Formula supplementation in hospital and subsequent feeding at discharge among women who intended to exclusively breastfeed: An administrative data retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Among women who intend to exclusively breastfeed, it is important to identify mothers and their infants who have a greater risk of formula supplementation in hospital, and are unlikely to recover exclusive breastfeeding at discharge. We investigated factors associated with in-hospital formula feeding among healthy term infants born to women who intended to exclusively breastfeed, and among this group, predictors of infant feeding at discharge. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study utilizing routinely collected clinical data for women who intended to exclusively breastfeed and gave birth to healthy term infants in five hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, 2010-2013. Robust Poisson regression was used to obtain adjusted relative risks (aRR) for the associations between formula feeding in hospital, feeding at discharge, and associated factors. RESULTS: Of 24 713 mother-infant dyads in the study population, 16.5% received formula in hospital. After adjustment, the strongest predictors of formula supplementation were breastfeeding difficulties (aRR 2.90 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.74-3.07]), Asian born mother (aRR 2.07 [95% CI 1.92-2.23]), and neonatal conditions (aRR 2.00 [95% CI 1.89-2.13]). Among infants who received formula (n=3998), 49.3% were fully breastfeeding at discharge, 33.1% partially breastfeeding, and 17.5% formula-only feeding. Compared with formula-only feeding, special care nursery admission (aRR 1.23 [95% CI 1.17-1.30]) and ≥1 neonatal conditions (compared with none) were most strongly associated with fully breastfeeding at discharge (aRR 1.21 [95% CI 1.16-2.16]). CONCLUSION: Women and their infants who receive formula in hospital need additional support to attain exclusive breastfeeding by hospital discharge. Such support is especially needed for younger women, smokers, and women with breastfeeding difficulties.

Factors Associated with Recurrent Infant Feeding Practices in Subsequent Births.

BACKGROUND: Previous breastfeeding experience has been associated with subsequent infant feeding practices. However, few longitudinal studies have investigated formula-only feeding patterns or the full range of potentially associated characteristics. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the recurrence of infant feeding practices and maternal, birthing, and infant characteristics associated with recurrent formula-only feeding and changes between exclusive breastfeeding and formula-only feeding across subsequent births. METHODS: We conducted a population-based record-linkage study of 317 027 mothers, with a term singleton live-birth in 2007-2011, New South Wales, Australia. Infant feeding patterns were described using sequential birth pairs. For mothers with a first and second birth, robust Poisson regression was used to investigate the association between maternal, birthing, and infant characteristics and infant feeding patterns. Combined relative risks (RRs) were calculated for selected maternal characteristics. RESULTS: Across 69 994 sequential birth pairs, the recurrence rate of formula-only feeding was 71%, and 92% for exclusive breastfeeding. Maternal characteristics < 25 years old, being Australian born or single, smoking during pregnancy, and living in lower socioeconomic areas were most strongly associated with repeat formula-only feeding (RR, 22.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18.6-26.3), changing from exclusive breastfeeding to formula-only feeding (RR, 9.0; 95% CI, 7.4-10.7), and being less likely to change from formula-only feeding to exclusive breastfeeding (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38-0.59). CONCLUSION: Infant feeding practices were strongly recurrent, highlighting the importance of successful breastfeeding for first-time mothers. Additional support for young mothers from disadvantaged backgrounds accounting for infant feeding history, experiences, and common barriers could improve recurrent exclusive breastfeeding and positively affect infant and maternal health.

Perineal management techniques among midwives at five hospitals in New South Wales - a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Midwives are reported to have changed from 'hands on' to 'hands poised or off' approaches to birth at the same time as obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are increasing. As perineal management details are not routinely collected, it is difficult to quantify practice. AIMS: To determine which perineal protections techniques midwives prefer for low-risk non-water births; whether preference is associated with technique taught or with other characteristics; and whether midwives change preference according to clinical scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Midwives in Northern Sydney Local Health District (NSLHD) were surveyed during a 2-week period in 2014. Multiple-choice questions were used, with free text option. Descriptive analyses, chi-square and McNemar tests were undertaken. RESULTS: One hundred and eight midwives participated (response rate 76.7%). 'Hands poised or off' was preferred by 63.0% for a low-risk birth. Current practice was associated with technique taught (P < 0.01). For scenarios with increased OASI risk midwives reported switching to 'hands on', with 83.4% employing 'hands on' whether there was concern about an impending OASI. There has been a shift over time from teaching 'hands on' to 'hands poised or off'. CONCLUSION: The preferred technique for a low-risk birth appears to have changed from 'hands on' to 'hands poised or off', but most midwives adopt 'hands on' in situations of high risk for OASI. Further research is needed to establish whether there is an association with the rising OASI rate and the change in preferred perineal management technique for a low-risk birth.