Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of fosmanogepix IV to oral switch and multiple IV doses in healthy participants.

Fosmanogepix [FMGX, APX001; active form: manogepix (MGX), APX001A] is a first-in-class, intravenous (IV)/oral antifungal currently being evaluated for invasive fungal disease treatment. Data from two phase 1, placebo-controlled studies [IV-oral switch (study 1) and multiple IV doses (study 2)] evaluating FMGX tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) are presented. Healthy adults (study 1: 18-65 years; study 2: 18-55 years) were eligible (randomized 3:1 to FMGX: placebo). Eleven participants completed study 1. In study 2, 51 participants (48 planned + 3 replacement) were enrolled in six cohorts (8 participants each; 34 completed the study). In study 1, overall MGX systemic exposures were comparable from day 1 to day 42 of dosing; steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved in ≤24 h following two IV loading doses (1,000 mg) and exposures maintained after switching [IV (600 mg) to daily oral doses (800 mg)]. FMGX was safe and well-tolerated. In study 2, FMGX IV doses (loading doses twice daily/maintenance doses once daily; 3-h infusion) of 1,500/900 mg (cohort A), 900/900 mg (cohort B), and 1,000/900 mg (cohort C: with ondansetron) were not well-tolerated; most participants reported nausea and infrequent vomiting. FMGX IV doses of 1,000/750 mg (cohort D), 1,000/850 mg (cohort E), and 1,000/900 mg (cohort F: ondansetron prn) were relatively better tolerated. Steady-state systemic exposures were achieved between days 2 and 4. All cohorts had similar geometric mean (GM) concentrations during maintenance dosing and similar GM PK parameters. Dosing regimen evaluated in study 1 was safe, well-tolerated, and may be used for future clinical evaluations.

Rethinking, reducing, and refining the classical oral tyramine challenge test of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors.

The oral tyramine challenge evaluates the safety of novel monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors when taken with tyramine-containing food or drinks. In its current design, it comprises an extensive series of tyramine escalation steps until a blood pressure threshold is met. Due to the high variation in tyramine bioavailability, and thereby in blood pressure effect, this classical design has various limitations, including safety concerns. Based on data from a previously performed tyramine challenge study, the present study explored a reduced new design that escalates up to 400 mg, and evaluates the dose to a tyramine peak plasma concentration of ≥10 ng/mL, instead of a dose up to 800 mg, and to a blood pressure change of ≥30 mm Hg. Tested by trial simulation, the new design proves more efficient than the classical design in terms of better identifying tyramine sensitivity of test and reference treatments and reducing false-positive and false-negative rates in estimating tyramine sensitivity by more than 10-fold. Since it escalates over a lower tyramine dose range, the new design reduces risk to subjects associated with tyramine-induced blood pressure excursions, is less demanding for study participants, and is more efficient. By its focus on tyramine bioavailability as the primary concern for novel MAO inhibitors, the new tyramine challenge study provides better answers in a simplified and safer design compared with the classical design in trial simulation, warranting its use in future clinical studies.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and Oral Fosmanogepix, a First-in-Class Antifungal Agent, in Healthy Volunteers.

Fosmanogepix (FMGX, APX001), a first-in-class, intravenous (i.v.) and oral (p.o.) antifungal prodrug candidate is currently in clinical development for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Manogepix (MGX, APX001A), the active moiety of FMGX, interferes with cell wall synthesis by targeting fungal glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored cell wall transfer protein 1, thereby causing loss of cell viability. Data from two phase 1, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of FMGX (doses up to 1,000 mg, i.v. and p.o.) are presented. Eligible participants were healthy adults (aged 18 to 55 years) randomized to receive either FMGX or placebo. Across both phase 1 studies, 151 of 154 participants (aged 23 to 35 years; FMGX: 116, placebo: 38) completed the study. Administration of FMGX i.v. demonstrated linear- and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics of MGX in terms of geometric mean maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) (SAD: 0.16 to 12.0 µg/mL, dose: 10 to 1,000 mg; MAD: 0.67 to 15.4 µg/mL, dose: 50 to 600 mg) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) (SAD: 4.05 to 400, MAD: 6.39 to 245 µg · h/mL). With single and repeat p.o., dose-proportional increases in Cmax (SAD: 1.30 to 6.41 µg/mL, dose: 100 to 500 mg; MAD: 6.18 to 21.3 µg/mL, dose: 500 to 1,000 mg) and AUC (SAD: 87.5 to 205, MAD: 50.8 to 326 µg · h/mL) were also observed, with high oral bioavailability (90.6% to 101.2%). Administration of FMGX p.o. under post cibum conditions improved tolerability versus ante cibum conditions. No severe treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious AEs, or withdrawals due to a drug-related TEAEs were reported with single or multiple i.v. and p.o. doses. Preclinical target exposures were achieved and were not accompanied by any serious/unexpected concerns with generally safe and well-tolerated dose regimens.

Predictability of Elimination and Excretion of Small Molecules in Animals and Humans, and its Impact on Dosimetry for human ADME Studies with Radiolabeled Drugs.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the extent to which urinary and fecal excretion of 14C-labeled drug material in animal ADME studies was predictive of human ADME studies. We compared observed plasma elimination half-lives for total drug-related radioactivity in humans to pre-study predictions, and we estimated the impact of any major differences on human dosimetry calculations. METHODS: We included 34 human ADME studies with doses of 14C above 0.1 MBq. We calculated ratios of dosimetry input parameters (percentage fecal excretion in humans versus animals; observed half-life in humans versus predicted pre-study) and output parameters (effective dose post-study versus pre-study) and assessed their relationship. RESULTS: A quantitative correlation assessment did not show a statistically significant correlation between the ratios of percentages of 14C excreted in feces and the ratios of dosimetry outcomes in the entire dataset, but a statistically significant correlation was found when assessing the studies that were based on ICRP 60/62 (n=19 studies; P=0.0028). There also appeared to be a correlation between the plasma half-life ratios and the ratios of dosimetry results. A quantitative correlation assessment showed that there was a statistically significant correlation between these ratios (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In all cases where the plasma elimination half-life for 14C in humans was found to be longer than the predicted value, the radiation burden was still within ICRP Category IIa. Containment of the actual radiation burden below the limit of 1.00 mSv appeared to be determined partly also by our choice to limit 14C doses to 3.7 MBq.

Pharmacology-Guided Rule-Based Adaptive Dose Escalation in First-in-Human Studies.

First-in-human (FIH) studies typically progress through cohorts of fixed, standard size throughout the escalation scheme. This work presents and tests a pharmacology-guided rule-based adaptive dose escalation design that aims at making "best use" of participants in early clinical drug evaluation; it is paper based, not requiring real-time access to computational methods. The design minimizes the number of participants exposed to dose levels with low likelihood of being therapeutically relevant. Using criteria based on dose-limiting adverse event rate and on target exposure or target pharmacodynamics, the design increases the sample size when approaching the dose range of potential clinical relevance. The adaptive escalation design was retrospectively tested on actual data from a sample of 40 recently executed FIH studies with novel small and large molecules, and it was evaluated by simulating trials with three compounds with different therapeutic windows, i.e., representing a promising, unacceptable, and dubious profile. In retrospective evaluation of the adaptive escalation design, none of the cases overshot the actually reported top dose; one case resulted in a top dose that was within 20% under the estimated maximum tolerated dose in the original study. The median reduction of total number of participants per study was 38%. Trial simulations confirmed the retrospective evaluation, showing a similar performance of the adaptive escalation design compared with the conventional 6 + 2 design, at a reduced study size for compounds with a presumed acceptable therapeutic window. The adaptive escalation design was shown to make "best use" of participants in FIH studies without compromising safety.

First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and - Preliminary Dynamics of Neuroprotectant 2-Iminobiotin in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: 2-iminobiotin (2-IB) is an investigational neuroprotective agent in development for the reduction of brain cell injury after cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. OBJECTIVE: The present first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and -dynamics (PD) of 2-IB in healthy male subjects, intravenously infused with or without Captisol® as a solubilizing agent. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study was executed in 2 groups of 9 healthy male subjects. A single dose of 2-IB 0.6 mg/kg or placebo was infused over periods between 15 min and 4 h, and repeated doses escalating from 0.6 mg/kg to 12 mg/kg, or placebo were infused every 4 h for 6 administrations in total. RESULTS: Single and multiple doses of 2-IB up to 6 doses of 6 mg/kg with and without Captisol® were safe and well-tolerated in healthy male subjects. 2-IB proved to be a high-clearance drug with a volume of distribution slightly exceeding total body water volume, and with linear PK that appeared not to be affected by the presence of Captisol®. CONCLUSION: Sulfobutyletherbeta-cyclodextrin (SBECD) in Captisol® had a low-clearance profile with a small volume of distribution, with time-independent PK. Preliminary PD characterization of repeated iv dosing of 2-IB in an acute peripheral hypoxic ischemia model in healthy subjects did not reveal any notable effects of 2-IB, noting that this model was not selected to guide efficacy in the currently pursued indication of cerebral hypoxia-ischemia.

Science-based Ethnic Bridging in Drug Development; Review of Recent Precedence and Suggested Steps Forward.

BACKGROUND: Exposure, safety and/or efficacy of drugs are subject to potential differences between human races or ethnicities, as acknowledged by regulatory guidance and by label texts of various, but not all approved drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present review was to assess recent regulatory precedence on drug use and race or ethnicity, with the goal of identifying opportunities for increasing the informative value of clinical ethnic or racial bridging in drug development. METHODS: Recently, (January 2014-July 2018) FDA approved drug product label texts and approval packages were reviewed for claims, comments and underlying data on use of the product in specific ethnic or racial groups. RESULTS: Among the 266 FDA-approved products, no product with unambiguous race- or ethnicity specific dosing instructions was retrieved. A small majority (55%) was approved with a claim or comment on race or ethnicity, and of these, a large majority (87%) was based on population pharmacokinetic data analysis. Statements were often related to incidence of a genotype for drug metabolizing enzyme or for other risk factors, or were related to body weight. Absence of clinically relevant exposure differences were often justified in terms of exposure ratios that notably exceeded the typical 0.80-1.25 no-effect boundary. CONCLUSIONS: Recent precedence reflected a pragmatic, descriptive approach of racial or ethnic bridging, apparently meeting current regulatory expectations, whilst not resulting in strict guidance to prescribers. We recommend further work on defining the objectives of bridging studies, as well as criteria for their design and data analysis. Regarding the latter, we recommend investigating the value of prospectively defined tests for similarity with appropriate follow-up analysis in the case where the test has failed.

Transient CDK4/6 inhibition protects hematopoietic stem cells from chemotherapy-induced exhaustion.

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is highly effective in certain cancers but causes dose-limiting damage to normal proliferating cells, especially hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Serial exposure to cytotoxics causes a long-term hematopoietic compromise ("exhaustion"), which limits the use of chemotherapy and success of cancer therapy. We show that the coadministration of G1T28 (trilaciclib), which is a small-molecule inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), contemporaneously with cytotoxic chemotherapy protects murine hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from chemotherapy-induced exhaustion in a serial 5-fluorouracil treatment model. Consistent with a cell-intrinsic effect, we show directly preserved HSC function resulting in a more rapid recovery of peripheral blood counts, enhanced serial transplantation capacity, and reduced myeloid skewing. When administered to healthy human volunteers, G1T28 demonstrated excellent in vivo pharmacology and transiently inhibited bone marrow (BM) HSPC proliferation. These findings suggest that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy should provide a means to attenuate therapy-induced BM exhaustion in patients with cancer.

Evaluation of metabolite profiles as biomarkers for the pharmacological effects of thiazolidinediones in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and healthy volunteers.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Many studies have investigated the effects of thiazolidinediones on isolated biochemical markers (biomarkers) or sets of markers in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and healthy volunteers. * However, a limited number of parameters is not capable of capturing the broad response to pharmacological intervention with these types of (pleiotropic) drugs, which are known to activate the nuclear transcription factor peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). * Our study tested the new hypothesis (primary objective) that nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics, capable of providing a readout of global metabolite concentrations in biofluids, could provide a better (more holistic) picture of the the multiparametric response to pharmacological intervention with a PPARgamma agonist and thus yield a broad array of biomarkers ('fingerprint') that could be used to support and expedite clinical development of novel thiazolidinediones. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * NMR-based metabolomics coupled with sophisticated bioinformatics is indeed capable of identifying rapid changes in global metabolite profiles in urine and plasma (treatment 'fingerprints'), which may be linked to the well-documented early changes in hepatic insulin senstitivity following thiazolidinedione intervention in T2DM patients. * Consequently, this approach (upon proper validation) comprises an important new addition to the early clinical development 'proof of concept' toolbox for thiazolidinediones, and may also be applicable to other classes of drugs. AIMS: To explore the usefulness of metabolomics as a method to obtain a broad array of biomarkers for the pharmacological effects of rosiglitazone (RSG) in plasma and urine samples from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and healthy volunteers (HVs). Additionally, we explored the differences in metabolite concentrations between T2DM patients and HVs to identify a putative metabolic disease fingerprint for T2DM. METHODS: (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to profile blood plasma and urine samples of 16 T2DM patients and 16 HVs receiving RSG 4 mg or placebo twice daily for 6 weeks. Multivariate analyses were employed to identify treatment- and disease-related effects on global endogenous metabolite profiles. RESULTS: RSG treatment led to a rapid relative reduction in urinary hippurate and aromatic amino acids as well as an increase in plasma branched chain amino acids and alanine, glutamine and glutamate in the T2DM group. No RSG treatment effects were noted in the HV group. Exploratory baseline analyses showed that urine and plasma metabolites discriminated between genders and disease state. T2DM patients showed a relative increase in urinary concentrations of several amino acids, citrate, phospho(enol)pyruvate and hippurate. Putative T2DM-related changes in plasma were largely attributable to increased plasma lipids. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that NMR-based metabolomics of urine and blood plasma samples can yield a broad array of early responding biomarkers for the effects of RSG in T2DM patients, as well as nonglucose biomarkers that may reflect the T2DM state.

Renal glucose excretion as a function of blood glucose concentration in subjects with type 2 diabetes--results of a hyperglycaemic glucose clamp study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate renal glucose excretion as a function of blood glucose concentration and to evaluate the within-subject variability and between-subject variability in subjects with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-two subjects with type 2 diabetes [age 58 (12) years, diabetes duration 7 (6) years, endogenous creatinine clearance 117 (38) ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2); median (inter-quartile range, IQR)] underwent two five-period hyperglycaemic glucose clamp experiments at intervals of 7-21 days. Starting from an initial blood glucose level of 12.2 mmol l(-1), subsequent glucose clamp levels were chosen using an algorithm based on urinary glucose concentrations measured at the end of the preceding glucose clamp period. That is, blood glucose was either stepwise decreased or increased depending on whether urinary glucose concentration was above or below 11.1 mmol l(-1), respectively. RESULTS: As expected, increasing the blood glucose from 7.8 to 13.3 mmol l(-1) during the glucose clamps resulted in a steep increase of urinary glucose excretion from 0.06 to 0.77 mmol min(-1). With decreasing blood glucose, a measurable glucosuria persisted up to a blood glucose level of 7.8 mmol l(-1). When defining the (pseudo)threshold for renal glucose excretion (PRT(G)) as the highest blood glucose level during glucose clamps associated with a concomitant glucose concentration in urine of <2.8 mmol l(-1), median (IQR) PRT(G) was 11.0 (1.1) mmol l(-1). The within-subject variability of PRT(G), i.e. the difference between two assessments, was low, 0.1 (0.0) mmol l(-1) while the between-subject variability of PRT(G) was high, ranging from 7.7 to 12.2 mmol l(-1). CONCLUSION: Renal glucose excretion increases in a proportional manner with increasing blood glucose. When decreasing blood glucose to euglycaemic blood glucose levels, glucosuria persists so that the classical concept of a renal threshold for glucose excretion cannot be upheld in subjects with type 2 diabetes.