RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of an objective, standardised method for selection of residents for medical specialty training. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: University Hospital Utrecht, department of diagnostic radiology. Utrecht University, Department of Clinical Psychology and Health Psychology. METHODS: All applicants for residency positions in 1990-1991 were requested to complete a standard application form. The applications were judged by seven staff members on six criteria. Using statistical tests the relative contribution of each criterium was calculated. A similar procedure was followed for those who were invited for an interview. RESULTS: Most of the criteria applied for the written and oral applications contributed significantly to the rank order achieved. The written and oral criteria showed some degree of overlap, whilst the criteria used for the written application were relatively independent from those used for the interview. For a balanced evaluation of the written information a selection committee of four staff members was sufficient. CONCLUSION: Structuring the selection process as described gives both staff and applicants more insight in the criteria applied, and thus allows a more objective and valid evaluation. To medical students it is beneficial to become acquainted with criteria that may be used in selection procedures for medical specialty training, so they can prepare themselves adequately.