Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 26(6): 1324-32, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22167440

RESUMO

PURPOSE: For dental implants to be successful, osseointegration must occur, but it is unknown how much time must pass for osseointegration to be established. Preclinical studies suggested that titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface were more osteoconductive and allowed more rapid osseointegration than machined or turned implant surfaces. The hypothesis of this study was that implants with an SLA surface could be loaded in half the conventional healing time of machined-surface implants and that, after loading, the implants would be successful for 5 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted with 439 implants placed in native bone in 135 edentulous and partially edentulous patients. Abutments were attached to the implant with 35 Ncm of torque without countertorque after 6 weeks in type I to III bone and after 12 weeks in type IV bone. The patients were carefully evaluated for 5 years. RESULTS: Most implants were placed in nonsmoking, nondiabetic patients with a mean age of 55 years (range, 21 to 82 years). Eighty percent of the implants were 10 or 12 mm long, 96% had a diameter of 4.1 mm, and 78% were placed in type II or III bone. Patients maintained good oral hygiene and were satisfied with the restorations. Four implants failed, and one implant was deemed unsuccessful between surgery and the 1-year postloading visit. No implants failed or were unsuccessful in subsequent years. The cumulative survival and success rates for 385 implants in 120 patients after 5 years were 99.1% and 98.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implants with an SLA surface can be restored in 6 weeks for type I to III bone and 12 weeks for type IV bone. Furthermore, they can be maintained after loading for 5 years with very high success and survival rates.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantes Dentários , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Osseointegração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/instrumentação , Falha de Restauração Dentária/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Arcada Edêntula/reabilitação , Masculino , Metalurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Propriedades de Superfície , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Titânio , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 13(2): 144-53, 2002 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11952734

RESUMO

ITI dental implants are available with two bone-anchoring surfaces, a titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surface, and a recently introduced sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Cell culture and animal tests demonstrate that the SLA surface stimulates bone cell differentiation and protein production, has large amounts of bone-to-implant contact, and results in large removal torque values in functional testing of the bone contact. As a result of these studies, a prospective human clinical trial was initiated to determine whether the 4.1 mm diameter SLA ITI solid screw implants could be predictably and safely restored as early as six weeks after implant placement surgery. The protocol restricted the use of the reduced healing time to a) healthy patients with sufficient bone volume to surround the implant, and b) those patients who had good bone quality (classes I-III) at the implant recipient site. Patients with poorer bone quality (class IV) did not have restorations until 12 weeks after implant placement. The clinical trial is an ongoing multicenter trial, with six centers in four countries, and with follow-up over five years. The primary outcome variable was abutment placement with a 35 Ncm force, with no countertorque and no pain or rotation of the implant. A secondary outcome was implant success, as defined by no mobility, no persistent pain or infection, and no peri-implant radiolucency. To date, 110 patients with 326 implants have completed the one-year post-loading recall visit, while 47 patients with 138 implants have completed the two-year recall. Three implants were lost prior to abutment connection. Prosthetic restoration was commenced after shortened healing times on 307 implants. The success rate for these implants, as judged by abutment placement, was 99.3% (with an average healing time of 49 days). Life table analyses demonstrated an implant success rate of 99.1%, both for 329 implants at one year and for 138 implants at two years. In the 24-month period after restoration, no implant losses were reported for the 138 implants. These results demonstrate that, under defined conditions, solid screw ITI implants with an SLA endosseous surface can be restored after approximately six weeks of healing with a high predictability of success, defined by abutment placement at 35 Ncm without countertorque, and with subsequent implant success rates of greater than 99% two years after restoration.


Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Condicionamento Ácido do Dente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Óxido de Alumínio , Densidade Óssea , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/química , Dente Suporte , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Tábuas de Vida , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osseointegração , Estudos Prospectivos , Rotação , Estresse Mecânico , Propriedades de Superfície , Fatores de Tempo , Titânio/química , Torque , Resultado do Tratamento , Suporte de Carga , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA