Cost-effectiveness of a stepped care program to prevent depression among primary care patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and/or coronary heart disease and subthreshold depression in comparison with usual care.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) and/or coronary heart disease (CHD) are at high risk to develop major depression. Preventing incident major depression may be an important tool in reducing the personal and societal burden of depression. The aim of the current study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a stepped care program to prevent major depression (Step-Dep) in diabetes mellitus type 2 and/or coronary heart disease patients with subthreshold depression in comparison with usual care. METHODS: An economic evaluation with 12 months follow-up was conducted alongside a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial from a societal perspective. Participants received care as usual (n = 140) or Step-Dep (n = 96) which consisted of four sequential treatment steps: watchful waiting, guided self-help, problem solving treatment and referral to a general practitioner. Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cumulative incidence of major depression. Costs were measured every 3 months. Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation. Uncertainty around cost-effectiveness outcomes was estimated using bootstrapping and presented in cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in QALYs or depression incidence between treatment groups. Secondary care costs (mean difference €1644, 95% CI €344; €3370) and informal care costs (mean difference €1930, 95% CI €528; €4089) were significantly higher in the Step-Dep group than in the usual care group. The difference in total societal costs (€1001, 95% CI €-3975; €6409) was not statistically significant. The probability of the Step-Dep intervention being cost-effective was low, with a maximum of 0.41 at a ceiling ratio of €30,000 per QALY gained and 0.32 at a ceiling ratio of €0 per prevented case of major depression. CONCLUSIONS: The Step-Dep intervention is not cost-effective compared to usual care in a population of patients with DM2/CHD and subthreshold depression. Therefore, widespread implementation cannot be recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR3715 ).

The association between somatization and disability in primary care patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient encounters for medically unexplained physical symptoms are common in primary health care. Somatization ('experiencing and reporting unexplained somatic symptoms') may indicate concurrent or future disability but this may also partly be caused by psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between somatization and disability in primary care patients with and without anxiety or depressive disorder. METHODS: Data were obtained from 1545 primary care patients, participating in the longitudinal Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Somatization was assessed using the somatization scale of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ). Disability was determined by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS II). The relationships between somatization and both the total and subdomain scores of the WHO-DAS II were measured cross-sectionally and longitudinally after one year of follow-up using linear regression analysis. We examined whether anxiety or depressive disorder exerted a modifying effect on the somatization-disability association. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally and longitudinally, somatization was significantly associated with disability. Somatization accounted cross-sectionally for 41.8% of the variance in WHO-DAS disability and, longitudinally, for 31.7% of the variance in disability after one year of follow-up. The unique contribution of somatization to disability decreased to 16.7% cross-sectionally and 15.7% longitudinally, when anxiety and/or depressive disorder was added to the model. CONCLUSION: Somatization contributes to the presence of disability in primary care patients, even when the effects of baseline demographic and health characteristics and anxiety or depressive disorder are taken into account.

Depression, disability and somatic diseases among elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Depression among older adults is associated with both disability and somatic disease. We aimed to further understand this complicated relationship and to study the possible modifying effect of increasing age. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: Outpatient and inpatient clinics of regional facilities for mental health care and primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly people, 60 years and older, 378 persons meeting DSM-IV criteria for a depressive disorder and 132 non-depressed comparisons. MEASUREMENTS: Depression diagnoses were assessed with the CIDI version 2.1. Disability was assessed with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Social-demographic information and somatic diseases were assessed by self-report measurements. RESULTS: Disability, in general and on all its subscales, was strongly related to depression. Presence of somatic disease did not contribute independently to variance in depression. The relationship was stronger for people of 60-69 years old than for those older than 70 years. Important aspects of disability that contributed to depression were disability in participation, self-care and social activities. LIMITATIONS: Results are based on cross sectional data. No inferences about causal relationships can be drawn. CONCLUSION: Disability, especially disability regarding participation, self-care, or social activities is strongly related to late-life depression. Somatic diseases in itself are less of a risk for depression, except that somatic diseases are related to disability.

Big Five personality and depression diagnosis, severity and age of onset in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Personality may play an important role in late-life depression. The aim of this study is to examine the association between the Big Five personality domains and the diagnosis, severity and age of onset of late-life depression. METHODS: The NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) was cross-sectionally used in 352 depressed and 125 non-depressed older adults participating in the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older Persons (NESDO). Depression diagnosis was determined by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Severity of depression was assessed by the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS). Logistic and linear regression analyses were applied. Adjustments were made for sociodemographic, cognitive, health and psychosocial variables. RESULTS: Both the presence of a depression diagnosis and severity of depression were significantly associated with higher Neuroticism (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.28-1.43 and B=1.06, p<.001, respectively) and lower Extraversion (OR=.79, 95% CI=.75-.83; B=-.85, p<.001) and Conscientiousness (OR=.86, 95% CI=.81.-.90; B=-.86, p<.001). Earlier onset of depression was significantly associated with higher Openness (B=-.49, p=.026). LIMITATIONS: Due to the cross-sectional design, no causal inferences can be drawn. Further, current depression may have influenced personality measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms an association between personality and late-life depression. Remarkable is the association found between high Openness and earlier age of depression onset.

[Acute otitis media: do not hesitate to treat]. / Otitis media acuta: aarzel niet te behandelen.

Recently, two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials published in The New England Journal of Medicine have stirred up discussion about the use of antibiotics in the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM). In the Netherlands, the practice guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners recommends withholding antibiotics in most cases and that antibiotics can be considered when a child under the age of 2 years has bilateral AOM, otorrhoea, or persistent symptoms for 3 days or more. These recommendations are mostly based on a meta-analysis published in 2006. Previous studies on AOM had important limitations such as varying diagnostic criteria and biased patient selection. The new trials, which are of high methodological quality, investigated only 'real' AOM and the results show the same efficacy as the aforementioned meta-analysis. We therefore feel it is justified to consider prescribing antibiotics for a young child with manifest symptoms and evident AOM on otoscopic examination.

Does patient feedback improve the consultation skills of general practice trainees? A controlled trial.

CONTEXT: This study aimed to assess if an additional patient feedback training programme leads to better consultation skills in general practice trainees (GPTs) than regular communication skills training, and whether process measurements (intensity of participation in the programme) predict the effect of the intervention. METHODS: We carried out a controlled trial in which two sub-cohorts of GPTs were allocated to an intervention group (n = 23) or a control group (n = 30), respectively. In 2006, allocated first-year GPTs in the VU University Medical Centre attended a patient feedback training programme in addition to the regular communication skills training. The control group attended only regular communication skills training. Trainees were assessed by simulated patients who visited the practices and videotaped the consultations at baseline and after 3 months. The videotapes were randomly assigned to eight trained staff members. The MAAS-Global Instrument (range 0-6) was used to assess (a change in) trainee consultation skills. RESULTS: were analysed using a multi-level, linear mixed-model analysis. Results Data on 50 GPTs were available for the follow-up analysis. Both intervention group and control group GPTs improved their consultation skills: mean MAAS-Global scores for all participants were 3.29 (standard deviation [SD] 0.75) at baseline and 3.54 (SD 0.66) at follow-up (P = 0.047). The improvement in MAAS-Global scores in the intervention group did not differ significantly from the improvement in the control group. The analysis showed a trend for intensity of participation in the patient feedback programme to predict greater improvement in MAAS-Global scores. DISCUSSION: Although the baseline scores were already in the high range, consultation skills in both groups improved significantly. This is reassuring for current teaching methods. The patient feedback programme did not improve consultation skills more than regular communication skills training. However, a subgroup of GPTs who participated intensively in the programme did improve their consultation skills further in comparison with the less motivated subgroup.

Outcome of depression in later life in primary care: longitudinal cohort study with three years' follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To study the duration of depression, recovery over time, and predictors of prognosis in an older cohort (>or=55 years) in primary care. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study, with three years' follow-up. SETTING: 32 general practices in West Friesland, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 234 patients aged 55 years or more with a prevalent major depressive disorder. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depression at baseline and every six months using structured diagnostic interviews (primary care evaluation of mental disorders according to diagnoses in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition) and a measure of severity of symptoms (Montgomery Asberg depression rating scale). The main outcome measures were time to recovery and the likelihood of recovery at different time points. Multivariable analyses were used to identify variables predicting prognosis. RESULTS: The median duration of a major depressive episode was 18.0 months (95% confidence interval 12.8 to 23.1). 35% of depressed patients recovered within one year, 60% within two years, and 68% within three years. A poor outcome was associated with severity of depression at baseline, a family history of depression, and poorer physical functioning. During follow-up functional status remained limited in patients with chronic depression but not in those who had recovered. CONCLUSION: Depression among patients aged 55 years or more in primary care has a poor prognosis. Using readily available prognostic factors (for example, severity of the index episode, a family history of depression, and functional decline) could help direct treatment to those at highest risk of a poor prognosis.

[Screening for depression and anxiety in residential homes for the elderly]. / Problemen bij het opsporen van depressieve- en angststoornissen bij bewoners van verzorgingshuizen.

Elderly persons in residential homes in the Netherlands are at high risk for developing major depressive and anxiety disorders. A stepped-care protocol being used in a study for vulnerable elderly in the community may also be feasible and effective for this group. A pilot study in a residential home in Amsterdam showed more problems than expected in screening and motivating the inhabitants for this intervention protocol. This article describes the problems in our screening procedure. A personal approach, performed by familiar persons, directed at the more independent inhabitants is most likely to succeed. The need for research on effectiveness and feasibility of evidence based methods in residential care remains evident. However, the more vulnerable inhabitants need something else. For this group of inhabitants we need to look more closely to the needs and possibilities by conducting research using a qualitative design.

[The prevention of psychiatric disorders]. / Preventie van psychiatrische stoornissen.

About 450 million people all over the world suffer from psychiatric disorders. Limitations and handicaps are caused especially by unipolar depression, excessive alcohol consumption, schizophrenia and manic-depressive disorder. It is expected that the importance of psychiatric disorders for public health will increase in the coming decades. Psychiatric disorders are often the cause of death, destroy the lives of both patients and their families, have far-reaching economic consequences and are often complicated by somatic diseases. The advances in the field of treatment are impressive but can have only a limited effect on the consequences of psychiatric disorders for public health. The incidence of psychiatric disorders can be reduced by more than 25%. The greatest effects have been seen with depressive disorders, indicated prevention and the use of cognitive therapy. Indicated prevention has also been found to be effective in psychotic disorders. Debriefing is ineffective in posttraumatic stress disorder. The efficacy of universal prevention has not been investigated. There are still insufficient data to develop evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of psychiatric disorders.

Frequent attenders in general practice: problem solving treatment provided by nurses [ISRCTN51021015].

BACKGROUND: There is a need for assistance from primary care mental health workers in general practice in the Netherlands. General practitioners (GPs) experience an overload of frequent attenders suffering from psychological problems. Problem Solving Treatment (PST) is a brief psychological treatment tailored for use in a primary care setting. PST is provided by nurses, and earlier research has shown that it is a treatment at least as effective as usual care. However, research outcomes are not totally satisfying. This protocol describes a randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of PST provided by nurses for patients in general practice. The results of this study, which currently being carried out, will be presented as soon as they are available. METHODS/DESIGN: This study protocol describes the design of a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PST and usual care compared to usual care only. Patients, 18 years and older, who present psychological problems and are frequent attenders in general practice are recruited by the research assistant. The participants receive questionnaires at baseline, after the intervention, and again after 3 months and 9 months. Primary outcome is the reduction of symptoms, and other outcomes measured are improvement in problem solving skills, psychological and physical well being, daily functioning, social support, coping styles, problem evaluation and health care utilization. DISCUSSION: Our results may either confirm that PST in primary care is an effective way of dealing with emotional disorders and a promising addition to the primary care in the UK and USA, or may question this assumption. This trial will allow an evaluation of the effects of PST in practical circumstances and in a rather heterogeneous group of primary care patients. This study delivers scientific support for this use and therefore indications for optimal treatment and referral.

[Summary of the practice guideline 'Depressive disorder' (first revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners]. / Samenvatting van de standaard 'Depressieve stoornis' (eerste herziening) van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap.

In the revised practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with a depressive disorder in general practice the distinction between mild and severe depression has been removed. By paying attention to a number of risk factors, the general practitioner can detect patients with a hidden depressive disorder. The general practitioner's strategy is aimed at reducing symptoms and restoring the ability to function normally. Factors that define the strategy are in particular patient's degree of suffering and dysfunctioning, and the patient's preferences and demands. In primary care tricyclic antidepressants and specific serotonin re-uptake inhibitors are the drugs of first choice: both are equally effective; the nature of the side effects differs.

Incidence of cervical carcinoma in a high-risk, non-screened area results of a retrospective analysis on the Dutch Caribbean Antilles from 1983 to 1998.

Cancer of the uterine cervix is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The average annual incidence of cervical cancer varies widely per geographical area. Some of the highest rates have been reported in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Previous research into the frequency of cervical carcinoma in Curaçao, the main island of the Dutch Caribbean, has reported predominantly far-advanced stages of the disease. The objectives of this study were to determine: whether there are indications of changes in the incidence of cervical carcinoma, whether these changes are a result of increased clinical attention paid by general practioners (GPs) and gynaecologists, and whether less advanced stages of cervical cancer were found, indicating earlier diagnosis. Data on patients with cervical carcinoma, obtained from records kept in the Department of Pathological Anatomy at the St Elisabeth Hospital in Curaçao were retrospectively analyzed for the period 1983 to 1998. To study the incidence rate over time, cumulative and incidence rates, standardized to the World Standard Population, were calculated and compared to the rates in other Latin American and Caribbean countries. The age-standardized incidence rate for Curaçao was 14.3 per 100 000 women. The cumulative rate up to 74-years-of-age was 1.6%. Sub-division into the three groups showed a trend towards a decrease in the incidence and cumulative rates. A comparison of clinical staging International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (FIGO) showed a trend towards an increase in time of almost 48% to 59% in stage IA (ie less severe cases). A significant increase (p < 0.0001) was found in the numbers of smears performed in the complete period of 1983-1998, compared to a previously examined period of 1972-1982. The incidence of cervical cancer in Curaçao appears to be decreasing, and is lower than in other areas in the region. The number of smears GPs performed over time increased However the incidence is still relatively high compared to western countries and cases are still presenting in relatively advanced stages of the disease. Although the introduction of a screening programme might not influence the actual incidence of cervical cancer dramatically, nonetheless it may contribute to earlier diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.