Temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Older individuals are often underrepresented in clinical trials. In 2012 only 7% of RCT's specifically studied older people and their geriatric characteristics were poorly reported. The aim of this review was to investigate temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019. METHODS: PubMed was searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in 2019. Firstly, the proportion of RCTs specially designed for older people were determined by the following criteria: a reported mean age of ≥ 70 years or a lower age cutoff of ≥ 55. Secondly, the trials with a majority of older people, defined by a reported mean age of ≥ 60 years, were screened for reporting of geriatric assessments. Both parts were compared with identical reviews performed in 2012. RESULTS: From a 10% random sample, 1446 RCTs were included in this systematic review. First, 8% of trials were specifically designed for older people in 2019 compared to 7% in 2012. Secondly, 25% of the trials included a majority of older people in 2019, compared to 22% in 2012. Thirdly, in 52% of these trials in 2019 one or more of the geriatric assessments were reported compared to 34% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Although in 2019 the proportion of published RCTs specifically designed for older people remains low, more characteristics on geriatric assessments were reported compared to 2012. Continued efforts should be paid to increase both the number and the validity of trials for older people.

Feasibility of Dried Blood Spots in Children with Behavioral Problems.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive sampling methods are important to facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic research in children with behavioral problems. This study assessed the feasibility and pain of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling in this population. METHODS: Repeated DBS sampling was performed in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and severe behavioral problems using antipsychotic drugs, aged between 6 and 18 years. The child, guardian, and DBS performer assessed pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS-11) or 5-face Faces Pain Scale. The influence of age, sex, and the fingerprick performer on the child's pain intensity was analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Overall, 247 fingerpricks were performed in 70 children. Seven children refused all DBS sampling. The median (interquartile range) NRS-11 pain scores were 2 (3) rated by children, 3 (2.5) by guardians, and 2 (2) by fingerprick performers. The child's age and sex, and fingerprick performer had no significant influence on pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: DBS sampling could be performed in most children with ASD and severe behavioral problems. However, 1 in 5 children refused one or more DBS fingerpricks owing to distress. Most expressed minimal pain (NRS < 4). Repeated sampling with DBS is feasible in children with ASD and severe behavioral problems.