Factors influencing functional recovery after limb-salvage surgery for lower extremity musculoskeletal tumours: a qualitative study combining patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives.

PURPOSE: Survival rates of lower extremity musculoskeletal tumours (LEMTs) have been increasing. However, patients continue to experience functional limitations after LEMT followed by limb-salvage surgery (LSS). This study aimed to identify factors influencing functional recovery after LSS for LEMT. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of adult patients who underwent LSS for LEMT (n=7) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) with expertise in orthopaedic oncology (n=7). Recruitment continued until data saturation. A combination of deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis was performed to analyse the transcribed data, producing subthemes under the main International Classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF)-model domains. RESULTS: Four themes were described: (1) bodily functions and structures, (2) activities and participation, (3) environmental factors, and (4) expectations. Physical aspects such as larger resection size and complications negatively affected recovery. The importance of communication strategies of tertiary HCPs and the unfamiliarity of the primary physical therapists with the disease, its surgical treatment, and related consequences were emphasised by both the interviewed patients and HCPs. CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery after LSS for LEMT is a multifactorial process. To improve patient care, improving (intercollegiate) communication strategies on treatment details and expectations about functional outcomes is warranted.Implications for rehabilitationHealthcare professionals should be aware some patients experience limited functional recovery after limb-salvage surgery (LSS) for lower extremity musculoskeletal tumours.Healthcare professionals should use multiple communication strategies to bridge the gap between the information provided and what the patient recalls.Knowledge exchange and communication between primary and tertiary care should be more extensive.Multidisciplinary consultations and/or case managers are needed to address all aspects of the individual's functional recovery after LSS.

Therapeutic validity and effectiveness of exercise interventions after lower limb-salvage surgery for sarcoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients are surviving sarcoma after lower limb-salvage surgery (LSS) and are left with functional limitations. This systematic review aimed to determine the therapeutic validity and effectiveness of exercise interventions after lower limb-salvage surgery (LSS) for sarcoma. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using formal narrative synthesis of intervention studies (with and without control group) identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PEDro databases. Studies were included if participants were treated with LSS for unilateral lower limb sarcoma and followed an exercise intervention using active exercise, physical training, or rehabilitation before and/or after surgery. This review's outcome measures were interventions' therapeutic validity, assessed using the CONTENT scale (0 to 9); methodological quality, identified using the Downs & Black checklist (0 to 28); interventions' effectiveness, assessed based on differences in outcome measures between intervention and control groups; and certainty of evidence, classified according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 214 participants were included. None of the included interventions were therapeutically valid (median 5, range 1-5). All but one study were of at least fair methodological quality (median 18, range 14-21). There was very low-quality evidence that exercise interventions resulted in increased knee range of motion (MD 10-15°) or compliance (MD 30%), and reduced functionality scores (MD -5%) compared to usual care. CONCLUSIONS: We found overall low therapeutic validity of interventions, performed in overall low-quality studies. Combined with the very low certainty of evidence, the results prevent drawing valid conclusions on the interventions' effectiveness. Future studies should aim for uniformity among their methodological approaches and outcome measures, using the CONTENT scale as a template to avert insufficient reporting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021244635.

The role of computer-assisted cryotherapy in the postoperative treatment after total knee arthroplasty: positive effects on pain and opioid consumption.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether computer-assisted cryotherapy is effective in reducing postoperative pain and analgesics consumption, next to improving functional outcome and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis is that computer-assisted cryotherapy has positive effects on postoperative pain after TKA. METHODS: A single-centre non-blinded randomised controlled trial was designed to study the early (first postoperative week) and late (2 and 6 weeks postoperatively) additive effect of computer-assisted cooling after TKA. Participants scheduled for a TKA were randomly allocated to a cold (cryotherapy) C-group or a regular (control) R-group. Next to usual postoperative care for both groups, the C-group received computer-assisted cryotherapy during the first seven postoperative days. Primary outcome was pain, monitored with the numerical rating scale for pain and use of opioid escape medication. Secondary outcomes were function and swelling, monitored by active range of motion, timed up and go test and circumference measurements; patient-reported outcome measurements (KOOS and WORQ questionnaires); and patient satisfaction, monitored by the numerical rating scale for satisfaction. RESULTS: 102 patients participated in this study, both groups contained 51 patients. On most days during the first week, patients in the C-group scored significantly lower NRS pain scores and registered significantly less use of opioid escape medication. In a sub-analysis of 57 patients using the same standard pain protocol, patients in the C-group (n = 28) used less oxycodone during the first postoperative week. There were no significant differences between both groups in active range of motion, timed up and go, or circumference measurements. For the WORQ questionnaire, there was a significant difference between the two groups 6 weeks postoperatively in favour of the C-group. This could be however due to a reduced validity of this questionnaire shortly after TKA. The satisfaction score was not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted cryotherapy following TKA can be beneficial during the first postoperative week in terms of pain reduction and diminished opioid consumption. No clear differences in knee function or swelling were seen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study with level of evidence I.