Risk factors such as age, sex, diabetic complications, a history of alcohol abuse and the use of medication were included in an adjusted analysis. The incidence rate, incidence rate difference and incidence rate ratio (IRR) of falls and the anatomic localization of fall-related injuries as lesions and fractures were identified. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The cumulative incidence, of falls requiring hospital treatment, was 13.3% in T1D, 11.9% in T2D. In the adjusted analysis, T1D and T2D were associated with a higher risk of falls [T1D, Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.33 (95% CI: 1.25 - 1.43), T2D, HR: 1.19 (95% CI:1.16 - 1.22), respectively]. Women [group 1, HR 1.21 (CI:95%:1.13 - 1.29), group 2, HR 1.61 (CI:95%:1.58-1.64)], aged >65 years [groups 1, HR 1.52 (CI:95%:1.39 - 1.61), group 2, HR 1.32 (CI:95%:1.58-1.64)], use of selective serotonin receptor inhibitors (SSRI) [group 1, HR 1.35 (CI:95%:1.1.30 - 1.40), group 2, HR 1.32 (CI:95%:1.27-1.38)], opioids [group 1, HR 1.15 (CI:95%:1.12 - 1.19), group 2, HR 1.09 (CI:95%:1.05-1.12)] and a history of alcohol abuse [group 1, HR 1.77 (CI:95%:1.17 - 2.15), group 2, HR 1.88 (CI:95%:1.65-2.15)] were significantly associated with an increased risk of falls in both groups. The IRR of fall-related injuries as hip, radius, humerus and skull/facial fractures were higher in people with T2D than controls [IRR 1.02 (CI:95%:1.01-1.04), IRR 1.39 (CI:95%: 1.18-1.61), IRR 1.24 (CI:95%: 1.12-1.37) and IRR 1.15 (CI:95%:1.07-1.24)]. People with T1D had a higher IRR of hip fractures than controls [IRR: 1.11 (CI:95%:1.02 - 1.23)]. CONCLUSION: People with diabetes have an increased risk of first fall and a higher incidence of fall- related injuries, including fractures. Advanced aging and sex are non-modifiable risk factors, whereas diabetes, the use of SSRIs and opioids and alcohol abuse could be potentially modifiable risk factors for falls. Gaining information on risk factors for falls could guide the management of diabetes treatment, i.e., choice of drugs, which enables us to improve treatment, particularly in people with a high risk of falls and fractures associated with high mortality.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Fraturas Ósseas , Acidentes por Quedas , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly use oral glucocorticoids (GCs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), both associated with osteoporotic fractures. We investigated the association between concomitant use of oral GCs and PPIs and the risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with RA. METHODS: This was a cohort study including patients with RA aged 50+ years from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1997 and 2017. Exposure to oral GCs and PPIs was stratified by the most recent prescription as current use (<6 months), recent use (7-12 months) and past use (>1 year); average daily and cumulative dose; and duration of use. The risk of incident osteoporotic fractures (including hip, vertebrae, humerus, forearm, pelvis and ribs) was estimated by time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards models, statistically adjusted for lifestyle parameters, comorbidities and comedications. RESULTS: Among 12 351 patients with RA (mean age of 68 years, 69% women), 1411 osteoporotic fractures occurred. Concomitant current use of oral GCs and PPIs was associated with a 1.6-fold increased risk of osteoporotic fractures compared with non-use (adjusted HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.35 to 1.89). This was statistically different from a 1.2-fold increased osteoporotic fracture risk associated with oral GC or PPI use alone. Most individual fracture sites were significantly associated with concomitant use of oral GCs and PPIs. Among concomitant users, fracture risk did not increase with higher daily dose or duration of PPI use. CONCLUSIONS: There was an interaction in the risk of osteoporotic fractures with concomitant use of oral GCs and PPIs. Fracture risk assessment could be considered when a patient with RA is co-prescribed oral GCs and PPIs.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone is recommended for empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with sepsis. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) guided dose optimisation could elucidate pharmacokinetic variabilities, improving treatment efficacy. However, detailed data on Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) for unbound ceftriaxone quantification in serum are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to develop a reliable UPLC-MS/MS method for serum ceftriaxone quantification and exhibit its application potential in routine hospital settings. METHODS: In this observational, single centre study, UPLC-MS/MS method validation included specificity, carry-over, linearity, repeatability, intermediate precision, accuracy, the limit of quantification, and plasma protein binding. Unbound and total ceftriaxone were quantified in the serum of 5 critically ill patients. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment calculations were performed for both unbound and total ceftriaxone. The PK/PD target for unbound ceftriaxone in serum was set at 4 times the non-species related minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of 1 mg/L for at least 60% of the dosing interval. RESULTS: The UPLC-MS/MS method revealed acceptable limits for clinical samples, with coefficients of variation < 15.0% for concentrations between 0.2 - 400.0 mg/L. Ceftriaxone eluted at 1.94 min and ceftazidime, as internal standard, eluted at 1.42 min. Patients demonstrated a median unbound ceftriaxone fraction of 29.1% (IQR: 15.2 - 52.2). Day 1 of ceftriaxone treatment presented a median PK/PD target attainment of 100.0% (IQR: 81.1 - 100.0) for unbound ceftriaxone in serum, while for calculations based on total concentrations, this figure was 23.9% (IQR: 10.5 - 80.6). CONCLUSION: The described UPLC-MS/MS method enables reliable and rapid ceftriaxone quantification in the serum of critically ill patients. Method feasibility was exhibited for TDM purposes in routine clinical practice.
Assuntos
Ceftriaxona , Estado Terminal , Ceftriaxona/uso terapêutico , Cromatografia Líquida , Estado Terminal/terapia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Espectrometria de Massas em TandemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A Chlamydia trachomatis infection (chlamydia) can result in tubal factor infertility in women. To assess if this association results in fewer pregnant women, we aimed to assess pregnancy incidences and time to pregnancy among women with a previous chlamydia infection compared with women without one and who were participating in the Netherlands Chlamydia Cohort Study (NECCST). METHODS: The NECCST is a cohort of women of reproductive age tested for chlamydia in a chlamydia screening trial between 2008 and 2011 and reinvited for NECCST in 2015 to 2016. Chlamydia status (positive/negative) was defined using chlamydia screening trial-nucleic acid amplification test results, chlamydia immunoglobulin G presence in serum, or self-reported chlamydia infections. Data on pregnancies were collected via questionnaires in 2015-2016 and 2017-2018. Overall pregnancies (i.e., planned and unplanned) and time to pregnancy (among women with a pregnancy intention) were compared between chlamydia-positive and chlamydia-negative women using Cox regressions. RESULTS: Of 5704 women enrolled, 1717 (30.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.9-31.3) women was chlamydia positive. Overall pregnancy proportions were similar in chlamydia-positive and chlamydia-negative women (49.0% [95% CI, 46.5-51.4] versus 50.5% [95% CI, 48.9-52.0]). Pregnancies per 1000 person-years were 53.2 (95% CI, 51.5-55.0) for chlamydia negatives and 83.0 (95% CI, 78.5-87.9) for chlamydia positives. Among women with a pregnancy intention, 12% of chlamydia-positive women had a time to pregnancy of >12 months compared with 8% of chlamydia negatives (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Overall pregnancy rates were not lower in chlamydia-positive women compared with chlamydia-negative women, but among women with a pregnancy intention, time to pregnancy was longer and pregnancy rates were lower in chlamydia-positive women. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial Register NTR-5597.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Tempo para Engravidar , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) might be at risk of gout because of pathophysiological mechanisms that can lead to hyperuricemia and eventually gout or because of shared risk factors between both diseases. The objective of the present study was to investigate the risk of gout in patients with OSA. METHODS: A population-based case-control study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD including all patients aged 40 years and older with a first diagnosis of gout between 1987 and 2014. Gout cases were matched by year of birth, sex, and practice to non-gout controls. Conditional logistic regression estimated the risk of gout with an earlier diagnosis of OSA. Analyses were adjusted for lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and recent drug use. RESULTS: One hundred eleven thousand five hundred nine cases were matched with 210,241 controls. Patients with OSA were at increased risk of gout (OR 1.86; 95%CI (1.71-2.02). However, this association disappeared (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.96-1.16) after adjustment for smoking status, body mass index (BMI), alcohol use, a history of heart failure, diabetes mellitus, renal function, and recent use of diuretics and other medications. Among females with OSA and patients with OSA associated with heart failure, renal impairment, or higher BMI, the risk of gout was however still increased when compared to the total control population. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the observed association between OSA and gout disappeared after adjustment.
Assuntos
Gota/epidemiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to antihypertensives is associated with negative outcome of the disease as well as loss of health-care resources. Addressing the epidemic of poor adherence requires identifying factors associated with this behaviour. The aim of this study is to describe adherence to antihypertensive medication among Lebanese hypertensive patients and to evaluate the association between socio-economic, patient- and conditions-related factors and non-adherence. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on adherence to antihypertensive medications covering all governorates of Lebanon. This study was conducted between February 2018 and January 2019 on a random sample of 1497 hypertensive patients. A face-to-face questionnaire was used to assess adherence to antihypertensive medication and its determinants according to the five World Health Organization (WHO) main categories. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the adjusted association between the multiple exposure factors, and drug adherence data were collected by trained interviewers. RESULTS: Adherence to antihypertensive medications was reported by 1253 (83.7%) of the patients. After multivariate analysis, patients who tried to control their stress level (OR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.38-0.95]), those who had normal BP readings (OR =0.49, 95% CI [0.18-0.97]), and those who believed in the effectiveness of their treatment (OR = 0.31, 95% CI [0.14-0.76]) had a significantly lower chance to exhibit non-adherence to their treatment. However, older patients (OR= 1.87, 95% CI [1.23-2.21]), divorced/separated patients (OR= 2.14, 95% CI [1.31-5.48]), married (OR=1.96, 95% CI [1.27-3.90]), widowed (OR=2.11, 95% CI [1.62-6.50]), obese patients (OR = 1.76, 95% CI [1.21-1.94]), and patients who smoked hookah and cigarettes (OR = 2.62, 95% CI [1.17-6.76]) were more likely to exhibit non-adherence. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the influence of factors such as old age, marital status, BMI and high level of emotional stress on non-adherence to medication in hypertensive patients. These determinants should be incorporated into adherence improving strategies.