Early clinical response to treatment predicts 5-year outcome in RA patients: follow-up results from the CAMERA study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term effects of the tight control (TC) and conventional (CT) methotrexate-based strategies of the Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis trial in early rheumatoid arthritis and evaluate the predictive value of an early response to treatment. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic 5-year outcome was compared between initial strategies. Patients were classified according to the EULAR response criteria. The prognostic value of early response to treatment in addition to established predictors was analysed by multiple linear regression analyses. RESULTS: 5 years of data were available for 205 of 299 patients, with no indication for selective drop-out. At 5 years there was no longer any significant difference for clinical and radiographic outcomes between treatment strategies applied during the first 2 years. Good-responders had a mean disease activity score of 2.39 (1.2) and median yearly radiographic progression rate of 0.6 (0.0 to 2.2) at 5 years; significantly lower (both p<0.02) when compared to moderate- and non-responders. Multiple regression analysis showed that early response to treatment is an independent predictor of 5-year outcome, irrespective of treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in disease activity between treatment strategies disappeared over the years. Good-response to treatment independently predicts significantly better 5-year clinical and radiographic outcome. The TC principle probably should be continued in the long-term.

Joint surgery in the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort: the effect of treatment strategy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and prognostic factors of joint surgery in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, whose treatment, clinical and radiographic data have been assessed at predefined points in time since disease onset. METHODS: Data on surgical interventions were retrospectively obtained from 482 patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose follow-up data for at least 2 years were available, including treatment and response to treatment during the first 2 years. Survival time until the first surgical intervention and until the first major surgical intervention was determined for the total study population by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Three separate Cox regression analyses were carried out to determine which variables measured at baseline, during the first year and during the first 2 years were predictors for joint surgery. RESULTS: 27% of the patients underwent surgical interventions. Mean survival time until the first surgical intervention was 10.4 years. The percentage of patients with a surgical intervention was 10% lower in the group with response to treatment when compared with the non-response group. Next to a delayed start with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, fast radiographic progression during the first year and first 2 years was a predictor of joint surgery in the multivariate regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs immediately after diagnosis results in less joint surgery when compared with a delayed start. Furthermore, joint surgery is carried out more often in patients who do not respond to treatment.

Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial. On behalf of the Rheumatic Research Foundation Utrecht, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three therapeutic strategies using slow acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for their disease modifying properties, toxicity, and lag time until treatment effect. METHODS: Patients with recent onset RA from six hospitals were randomly assigned to immediate initiation of one of three treatment strategies: (I) a "mild SAARD with a long lag time" (hydroxychloroquine, if necessary replaced by auranofin); (II) a "potent SAARD with a long lag time" (intramuscular gold, if necessary replaced by D-penicillamine); (III) a "potent SAARD with a short lag time" (methotrexate, if necessary replaced by sulfasalazine). Comparisons included two years of follow up. RESULTS: All SAARD strategies reduced mean disease activity. A greater percentage of patients improved clinically with strategies II and III than with strategy I: percentages of patients improved on joint score with strategies II and III (79% and 82%, respectively), which was statistically different from strategy I (66%). The same was true for remission percentages: 31% and 24% v 16%, respectively). Longitudinal analysis showed significantly less disability with strategy III, and a lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate with strategy II than with strategy I. In addition, radiological damage after one and two years, was significantly lower in strategies II and III (at two years median scores were 11 and 10 v 14 in strategy I, p<0.05). Toxicity was increased in strategy II compared with the other strategies. CONCLUSION: Strategy III, comprising methotrexate or sulfasalazine, produced the best results weighing effectiveness and toxicity. Strategy I (hydroxychloroquine or auranofin) was slightly less effective, and strategy II (intramuscular gold or D-penicillamine) was associated with increased toxicity.

The prognostic value of the antiperinuclear factor, anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies and rheumatoid factor in early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic value of the antiperinuclear factor (APF), determined by an indirect immunofluorescence test (IIF) and a recently developed anti-citrullinated cyclic peptide (CCP) ELISA, in combination with rheumatoid factor (RF) status, in early RA (< 1 year). METHODS: A total of 249 participants in a randomized trial of treatment strategies were divided into 4 groups according to their APF (or CCP) and RF status at baseline. Differences in disability, joint involvement and radiological damage over a 3-year period were analysed. RESULTS: APF-IIF results differed from CCP-ELISA in 42 cases (17%); 38 of the 42 had a positive IIF and negative ELISA value. Disability after 3 years did not differ significantly between the RF and APF groups. APF- patients had significantly lower Thompson joint scores compared to APF+ patients (6 vs 24 for CCP-ELISA; 2 vs 24 for IIF). RF+APF+ patients exhibited more radiological damage compared to RF-APF- patients. RF+APF- and RF-APF+ patients had intermediate scores. Within the RF+ and RF- groups, APF+ was associated with more radiological damage and thus yielded prognostic information in addition to RF. In this respect, the results of ELISA and IIF were comparable. Thirty percent of the RF+APF+ patients had a radiological score higher than 45, compared to 13% of the RF+APF-, none of the RF-APF+, and 2% of RF-APF- patients (p < 0.001). In addition, more large joints were affected in APF+ than in APF- patients, while no difference was observed between RF+ and RF- patients. CONCLUSION: APF has prognostic value in addition to RF for joint involvement and radiological damage in early RA. The CCP-ELISA technique for APF assessment may facilitate its use in clinical practice. However, the prognostic value of the two tests lies in their ability to predict mild disease. Reliable identification at baseline of individual patients with progressive disease is still not possible.

Can methotrexate be used as a steroid sparing agent in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether methotrexate (MTX) has a steroid sparing effect in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: We carried out a randomised double blind, placebo controlled study in 40 patients with PMR, six of whom also had clinical symptoms of GCA. A temporal artery biopsy specimen was available from 37 patients; GCA was found in six of the specimens. Among the six patients with clinical signs of GCA, three had a positive biopsy specimen. All patients were started on prednisone 20 mg/day, irrespective of clinical signs and biopsy result, supplemented with a weekly, blinded capsule containing either MTX 7.5 mg or placebo. The prednisone dose was decreased as soon as clinical symptoms disappeared and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein level, or both, had normalised. RESULTS: Twenty one patients were followed for two years, or at least one year after discontinuing medication. No differences were found between the MTX group and the placebo group concerning time to achieve remission, duration of remission, number of relapses, or cumulative prednisone doses. After 21 weeks the mean daily prednisone dose was reduced by 50%. Forty percent of all patients were able to discontinue prednisone within two years. Median duration of steroid treatment was 47.5 weeks (range 3-104). No serious complications from GCA were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: With a (rapid) steroid tapering regimen, it was possible to reduce the mean daily prednisone dose by 50% in 21 weeks and to cease prednisone in 40% of the patients within two years. With this regimen, no steroid sparing effect of MTX in a dosage of 7.5 mg/week was found.

The effectiveness of early treatment with "second-line" antirheumatic drugs. A randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two therapeutic strategies for patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Open, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of six clinical centers. PATIENTS: 238 consecutive patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. INTERVENTIONS: Delayed or immediate introduction of treatment with slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (SAARDs). MEASUREMENTS: Primary end points were functional disability, pain, joint score, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 6 and 12 months and progression of radiologic abnormalities at 12 months. RESULTS: Statistically significant advantages at 12 months for patients receiving the SAARD strategy (immediate treatment with SAARDs) with regard to all primary end points that may be clinically important are indicated by the differences in improvements from baseline and their 95% CIs. These differences were 0.3 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6) for disability (range, 0 to 3), 10 mm (CI, 1 to 19 mm) for pain (range, 0 to 100 mm), 39 (CI, 4 to 74) for joint score (range, 0 to 534), and 11 mm/h (CI, 3 to 19 mm/h) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (range, 1 to 140 mm/h), all in favor of SAARD treatment. The SAARD strategy also appears to be advantageous at 6 months. Radiologic abnormalities progressed at an equal rate in the SAARD and the non-SAARD groups; the difference in progression (range, 0 to 448) was 1 (CI, -3 to 5). Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle and thus included 29% of patients in the non-SAARD group who discontinued the non-SAARD treatment strategy; treatment was usually discontinued because of insufficient effectiveness. The SAARD strategy including two alternative SAARDs could not be continued by 8% of patients, usually because of adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Early introduction of SAARDs may be more beneficial than delayed introduction for patients with recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis.